• Iran,  Iran Nuclear Watch

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Arrests a Nuclear Spy

    irannukejan82007aweb

    The Bushehr nuclear reactor in southern Iran

    AP: Iran says it has arrested a nuclear spy

    Iran said Tuesday it has arrested a man on suspicion of selling nuclear secrets to an exiled Iranian opposition group, state radio reported.

    The report didn’t identify the suspected spy, but said he had been working at the Iranian Parliament’s Research Center, an organization that advises lawmakers on foreign and strategic issues.

    “The man transferred classified information, including a bulletin on nuclear activities, to the hypocrites,” state radio said, referring to the People’s Mujahedeen of Iran.

    The Paris-based group, regarded as a terrorist organization by the United States, has frequently made accusations about Iran’s nuclear activities, reporting on what it says is secret information received from insiders in Iran.

    In 2002, the group disclosed the existence of two previously secret nuclear facilities, a pilot uranium enrichment plant at Natanz and a research reactor being built in the city of Arak, which turned out to house Iran’s uranium enrichment program and a hard-water reactor project. Other claims by the group have not been substantiated.

    Cold War intrigue grips Iran’s nuclear program…….

    One of ours?

    Stay tuned……

    israelaugust24njpgweb

    Previous:

    Iran Nuclear Watch: United States Submarine Collides With Japanese Ship

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – Iran Will NEVER Abandon Development of Nuclear Technology

    Cox & Forkum: Saber Rattling

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Israel Planning Nuclear Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Facilities?

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Ali Larijani – Iran if Threatened Will Obtain NUKES

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Ahmadinejad – Iran Soon to “Push The Button” to Produce Nuclear Fuel

    Michael Ramirez on Iran United Nations Sanctions

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Vows to Continue Uranium Enrichment

    Iran Nuclear Watch: United Nations Security Council Approves Iran Sanctions

    Iran Nuclear Watch: United Nations Poised to Pass Sanctions Despite Iran Threat

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Ahmadinejad MOCKS the United States and EU

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Ahmadinejad – “Britain, Israel and United States Will Vanish Like the Pharaohs”

    Iran Nuclear Watch: British Prime Minister Tony Blair Issues Iran Warning

    Iran Nuclear Watch: United States Considering Show Of Force Against Iran

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Meir Dagan Head of Israeli Espionage Agency – Iran Will Possess Nuclear Bomb By 2009-2010

    Cox & Forkum: Genocidal Logic

    Iran Nuclear Watch: A Military Option Redux

    The Iran Nuclear Files

    irannukejuly15aweb

    The Natanz uranium enrichment complex in Natanz is pictured in this January 2, 2006 satellite image.


    Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • Cox & Forkum,  Iraq,  Iraq War

    Cox & Forkum: Cut and Run

    cox&forkum07.01.09.CutRun-X

    Cox & forkum: Cut and Run

    CNN: Democrats considering ways to block escalation of war.

    As President Bush prepares to announce an increase in the number of U.S. troops fighting in Iraq, some Democrats say they would consider blocking funding for the escalation.When asked whether Congress would consider cutting off the funds, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said, “We’re going take a look at it, of course.”

    Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, said his “office is now investigating what tools are available to us to condition or constrain appropriations” for the surge in troops. But he cautioned he doesn’t want troops already in Iraq to be “shortchanged.”

    “So it creates a difficult situation for Democrats,” he said.

    Aware of this concern, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, told reporters at a Capitol news conference Monday, “Democrats will not cut off funding for our troops.”

    But, an aide later explained, the speaker is open to restricting money for the escalation, after hearings on the president’s new plan.

    “We will always support the troops who are there,” Pelosi said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” Sunday. But, Pelosi added, “If the president wants to expand the mission, that’s a conversation he has to have with the Congress of the United States.

    But that’s not … a blank check to him to do whatever he wishes there.”

    Bush is scheduled to introduce his new Iraq strategy Wednesday night.

    CNN: Soldiers tell Gates more troops needed in Iraq.

    U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the rest of the Bush administration may be undecided on whether to send more troops to Iraq. But several soldiers he met with at Camp Victory here on Thursday morning said extra forces would help.

