• Arnold Schwarzenegger,  Bear Flag League,  California,  Politics,  Proposition 74,  Proposition 75,  Proposition 76,  Proposition 77,  Proposition 78,  Special Election 2005

    California Special Election Watch: Does California Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez Support Violence and Thuggery?

    CBS Channel 2 and KCAL News Los Angeles television Channel Nine has this video clip depicting a single Schwarzenegger supporter (Genevieve Peters) struggling to hold her ground in a rally against the governor’s special election initiatives. The rally was held at Los Angeles Pershing Square yesterday. Schwarzenegger opponents tried to hit her with their signs, tried to steal her hat and some blocked news cameras as she argued her point. The crowd turns quickly, grabbing her signs and tearing them up. Even a woman wearing an orange security vest rips up the “Vote Yes” signs.” (CBS 2 News, October 28, 2005).

    Check out the video clip here.

    Check out the thugs as they assault Ms. Peters.

    Now, California Assembly Speaker earlier had whipped up the union crowd to a frenzy. As a former union organizer shouldn’t he know better and urge restraint?

    Shouldn’t he now APOLOGIZE to Ms. Peters on behalf of the UNION THUGS that control him?

    Call his office and let him now how you feel! Remind the Speaker this is America and not a third world country – violence is not acceptable for political dissent.

    Sacramento Office: (916) 319-2046

    Los Angeles Office: (213) 620-4646

    Flap knows you will be glad you did.

    Thanks to The Political Teen for help with the graphics.

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

    Cross-posted to the Bear Flag League Special Election Page

    Michelle Malkin has UNION THUGS UNHINGED

  • CIA Leak Case,  Politics

    CIA Leak Case Watch: Charges Don’t Directly Address CIA Leak

    Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald speaks during a press conference regarding the CIA leak criminal investigation at the Justice Department in Washington, Friday, Oct. 28, 2005. I. Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, was indicted on charges of obstruction of justice.

    The ASSociated Press has Charges Don’t Directly Address CIA Leak.

    Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald’s first charges in the White House leak case don’t get to the heart of his two-year probe: the leak.

    The indictment of vice presidential adviser I. Lewis “Scooter’ Libby Jr. is built on charges of obstruction of justice, making false statements and perjury — and it will rest primarily on testimony from a handful of Washington reporters.

    The charges in the Friday indictment are similar to the ones used inMartha Stewart’s criminal case. She was convicted last year for obstructing justice and lying about why she sold ImClone Systems stock, just before a negative government decision on an ImClone drug. She served a five-month prison term followed by home confinement.

    “Very rarely do obstruction of justice cases and perjury cases come as neatly tied as Martha Stewart’s … it is by no means a slam dunk,” said Viet Dinh, a law professor at Georgetown University and former Justice Department lawyer in the Bush administration.

    The prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Libby “knowingly and willfully” made false statements and lied to the grand jury. He could claim that any misstatements were not intentional.

    22 Months and over $70 million…… worth it?

  • CIA Leak Case,  Politics

    CIA Leak Case Watch: Libby Resigns After Indictment

    I. Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, testifies on Capitol Hill in this March 1, 2001 file photo. Libby was indicted Friday, Oct. 28, 2005, on charges of obstruction of justice, making a false statement and perjury in the CIA leak case.

    The ASSociated Press has Cheney Adviser Resigns After Indictment

    The vice president’s chief of staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby Jr., was indicted Friday on charges of obstruction of justice, perjury and making false statements in the CIA leak investigation, a politically charged case that will throw a spotlight onPresident Bush’s push to war.

    Libby, 55, resigned and left the White House.

    Friday’s charges stemmed from a two-year investigation by special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald into whether Rove, Libby or any other administration officials knowingly revealed the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame or lied about their involvement to investigators.

    The grand jury indictment charged Libby with one count of obstruction of justice, two of perjury and two false statement counts. If convicted on all five, he could face as much as 30 years in prison and $1.25 million in fines.

    Cheney is mentioned by name in the 22-page indictment and several officials are identified by title, but no one besides Libby was charged.

    In each of the counts, the basic allegation against Libby is that he lied to investigators or Fitzgerald’s grand jury about his conversations with reporters. He is not accused of purposely revealing the identity of a covert officer, the potential charge that Fitzgerald was initially appointed to investigate.

    22 Months and $70 million for 5 B.S. charges.

    N.B. He is not accused of purposely revealing the identity of a covert officer, the potential charge that Fitzgerald was initially appointed to investigate.

    First Martha Stewart and now this.

    The federal justice system is broken.

    Flap is listening to Patrick Fitzgerald on Fox News.

    Flap’s impression of Fitzpatrick is that he is a self-righteous prosecutor with a BIG HEAD from previous case who is out of control.

    His career as a United States Attorney should be over.

    He has wasted taxpayers money and did NOT prove a case.

    And some heads are going to ROLL at the CIA……

    Blah Blah Fitzgerald is blabbing on about who told what to whom and when……. Who Cares? But then again he spent over $70 million on this investigation.

    Damn this guy is a self-righteous idiot…..the United States takes its laws serious…….GAG ME PLEASE….

    Now he is taking questions… and throwing out baseball analogies regarding whether the investigation continues……

    Fitzgerald is throwing out charges but he did NOT indict Libby on them…….Guilt by innuendo……

    Reporters are asking why someone was not charged with the LEAK???? Fitzpatrick is NOT answering but using the law as an excuse for not explaining….. refusing to comment.

    Fitzpatrick wants people to take a deep breath……. but something SMELLS here………

    The average person does not understand about the Grand Jury process………Oh Please!

    Was it worth keeping Judy Miller in jail? didn’t want to pick a fight with the New York Times and did not want a First Amendment showdown…… blah blah blah…… wanted to make sure we needed reporter testimony…..

    Other leakers? Cannot go beyond the four corners of the indictment….

    Fitzgerald is not saying Valerie Plame was covert…… not charging Libby with that.

    The news conference is continuing…….$70 million worth of prosecutorial excess…….

  • CIA Leak Case,  Politics

    CIA Leak Case Watch: Libby Awaiting Indictment

    I. Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby, Vice President Cheney’s chief of staff, is driven to work from his home in McLean, Virginia, October 28, 2005.

    Reuters has Charges expected against Libby.

    A federal grand jury investigating the leak of a covert CIA operative’s identity met in secret on Friday and was expected to bring criminal charges against Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff and possibly other White House officials.

    But special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald informed President George W. Bush’s top political adviser, Karl Rove, that he would not be among those indicted on Friday, although Fitzgerald indicated that Rove would remain under investigation and in legal jeopardy, legal sources said.

    Fitzgerald planned to release information about the case at noon EDT and hold a news conference at 2 p.m.

    Flap will wait for Fitzgerald’s news conference and release of information on the Department of Justice website before commenting.

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger,  Bear Flag League,  California,  Politics,  Proposition 74,  Proposition 75,  Proposition 76,  Proposition 77,  Proposition 78,  Special Election 2005

    California Special Election Watch: Latest Public Policy Institute of California Poll Released

    The PPIC Statewide Survey: Special Survey on Californians and the Initiative Process, October 2005 has ben released:

    Some findings of the current survey

    • 54% of likely voters consider the special election a bad idea.
    • As the election approaches, none of the measures actively supported by Governor Schwarzenegger enjoys majority support among likely voters:
      • Proposition 74 (teacher tenure), 46% yes, 48% no
      • Proposition 75 (use of union dues), 46% yes, 46% no
      • Proposition 76 (spending and funding limits), 30% yes, 62% no
      • Proposition 77 (redistricting), 36% yes, 50% no
    • Approval ratings of public officials among all Californians:
      • Governor Schwarzenegger, 33% approve, 58% disapprove
      • California Legislature, 25% approve, 56% disapprove
      • President Bush, 36% approve, 60% disapprove
      • U.S. Congress, 42% approve, 46% disapprove
      • Senator Feinstein, 50% approve, 27% disapprove
      • Senator Boxer, 48% approve, 29% disapprove
    • Likely voters are very unhappy with the federal government:
      • 74% have little or no confidence in the federal government to do what is right
      • 69% believe that the federal government wastes a lot of tax dollars.

    Flap reproduces the entire summary of the poll to point out the poll cynicism and bias. The poll is OFF.

    The entire 38 page PPIC Survey is here.

    Approval of Feinstein and Boxer and disapproving everything and everyone else by very wide margins……. not very credible.

    Flap says place this poll in the circular file.

    Stay tuned for the Field and L.A. Times polls.

    November 8 election day is looming.

    Stay tuned.

    The ASSociated Press has Poll: Gov. Schwarzenegger’s Measures Lag.

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s “year of reform” initiatives are proving a tough sell to California voters despite a multimillion dollar advertising blitz, according to a poll released Thursday. None of his measures on the Nov. 8 ballot has majority support, and two are opposed by wide margins.

    Telephone interviews were conducted with 1,079 likely voters over seven days ending Oct. 23. There was a sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

    Governor Schwarzenegger’s Job Approval Rating:

    Approve 38%

    Disapprove 57%

    Proposition 74 extends the probationary period for new teachers from 2 years to 5 years, and makes it easier to dismiss teachers with unsatisfactory performance evaluations.

    Approve 46%

    Disapprove 48%

    But within the margin of error.

    Proposition 75 prohibits public employee unions from using union dues for political purposes without the written consent of union members.

    Approve 46%

    Disapprove 46%

    Again, within the margin of error.

    Proposition 76 limits growth in state spending so that it does not exceed recent growth in state revenues.

    Approve 30%

    Disapprove 62%

    Proposition 77 changes the way California draws boundaries for Congressional and legislative districts. District boundaries would be drawn by a panel of retired judges and approved by voters in a statewide election.

    Approve 36%

    Disapprove 50%

    While the poll numbers are not very encouraging for the governor, pollster Mark Baldassare cautioned that the results don’t mean the election is over.

    “All these measures are close,” he said. “There’s a considerable amount of time . . . and there will be new messages and counter-messages. I don’t feel like this election is necessarily settled.”

    This poll although not favorble to the Governor is not disastrous either.

    Indeed, Proposition 74 and 75 may be winning since the results are within the margin of error.

    And Schwarzenegger has forced the California Teachers Association to spend $52.9 million fighting these measures – not a small chunk of change.

    Stay tuned the Field Organization and Los Angeles Times will soon release their polls.

    Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

    Cross-posted to the Bear Flag League Special Election Page