Archive for February, 2010
Former California Congressman Tom Campbell who has accepted campaign contributions from prominent Muslim activist Sami al-Arian who is alleged to have formed with others a terrorist support network across the United States and who pled guilty to conspiring to help associates of the terrorist group Palestinian Islamic Jihad
I wrote a few weeks ago about former California Congressman and current U.S. Senate candidate Tom Campbell and the problems with his anti-Israel voting record.
Today, Jennifer Rubin over at Commentary has more on his Muslim activist terrorist associations, including Sami al-Arian
Sami al-Arian, a University of South Florida computer-science professor and prominent Muslim activist, handed out $1,000 contributions to [Rep. Cynthia] McKinney and other lawmakers during a short burst of political giving between 1998 and 2001. … Al-Arian’s first legal campaign contribution on record was a $200 donation in 1998 to re-elect his local congressman, Rep. Jim Davis (D-Fla.), according to FEC records. Between 1999 and early 2001, the Islamist leader and his wife, Nahla, gave larger, multiple contributions to the campaigns of McKinney ($2,000), [David] Bonior ($3,200) and [Tom] Campbell ($1,300).
And, Rubin has more:
What was Al-Arian up to and why did he favor then Congressman (and now Senate candidate) Tom Campbell? The report continues that Al-Arian and other Muslim figures were looking to do away with â€provisions of the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which allowed federal authorities to use classified information as a basis on which to hold foreign terrorist suspects and to deny that information to the suspects’ defense attorneys. The thinking behind the law, congressional sources say, was to allow domestic law-enforcement services to use foreign intelligence as evidence on which to detain and deport the foreign suspects. Much of that intelligence could not be revealed to the defense because it would put the sources of that intelligence in physical danger.†(Campbell, in fact, testified in favor of his donor’s position at a congressional hearing.)
Beyond that, the report tells us that a Campbell staffer “serve[d] as point man on the issue. That staffer, according to the program and subsequent AMC newsletter, spoke to an event for training Muslim activists on ‘How to Lobby Congress.’ The published agenda of the AMC’s June 2001 national conference shows that al-Arian was another AMC lobbying coach who helped train activists from around the country in lobbying Congress.†That staffer was most likely Suhail Khan, who served as Campbell’s policy director and press secretary. And lo and behold, he appeared at the very same CAIR conference in 2009 – with none other than Hussain. (Campbell, too, was a CAIR fan. When a new headquarters opened in June 2000, “several members of Congress, including Republican Congressmen Tom Campbell and Democrat James Moran also came to lend their support.â€) What a small world.
Moreover, here is the FEC report on the campaign money Tom Campbell accepted from Sami al-Arian
AL-ARIAN, SAMI TAMPA, FL 33687 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
Now, come on Tom.
What the hell were you doing back in 2000 with these Muslim activists with shady associations. Why did you accept the money? Did you return the contributions and what is your position on Sami al-Arian today?
Philip Klein has MORE over at the American Spectator.
His involvement went further than that. Later in 2000, Campbell wrote a letter to an immigration judge on behalf of Mazen Al-Najjar, Al-Arain’s brother-in-law and collaborator, protesting the fact that the government was going to use classified evidence against him.
According to a Sept. 1, 2000 article in the St. Petersburg Times that I accessed via Nexis:
This week, two members of the U.S. House, one a Republican and one a Democrat, sent a letter to (Judge R. Kevin) McHugh asking him not to resort to secret evidence because high-ranking government officials have serious doubts.
“National Security Adviser (Sandy) Berger stated that he had seen the secret portions of the government’s investigation in this matter and had misgivings about it,” wrote Democratic Whip David Bonior of Michigan and U.S. Rep. Tom Campbell, R-Calif. The two have introduced legislation to ban the use of secret evidence as unconstitutional.
In his plea deal, Al-Arain admitted that he concealed his knowledge that Al-Najjar was an associate of Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Ok, as a California voter, Tom, explain to me what gives with supporting these Muslim terrorist shills and giving them political access to you?
Update:
Here is Tom Campbell’s fairly weak sauce response over at American Spectator.
The question is: incompetence, stupdity, or naivety? Take your pick.
I won’t EVER be voting for Tom Campbell – for any office.
Technorati Tags: Tom_Campbell, Sami_al-Arian
Tags: Sami_al-Arian
1 Comment »
Former California Congressman Tom Campbell who has accepted campaign contributions from prominent Muslim activist Sami al-Arian who is alleged to have formed with others a terrorist support network across the United States and who pled guilty to conspiring to help associates of the terrorist group Palestinian Islamic Jihad
I wrote a few weeks ago about former California Congressman and current U.S. Senate candidate Tom Campbell and the problems with his anti-Israel voting record.
