<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul Watch: Stumps for The November 5 Creep Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flapsblog.com/2007/11/02/ron-paul-watch-stumps-for-the-november-5-creep-show/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flapsblog.com/2007/11/02/ron-paul-watch-stumps-for-the-november-5-creep-show/</link>
	<description>Flap&#039;s Comments on Politics, the Dental World and Much More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galileo</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2007/11/02/ron-paul-watch-stumps-for-the-november-5-creep-show/#comment-63720</link>
		<dc:creator>Galileo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 01:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/?p=5821#comment-63720</guid>
		<description>Mind you, the IRS accepts money from KKK Grand Wizards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mind you, the IRS accepts money from KKK Grand Wizards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flap</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2007/11/02/ron-paul-watch-stumps-for-the-november-5-creep-show/#comment-63718</link>
		<dc:creator>Flap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/?p=5821#comment-63718</guid>
		<description>No, the issue is moot now and the campaign finessed it anyway.  Ron Paul would promote the fundraising event by saying remember the 5th of November and out of the other side of his mouth his spokesman Jesse Benton (the one who has not gotten back to you over the Stormfront.org flap)would say the RP campaign has nothing to do with it.

I saw an interview with Trevor someplace and he admitted he talked to the campaign to get the ok but went no further in explanation.  If he admits he worked with the campaign then he is no longer considered a volunteer - you know the ol&#039; FEC rules then apply more stringently.

It stretches the imagination that the campaign did not know about it and early in its origination.

Hey, how about Huckabee taking off with no money!  In Iowa he is beating Ron Paul in the polls 3 to 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the issue is moot now and the campaign finessed it anyway.  Ron Paul would promote the fundraising event by saying remember the 5th of November and out of the other side of his mouth his spokesman Jesse Benton (the one who has not gotten back to you over the Stormfront.org flap)would say the RP campaign has nothing to do with it.</p>
<p>I saw an interview with Trevor someplace and he admitted he talked to the campaign to get the ok but went no further in explanation.  If he admits he worked with the campaign then he is no longer considered a volunteer &#8211; you know the ol&#8217; FEC rules then apply more stringently.</p>
<p>It stretches the imagination that the campaign did not know about it and early in its origination.</p>
<p>Hey, how about Huckabee taking off with no money!  In Iowa he is beating Ron Paul in the polls 3 to 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor Morrill</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2007/11/02/ron-paul-watch-stumps-for-the-november-5-creep-show/#comment-63717</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor Morrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/?p=5821#comment-63717</guid>
		<description>I guess that&#039;s where the discussion ends - when I ask for evidence you obviously don&#039;t have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that&#8217;s where the discussion ends &#8211; when I ask for evidence you obviously don&#8217;t have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2007/11/02/ron-paul-watch-stumps-for-the-november-5-creep-show/#comment-63706</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/?p=5821#comment-63706</guid>
		<description>How can you claim that you are embarassed as a &quot;libertairan republican&quot; when Ron Paul is referred to as such, when you yourself are a &quot;neoconservative republican&quot;?  There is no reason for you to be embarassed.

But you have a delusion, and that delusion is that no matter how far your beliefs have diverged you still consider yourself a libertarian.  An authoritarian libertarian perhaps?  But that does explain why you thin that if your authoritarianism is libertarian then you consider Giuliani to be libertarian and Paul not so, because Giuliani is authoritarian and Paul not so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you claim that you are embarassed as a &#8220;libertairan republican&#8221; when Ron Paul is referred to as such, when you yourself are a &#8220;neoconservative republican&#8221;?  There is no reason for you to be embarassed.</p>
<p>But you have a delusion, and that delusion is that no matter how far your beliefs have diverged you still consider yourself a libertarian.  An authoritarian libertarian perhaps?  But that does explain why you thin that if your authoritarianism is libertarian then you consider Giuliani to be libertarian and Paul not so, because Giuliani is authoritarian and Paul not so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor Morrill</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2007/11/02/ron-paul-watch-stumps-for-the-november-5-creep-show/#comment-63420</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor Morrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/?p=5821#comment-63420</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Pleaseâ€¦â€¦..are you really serious?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Absolutely.

If I am so glaringly wrong here, I think you&#039;d be able to present something close to a shred of evidence to the contrary.

Instead all you provide is incredulous questions.  &quot;are you really serious?&quot; doesn&#039;t make your case.  Present some evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pleaseâ€¦â€¦..are you really serious?</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely.</p>
<p>If I am so glaringly wrong here, I think you&#8217;d be able to present something close to a shred of evidence to the contrary.</p>
<p>Instead all you provide is incredulous questions.  &#8220;are you really serious?&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make your case.  Present some evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

