• Meg Whitman,  Steve Poizner

    Meg Whitman Stumps in the California Capitol for Governor But Shouldn’t She Run for U.S. Senate?

    Romney McCain and Whitman

    Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., center, flanked by adviser Meg Whitman, left, and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, speaks at an economic roundtable, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2008, in New York

    Yesterday, the national press picked up on the fact that Meg Whitman was apparently a go for a run for California Governor in 2010.

    Today, Whitman, the former President and CEO of eBay, was seeking support from Republican Legislators in the State Capitol.

    Whitman, a Republican, was meeting today with members of the GOP caucus not yet aligned with anyone in the 2010 governor’s race.

    They’re harder to find than you might think, as Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner has stumped hard among Republican lawmakers for their support.

    Poizner, who first won elective office in 2006, has already garnered the support of 31 of the 44 GOP state legislators.

    It seems non-productive and down-right destructive for two well financed GOP players to face each other in a divisive primary election for Governor.

    Might Meg Whitman be persuaded to run instead for the U.S. Senate against Barbara Boxer?

    Like Flap said the first time.


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Dianne Feinstein,  Harry Reid,  Rod Blagojevich,  Roland Burris

    California Senator Dianne Feinstein Says Seat Roland Burris

    Dianne Feinstein

    It was reported that Leon Panetta, a former White House chief of staff with no direct intelligence experience, was selected by US President-elect Barack Obama to serve as CIA director. Senator Dianne Feinstein, the incoming chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, seen here in 2007, said she had not been informed about the decision, and indicated she did not approve

    Di Fi may not like Leon Panetta for CIA Director but she can read the political tea leaves and now calls for the U.S. Senate to seat Roland Burris.

    The chairman of the Senate Rules Committee has parted with many of her Democratic colleagues and says that the Senate should seat former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris.

    Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California said Tuesday that Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, however tainted by corruption charges, has the right to appoint someone to President-elect Barack Obama’s former seat. The Rules Committee decides whether Burris is qualified to serve.

    Feinstein said that blocking Burris would have ramifications for other governors’ appointments.

    Well, Harry Reid has few legal remedies since every MAJOR legal scholar predicts the U.S. Supreme Court would seat Roland Burris anyway.

    So, Harry Reid will say ashucks tomorrow and seat Burris before the political damage spins out of control.

    In the meantime, the Illinois GOP is licking its chops to challenge the 70 year old plus appointed Senator in two years tainted by Hot Rod Blagojevich whose impeachment is just beginning.


    Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • Jeb Bush

    Jeb Bush Says No to Florida U.S. Senate Run

    George and Jeb Bush

    President Geroge W. and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush

    Jeb Bush says no to a run for the U.S. Senate from Florida in 2010.

    Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush will not run for the open Senate seat of Sen. Mel Martinez, he announced in a statement released moments ago.

    “After thoughtful consideration, I have decided not to run for the United States Senate in 2010,” said Bush. “While the opportunity to serve my state and country during these turbulent and dynamic times is compelling, now is not the right time to return to elected office.”

    Flap does not blame Jeb. The GOP will not have anywhere close to a majority in the Senate in the next few election cycles and Jeb can keep his powder dry for a possible Presidential run in 2016. Jeb already has the GOP cred and executive experience to run for the Presidency.

    This is not the last we have heard from the Bush family.


    Technorati Tags:

  • Gay Marriage,  Gay Politics

    New Gay Marriage Study Challenges Notion that African-Americans Overwhelmingly Help Pass California Proposition 8

    California-Proposition-8-an

    A new study tries to debunk the notion that California African-American voters spurred to the polls by the election of the first African-American President, Barack Obama overwhelmingly supported California Proposition 8 that restored the traditional definition of marriage (one man and one woman).

    A new study of voting patterns on Proposition 8, the November ballot measure that would outlaw same-sex marriage, concludes that African American support, reported by exit pollsters at 70 percent, was at least 10 percentage points lower.

    The high reported support levels among black and Latino voters for the measure, which won voter approval but is now being challenged in court, led to post-election controversy and conclusions that non-white voters provided the margin of victory for Proposition 8.

    The new study, commissioned by the San Francisco-based Evelyn and Walter Hass Jr. Fund and released by a consortium of gay rights groups, was conducted by two New York college researchers. It concludes that party affiliation, political ideology, frequency of attending church and age “were the driving forces behind the measure’s passage” rather than ethnicity.

    When voting results were adjusted for those factors, the researchers concluded, “support for Proposition 8 among African Americanss and Latinos was not significantly different than other groups.” They put overall black support for Proposition 8 at “no more than 59 percent” rather than the 70 percent found in exist polls of voters.

    “These figures point the way to winning marriage equality for same-sex couples sooner rather than later,” said Jaime Grant, Ph.D., director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute. “Convincing the Republican Party that continued gay bashing will cripple its future is one; another is accelerating the already strong surge in support among young voters.”

    An interesting study that really compares apples to oranges in a number of their analyses but the reader can read it here (PDF).

    The November California Proposition 8 was a “PERFECT STORM” for the passage of gay marriage in California. A down GOP year, an accelerated Democrat registration drive plus turn-out for Obama, optimized ballot language by a sympathetic California Attorney General and a Presidental election year turn-out of voters should have produced a victory for gay marriage proponents. But, it didn’t.

    Why?

    There is No doubt the No on Proposition 8 Campaign was poorly run but the fact is that California voters simply do NOT support gay marriage and the considerable political baggage that accompanies its legalization. And, an almost 60 per cent African-American support for a gay marriage ban is nothing to overlook. But, does it really matter?

    The homosexual lobby will try again (when the California Supreme Court upholds Proposition 8 as constitutional) but will be less likely to obtain even 48 per cent they received last November. Younger voters will return to their habit of ignoring elections and GOP voters will return to the fold of turning out to vote disproprtionately in non-Presidental election years. Gay Marriage = FAIL.

    There has not been one election in ANY state where gay marriage has passed the muster of voters. It won’t be happening anytime soon in California either – despite what homosexual political scientists desire.


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Caroline Kennedy,  David Paterson,  George Pataki,  Hillary Clinton,  Rudy Giuliani

    Caroline Kennedy Sinks in the Polls But Does it Matter?

    Caroline Kennedy and Al Sharpton

    The Rev. Al Sharpton, center, stands beside Caroline Kennedy as they field questions during a news conference outside the famed soul food restaurant Sylvia’s in Harlem, New York, Thursday Dec. 18, 2008. The late President John F. Kennedy’s daughter acknowledged Wednesday that she is seeking to be appointed to the Senate seat held by Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has been nominated by President-elect Barack Obama to be secretary of state

    Caroline’s popularity with New York voters has been in a nosedive in the polls but it may all be moot for a number of reasons.

    Caroline Kennedy‘s popularity has suffered a “clear hit” as a result of her public campaign for Hillary Rodham Clinton‘s Senate seat, while Attorney General Andrew Cuomo’s positive ratings have shot up, according to a new poll.

    According to Public Policy Polling, of Raleigh, N.C., 44 percent of New York State voters now say they have a less favorable opinion of Kennedy than they did before she started vying for the position. Thirty-three percent say it’s made no difference, and 23 percent report now having a more favorable opinion of her.

    Cuomo now leads Kennedy 58-27 in a survey of the preferences of state voters. Among Democrats, Cuomo is ahead of Kennedy 54-34 percent; a month ago, the survey found Kennedy ahead of Cuomo by 44-23 percent among Democrats.

    • Will Caroline Kennedy, despite her wealth for a self-funded campaign, be of sufficent stature to defeat former New York Governor George Pataki or Rudy Giuliani, both Republicans?
    • Will New York Governor David Paterson defuse a possible Democrat Primary election for himself by appointing New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo to the Senate?
    • And, it ALL may be MOOT should Hillary Clinton run into confrirmation problems on the Hill.

    Stay tuned……


    Technorati Tags: , , , ,

  • Gay Marriage,  Jerry Brown,  Kenneth Starr

    The Protect Marriage Coalition (Pro California Proposition 8) Files Legal Briefs Attacking California Attorney General Jerry Brown’s Arguments Supporting Gay Marriage

    Yes on prop 8 400

    California Proposition 8 supporters yesterday filed legal briefs in the ongoing battle in the California Supreme Court over the constitutionality of California Proposition 8 that restored the traditional definition of marriage (one man and one woman) by California Constitutional Amendment last November.

    Gay-marriage opponents filed legal briefs Monday accusing California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown of having “invented an entirely new theory,” one that “fails at every level,” in his quest to find a reason to invalidate Proposition 8, which passed with 52% of the vote in November.

    “The people have the final word on what the California Constitution says,” lawyers for the Protect Marriage Coalition wrote. “The practical result of the attorney general’s theory is that the people can never amend the Constitution to overrule judicial interpretations of inalienable rights.”

    The filing, which was co-written by Whitewater prosecutor and Pepperdine Law School Dean Kenneth Starr, came in response to a brief filed two weeks ago by the attorney general in which Brown surprised legal experts with a novel theory to argue that Proposition 8 should be invalidated.

    Brown’s theory, Starr wrote, is “utterly without foundation in this court’s case law” and “is not only unprecedented but contradicts the most basic understanding of the role of the judiciary in a constitutional democracy.”

    The attorney general has a legal duty to uphold state laws, and Brown, though he personally supports same-sex marriage, had pledged to defend Proposition 8 after gay-rights activists and California cities filed lawsuits challenging it the day after the election.

    But in a move that outraged supporters of Proposition 8 and took even gay-rights activists by surprise, Brown’s brief instead urged the court to toss the proposition, declaring that “the amendment process cannot be used to extinguish fundamental constitutional rights without compelling justification.” Brown argued that the California Constitution protects the right to marry as inalienable.

    Legal experts said Starr and the Protect Marriage coalition had made a strong counter-argument in their filing Monday.

    Santa Clara University Law professor Gerald Uelmen, an expert on the state high court, said it “hits the nail on the head.”

    “If you think of the Constitution as a compact between the people and those who govern us, to say the people have no power to amend a court’s ruling simply because the court . . . says this is an inalienable right — I think that is pretty far out.”

    All of the legal filings before the California Supreme Court are here.

    The Protect Marriage Coalition legal brief in response to California Attorney General Jerry Brown’s brief is here (PDF).

    The California Supreme Court will likely hear oral arguments in March and render a ruling sometime this late spring or early summer.

    Stay tuned…….

    Previous:

    Jerry Brown, Kenneth Starr and California Proposition 8


    Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • Barack Obama,  Rod Blagojevich,  Roland Burris

    Harry Reid Gets his Way: Roland Burris Refused U.S. Senate Seat

    Roland-Burris-Refused-Seat-

    Not really a shocker since Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said for days that Roland Burris would not be seated today.

    Former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris announced his rejection for Barack Obama’s Senate seat Tuesday in a bizarre rainy-day scene on the Capitol grounds as lawmakers awaited the gaveling of the 111th Congress into session.

    Standing amid a huge throng of reporters and television cameras in a cold and steady rain, Burris, 71, declared that he had been informed that “my credentials are not in order and will not be accepted.”

    He said he was “not seeking to have any type of confrontation” over taking the seat that he was appointed to by embattled Gov. Rod Blagojevich. But Burris also said he was looking at options for taking the seat.

    Harry Reid and his Democrat Senate colleagues will try to work out a deal with Burris and formalize it when they have a meeting tomorrow. In the meantime, the Illinois Supreme Court may rule at any time about Burris’ credentials of appointment that the Illinois Secretary of State have refused to sign.

    If there was a deal in the making, certainly Harry Reid and President-elect Obama would have preferred to spare the political world the drama of turning away an African-American from the Senate. The sticking point in any negotaitions is probably whether Burris who is in his 70’s would run for re-election in 2010 in the special election. Harry Reid has made it clear he prefers Asian American woman Tammy Duckworth for the position since he beleives she is more electable than Burris against a GOP challenger.

    However, with “pay to play” already dogging the incoming Obama Administration, Reid et. al. may be hesitant to offer too much lest they be picked up on tape.

    Flap predicts that Burris will be ultimately seated and if need be he will file suit in the U.S. Supreme Court to force Reid’s hand.


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Air America,  Day By Day,  Roland Burris

    Flapsblog.com: Day By Day by Chris Muir January 6, 2009 – ColorGuard It

    Day By Day 010609

    Day By Day by Chris Muir

    Roland Burris, the duly appointed Junior Senator from Illinois is on route to the U.S. Capitol and likely will be turned away from taking his seat by the Secretary of the U.S. Senate. The claim will be his papers from Illinois are NOT in order.

    This is a PR disaster for Harry Reid and the Senate Democrats.

    The campaign for the 2010 Congressional elections begins today.

    Previous:

    The Day By Day Archive


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Del.icio.us Links

    links for 2009-01-06

    • When it comes to statewide politics, the biggest question this year is: Dianne Feinstein – senator or governor?

      Actually, Dianne would love to have both jobs. Ultimately, however, my bet is that she stays in the Senate to head the intelligence committee and passes on running to succeed Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010.

      There's another bet, and this one's a sure thing: Jerry Brown is running for governor, regardless of whether Feinstein is in the race. He's already too far down the tracks to turn back.

      The main challenge for Brown in the coming year will be how to send the message to Feinstein that he isn't budging, but to do it in a way that doesn't offend her. Because even if he succeeds in keeping her out of the Democratic primary, he's going to need her support to get elected.
      +++++
      Di Fi would whip Brown in the Democrat Primary and might just run after Panetta was appointed to be CIA Chief.

    • Willie Brown, the former San Francisco mayor and legendary speaker of the California Assembly, dropped an intriguing suggestion — seemingly out of the blue — in his column yesterday in the San Francisco Chronicle. He suggested that Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell would be the instant favorite should he decide to run for lieutenant governor in 2010. The suggestion is intriguing for two reasons: (1) Brown has been a long-time mentor to O'Connell. The two have been close since their days in the Assembly, when O'Connell, who represented Ventura County in the Legislature for two decades, served as speaker pro tem under Brown. And, (2) O'Connell has publicly insisted that the only political office he's interested in seeking in 2010 is governor.Was Brown using his column to tell O'Connell that he should lower his sights? Or was he using it to prop up a fallback position for his protege?
      +++++++++
      Gavin Newsom could beat Jackl in a heartbeat in the Dem Primary election.
    • Vandals spray-painted swastikas on a Catholic church in San Francisco's Castro District Saturday night.

      It appears the vandals are upset about the Catholic church's support of Proposition 8, which made same-sex marriage illegal in California.

      But, the Most Holy Redeemer Catholic Church on Diamond Street is gay-friendly. Many parishioners voted against Prop 8 and they are upset their church was targeted.

    • Vandals may have marked up the wrong church Saturday night in an apparent revolt against Proposition 8 supporters.

      Black spray-painted swastikas marred the front of Most Holy Redeemer Catholic Church in San Francisco's Castro district. Though the church itself is gay friendly, the proposed ban on gay marriage had support from prominent Catholics up to and including Pope Benedict.

      Pastor Steve Meriweather told KCBS his parishioners actually share the vandals' sentiment against Prop 8. "I think it's unfortunate that they selected our community to attack," said Meriweather, "because it's the wrong one."

      Some attending mass at Holy Redeemer in the heart of the Castro are calling it a hate crime. San Francisco Police have been called in to investigate.
      ++++++
      Oh the tolerance…..

    • The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights sent out an e-mail this morning urging Catholics to call San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom to protest vandalism over the weekend at Most Holy Redeemer Catholic Church in the city’s Castro District.

      The e-mail claims that opponents of Proposition 8, which amended the California Constitution to ban gay marriage, defaced the church with swastikas alongside the names of Pope Benedict XVI and the San Francisco archbishop.

      (tags: gaymarriage)
    • Waterford Wedgwood said on Monday that its 10 British units and 4 businesses in Ireland were placed into administration, similar to bankruptcy protection in the United States, after running out of money and failing to find a buyer. The remaining subsidiaries, including those in the United States, Germany and Canada, remain unaffected.

      The auditor, Deloitte, was appointed as administrator of the troubled businesses, which employ 2,700, or more than half of Waterford’s 5,000 employees. The units will continue to operate until the administrator decides to sell, close or reorganize them.
      ++++++
      Damn Flap loves their crystal……

    • The action concludes the recount, with Democrat Franken ahead by 225 votes. No election certificate can be issued for at least seven days, and the Coleman campaign has said it plans a legal challenge.
    • Charles Krauthammer has an absolutely compelling, and completely unexpected, argument for a gasoline tax in the Weekly Standard. He proposes a $1 per gallon tax that would be revenue neutral, 100% redistributed into payroll taxes and social security checks. This is not a new idea. (I wrote a column proposing a gas tax-payroll tax swap a few years ago; others came well before me.) And Krauthammer is, not surprisingly, more sympathetic to the national security arguments for higher gasoline prices than the environmental ones–Krauthammer remains unconvinced that global warming is man-made. But it is fascinating to see this proposal on the cover of Bill Kristol's magazine. (And yes, one might argue ulterior motives–let a Democrat self-immolate by imposing a gas tax…one wonders where Krauthammer was on this issue the past eight years?)
    • Americans have a deep and understandable aversion to gasoline taxes. In a culture more single-mindedly devoted to individual freedom than any other, tampering with access to the open road is met with visceral opposition. That's why earnest efforts to alter American driving habits take the form of regulation of the auto companies–the better to hide the hand of government and protect politicians from the inevitable popular backlash.
      ++++++
      A ridiculous notion indeed.
    • The number of Americans who consider themselves to be Democrats inched up again in December to 41.6%. That’s up two-tenths of a point since November and the third straight monthly increase in the number of Democrats.
    • "Besides Republicans, it was the minority voters voting for it," DeVore said. "You're not necessarily going to win all the African American and Latino vote by supporting these social issues, but you're sure not going to win them by abandoning these issues. You're not going to appeal to them solely with limited government and tax cuts."

      However, DeVore is less eager to tackle immigration.

      "Immigration is already declining as an issue as the economy struggles and many people repatriate themselves," he said, adding that anti-immigration stances deter Latino voters.

      "The future of the Republican Party isn't in white voters," he said. "That demographic is dying."
      +++++++
      Chuck DeVore is becoming a RINO Panda Bear like Arnold in order to beat Barbara Boxer.