• ACLU

    Stop the ACLU Blogburst Watch: ACLU Attacks American Sovereignty; Seeks Non-Discrimination For Illegal Aliens In The Workplace

    Update: NY Times picks up the story.

    I was going to talk about the dishonest argument the ACLU made in its attack on Hazelton, PA for trying to crackdown on illegal immigration problems. They argued that it was not the place of small communities to create laws fashioned to their own unique problems on illegal immigration, but the Federal government’s responsibility. Of course this argument does not reflect the ACLU’s true beliefs on the topic. If the Federal government created a similar law as Hazelton the ACLU would find a different argument to oppose it. The argument was, however, good enough to convince a Clinton appointed judge to temporarily block their ordinances.

    I was going to show the ACLU’s real agenda for illegal immigrant. Well, they just showed a lot of it themselves in press release.

    ACLU

    The American Civil Liberties Union, the National Employment Law Project and the Transnational Legal Clinic at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law today filed a petition urging the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to find the United States in violation of its universal human rights obligations by failing to protect millions of undocumented workers from exploitation and discrimination in the workplace.

    The ACLU is basing its argument on stating the United States has violated a vague International Human Rights Treaty signed in 1948 called the AMERICAN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF MAN. This treaty states that, “Every person has the right to work, under proper conditions, and to follow his vocation freely, insofar as existing conditions of employment permit.” As I said, the treaty is vague. Nowhere in the treaty does it define what proper conditions are, however another section does state that the duty of every person to obey the law of the country in which he may be.

    Current immigration law provides criminal sanctions for employers who hire illegal aliens. In other words it is a crime to hire an illegal alien…period. The ACLU tries to hide this fact by omitting the word “illegal” and replacing it with “undocumented”. Illegal aliens are criminals and hiring a criminal to work is a crime also. In essence the ACLU is attempting to grant the same rights and benefits that a law abiding citizen enjoys to international criminals.

    “The most poorly paid and least desirable jobs in the United States are filled by undocumented immigrants, yet the government increasingly limits the safeguards available to this population, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation and workplace discrimination,” said Claudia Flores, an attorney with the ACLU Women’s Rights Project. “The United States government has an obligation under universal human rights norms to protect vulnerable populations, such as immigrant women, and has failed in this regard.”

    Undocumented immigrants make up nearly five percent of the U.S. labor force. However, employment and labor protections under state laws have been either eliminated or severely limited for undocumented workers in some states. These include such basic workplace protections as freedom from workplace discrimination and entitlement to hold an employer responsible for a workplace injury.

    The ACLU ignores the fact that these “undocumented workers” don’t have a right to work here in the first place, and that those hiring them are breaking the law. The United States can not enforce or provide protections for criminals in the work place. They can’t even enforce laws against hiring them in the first place. If any illegal immigrant is being exploited it is from an employer that is providing them with much more of an opportunity than they could ever find in their own country and at the expense of American jobs and law. The real way to stop the exploitation is to stop the illegal hiring.

    “International human rights law requires the United States to apply its workplace protections equally and without discrimination based on immigration status. We bring this petition to cast a global spotlight on the U.S. government’s poor human rights record in protecting undocumented workers from discrimination and to demand accountability from states and the federal government, all of whom are obligated to protect and defend human rights,” said Chandra Bhatnagar, a staff attorney with the ACLU Human Rights Program.

    What a load of bull! The ACLU goes on to list the individuals on their petition which includes illegals that want handouts for injuries in jobs they acquired illegally instead of accepting the responsibility they knowingly took upon themselves by breaking our laws.

    The ACLU fights every effort the U.S. attempts to secure its borders and enforce illegal immigration laws. Their hostility towards the Minutemen’s efforts to enforce the border is all too telling. They align themselves with open border advocates and even help illegals get into the country.

    The head of the ACLU is also an adviser to the IFC and of course, ACLU is among the most important and dangerous members of the open borders combine, using its considerable resources in support of causes that will encourage illegal aliens to enter the US and facilitate their remaining here: granting them drivers’ licenses to illegal aliens, granting instate tuition to illegals, welfare and free health care etc. The ACLU has even opposed rules to speed the deportation of illegals convicted of violent felonies.

    Front Page Magazine has a lot on this issue. Here is more on the ACLU’s opposition to fighting the illegal immigration problem.