    “Sir I think we need to just keep doing what we’re doing,” Spc. Jason T. Green, with the 101st Military Intelligence Brigade Combat Team of the 1st Infantry Division, told Gates during a breakfast session with about 15 U.S. soldiers.

    “I really think we need more troops here. With more presence on the ground, more troops might hold them off long enough to where we can get the Iraqi Army trained up.”

    The troops may be somewhat at odds with military commanders, who worry that rushing thousands more Americans to the battlefront could prompt Iraqis to slow their effort to take control of their country.

    AP: Democrats to challenge Bush’s Iraq plan

    President Bush is telling lawmakers he will send thousands more U.S. troops to Iraq’s two most troubled regions, in a plan that Democrats are resisting as a major escalation of a 31/2-year-old war. On Tuesday, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich., said he expects Bush to announce that up to 20,000 additional troops will be sent to Iraq, but will not say how long the extra forces will be there.

    A day before Bush’s nationally televised speech describing his proposal, Sen. Edward Kennedy (news, bio, voting record), a longtime critic of Bush and the war, will propose legislation denying him the billions needed to send more troops to war unless Congress agrees first. Though it was unclear whether the bill would ever reach the full Senate, it could at least serve as a rallying point for the most insistent foes of the Iraq conflict.

    Democrats seem divided on whether to block funds for troop increases, but many were not ruling it out. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record), D-Nev., said Democrats would “look at everything” in their power to curb the war, short of cutting money for troops already in the field.

    He said he would only consider an increase in U.S. forces in Iraq if Bush agreed to start withdrawing troops within six months.

    The bill by Kennedy, D-Mass., is guaranteed to fuel the debate among lawmakers on how far they should go to try to force the president’s hand on the unpopular war.

    Under the Constitution, the president has broad war-making powers, while Congress controls spending. Democratic leaders have swiftly rejected any suggestion of withholding money from troops already in combat zones.

    “The Congress has the power of the purse and what we are saying is before the president sends additional American troops into the civil war, the president has to come back to the Congress and get the authority for that deployment,” Kennedy said Tuesday on NBC’s “Today” show.

    “The American people ought to have a voice and a vote and members of Congress should be held accountable. We ought to take this step and stop the surge,” Kennedy said.

    The Democrats are SPLIT. At least Ted Kennedy has the Cojones to propose legislation that the NUTROOTS and LEFT desire.

    But, what about the mainstream Democrats?

    Why aren’t the Democrats asking for equal time to respond to President Bush’s address to the nation tomorrow night?

    No Plan?

    What about the Democrats running for President and some who sit on the Senate Armed Services Committee?

    Hillary?

    Barack?

    Edwards?

    Joe Biden?

    Where do you stand on the Kennedy legislation? Do you want to cut off funding so the President will be forced to bring the troops home? Isn’t that what the Democrat Party ran on last November?

    Come on, now, speak up………

    Anyone?


    Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • Bill Clinton,  General,  Hillary Clinton

    Sandy Berger Watch: House report: Berger Hurt National Security

    bergerdecember20aweb
    WorldNet.com: House report: Berger hurt national security

    A House committee released a report today concluding former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger went to extraordinary lengths to compromise national security and that the Department of Justice could not assure the 9/11 commission that it received the documents it requested.

    Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, ranking Republican member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said his staff’s investigation reveals Berger “compromised national security much more than originally disclosed.”

    “It is now also clear that Mr. Berger was willing to go to extraordinary lengths to compromise national security, apparently for his own convenience,” Davis said.

    The report from Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (Republicans) by Ranking Member Thomas M. Davis is here.

    As WND reported, a newly released investigation report by the National Archives and Records Administration showed President Bill Clinton signed a letter authorizing Berger’s access to the classified documents.

    Last year, Berger plea bargained a criminal sentence on the charge of unlawfully removing and retaining classified documents. A judge gave him no prison time, a $50,000 fine, 100 hours of community service and a ban from access to classified material for three years.

    Davis said the 9/11 commission “relied on incomplete and misleading information regarding its access to documents” Berger reviewed.

    The commission was never told Berger had access to original documents that he could have taken without detection, Davis stated.

