<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Proposition 8 Re: Gay Marriage Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/</link>
	<description>Flap&#039;s Comments on Politics, the Dental World and Much More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Bruno</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/#comment-143070</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/#comment-143070</guid>
		<description>Apparently Kenneth Starr, believes the 18,000 marriages were not void ab initio. Lesbians and gays are &quot;a suspect class.&quot; Good reasons why George et al the &quot;wise four&quot; to in essence sustain their original opinion. Even Starr was conceding a world of judical nihilism in arguing that these once valid marriages would have to now rely on the protection of the &quot;putative spouse doctrine.&quot; It is amazing to hear that an admittedly suspect class can find protection in the latest &quot;separate but equal&quot; quick fix. You can just see both the interminable and quixotic world of juris prudence to rise from this ersatz approach. Ironic is the fact that this very Court, expressly refused requests to stay the performance of the eventual 18,000 marriages.

The most laughable and buffoonish aspect of all this was to hear a Roman Catholic Archbishop preaching morality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Kenneth Starr, believes the 18,000 marriages were not void ab initio. Lesbians and gays are &#8220;a suspect class.&#8221; Good reasons why George et al the &#8220;wise four&#8221; to in essence sustain their original opinion. Even Starr was conceding a world of judical nihilism in arguing that these once valid marriages would have to now rely on the protection of the &#8220;putative spouse doctrine.&#8221; It is amazing to hear that an admittedly suspect class can find protection in the latest &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; quick fix. You can just see both the interminable and quixotic world of juris prudence to rise from this ersatz approach. Ironic is the fact that this very Court, expressly refused requests to stay the performance of the eventual 18,000 marriages.</p>
<p>The most laughable and buffoonish aspect of all this was to hear a Roman Catholic Archbishop preaching morality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Frost</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/#comment-143065</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/#comment-143065</guid>
		<description>WOW, that&#039;s really serious precedent... Would the authorities marriage them? Or they alredy do that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, that&#8217;s really serious precedent&#8230; Would the authorities marriage them? Or they alredy do that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flap</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/#comment-143037</link>
		<dc:creator>Flap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/#comment-143037</guid>
		<description>Go here: http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-appears-to-be-ready-to-uphold-constitutionality-of-proposition-8/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go here: <a href="http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-appears-to-be-ready-to-uphold-constitutionality-of-proposition-8/">http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-appears-to-be-ready-to-uphold-constitutionality-of-proposition-8/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/#comment-143036</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flapsblog.com/2009/03/05/california-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-proposition-8-re-gay-marriage-today/#comment-143036</guid>
		<description>What is going on here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is going on here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