    The ACLU has opposed any Department of Justice plan to fingerprint and track immigrants and foreign visitors to the United States. “The ACLU has long opposed immigrant registration laws, saying that they treat immigrant populations as a separate and quasi-criminal element of society and that they create an easy avenue for surveillance of those who may hold unpopular beliefs,” read a press release, “The fingerprinting and tracking proposal is only the latest Bush Administration action targeted at Muslims and people of Middle Eastern descent since September 11. Other discriminatory measures have included round-ups, dragnet questioning, the detention of more than a thousand young men and the targeting of Middle Eastern communities for heightened enforcement of minor immigration law violations.”[20] The ACLU also opposes the use of immigration law violations as the means for holding or deporting suspects with ties to terrorism, and the use of secret or classified evidence in deportation hearings.

    The ACLU is attempting to circumvent our current laws with a vague international treaty all in the name of granting criminals rights and benefits at the expense of law abiding Americans. If you think that illegal immigration is a problem now, just imagine how it will increase if the ACLU is successful. In the process the ACLU is threatening our very sovereignty.

    This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay at Jay@stoptheaclu.com or Gribbit at GribbitR@gmail.com. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 200 blogs already on-board.


    Technorati Tags:

  • Mark Steyn

    Mark Steyn Watch: America Alone Makes New York Times Bestseller List

    NewsMax: Mark Steyn’s ‘America Alone’ Hits N.Y. Times List

    Mark Steyn’s compelling new book “America Alone: The End of the World As We Know It” has hit the New York Times bestseller list in its first week out.

    The book by the conservative columnist debuted at No. 14 on the list. It has also reached No. 3 on Amazon.com’s list of books on politics, No. 9 on its nonfiction list and No. 23 among all books.

    Congrats Mark……

    It must be the clever photo on the back FLAP.

    Previous:

    Mark Steyn Watch: America Alone – A FLAP Surprise


    Technorati Tags:

  • Iran Nuclear Watch

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Russia and China Say NO to United Nations Iran Sanction Resolution

    irannukenovember2cweb

    Iranian clergymen watch a Shahab-3 long-range ballistic missile fird by Iran ‘s Revolutionary Guards in the desert outside the holy city of Qom. Iran has fired its longer-range Shahab-3 ballistic missile on exercise for the first time as it began 10 days of war games amid a mounting standoff with the West over its nuclear programme.

    AP: Russia, China Won’t Back Iran Sanctions

    Russian and China indicated that they will not support a draft U.N. resolution imposing tough sanctions on Iran for its refusal to halt its nuclear enrichment program.

    The comments by Russia’s foreign minister and China’s U.N. ambassador were the strongest reactions yet to the draft by the two key U.N. Security Council members, and signaled difficult negotiations ahead on the resolution drawn up by Britain, France and Germany.

    “We cannot support measures that in essence are aimed at isolating Iran from the outside world, including isolating people who are called upon to conduct negotiations on the nuclear program,” the Interfax news agency quoted Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov as saying Wednesday.

    China’s U.N. Ambassador Wang Guangya said “there are still different views on what kind of actions the council needs to do under the current circumstances.”

    Wang said “the major concern” is that some members want tough sanctions like those in the resolution that the council approved on Oct. 14 to punish North Korea for conducting a nuclear test.

    The European draft on Iran orders all countries to prevent the sale and supply of material and technology that could contribute to Tehran’s nuclear and missile programs. It imposes a travel ban and freezes the assets of people involved in these programs – and also orders countries to freeze the assets of companies and organizations involved in Iran’s nuclear and missile programs.

    What a surprise?

    NOT

    Russia and China will NEVER support meaningful sanctions against their business partner Iran.

    Why is the United States bothering?

    Probably biding time to prepare for the inevitable military conflict.

    irannukenovember2aweb

    Iran’s Revolutionary Guards fire test missiles during the first phase of military manoeuvres in the central desert outside the holy city of Qom. Iran has fired its longer-range Shahab-3 ballistic missile on exercise for the first time as it began 10 days of war games amid a mounting standoff with the West over its nuclear programme.

    While Russia and China signaled the draft resolution is too strong, the United States indicated it considers the draft too weak.

    Russia’s Security Council chief Igor Ivanov indicated in comment Tuesday that Russia could support sanctions as a way to push Tehran into talks, but also left plenty of room for wrangling in the council.

    Speaking Wednesday in Moscow, South Korean Foreign Minister Ban Ki-moon, who will take over as U.N. secretary-general on Jan. 1, urged Iran to halt uranium enrichment and accept the incentives in return, Interfax reported.

