<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recalling the California Supreme Court Over Proposition 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flapsblog.com/2008/11/22/recalling-the-california-supreme-court-over-proposition-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flapsblog.com/2008/11/22/recalling-the-california-supreme-court-over-proposition-8/</link>
	<description>Flap&#039;s Comments on Politics, the Dental World and Much More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrazies</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2008/11/22/recalling-the-california-supreme-court-over-proposition-8/#comment-138637</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrazies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/2008/11/22/recalling-the-california-supreme-court-over-proposition-8/#comment-138637</guid>
		<description>I personally think that gay marriage should be allowed as people should be allowed to live life in their own way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think that gay marriage should be allowed as people should be allowed to live life in their own way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Air Jordans</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2008/11/22/recalling-the-california-supreme-court-over-proposition-8/#comment-138624</link>
		<dc:creator>Air Jordans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/2008/11/22/recalling-the-california-supreme-court-over-proposition-8/#comment-138624</guid>
		<description>It seems there are enough people desperate to keep the current definition of marriage as union between a man and woman. Being there are many influential people in front of the public such as entertainers, politicians etc. it will be passed. Much to their chagrin it may be later rather than sooner though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems there are enough people desperate to keep the current definition of marriage as union between a man and woman. Being there are many influential people in front of the public such as entertainers, politicians etc. it will be passed. Much to their chagrin it may be later rather than sooner though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

