• Del.icio.us Links

    links for 2010-09-01

    • Boxer Attacked On…

      Carly’s Record At Hewlett-Packard

      But Carly’s Record Shows…

      Since Carly Fiorina’s Departure From HP, Experts Have Credited Her With Making HP A Stronger Company:

      Industry Experts Have Claimed That HP “Desperately Needed Someone Like” Fiorina. “But while analysts praise Hurd’s low-key style, many are quick to credit Fiorina for laying the groundwork. She was the biggest proponent of changing HP’s culture, and although her hard-charging style ultimately worked against her, HP desperately needed someone like her, said Roger L. Kay, president of Endpoint Technologies Associates.” (Rachel Konrad, “HP Is Hurd’s Now, But Ousted Fiorina Gets Some Credit For Revival,” The Associated Press, 8/17/06)

    • Boxer Mentioned…
      Her Legislative Record

      But The Record Shows…
      Boxer Is Nationally Recognized For Her Sparse Record In The Senate:

      “[Boxer’s] Press Clippings Are Many, Her Ceremonial Bill-Signing Pens Few.” (Adriel Bettelheim, “Wage Hike Fight One Of Many For A Leading Liberal,” Congressional Quarterly, 4/5/04)

      Boxer Acts As “Unremitting Activist” Pushing Ideological Proposals With Little Chance Of Passing Into Law. “While some politicians pride themselves on their ability to horse-trade and compromise in pursuit of legislation, she usually operates as an unremitting activist, offering proposals that have no chance of adoption just to make a point about how things ought to be.” (Adriel Bettelheim, “Wage Hike Fight One Of Many For A Leading Liberal,” Congressional Quarterly, 4/5/04)

    • It is important to remember that Palin doesn’t discriminate against establishment Republicans when picking who she endorses. For instance, Carly Fiorina received Palin’s endorsement late in the California primary race. For Fiorina, who wasn’t the Tea Party backed candidate, it was a huge boost to receive Palin’s endorsement, especially since many people didn’t realize or were misinformed over Fiorina’s conservative credentials.

      Thanks to Palin, Fiorina garnered enough of the conservative vote to win the primary and now has the general race with the leftist Barbara Boxer polling inside the margin of error. In the very liberal state of California, that is some pull from the Mama Grizzly.

      Out of all the Republican political players, Palin has to be the queen of the ball right now. Endorsements from Mike Huckabees, Mitt Romneys, and Newt Gingrichs of the world just don’t garner the same media buzz or scrutiny the way Palin’s endorsements do.

    • Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina is getting a hand from her could-be GOP colleagues in various forms this week.

      GOP Sen. John McCain hosted a fundraiser for Fiorina last night, Fiorina spokeswoman Andrea Saul confirmed today. Saul declined to comment on where the fundraiser was held or how much the Arizona senator raised for Fiorina, who served as an economic adviser during McCain's 2008 presidential bid, and said there are no plans for joint appearances on the campaign trail.

      Later this week, Fiorina's bank account is scheduled to get a boost from Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown.

      Brown, who became a symbol of momentum for Republicans in the wake of his special election victory, is listed as a special guest for a Thursday fundraiser in Newport Beach. Tickets for the evening cocktail reception and dinner range from $250 to $30,400.
      +++++++
      This race is bound to be expensive as the Dems pour all of their resources into defending Barbara Boxer

    • Ah, the unintended consequences of liberal judicial activism: According to experts, the Serrano decision “overlooked the fact that 75% of poor children lived in high spending districts,” and it thus “actually led to lower school spending for most poor children” and to “equalized mediocrity.” Further, Serrano and its follow-on rulings are credited with triggering the property-tax revolt that culminated in California’s Proposition 13—“After all, the logic goes, if increased property taxes don’t help our schools, why should we be for increased property taxes”—and helped lead to Ronald Reagan’s election as president in 1980.
      +++++++
      The begining of the end of California's then excellent public school system.
    • The study, which is drawn largely from Census data and labor statistics, cited the recession and increased border enforcement as possible reasons for the slowdown. Several South Atlantic states between Delaware and Georgia that have become new immigrant magnets in recent years have also seen a decline in its illegal migrant population, according to the study.

      California still has the largest concentration of illegal immigrants in the nation with 2.6 million, which is about 1 million more living in the state than in 1990, according to the report.

      The study echoes the findings of a report issued earlier this year by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which concluded that illegal immigration had declined by nearly 1 million between 2008 and 2009. This was the second consecutive year of decline and sharpest decrease in at least three decades.
      +++++++
      Well, perhaps.

      But, statistics can be manipulated and I do not trust the Pew Hispanic Center.

    • The federal government has posted signs along a major interstate highway in Arizona, more than 100 miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border, warning travelers the area is unsafe because of drug and alien smugglers, and a local sheriff says Mexican drug cartels now control some parts of the state.

      The signs were posted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) along a 60-mile stretch of Interstate 8 between Casa Grande and Gila Bend, a major east-west corridor linking Tucson and Phoenix with San Diego.
      ++++++
      Where is President Obama?

      Right! Having his Department of Justice taking Arizona to court.

  • Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina

    CA-Sen: Barbara Boxer Vs. Carly Fiorina – The Smackdown at St. Marys

    California Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer speaking at the San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board where she takes a few shots at her opponent Carly Fiorina

    The debate between Barbara Boxer and Carly Fiorina will start in less than an hour.

    With just a few hours to go until the “Smackdown at St. Mary’s” — the first televised U.S. Senate debate — incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer began throwing punches Tuesday at GOP candidate Carly Fiorina during a visit to the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board.

    Boxer, the three term U.S. Senator, ripped the former Hewlett Packard CEO for her record at the tech company, for her opposition to Obama’s Economic Recovery Act — and for suggesting the need for term limits for U.S. Senators and members of Congress.

    Boxer, in addition to calling for an exit strategy from the war in Afghanistan, also told us she sees herself and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown as a “ticket.” And she gave us a preview of what’s to come when she faces off with Fiorina Wednesday at 7 p.m. in a live hour-long televised debate (no commercial breaks!) at St. Mary’s College in Moraga.

    The debate is sponsored by the San Francisco Chronicle, KTVU Channel 2, Oakland, and KQED-FM radio.

    It will be moderated by KTVU political editor Randy Shandobil. The media panel is made up of Chronicle reporter Carla Marinucci (that would be me), La Opinion senior political writer Pilar Marrero and KQED radio host Scott Shafer.

    The political faceoff can seen and heard live in broadcasts around the state. Watch it on KTVU Channel 2 Oakland (which will also stream it live at ktvu.com), or listen on KQED-FM radio in the Bay Area and Sacramento.

    Other places to catch the action starting at 7 p.m.: KTTV (Los Angeles); KGTV (San Diego), KMPH (Fresno), KGET (Bakersfield), KCOY (Santa Barbara), KSBW (Salinas), KEMY and KRVU (Eureka and Chico), KMIR (Palm Springs), and KSWT (Yuma).

    And on radio, KQED-FM will be providing the feed live to other California Public Radio stations.

    I will be tweeting up my thoughts, observations and opinions during the Smackdown ————> in the right sidebar or Follow @Flap on Twitter.

  • Obamacare

    ObamaCare: Physicians Asking Patients to Vote for Repeal

    Fred Shessel, M.D. Docs4PatientCare.org

    Physicans are not going to accept ObamaCare, and lay in wait for the demise of their profession and private American medicine. They will take/make their case to their patients.

    Facing a nationwide backlash, Democratic congressional candidates have a new message for voters: We know you don’t like ObamaCare, so we’ll fix it.

    This was the line offered by Democrat Mark Critz, who won a special election in Pennsylvania’s 12th congressional district after expressing opposition to the law and promising to mend it—but not to repeal it. As a doctor I know something about unexpected recoveries, and this latest attempt to rescue ObamaCare from repeal needs to be taken seriously.

    For Democrats who voted for ObamaCare, this tactic is an escape route, a chance to distance themselves from the president with a vague promise to fix health-care reform in the next Congress.

    To counter this election-year ruse, my colleagues and I at Docs4PatientCare are enlisting thousands of doctors in an unorthodox and unprecedented action. Our patients have always expected a certain standard of care from their doctors, which includes providing them with pertinent information that may affect their quality of life. Because the issue this election is so stark—literally life and death for millions of Americans in the years ahead—we are this week posting a “Dear Patient” letter in our waiting rooms.

    Here is Dr. Hal Scherz’s plea:

    Dr. Hal Scherz tells doctors about ObamaCare

    Here is the letter:

    To My Patients,Section 1311 of the new health care legislation gives the US Secretary of Health and Human Services and her appointees the power to establish careguidelines that your doctor must abide by or face penalties and fines. In making doctors answerable in the federal bureaucracy this bill effectively makes them government employees and means that you and your doctor are no longer in charge of your health care decisions.

    This new law politicizes medicine and in my opinion destroys the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship that makes the American health care system the best in the world.

    In addition to also badly exacerbating the current doctor short age, the law will bring major cost increases, rising insur ance premiums, higher taxes, a decline in new medical techniques, a fall-off in the development of miracle drugs as well as rationing by government panels and bureaucrats like passionate rationing advocate Donald Berwick forcing delays of months or sometimes years for hospitalization or surgery. Finally, studies show the legislation will adversely affect the elderly, the poor and rural residents.

    Despite countless protests by doctors and overwhelming public opposition — up to 60% of Americans opposed this bill — the current party in control of Congress pushed this bill through with legal bribes and Chicagostyle threats and is determined now to resist any “repeal and replace” efforts.

    This doctor’s office is non-partisan — always has been, always will be. But the fact is that every Republican voted against this bad bill while the Democratic Party leadership and the White House completely dismissed the will of the people in ruthlessly pushing through this legislati on.