    A Russian Defense Ministry official told The Associated Press on Wednesday that his government would fulfill a contract to supply air defense missiles to Iran unless Moscow decides to back the international sanctions that would make it illegal.

    The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, denied an ITAR-Tass report that said Russia had already started delivering the missiles.
    Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov defended the $700 million contract signed last December to sell 29 Tor-M1 air defense missile systems to Iran, saying they were purely defensive weapons with a limited range.

    Russia needs the cash and China needs the oil.

    This is a NO brainer folks.

    And…….America as a bonus gets tied up trying to deal with Iran and an insecure oil supply.

    America better start planing on another area of the world to extract its oil……..

    irannukenovember2bweb

    An Iranian Shahab-3 ballistic missile rolls past during a military parade in Tehran in September 2005. Iran has fired its longer-range Shahab-3 ballistic missile on exercise for the first time as it began 10 days of war games amid a mounting standoff with the West over its nuclear programme.

    Stay tuned as Iran demonstrates its military hardware…..

    Previous:

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Russia Says NYET to Iran United Nations Draft Sanctions

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Adds Second Cascade of Centrifuges to Enrich Uranium

    Iran Nuclear Watch: United Nations Draft Sanctions Proposal Wants Iran Technology Sales Banned

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Ahmadinejad Threatens Europe

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Expanding Uranium Enrichment

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Olmert – IDF preparing for Iranian Threat

    Cox & Forkum: Savoir-Farce

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Ahmadinejad – Iran Will NOT Back Down “An Inch”

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Warns Against United Nations Sanctions

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Anonymous Assured Destruction

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – Iran to Proceed With Uranium Enrichment

    The Iran Nuclear Files

    irannukejuly15aweb

    The Natanz uranium enrichment complex in Natanz is pictured in this January 2, 2006 satellite image.


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Election 2006,  Iraq War,  John Kerry,  Liberal Morons,  Politics

    John Kerry Watch: I’m Sorry But…….

    kerrynovember2aweb

    John Kerry, Democratic congressional campaigner in the Fifth District, speaks at a news conference Sept. 18, 1972 in Boston. During the Vietnam era, Kerry opposed a volunteer Army because it would be dominated by the underprivileged, be less accountable and be more prone to “the perpetuation of war crimes.

    AP: Kerry’s ’72 Army Comments Mirror Latest

    During a Vietnam-era run for Congress three decades ago, John Kerry said he opposed a volunteer Army because it would be dominated by the underprivileged, be less accountable and be more prone to “the perpetuation of war crimes.”

    Kerry, a decorated Vietnam veteran who turned against the war, made the observations in answers to a 1972 candidate questionnaire from a Massachusetts peace group.

    Is Senator Kerry FLIPPIN’ again? Or?

    After Kerry caused a firestorm this week with what he termed a botched campaign joke that Republicans said insulted current soldiers, The Associated Press was alerted to the historical comments by a former law enforcement official who monitored 1970s anti-war activities

    Kerry apologized Wednesday for the 2006 campaign trail gaffe that some took as suggesting U.S. soldiers fighting in Iraq were undereducated. He contended the remark was aimed at Bush, not the soldiers.

    In 1972, as he ran for the House, he was less apologetic in his comments about the merits of a volunteer army. He declared in the questionnaire that he opposed the draft but considered a volunteer army “a greater anathema.”

    “I am convinced a volunteer army would be an army of the poor and the black and the brown,” Kerry wrote. “We must not repeat the travesty of the inequities present during Vietnam. I also fear having a professional army that views the perpetuation of war crimes as simply ‘doing its job.’

    “Equally as important, a volunteer army with our present constitutional crisis takes accountability away from the president and put the people further from control over military activities,” he wrote.

    So, did he make the statements about Iraq and the troops before he meant them?

    Or did Kerry BOTCH THE JOKE before he was AGAINST it?

    Or is it a HYPOCRITICAL APOLOGY?

    Allah has more: What the left really thinks about the military

    kerryflipperweb

    Previous:

    John Kerry Watch: Kerry Makes Direct Apology to Troops

    John Kerry Watch: Kerry Apologizes for “Botched Joke”

    Michael Ramirez on John Kerry – Educate Yourselves or You’ll Get Stuck in Iraq

    John Kerry Watch: Kerry WARNS Students – Educate Yourselves or You’ll Get Stuck in Iraq

    kerryunclekerryweb

    Photo Credit: J. Farmer


    Technorati Tags: