• Global War on Terror,  Methamphetamine,  Politics

    Patriot Act Watch: Senate Rejects Extension of Patriot Act

    The Senate Friday, Dec. 16, 2005, rejected attempts to reauthorize several provisions of the USA Patriot Act, dealing a huge defeat to the Bush administration and Republican leaders. Senator Russ Feingold, D-Wis., center, threatened to fillibuster the measure. Flaning Sen. Feingold uring a news conference after the vote are Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., left, and Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.

    In a stinging defeat for President Bush, Senate Democrats blocked passage Friday of a new Patriot Act to combat terrorism at home, depicting the measure as a threat to the constitutional liberties of innocent Americans. Republicans spurned calls for a short-term measure to prevent the year-end expiration of law enforcement powers first enacted in the anxious days after Sept. 11, 2001. “The president will not sign such an extension,” said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and lawmakers on each side of the issue blamed the other for congressional gridlock on the issue.

    The Senate voted 52-47 to advance a House-passed bill to a final vote, eight short of the 60 needed to overcome the filibuster backed by nearly all Senate Democrats and a handful of the 55 Republicans.

    “We can come together to give the government the tools it needs to fight terrorism and protect the rights and freedoms of innocent citizens,” said Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., arguing that provisions permitting government access to confidential personal data lacked safeguards to protect the innocent.

    “We need to be more vigilant,” agreed Sen. John Sununu, a Republican from New Hampshire, where the state motto is “Live Free or Die.” He quoted Benjamin Franklin: “Those that would give up essential liberty in pursuit of a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security.”

    But Frist likened the bill’s opponents to those who “have called for a retreat and defeat strategy in Iraq. That’s the wrong strategy in Iraq. It is the wrong strategy here at home.”

    And who were the Republicans who voted against the President?:

    Larry Craig of Idaho

    Chuck Hagel of Nebraska

    Lisa Murkowski of Alaska

    John Sununu of New Hampshire

    voted to block the measure. Frist initially voted to advance the bill, then switched to opposition purely as a parliamentary move that enables him to call for a second vote at some point in the future.

    Here is their contact information courtesy of Hugh Hewitt:

    Here’s the contact info:

    Craig, Larry- (R – ID) Class II
    520 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
    (202) 224-2752
    Web Form: craig.senate.gov/email/

    Hagel, Chuck- (R – NE) Class II
    248 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
    (202) 224-4224
    Web Form: hagel.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home

    Murkowski, Lisa- (R – AK) Class III
    709 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
    (202) 224-6665
    Web Form: murkowski.senate.gov/contact.cfm

    Sununu, John- (R – NH) Class II
    111 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
    (202) 224-2841
    Web Form: www.sununu.senate.gov/webform.html

    All contact info for all senators is here.

    The Senate switchboard is 202-225-3121.

    Hewitt’s post is here.

    This is another failure of Bill Frist’s leadership but the Republican defections should be remembered at Republican Primary time.

    Give them a telephone call on Monday and ask the good Senators why they voted against America and FOR the terrorist bad guys.

    Flap does NOT feel safer tonight.

    Update #1

    With a failure of the Senate to vote for reauthorization of the Patriot Act, the anti-methamphetamine provisions and the Combat Methamphetamine Act die.

    Note: Senator Feinstein, D-California, one of the co-sponsors of the Combat Methamphetamine Act voted against her own sponsored legislation.

    But, will Bill Frist call the Patriot Act back for a vote this year/session?

    Stay tuned…..

  • Illegal Immigration,  Politics

    Illegal Immigration Watch: House Votes for Mexico WALL

    AFP has US House votes to wall up Mexico border

    The House of Representatives voted to build a wall along the US border with Mexico to stop illegal immigration.

    The 260-159 voice vote on an amendment to a bill on illegal immigration “mandates the construction of specific security fencing, including lights and cameras, along the Southwest border for the purposes of gaining operational control of the border.

    “Fencing has been designated in sectors that have the highest number of immigrant deaths, instances of drug smuggling and illegal border crossings,” because of the large number of would-be immigrants who die in the desert attempting to cross the US border.

    Long overdue……

    But, will the House-Senate conference committee delete or alter this provision out of the final bill.

    Stay tuned……..

    U.S. Border guards look out through the fence at the Mexican border in El Paso,Texas, November 29, 2005

  • Media,  Television

    Robert Novak Watch: The Prince of Darkness Moves to Fox News

    TVNewser Blog has FLASH: Bob Novak Becoming Fox News Channel “Contributor”

    This story suddenly becomes more interesting: As soon as Bob Novak’s contract with CNN runs out on Dec. 31, he will become a contributor to the Fox News Channel, the AP scoops. FNC spokesman Brian Lewis confirmed his signing with the network to David Bauder. “Novak said the switch to Fox had nothing to do with finding a more comfortable home for his views.”