    “Mr. Berger’s review of documents did not conform to the usual requirements for reviewing classified documents in a secure facility and under strict supervision,” he said. “The archives staff’s failure to contact law enforcement immediately and their contacts with Mr. Berger about the missing documents compromised the law enforcement effort.”

    Davis said the “compromised law enforcement effort contributes to reduced confidence that the 9/11 commission received all the documents it requested.”

    “The execution of a search warrant before Mr. Berger knew there was an investigation would have either located additional documents or enhanced confidence that he stole no others than those he admitted to taking,” he said.

    As Flap said previously:

    This former National Security Advisor for President Clinton should be barred from ever dealing with classified documents again. Three years was NOT long enough of a ban.

    Remember when Bill Clinton had a damn shit fit when the TV docu-drama, The Path to 9/11 aired?

    And that he bitched all over the place that he tried – after Berger stole documents that would implicate Clinton and himself before the 9/11 Commission with regards to Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda. America will NEVER know the role these characters played in pre-9/11 anti-terror activities, if ANY.

    Sandy Berger = THIEF

    The Inspector General’s Report is here (H/T Allah)

    bergersocks

    Flap wonders when Hillary announces Berger as part of her national security campaign staff? Berger should NEVER be confirmed or allowed acess to the government again – PERIOD.

    Stay tuned……

    bergerdecember20bweb

    Previous:

    Glenn McCoy on Sandy Berger and Bill Clinton

    Michael Ramirez on Sandy “Dox in the Sox” Berger

    Sandy Berger Watch: Inspector General – Berger Hid National Archive Classified Documents Under a Construction Trailer

    Sandy Berger Watch: Reckless Again

    Sandy Berger Fined for Illegaly Taking Classified Documents


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • Democrats,  Tim Johnson

    Senator Tim Johnson Watch: Senator’s Condition Upgraded From Critical to Fair After Brain Surgery

    johnsonjan9aweb

    CNN: Senator’s condition upgraded after brain surgery

    Sen. Tim Johnson’s condition has been upgraded from critical to fair, four weeks after he was hospitalized for a brain hemorrhage, his office said Tuesday.

    The South Dakota Democrat, who was rushed to the hospital December 13 and underwent emergency surgery, remains in intensive care, said his spokeswoman, Julianne Fisher.

    “The senator continues to make progress,” Fisher said. “The next step would be rehabilitation and we hope that would happen within the week.”

    Johnson’s office has said that his recovery is expected to take several months.

    He underwent surgery to correct a condition called arteriovenous malformation, involving tangled arteries in his brain.

    The senator’s doctors said last week that Johnson was improving but still needed a ventilator at night to help him breathe. The ventilator has required a tube to be placed down Johnson’s throat, making it impossible for him to talk.

    His long-term prognosis is unclear. He has been responsive to his family and physicians, following commands, squeezing his wife’s hand and understanding speech.

    Good news for Senator Johnson. But, still bad news for Senate Democrats and Majority Leader Harry Reid.

    Just as I said before, Senator Johnson will not be back to the Senate or a regular political life anytime soon. Many votes will pass with Johnson not being present.
    Moroever, the length of his rehabilitation time will affect whether there is ANY chance of Senator Johnson being a viable candidate for re-election in 2008.

    Stay tuned…..

    johnsondecember14aweb

    Previous:

    Senator Tim Johnson Watch: Johnson is Improving But Still Requires Ventilator at Night

    Senator Tim Johnson Watch: Johnson Remains in Critical Condition

    Senator Tim Johnson Watch: Johnson in Stable Condition After Brain Surgery

    Senator Tim Johnson Watch: Senate Back to 50-50 Split?

    Senator Tim Johnson Watch: Johnson in Critical Condition After Late Night Brain Surgery

    Senator Tim Johnson Watch: Senator Undergoes Surgery

    Senator Tim Johnson Watch: Democrat Spokesman Says Johnson Did Not Suffer Stroke

    Senator Tim Johnson Watch: Johnson Hospitalized with Apparent Stroke


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • General,  Iraq,  Iraq War,  Michael Ramirez

    Michael Ramirez on President Bush and the Iraq War

    ramireztoon010907web

    AP: Democrats resisting Bush’s Iraq plan

    President Bush is telling lawmakers he will send thousands more U.S. troops to Iraq’s two most troubled regions, in a plan that Democrats are resisting as a major escalation of a 31/2-year-old war.

    On Tuesday, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich., said he expects Bush to announce that up to 20,000 additional troops will be sent to Iraq, but will not say how long the extra forces will be there. Levin, who spoke to reporters a day after meeting with White House national security adviser
    Stephen Hadley, said he thinks Bush will signal that the overall U.S. commitment in Iraq is not open-ended.

    The extra forces would be sent to Baghdad, which has been consumed by sectarian violence, and the western Anbar Province, a base of the mostly Sunni insurgency and foreign al-Qaida fighters, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (news, bio, voting record), R-Texas, and others said following the session with Bush.

    Ok, let’s go in and win this war – finish the job and rebuild a democratic Iraq.


    Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • Al Qaeda,  Global War on Terror,  Somalia

    Somalia Watch: United States Helicopter Gunships Attack Al-Qaeda Fighters in South Somalia

    somaliajan9hweb

    A US Marine Corps attack helicopter is seen in a 2004 handout photo from the US Marine Corps (USMC). US attack helicopters launched fresh air strikes in southern Somalia, targeting the suspected command center of Al-Qaeda militants, a Somali defense ministry official said.

    AP: Copters attack Somalia militant suspects

    Helicopter gunships attacked suspected al-Qaida fighters in the south Tuesday after U.S. forces staged airstrikes in the first offensive in the African country since 18 American soldiers were killed there in 1993, witnesses said.

    Witnesses said 31 civilians, including two newlyweds, died in the assault by two helicopters near Afmadow, a town in an area of forested hills close to the Kenyan border 220 miles southwest of Somalia’s capital, Mogadishu. The report could not be independently verified.

    A Somali Defense Ministry official described the helicopters as American, but the local witnesses told The Associated Press they could not make out identification markings on the craft. Washington officials had no comment.

    On Monday, at least one U.S. AC-130 gunship attacked Islamic extremists in Hayi, 30 miles from Afmadow, and on a remote island 155 miles away believed to be an al-Qaida training camp at the southern tip of Somalia next to Kenya. Somali officials said they had reports of many deaths. The Pentagon confirmed the strike, but declined to comment on any details.

    The Pentagon is now acknowledging the special operation:

    The Somalia assault, however, was conducted by U.S. Special Operations Command and has been shrouded in secrecy. The military typically declines to reveal much about such missions by special operations forces, including the AC-130 gunships used in the Somalia attack, and Delta Force counterterrorism ground troops.

    somaliajan9gweb

    In this photo released by the U.S. Navy on Tuesday Jan. 9, 2007, An F/A-18C Hornet from the Wildcats of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 131 lands aboard the flight deck of the the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower on Monday Jan. 8, 2007. The U.S. military said Tuesday it had sent the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower to join three other U.S. warships conducting anti-terror operations off the Somali coast. The aircraft carrier is part of the Navy’s Bahrain-based Fifth Fleet.

    ussddedecember19gweb

    USS Dwight David Eisenhower

    Stay tuned as operations continue……..

    ac-130u_19990805ac130gweb

    AC-130

    Previous:

    Somalia Watch: United States Launching New Attacks Against Al Qaeda in Somalia

    Somalia Watch: United States Attacking Al Qaeda Positions in Somalia

    Somalia Watch: Diplomats Call for Urgent Deployment of Peacekeeping Troops in Somalia

    Cox & Forkum: Somalian Front

    Somalia Watch: Somalia Offers Islamists Amnesty

    Somalia Watch: Mogadishu Retaken by Somali Government Troops

    Somalia Watch: A Guide to the Latest Front of the War on Terror

    somalia_pol02web


    Technorati Tags: , , ,, , ,

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger,  Health,  Socialized Medicine

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Proposes RADICAL Health Care Reforms

    arnoldjan92007aweb

    California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (C) unveils his new health care plan to health care and business professionals via satellite from his office in Los Angeles, California, as Kim Belshe, Secretary of the California Health and Human Services Agency, listens in Sacramento January 8, 2007. Schwarzenegger was unable to attend due to his broken leg.

    Los Angeles Times: Gov. seeks sweeping health system reforms

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger today proposed upending just about every portion of the healthcare industry in one of the country’s most elaborate efforts at holding down medical costs and expanding insurance to those who don’t have it.

    Schwarzenegger’s plan, which he publicly unveiled at noon, would require employers with 10 workers or more to buy insurance for their workers or pay a fee of 4% of their payroll into a program to help provide coverage for the uninsured.

    Schwarzenegger would tax doctors 2% of their gross revenue and place a 4% tax on hospitals. He campaigned for reelection on an anti-tax platform, but his administration argues that so many more people would have insurance that medical providers would make more money.

    The governor also wants to ban insurers from refusing to offer coverage to some individuals because of their prior medical conditions. Insurers would also have to spend at least 85% of their premium revenues on patient care, a move that would limit the amount companies spend on administrative costs and profits.

    In an effort to cover all Californian children, including ones in the state illegally, Schwarzenegger’s plan would expand the state’s Healthy Families program, providing insurance to children whose parents make less than three times the poverty level. That works out to about $60,000 for a family of four.

    And Schwarzenegger said his plan would require every Californian to have health insurance.

    “If you can’t afford it, the state will help you buy it,” he said, “but you must be insured.”

    The ten page Governors’ Health Care Proposal is here.

    The Governor’s vision for health reform is an accessible, efficient, and affordable health care system that promotes a healthier California through prevention and wellness and universality of coverage. For the Governor’s vision to be realized, health care reform must reflect a“systems” approach that incorporates three essential building blocks in an integrated manner.
    These building blocks are:
    Prevention, health promotion, and wellness
    Coverage for all Californians
    Affordability and cost containment

    arnoldjan92007bweb

    Kim Belshe, Secretary for Health and Human Services, outlines Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger health coverage plan during a news conference in Sacramento, Calif., Monday, Jan. 8, 2007. Schwarzenegger proposed to extend health coverage to nearly all of California’s 6.5 million uninsured people, promising to spread the cost among businesses, individuals, hospitals, doctors, insurers and government.

    So, what does the Governor’s plan do?

    REDISTRIBUTION OF INCOME AND WEALTH – TRUE LIES: SOCIALIZED UNIVERSAL COVERAGE but California style.

    And this has been so successful where?

    Great Britain?

    Canada?

    Australia?

    Russia?

    Maine?

    Answer: NOWHERE

    And WHO IS GOING TO PAY?

    Major elements, dubbed “shared responsibility,” include requiring every Californian to be insured, much as motorists are required to carry insurance; requiring employers to either cover workers or pay payroll taxes into a state pool; taxing insurers and medical care providers to recapture some of their new revenues; and extracting more than $5 billion in new federal funds to help cover the $12 billion annual cost.

    While libertarians contend that government shouldn’t be in the health care business, as a practical — and legal — matter virtually everyone already receives some care, with the uninsured misusing hospital emergency rooms, which pass on their costs of uncompensated care to paying patients. Schwarzenegger cites that “hidden tax” as the rationale for bringing costs into the open and paying for them.

    There are some serious reservations about the Republican governor’s approach. With health care costs rising several times faster than payrolls, for example, it seems unlikely that flat taxes on payrolls, doctors and hospitals would work.

    The overarching uncertainty, however, is whether such an ambitious scheme could survive the legislative grinder, where interest groups will exert their influence to gain financially advantageous changes for their members. Consumer groups will oppose the individual coverage mandates, for instance, while many employers will oppose being required to provide coverage (those with under 10 workers would be exempted) or pay in-lieu taxes.

    A big question is whether the proposed taxes — about $4.5 billion of the $12 billion — would require two-thirds legislative votes, which would give a veto to anti-tax Republican legislators and perhaps sink the scheme. Administration officials and Democratic leaders hope to avoid the two-thirds vote by calling the taxes fees, but if they do that, the courts would have the last word.

    And ILLEGAL ALIENS are they covered?

    You bet….

    Arnold vetoes California Driver’s Licenses for illegal aliens but now will provide them with “FREE” Universal health care?

    How do you spell RECALL? and/or REFERENDUM?

    The DETAILS IN THIS DEVIL ARE HERE.

    Some of the reactions to the Governor’s radical proposal are here.

    Democrat Speaker of the Assembly Nunez:

    “This is a plan Assembly Democrats could have written – and in a lot of ways already did. I’m pleased to see so much in common with the plan I introduced last month.”

    California Nurses Assn.

    The California Nurses Association today said it welcomed the decision of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to address the state’s escalating healthcare crisis. But, said CNA President Deborah Burger, the sum of his proposals may ultimately amount to “little more than a fresh coat of paint on a collapsing house.”

    CNA commended portions of the governor’s plan that would require health plans to end denials of coverage based on age or health status and assurance of health services for the undocumented. But, overall, “the package has a number of gaping holes,” said Burger.

    That begins with the call to “criminalize the uninsured by forcing them to buy insurance, a plan that shifts the costs and risk from the insurers to individuals, won’t work for millions of Californians, and is a huge gift to the insurance industry,” said Burger.

    “What we don’t see is any discussion of what type of health coverage people will buy. There are no limits on skyrocketing health premiums, no requirements on what will be included in the required plans, and a new call to deregulate existing public protections.

    Assembly Republican Leader Mike Villines:

    “Imposing a new jobs tax on employers of any size and expanding costly government mandates is the wrong approach, one which will devastate our economy. We continue to agree with the Governor’s statements in 2004 when he argued that a new jobs tax will be a job killer and force many businesses to lay off workers, move out of state or close their doors for good.

    “As we debate health care reform this year, it is vital that lawmakers fully consider the impact our actions will have on jobs, the economy, hard working families, and the state budget. Assembly Republicans stand ready to work with the Governor and lawmakers to shape California’s health care future in a fiscally responsible manner, focusing on real problems, while protecting the wallets of California taxpayers.”

    California State Senator Tom McClintock

    ‘It is disappointing that just 72 hours into his [second term] he’s shattered the central campaign pledge upon which he won reelection — not to raise taxes,’ said state Sen. Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks), who ran unsuccessfully for lieutenant governor last year with the governor’s support.

    ‘I think it’s ironic,’ McClintock continued, ‘that a governor who just proclaimed himself a centrist would come up with a proposal well to the left of the one presented by Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata,’ a Democrat from Oakland.”

    Dan Walters in his excellent piece outlines four possible scenarios for this health initiative:

    1. Effectively reforming health care

    2. Enacting a minor, face-saving expansion of care

    3. Another gridlock failure

    4. Creating another unworkable monstrosity

    Flap says number two and the reform will indeed be minor.

    Schwarzenegger has NO voter mandate to undertake such a radical approach to reforming a health care system that until now has been private in California. This is NOT infrastructure reform.
    The Democrats and Labor Unions may like parts of the program but they REALLY want true socialized government paid universal single payor coverage.

    The GOP will NEVER support the business mandates and increased taxes.

    Medicine and hospitals will NEVER support taxes on their services – in hopes of increased revenues? What has the Governator been smoking?

    Stay tuned for tonight’s State of the State address and tomorrow’s unveiling of the Governor’s budget. Then watch, as the California GOP turns against their own Governor on this issue, partisanship and the budget.

    arnolddecember25bweb

    Others Blogging:

    Captain Ed

    Sister Toldjah

    Ed Driscoll 

    Previous:

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Governor A No Show at Inaugural Parties

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Continues to Work Despite Injury

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Scheduled for Tuesday Surgery

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Governator Breaks His Leg while Skiing


    Technorati Tags:

  • Al Qaeda,  Somalia

    Somalia Watch: United States Launching New Attacks Against Al Qaeda in Somalia

    ***SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATES***

    somaliajan9dweb

    AP: U.S. launches new attacks in Somalia

    A Somali official says U.S. helicopter gunships have launched new attacks against suspected al-Qaida terrorists. An earlier U.S. airstrike hit targets in southern Somalia where Islamic militants were believed to be sheltering suspects in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies, Somali officials and witnesses said Tuesday. Many people were reported killed.