Today, Jennifer Rubin over at Commentary has more on his Muslim activist terrorist associations, including Sami al-Arian
Sami al-Arian, a University of South Florida computer-science professor and prominent Muslim activist, handed out $1,000 contributions to [Rep. Cynthia] McKinney and other lawmakers during a short burst of political giving between 1998 and 2001. … Al-Arian’s first legal campaign contribution on record was a $200 donation in 1998 to re-elect his local congressman, Rep. Jim Davis (D-Fla.), according to FEC records. Between 1999 and early 2001, the Islamist leader and his wife, Nahla, gave larger, multiple contributions to the campaigns of McKinney ($2,000), [David] Bonior ($3,200) and [Tom] Campbell ($1,300).
And, Rubin has more:
What was Al-Arian up to and why did he favor then Congressman (and now Senate candidate) Tom Campbell? The report continues that Al-Arian and other Muslim figures were looking to do away with â€provisions of the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which allowed federal authorities to use classified information as a basis on which to hold foreign terrorist suspects and to deny that information to the suspects’ defense attorneys. The thinking behind the law, congressional sources say, was to allow domestic law-enforcement services to use foreign intelligence as evidence on which to detain and deport the foreign suspects. Much of that intelligence could not be revealed to the defense because it would put the sources of that intelligence in physical danger.†(Campbell, in fact, testified in favor of his donor’s position at a congressional hearing.)
Beyond that, the report tells us that a Campbell staffer “serve[d] as point man on the issue. That staffer, according to the program and subsequent AMC newsletter, spoke to an event for training Muslim activists on ‘How to Lobby Congress.’ The published agenda of the AMC’s June 2001 national conference shows that al-Arian was another AMC lobbying coach who helped train activists from around the country in lobbying Congress.†That staffer was most likely Suhail Khan, who served as Campbell’s policy director and press secretary. And lo and behold, he appeared at the very same CAIR conference in 2009 – with none other than Hussain. (Campbell, too, was a CAIR fan. When a new headquarters opened in June 2000, “several members of Congress, including Republican Congressmen Tom Campbell and Democrat James Moran also came to lend their support.â€) What a small world.
Moreover, here is the FEC report on the campaign money Tom Campbell accepted from Sami al-Arian
AL-ARIAN, SAMI TAMPA, FL 33687 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
Now, come on Tom.
What the hell were you doing back in 2000 with these Muslim activists with shady associations. Why did you accept the money? Did you return the contributions and what is your position on Sami al-Arian today?
Philip Klein has MORE over at the American Spectator.
His involvement went further than that. Later in 2000, Campbell wrote a letter to an immigration judge on behalf of Mazen Al-Najjar, Al-Arain’s brother-in-law and collaborator, protesting the fact that the government was going to use classified evidence against him.
According to a Sept. 1, 2000 article in the St. Petersburg Times that I accessed via Nexis:
This week, two members of the U.S. House, one a Republican and one a Democrat, sent a letter to (Judge R. Kevin) McHugh asking him not to resort to secret evidence because high-ranking government officials have serious doubts.
“National Security Adviser (Sandy) Berger stated that he had seen the secret portions of the government’s investigation in this matter and had misgivings about it,” wrote Democratic Whip David Bonior of Michigan and U.S. Rep. Tom Campbell, R-Calif. The two have introduced legislation to ban the use of secret evidence as unconstitutional.
In his plea deal, Al-Arain admitted that he concealed his knowledge that Al-Najjar was an associate of Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Ok, as a California voter, Tom, explain to me what gives with supporting these Muslim terrorist shills and giving them political access to you?
Technorati Tags: Tom_Campbell, Sami_al-Arian
Tags: Sami_al-Arian
3 Comments »
 Day By Day by Chris Muir
Zed does know his military training – his s**t.
But, Chris, he is MARRIED now with a family. And, yes, he is struggling in the private sector with the Obama depression and all.
Perhaps Zed could teach his s**t at a military college or Homeland Security training site? Placing him in harms way would be unnecessary but deploying him in this way would help him and the United States in Afghanistan.
Previous: The Day By Day Archive
Technorati Tags: Day_By_Day
Comments Off
Posted by Flap in Twitter
Comments Off
-
Sen. Dianne Feinstein on Wednesday ended speculation that she might leave Congress to run for governor, a spokesman confirmed.
Feinstein spokesman Gil Duran said the San Francisco Democrat spoke with Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown on Wednesday morning and informed him she would not get into the race. Brown has yet to declare himself a candidate but has been raising money and is the only major Democrat still considering a run for the state's highest office.
Most observers did not expect that Feinstein would leave her powerful post in the Senate for a gubernatorial bid, but speculation persisted in some quarters, in part because she is a popular figure who could amass a lot of money, including some from her personal fortune.
+++++
No Surprise here. She would not beat Jerry Brown anyway
-
Former eBay CEO Meg Whitman now runs dead even with likely Democratic nominee Jerry Brown in California’s gubernatorial contest.
The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely California voters finds Republican hopeful Whitman and Brown tied with 43% each. Six percent (6%) like some other candidate, and eight percent (8%) are undecided.
A month ago, Brown, a longtime California political figure who now serves as attorney general, posted a four-point lead over Whitman, 43% to 39%. In November, the two were tied at 41% apiece.
++++++++
It is Meg's early advertising that has catapulted her to the forefront. Jerry borwn is too tied and worn out to win in November. Unless Whitman blows it she will be elected governor in the Fall.
-
A spokesman for FreedomWorks' chief Dick Armey posts a clarification:
The New York Times reported recently that FreedomWorks Chairman Dick Armey has endorsed Sen. John McCain in the GOP primary in Arizona. This is not the case, though this story has been picked up and repeated by countless media personalities and reporters around the country.
This seems to be a good case study in how false information can make its way around the Internet and the airwaves before it can be corrected. But we wanted to post a quick statement for all of you who have asked us about this.
Thanks!
+++++++
On the other hand….Armey's Tea Party group will NOT be involved in the McCain race
-
As former Rep. J.D. Hayworth prepares to officially enter the Republican primary race against incumbent Sen. John McCain, he probably had better not count on any support from FreedomWorks, the national conservative group closely associated with the Tea Party movement.
In a telephone interview former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, FreedomWorks' chairman, delivered a surprisingly harsh assessment of Hayworth, with whom he served on Capitol Hill:
"We're a small organization with a limited budget. There's an awful lot of places where our presence would be needed and can really make a difference. We don't see this Arizona race as one where we need to be actively involved. It's hard for us to believe that J.D. Hayworth could mount a credible challenge to John McCain. Obviously, we'll watch the race. But J.D. had a fairly short, undistinguished congressional career with virtually no initiative on his part. I just don't see any reason why we should be concerned about that race."
Comments Off

Warning, Warning. Somebodies head is going to roll at the White House.
52 percent of Americans said President Barack Obama doesn’t deserve reelection in 2012, according to a new poll.
44 percent of all Americans said they would vote to reelect the president in two and a half years, less than the slight majority who said they would prefer to elect someone else.
Obama faces a 44-52 deficit among both all Americans and registered voters, according to a CNN/Opinion Research poll released Tuesday. Four percent had no opinion.
At least Bill Clinton when his health care reform program FAILED with Hillary was able to salvage a re-election bid.
Will Obama be able to make a comeback?
What a difference a year makes.
More Democrat Congressional retirements to soon follow.
Technorati Tags: Barack_Obama
1 Comment »
In the latest Rasmussen poll, there are really NO surprises.
2010 Senate
- 46% Boxer (D), 42% Fiorina (R)
- 47% Boxer (D), 42% DeVore (R)
- 45% Boxer (D), 41% Campbell (R)
Favorable / Unfavorable
- Barbara Boxer: 51 / 46
- Chuck DeVore: 32 / 36
- Carly Fiorina: 37 / 40
- Tom Campbell: 44 / 33
The incumbent Senator Boxer is below 50 per cent approval and all three GOP contenders are showing strength against her. With Tom Campbell entering the race, it continues to be difficult to predict the mix of votes for the June GOP primary election. However, both Campbell and DeVore are at a financial campaign cash disadvantage to former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina.
Whoever can turn out their voters on primary day will win the Republican nomination.
If anything, having three contesting Republicans, all with good poll numbers heads up with Boxer, will limit the ability of the Democrats to run negative ads against them before June. If Boxer targets one of the Republicans, it might actually counterintuitively help that candidate beat her in the Fall.
Stay tuned…..
Technorati Tags: Barbara_Boxer, Carly_Fiorina, Chuck_DeVore, Tom_Campbell
Tags: Barbara Boxer, Carly Fiorina, Chuck DeVore
Comments Off
|