    In the face of voter anger some Democratic candidates are now trying to make a cosmetic retreat, calling for minor modifications or pret ending they are opposed to government-run medicine. Once the election is over, however, they will vote with their party bosses against repealing this bill. Please rememberwhen  you vote this November that unless the Democratic party receives a strong negative message about this power grab our health care system will never be fixed and the doctor patient relationship will be ruined forever.

    I will be glad to discuss this with you at the end of our consultation.

    Your Doctor

    I would say this is a fairly profoundly partisan statement which most physicians will be reluctant to pursue but WILL out of a sense of duty to their fellow Americans and patients.

  • Glenn Beck,  Sarah Palin

    Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin on 9/11 in Alaska – Oh My!

    Fox News’ Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin

    Oh My, is right.

    Moore, a green-eyed blonde who, like Palin, was once an Alaska beauty queen, albeit a few stripes more self-aware, drives her Subaru through downtown Anchorage, steering with one hand, holding a cigarette and her smartphone in the other. When Devon calls to tell her that Glenn Beck has booked the Dena’ina Center, the largest venue in Anchorage, for a speech on September 11, 2010, she sits bolt upright and yells. Immediately, they start trying to figure out what the news might mean. “Listen, listen, listen: Why in the world do you imagine Glenn Beck would come to Anchorage on 9/11? You think he might have a special guest? With a special announcement? Oh,” she says, her whole face falling as the implications of a Palin campaign kickoff hit her, “Jesus Christ.”

    Probably a joint book/speaking tour announcement or some other media event.

    But, you never know…….

  • Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina

    CA-Sen: Senator Barbara Boxer Lying About Condi Rice Remarks?

    California Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer at the San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board

    Apparently, as Debra Saunders has the goods.

    Boxer also said: “I was criticizing the fact that she didn’t know how many people died in Iraq. Absolutely I was.”

    There’s just one problem. Boxer never asked Rice how many U.S. troops had died in Iraq when she began her “personal price” remarks. In fact, Boxer had not asked Rice a single question. She was engaged in her usual filibustering.

    You can watch the exchange on C-SPAN, starting at about 01:42:48.

    I can see why Boxer would want to believe that she put her foot in her mouth — and somehow it was Rice’s fault, but the tale turns out to be a figment of Barbara Boxer’s self-aggrandizing imagination.

    Nice to know that Boxer’s foreign policy decisions/votes will be based on whether her children or grandchildren have a stake in the matter rather than what is best for the United Sates and/or California.

    Time for Boxer to go and elect Carly Fiorina.

  • Barack Obama,  Sarah Palin

    Sarah Palin Going to Iowa

    The Drudge center photo and this piece merit some attention after President Obama’s continuing fall in the polls.

    Sarah Palin’s scheduled political trip to Iowa this month marks a shift from near silence in the leadoff presidential nominating state to the kind of outreach common among White House prospects.

    Palin’s plan to headline the Iowa Republican Party’s annual fall fundraiser on Sept. 17 is solely to help raise money for the state party’s candidates, the former Alaska governor’s aides said.

    And one trip to Iowa is a long way from a successful campaign for the state’s 2012 presidential caucuses, still 18 months away, Iowa party insiders said.

    But Palin’s recent overtures to Iowa reveal a change in posture that puts her in a position — like other 2012 presidential prospects already laying campaign groundwork in Iowa — to build goodwill and relationships with influential activists, state Republican officials said.

    “It does signal an interest in helping Iowans be successful in 2010,” state Republican Party Chairman Matt Strawn said. “Iowa Republicans are going to look favorably on anybody that has come to this state this year to help us win in 2010.”

    Palin aides confirmed Tuesday that she plans to be the featured guest at the Iowa GOP’s Reagan Day dinner on Sept. 17. Palin is also planning yet-announced political stops that day, with the state party’s marquee Ronald Reagan dinner that evening.

    Sarah is keeping her 2012 powder dry and, in the meantime, collecting political favors for future use. If Obama continues to drive the economy south and his poll numbers fall below 45% my bet is that Sarah Palin will run.

  • Day By Day,  Dennis Hollingsworth

    Day By Day September 1, 2010 – Black and White



    Day By Day by Chris Muir

    Chris, it looks like Juliette has a winner of a novel here: Tale of the Tigers.

    Of course, I know her from her days with the California Bear Flag League and her blogging at Baldilocks.

    What is the Tale of the Tigers?

    At a southwestern university, a young man and a young woman do something that’s done every day: they fall in love. There’s just one thing–he’s white and she’s black.

    Set in the early 1990s, Tale of the Tigers tells the story of how the tables have turned on race relations and sexual jealousy and of how two young Americans weather the storm of that heritage in the post-Civil Rights Era.

    Go here and order your copy today. You won’t be disappointed.

    Previous:

    The Day By Day Archive

  • Twitter

    @Flap Twitter Updates for 2010-09-01

    Powered by Twitter Tools