Site Meter

Archive for September 21st, 2005

google plus 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?linkedin 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?pinterest 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?stumbleupon 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?reader 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?printfriendly 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?email 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?share save 171 16 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?

wteeth9ea 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?

The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons has Research Study Links Wisdom Teeth to Health Problems in Young Adults.

Retained wisdom teeth (third molars), even those that are asymptomatic and display no current sign of disease, pose an increased risk for chronic oral infectious disease, periodontitis and tooth decay, and should be considered for removal in young adulthood, according to data released today from a series of institutional review board approved longitudinal clinical trials conducted under the auspices of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Foundation.

There is no cause and effect proven in this study but heightens the awareness of dentists and patients alike for 3rd molar eruption and retention.

The Washington Post has Adults With Wisdom Teeth Often Develop Gum Disease, Studies Show That Keeping Extra Molars Adds Health Risks.

Young adults who keep their wisdom teeth often quickly develop gum disease, which appears to increase the risk of pregnancy complications and possibly other health problems, according to the first large studies to carefully evaluate the risks posed by wisdom teeth.

The research, which is being released today, should prompt more dentists and patients to closely monitor the extra molars — and consider removing them — even if they are not impacted or causing obvious problems, experts said.

Flap has always had an aggressive treatment policy with regards to 3rd molars – better to get them out at a young age than wait for problems to arise – which they often do.

wtpos7dv 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

google plus 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?linkedin 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?pinterest 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?stumbleupon 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?reader 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?printfriendly 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?email 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?share save 171 16 3rd Molar Watch: Is it WISE to Keep Wisdom Teeth?

Comments 3 Comments »

google plus Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationlinkedin Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationpinterest Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationstumbleupon Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationreader Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationprintfriendly Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationemail Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationshare save 171 16 Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nomination

leahysenleadweb7kg Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports NominationSenate leaders and the top two lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee speak with members of the media, Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2005, after a White House meeting with President Bush to discuss the second vacancy on the Supreme Court. The meeting was similar to one Bush held in July, one week before he nominated Roberts to fill the shoes of the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. Left to right are Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Arlen Specter, R-Penn. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.

The senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee announced Wednesday he will vote to confirm John Roberts for chief justice of the United States after leading lawmakers met with
President Bush to discuss candidates for the other high court vacancy.

The announcement by veteran Sen. Patrick Leahy (news, bio, voting record) came amid virtually unprecedented executive-legislative branch jockeying over not one, but two high court openings, seats left vacant by the death of Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and the retirement of Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.

Roberts’ confirmation was virtually assured even before Leahy’s announcement. The Vermont senator’s decision, made public shortly after he and three other leading senators met privately with Bush at the White House to discuss candidates for O’Connor’s place on the bench, came on the eve of the Judiciary panel’s vote on whether to favorably recommend Roberts’ confirmation.


Who cares?

Is this the attempt by Democrats to look reasonable in the Robert’s confirmation process. Judge Robert’s confirmation is assured and Leahy’s support is meaningless. But, then again, it is no surprise that Kennedy and Kerry will vote against the confirmation.

The Robert’s confirmation is guaranteed and the President is now moving to his next nomination.

Captain Ed has Dividing The Dems

Tehnorati Tags: , ,

google plus Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationlinkedin Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationpinterest Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationstumbleupon Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationreader Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationprintfriendly Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationemail Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nominationshare save 171 16 Judge John Roberts Watch: Leahy Supports Nomination

Comments Comments Off

©Gregory Flap Cole All Rights Reserved