    Monday’s attack was the first overt military action by the U.S. in Somalia since it led a U.N. force in the 1990s that intervened in Somalia in an effort to fight famine. The mission led to clashes between U.N. forces and Somali warlords, including the “Black Hawk Down” battle that left 18 U.S. servicemen dead.

    Helicopter gunships launched new attacks Tuesday near the scene of a U.S. airstrike in the village of Hayi, although it was not clear if they were American or Ethiopian aircraft, and it was not known if there were any casualties.

    Two helicopters “fired several rockets toward the road that leads to the Kenyan border,” said Ali Seed Yusuf, a resident of the town of Afmadow in southern Somalia.

    The aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower arrived off Somalia’s coast and launched intelligence-gathering missions over Somalia, the military said. Three other U.S. warships are conducting anti-terror operations off the Somali coast.

    And why are these attacks being launched?

    AL QAEDA

    Washington Post: U.S. Strike in Somalia Targets Al-Qaeda Figure

    One target of the strike, sources said, was Abu Talha al-Sudani, a Sudanese who is married to a Somali woman and has lived in Somalia since 1993 — the year of the attack against U.S. troops that was chronicled in the book and movie “Black Hawk Down.” In a 2001 U.S. court case against Osama bin Laden, Sudani was described by a leading witness as an explosives expert who was close to the al-Qaeda leader.

    More recently, Sudani was identified by U.S. intelligence as a close associate of Gouled Hassan Dourad, head of a Mogadishu-based network that operated in support of al-Qaeda in Somalia. Dourad is one of 14 “high-value” prisoners transferred last September from CIA “black sites” to the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence then disclosed that Dourad “worked for the East African al-Qaeda cell led by . . . al-Sudani” and carried out at least one mission for him, related to a plan to bomb the U.S. military base in Djibouti.

    Others have identified Sudani as the financier for Fazul Abdullah Mohammed and Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan, believed responsible for the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. All are among the senior al-Qaeda operatives the Bush administration has charged were sheltered by Somalian Islamic fundamentalists controlling Mogadishu, the country’s capital. They are believed to have fled late last month when Ethiopian troops drove the fundamentalists out of the capital and toward the Kenyan border.

    somaliajan9eweb2

    A FBI most wanted poster of Fazul Abdullah Mohammed who has been indicted by a U.S. Federal court for his involvement in the 1998 U.S. embassy attacks in Kenya and neighboring Tanzania, displayed on the FBI’s website Friday, March 21, 2003. The target of U.S. air strikes in Somalia is one of the FBI’s most wanted terrorists and the suspected mastermind of two major terrorist attacks in East Africa.Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, a slight, youthful man born in Comoros, has a US$5 million price on his head for allegedly planning the 1998 attacks on the U.S. Embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam.

    Fox News is reporting continuing military strikes against targets in Somalia.

    BREAKING: Fox News is reporting United States officials are reporting that Abu Talha al-Sudani has been killed. Identification of bodies is pending.

    Update: 8:00 AM PST

    Fox News is reporting that “several” Al Qaeda members may have been killed.  There are on-going military operations with Somali, Ethiopian and Americans working jointly to flush out hiding Al Qaeda members.

    In the meantime, the reader should be directed to Bill Roggio’s excellent treatise: The Rise & Fall of Somalia’s Islamic Courts: An Online History

    Stay tuned……..

    ac-130u_19990805ac130gweb

    AC-130

    ussddedecember19gweb

    USS Dwight David Eisenhower

    Previous:

    Somalia Watch: United States Attacking Al Qaeda Positions in Somalia

    Somalia Watch: Diplomats Call for Urgent Deployment of Peacekeeping Troops in Somalia

    Cox & Forkum: Somalian Front

    Somalia Watch: Somalia Offers Islamists Amnesty

    Somalia Watch: Mogadishu Retaken by Somali Government Troops

    Somalia Watch: A Guide to the Latest Front of the War on Terror

    somalia_pol02web


    Technorati Tags: , , ,, , ,