Site Meter

Archive for September 26th, 2010

google plus Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%linkedin Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%pinterest Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%stumbleupon Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%reader Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%printfriendly Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%email Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%share save 171 16 Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%

++++++Update ++++++

From the Carly Fiorina campaign:

September 26, 2010

MEMORANDUM

TO: Interested Parties
FR: Martin Wilson, C ampaign Manager, Carly for California
RE: Los Angeles Times Poll/CA Senate Race Update
________________________________________________________________________

The just-released poll by the Los Angeles Times is neither an accurate nor a reliable reflection of voter interest or likely participation in the upcoming election.

Simply put, the Times poll overestimates Democratic voter participation by a wide margin, hence it produced skewed results that are inconsistent with other public and private polling in this race, including the respected Field Poll released on Friday. Specifically, the poll’s sample indicates that self-identified Democrats will hold a 16.75 percent advantage over Republicans, which is at least double what other credible polls indicate. In addition to understating the Republican vote, its results are based on 9 percent
participation of independent voters when, again, other pollsters estimate that at least 20 percent of the electorate will be comprised of swing voters.

With such an errant sampling methodology, we are amazed that Boxer’s lead over Carly is not in the double digits as opposed to the eight-point advantage they are giving the incumbent. At this stage and in light of the dynamics of the race during the time this survey was in the field, that is a gap that can, and will, be bridged in the coming weeks.

For 10 days, while this survey was being conducted, Barbara Boxer spent several million dollars on unanswered advertising mischaracterizing both her own record and Carly’s record. It is notable that, despite this, Barbara Boxer was unable to increase her standing with voters in the Field Poll. We are now answering back with the launch of our advertising campaign just 72 hours ago, after both the Times and Field polls had been completed. As this campaign moves forward and as voters become aware of the facts about Barbara Boxer, the hyper-partisan career politician, the dynamics in this race will change quickly. Over the course of the next 38 days, the spotlight will be squarely on
Barbara Boxer and the low road she has taken toward achieving higher office. Carly will stand in stark contrast to Boxer’s record of failure: a bipartisan problem solver who will use her real-world business experience to find common-sense solutions to solving our state and nation’s problems. As that happens, the numbers in this race will move, so hold on to your hats for an exciting and competitive race to November 2.

+++++++++++++

Pollster’s Interactive poll average graph: Boxer 47.9& Vs. Fiorina 44.2%

The latest poll in this race from the Los Angeles Times/USC is probably an outlier since the venerable California Field Poll has the race closer and they polled at about the same time. Also, there have been some documented deficiencies in the polling sample (Meg Whitman campaign)

There is strong evidence why the LA Times/USC Poll is out-of-step with the California Field Poll, despite the fact that they polled voters at the same time. The Field Poll conducted interviews from September 14-21 and the LAT/USC Poll was in the field September 15-22. The most significant difference is that the LAT/USC poll under-sampled Republicans. That’s why its results differ so sharply from Field and all the other recently reported public polls, as well as our own internal polls. Field provides a far truer representation of California’s 2010 electorate, in our estimation.

But…..this is yet another poll that has Carly Fiorina behind.


Pollster

Dates

N/Pop

Fiorina

Boxer

Other

Undecided

Margin

USC/LATimes
9/15-22/10 838 LV 43 51 - 4 +8D

SurveyUSA
9/19-21/10 610 LV 43 49 6 2 +6D

Field
9/14-21/10 599 LV 41 47 - 12 +6D

Rasmussen
9/20/10 750 LV 43 47 4 6 +4D

FOX
9/18/10 1000 LV 46 47 3 4 +1D

PPP (D)
9/14-16/10 614 LV 42 50 - 8 +8D

FOX
9/11/10 1000 LV 44 46 4 6 +2D

Rasmussen
9/6/10 750 LV 48 47 2 3 +1R

Barbara Boxer has been running television ads statewide for a couple of weeks while Fiorina just started a few days ago.

Now, is the time for Fiorina, before early and absentee voting starts, to light up the California television airwaves – if she wants to win.

google plus Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%linkedin Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%pinterest Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%stumbleupon Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%reader Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%printfriendly Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%email Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%share save 171 16 Updated   CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%
Tags: ,

Comments 3 Comments »

google plus CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%linkedin CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%pinterest CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%stumbleupon CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%reader CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%printfriendly CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%email CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%share save 171 16 CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%

Pollster’s Interactive poll average graph: Boxer 47.9& Vs. Fiorina 44.2%

The latest poll in this race from the Los Angeles Times/USC is probably an outlier since the venerable California Field Poll has the race closer and they polled at about the same time. Also, there have been some documented deficiencies in the polling sample (Meg Whitman campaign)

There is strong evidence why the LA Times/USC Poll is out-of-step with the California Field Poll, despite the fact that they polled voters at the same time. The Field Poll conducted interviews from September 14-21 and the LAT/USC Poll was in the field September 15-22. The most significant difference is that the LAT/USC poll under-sampled Republicans. That’s why its results differ so sharply from Field and all the other recently reported public polls, as well as our own internal polls. Field provides a far truer representation of California’s 2010 electorate, in our estimation.

But…..this is yet another poll that has Carly Fiorina behind. 


Pollster

Dates

N/Pop

Fiorina

Boxer

Other

Undecided

Margin

USC/LATimes
9/15-22/10 838 LV 43 51 - 4 +8D

SurveyUSA
9/19-21/10 610 LV 43 49 6 2 +6D

Field
9/14-21/10 599 LV 41 47 - 12 +6D

Rasmussen
9/20/10 750 LV 43 47 4 6 +4D

FOX
9/18/10 1000 LV 46 47 3 4 +1D

PPP (D)
9/14-16/10 614 LV 42 50 - 8 +8D

FOX
9/11/10 1000 LV 44 46 4 6 +2D

Rasmussen
9/6/10 750 LV 48 47 2 3 +1R

Barbara Boxer has been running television ads statewide for a couple of weeks while Fiorina just started a few days ago.

Now, is the time for Fiorina, before early and absentee voting starts, to light up the California television airwaves – if she wants to win.

google plus CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%linkedin CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%pinterest CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%stumbleupon CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%reader CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%printfriendly CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%email CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%share save 171 16 CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 51% Vs. Carly Fiorina 43%
Tags: ,

Comments Comments Off

google plus CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?linkedin CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?pinterest CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?stumbleupon CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?reader CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?printfriendly CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?email CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?share save 171 16 CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?

California Attorney General and Democrat nominee for Governor Jerry Brown’s latest television ad. In this ad Brown attempts to reinvent himself again (LIES to voters) about increasing taxes and local control of government

Well, if you believe the LA Times/USC poll Brown is ahead by five points (49%-44%) but there are some problems with the polling samples.

There is strong evidence why the LA Times/USC Poll is out-of-step with the California Field Poll, despite the fact that they polled voters at the same time. The Field Poll conducted interviews from September 14-21 and the LAT/USC Poll was in the field September 15-22. The most significant difference is that the LAT/USC poll under-sampled Republicans. That’s why its results differ so sharply from Field and all the other recently reported public polls, as well as our own internal polls. Field provides a far truer representation of California’s 2010 electorate, in our estimation.

My belief which is supported by the venerable California Field Poll and polling averages is that the election is very close. Look at the poll average graph below.

Pollster Interactive CA-Gov Poll Average Graph (Meg Whitman 45.7% Vs Jerry Brown 44.8%)

In my various social ventures (in person) outside the blogosphere nobody and I mean nobody is discussing Jerry Brown or Barbara Boxer – absolutely no idol conversation about the coming elections at all. There are no signs, bumper stickers or anything in the lefty parts of Los Angeles. I cannot foresee an enthusiastic turnout for the Democrats in November – at least not in heavily Democratic Los Angeles County.

This is a very good sign for Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina.

google plus CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?linkedin CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?pinterest CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?stumbleupon CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?reader CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?printfriendly CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?email CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?share save 171 16 CA Gov Poll Watch: Is Jerry Brown Really Ahead of Meg Whitman?
Tags: ,

Comments Comments Off

google plus Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAlinkedin Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIApinterest Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAstumbleupon Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAreader Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAprintfriendly Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAemail Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAshare save 171 16 Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIA

0926101155389 Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIA

Day by Day by Chris Muir

Chris, American voters now understand how they were hoodwinked by Rahm Emanuel (now President Obama’s Chief of Staff) in the 2006 election cycle by portraying Democrats as conservatives in red-leaning Congressional Districts. Of course, said Democrats post-election, have voted for Speaker Pelosi’s Far-Left San Francisco agenda – in lockstep.

Now, voters will hold them accountable.

What is the difference between now and 2006?

No, it is not the fact that Rahm is no longer there (as the Chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee) to hold the Democratic Congressional candidate’s hand. Since this time, the internet has expanded and voters have more current information – like how their own Congressional Representatives have voted. YouTube, Twitter and Facebook have all contributed to the idiom: “You can run but you can’t hide.”

Previous:

The Day By Day Archive

google plus Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAlinkedin Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIApinterest Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAstumbleupon Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAreader Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAprintfriendly Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAemail Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIAshare save 171 16 Day By Day September 26, 2010   MIA
Tags:

Comments Comments Off

©Gregory Flap Cole All Rights Reserved