    “I don’t think that’s a factor,” Novak said. “In 25 years I was never censored by CNN and I said some fairly outrageous things and some very conservative things. I don’t want to give the impression that they were muzzling me and I had to go to a place that wouldn’t muzzle me.”

    The ASSociated Press continues:

    Commentator Robert Novak, who hasn’t been seen on CNN since swearing and storming off the set in August, will leave the network after 25 years and join Fox News Channel as a contributor next month. Novak, 74, said Friday he probably would have left CNN anyway when his contract expired this month even if it hadn’t been for the incident.

    The suspension actually served to eliminate a delicate problem for CNN, which had received some criticism for keeping the political columnist on the air with his involvement in the CIA leak case.

    A Novak column in July 2003 identified Valerie Plame as a CIA agent eight days after her husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, accused the Bush administration of manipulating intelligence before the Iraq war. Novak wrote that two administration officials were his sources, but he hasn’t identified them and Plame’s outing sparked a special prosecutor’s investigation.

    Novak walked off the set in August during a political debate after James Carville said that he’s “got to show these right-wingers that he’s got a backbone.”

    Novak quickly apologized, but CNN never let him back on the air. A CNN correspondent, Ed Henry, said he had been about to ask Novak on the air about the leak investigation, but Novak said that had nothing to do with why he walked off.

    “I’m sorry it ended that way but I am confident if it hadn’t happened that I would still be leaving CNN,” he said. The network has been de- emphasizing political content, and canceled the long-running debate show “Crossfire.”

    Flap is glad that Novak is moving over to Fox News and looks forward to many years of reporting and commentary from one of the finest of political pundits.

    Flap has had the pleasure to meet Novak (at Pat Buchanan’s home) and found him to be erudite, engaging and very much the “Prince of Darkness.”

    See you in January Bob…….

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger,  California,  California Republican Party,  Election 2006,  Politics

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Republican Party and Governor Call a Truce

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, right, speaks with reporters after leaving a meeting with state Republican party chair Duf Sundheim, left, and other state GOP leaders held in Sacramento, Calif., Thursday, Dec. 15, 2005. The meeting was held to discuss the concern party leaders had over Schwarzenegger’s appointment of Democrat Susan Kennedy as his new chief of staff.

    The Sacramento Bee has Truce is called on staff pick

    Governor, state GOP say they’ve worked it out.

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and California Republican Party Chairman Duf Sundheim emerged from a meeting Thursday to declare that as far as they’re concerned, the controversy over the governor’s appointment of Democrat Susan Kennedy as chief of staff is over.

    “I think that issue has been put to rest,” Sundheim said of the Kennedy matter, after the governor’s session with the state GOP board in a conference room at the Hyatt Regency that lasted about an hour. “He made it clear she is there to implement his policies. She’s totally committed to that, and we support his decision.”

    Sundheim last week expressed disappointment with Schwarzenegger’s appointment of Kennedy, a longtime Democratic Party stalwart, to run the day-to-day operations of his administration. The conservative California Republican Assembly also has called on the state party to withdraw its endorsement of Schwarzenegger’s 2006 re-election bid, and Republican members of the state Assembly have grumbled loudly about the governor’s naming of Kennedy.

    They might as well call a TRUCE since both the California Republican Party and the Governor are joined together at the hip – at least for this 2006 election cycle.

    The conservative wing of the party continues to be disgruntled.


    “‘It’s not over,’
    said Mike Spence, the president of the California Republican Assembly. ‘We still have the February convention. The governor, if he proposes his big general obligation bond, there’s going to be another big fight over that, and I think the dissatisfaction is going to continue.'”

    The FLAP will continue with conservatives refusing to work for the Governor and Republican voters looking for an alternative – perhaps Steve Westly.

    Or……

    California Republican voters will simply stay home, allowing the Democrats to again run the legislature and the executive branch of California government.

    Stay tuned…….

    Blogger extraordinaire, Ken Masugi, of the Claremont Institute has Republicans Come to Terms Over Susan Kennedy

    I think the whole dispute–and Matt Peterson, please correct me (my earlier posts here)–has been overblown and a good example of how conservatives in California fail to grasp politics and how they can succeed, in the face of hostility. The loudest voices objecting to the pick of Susan Kennedy were those who likely never voted for Schwarzenegger in the first place. (I didn’t vote for him either.) Does he owe us anything? Whether Republicans or conservatives vote for him in 2006 depends solely on the quality of his policies, not this inner-circle gossip. That’s my story, and I’m stickin’ to it.

    Indeed!
    Previous:

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Relationship with California GOP

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Republican Assembly Sponsoring an Online Petition Asking Governor to Rescind Susan Kennedy Appointment

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Governor Names Partisan Democrat Chief of Staff – THE FLAP

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Pat Clarey, Arnold’s Chief of Staff Resigns

    Technorati Tags: ,