• Del.icio.us Links

    links for 2010-09-29

    • South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint last week accused his Senate Republican colleagues of doing “everything” in their power to help Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s write-in campaign against GOP nominee Joe Miller.

      And he pounded them in a fundraising solicitation for doing “business as usual,” just as he “thought Republicans in Washington were beginning to get the message.”

      Turns out Republicans got his message — they just didn’t like it.

      A number of Republican senators told POLITICO Tuesday that DeMint was skewing the GOP Conference’s position solidly backing Miller, saying he was intensifying a rift within a party that’s trying to unite following a divisive primary season. And Republican leaders say DeMint’s decision to lay out to his supporters the debate about Murkowski in the closed-door meeting was a clear breach of protocol where senators don’t discuss private sessions between colleagues with outsiders.
      +++++++
      Read it all

      (tags: jim_demint)
    • In an age of diminished resources, the United States may be heading for an intensifying confrontation between the gray and the brown.

      Two of the biggest demographic trends reshaping the nation in the 21st century increasingly appear to be on a collision course that could rattle American politics for decades. From one direction, racial diversity in the United States is growing, particularly among the young. Minorities now make up more than two-fifths of all children under 18, and they will represent a majority of all American children by as soon as 2023, demographer William Frey of the Brookings Institution predicts.
      ++++++
      Read it all

      He misreads racial and cultural assimilation and the question of legal immigration to provide better educated workers

      (tags: democrats GOP)
    • A new poll indicates that the Democrats are opening up leads in the California battles for senator and governor.

      According to a CNN/Time/Opinion Research Corporation poll released Wednesday, 52 percent of likely voters in the Golden State say they support Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, with 43 percent backing Republican challenger Carly Fiorina.

      In the fight for governor, the poll indicates that 52 percent of likely voters back California Attorney General and former Gov. Jerry Brown, the Democratic nominee, with 43 percent supporting former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, the GOP nominee.
      ++++++
      Hard to believe this poll but it may spur voter turnout to vote against the Dems.

    • Get an outline map showing the 50 states and take a look at the latest poll averages in pollster.com in each race for senator and governor. Color in the percentage (rounded off; no need for tenths) by which either the Republican or Democratic candidate is leading (I use blue for Republicans, red for Democrats) in each state.

      The results are revealing, even breathtaking.
      +++++++
      Read all of the analysis with its implications for the 2012 Presidential race.

      (tags: democrats GOP)
    • Thanks to the leadership of President Obama, Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid, the Democratic Party is facing the biggest defeat in midterm elections in the past 110 years, perhaps surpassing the modern record of a 74-seat gain set in 1922. They will also lose control of the Senate.

      Republicans are now leading in 54 Democratic House districts. In 19 more, the incumbent congressman is under 50 percent and his GOP challenger is within five points. That makes 73 seats where victory is within easy grasp for the Republican Party. The only reason the list is not longer is that there are 160 Democratic House districts that were considered so strongly blue that there is no recent polling available.
      ++++++++
      A perfect storm and wave for the GOP

    • Former Massachusetts Governor Michael S. Dukakis, the failed 1988 presidential nominee, recently visited the White House and delivered his strategy for the midterm elections: pound key precincts across the country with the message that Republicans want to implement the same policies that led to the Great Recession.

      Dukakis, who said in a telephone interview that he "popped in" to the White House while on a trip here several weeks ago, said he told aides to President Obama that Republicans "want to go back and do exactly what got us in this mess in the first place."

      "It seems to me there has to be a single message coming from Democrats, from the president on down," Dukakis said. "We've got to pound that message as hard as can from now until November."

      Asked if the White House aides were receptive, he said, "I think they certainly get it." He declined to name the aides he met at the White House.
      ++++++
      Don't think it will help the Dems much – advice from this loser.

  • Jerry Brown,  Meg Whitman

    CA-Gov: Meg Whitman and Nicky the Illegal Alien Maid

    Oh dirty politics in a close campaign is always a nasty affair. You know the story: the rich Meg Whitman running for California Governor is a hypocrite because she had an illegal alien working for her household while she has called for tougher laws against employers doing the exact same thing.

    Then, there are the details where Nicky, the maid lied and submitted false documents and Meg Whitman and her doctor husband when they discovered that Nicky was illegal fired her – treating her like dirt or at least unseemingly (so Nicky claims).

    Here is a video of California Republican Meg Whitman responding:

    The bottom line is whether this hurts Meg Whitman’s campaign for California governor?

    Probably, a little.

    But, if California voters cannot get past this obvious set up and dirty trick then they deserve the calamity which Jerry Brown and his merry band of union controlled Democrats will deliver.

  • Albert Greenwood Brown,  Death Penalty

    California Calls Off the Scheduled Execution of Albert Greenwood Brown – FINALLY

    Albert Greenwood Brown, the next to die under California Death Penalty law?

    After many days of legal maneuvers and machinations, the scheduled execution of Albert Greenwood Brown has been called off by the State of California.

    State officials called off the scheduled execution of a convicted murderer Wednesday, hours after the California Supreme Court intervened in the case and made it all but impossible to carry out the death sentence.

    The attorney general’s office had begun the day by asking a federal appeals court to allow the execution of Albert Greenwood Brown Jr. to proceed but later asked the court to dismiss the request. Brown had been scheduled to be put to death by lethal injection at 9  p.m. Thursday.

    “A new execution date will be sought in accordance with applicable law and in conformity with all court orders,” said Christine Gasparac, a spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office.

    The high court said a separate challenge of the state’s protocol for lethal injection remains pending, and the state cannot proceed until that is resolved. That challenge was brought by other death row inmates in Marin County Superior Court.

    And, since the appeal will not be decided by Friday when the sodium thiopental drug expires, California will not be able to execute Brown or any other inmate on Death row until sometime during the first quarter of 2011.

    In the meantime, while the California Supreme Court was working its will, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger denied Browm clemency.

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger denied a request for clemency Wednesday for a convicted murderer and rapist at the center of a frenetic legal battle over whether California should resume executions after a nearly five-year gap.

    Attorneys for Albert Greenwood Brown had asked the governor to reduce his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole, arguing that jurors in his 1982 murder trial never heard about the full extent of the mental impairment that affected his ability to control his impulses.

    But Schwarzenegger noted that other courts had reviewed the same evidence and concluded it would not have affected the outcome of Brown’s trial. In addition, the governor cited the brutality of Brown’s crime and the “overwhelming” evidence pointing to his guilt.

    Brown was convicted of raping and murdering a 15-year-old girl. Prosecutors accused him of making taunting phone calls to the victim’s mother after the girl vanished.

    “The guilt and aggravating evidence is overwhelming, and the mitigation evidence is just the opposite,” Schwarzenegger wrote in his clemency denial. “Brown’s jury reasonably concluded that a penalty of death was appropriate in this case, and I have no reason to disagree.”

    But, alas, Brown will NOT be executed tomorrow and all of his criminal cronies at San Quentin Death Row will have another Thanksgiving and Christmas season to enjoy while the state and federal courts consider numerous appeals and the California Department of Corrections attempts to restock its stockpile of sodium thiopental.  Too bad the victims murdered by Brown and the other murderers will not receive the justice that is due them. Many of said victims have been waiting thirty years or more.

    A travesty of justice.

    Previous:


    Shocker: Federal Judge Jeremy Fogel Stays Thursday Execution of Albert Greenwood Brown

    Updated: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Orders a New Hearing for Albert Greenwood Brown – U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel Calls for Briefs

    Albert Greenwood Brown’s Execution Delayed by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

    U.S. District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel Clears Path for California Executions to Resume  But Will They?

    California Executions to Resume? Albert Greenwood Brown Would Be Next

    California Executions May Resume By the End of 2008

    Michael Morales Watch: US Supreme Court Upholds Lethal Injection Executions

    Michael Morales Watch: Lethal Injection Hearings Delayed Again

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Halts Construction of San Quentin Death Chamber

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: New San Quentin Death Chamber Under Construction

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Proposes Revised 5-Point Lethal Injection Protocol

    Michael Morales Watch: Judge  Jeremy Fogel Rules  California Method of Lethal Injection Violates a Constitutional Ban on Cruel and Unusual Punishment

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: Execution Postponed INDEFINITELY

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: Execution Tonight?

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: Execution Delayed by Doctor Walk Out

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: United States Supreme Court Refuses to Halt Morales Execution

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Denies Clemency Petition

    Michael Angelo Moreno Watch: State Agrees to Place Anesthesia Expert in Death Chamber

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: Lawyers Withdraw Allegedly Faked Juror Statements Supporting Their Clemency Bid

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: Federal Judge May Delay Execution

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: Ventura County Judge Asks California Governor Schwarzenegger for Clemency

    Michael Angelo Morales Watch: Kenneth Starr to Assist Death Row Clemency Bid

  • Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina

    Updated: CA-Sen: Are Improving GOP Senate Prospects Bad News for California and Carly Fiorina?

    +++++Update+++++
    Here is a statement from the Carly Fiorina Campaign: “It is unfortunate that the Daily Caller would print these falsehoods being perpetuated by Barbara Boxer and her Democratic allies. There is not one shred of truth to this rumor, the NRSC’s commitment to Carly has not changed and the fact is that this is nothing but wishful thinking on the part of Barbara Boxer who has yet to secure a similar commitment from her own party.” — Julie Soderlund, Deputy Campaign Manager for Communications, Carly for California

    So, did the Daily Caller piece quoted below get their story wrong about the NRSC? Is there a back story or simply a strategic decision? As I say as you read below, we will know soon enough.

    Carly Fiorina’s television ad: “Sir” now playing on California television

    The answer is probably unless Carly wishes to write a big check to fund more television advertising.

    Democratic incumbents Barbara Boxer in California and Patty Murray in Washington have been the brights spots of late for a national party beginning to assume the fetal position. Both have begun to put some distance between themselves and their Republican challengers in the last two weeks, and are about five or six points ahead on average.

    Boxer, in particular, has done so well that national Democrats have argued that the NRSCs withdrawal of a $1.9 million ad buy for the last week before the Nov. 2 election was a sign that the GOP wants to move the money to other races and is giving up on their candidate, former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina. Republicans say they merely wanted to give Fiorina flexibility to spend the money around the state and not just in one city.

    But a Democratic ad buyer who has watched the race closely said the GOPs buy in late July locked in about 1200 points  or a guarantee of roughly 12 ad views per person in the target range  over that last week. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee made a similar ad buy at the same time over the summer.

    However, rates have gone up since then, the Democrat said, and so giving up the buy means that a repurchase by the GOP would cost more for the same amount of air time or would buy fewer points with the same $1.9 million amount.

    Its possible that Republicans have decided their money would be better spent in a race like West Virginia, which has quickly become very close, with the bet being that their chances are better there and that Fiorina can afford to spend some more of her own fortune in California if she deems it a worthy investment. A Fiorina spokeswoman did not respond to an e-mail Tuesday evening.

    If there are increasing chances of a national Republican take over of the United States Senate in races with smaller media markets and where campaign cash will go farther, resources will be redirected away from California. Where a week of statewide television ad buys cost about $3 million, it is obvious that the money will go farther in West Virgina, Delaware, Washington and/or Connecticut.

    I have been wondering why the Fiorina campaign has left unanswered the current Boxer television ad and why they have not answered with a television blitz of their own. The answer is: Boxer has the campaign money for the television time buys and Fiorina does not.

    Of course, the management of resources is also a strategic decision and a television ad blitz may be forthcoming for Carly. But, if we do not see many television ads soon, it will be understood that Fiorina has decided not to write any more big checks and will make do with what she has on the table. We will see by the end of the week.

    This is not to say that Fiorina cannot win this race. Carly can still catch a GOP wave but with Boxer dominating California television, it will be just difficult to do so.

  • Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina

    CA-Sen: Are Improving GOP Senate Prospects Bad News for California and Carly Fiorina?

    Carly Fiorina’s television ad: “Sir” now playing on California television

    The answer is probably unless Carly wishes to write a big check to fund more television advertising.

    Democratic incumbents Barbara Boxer in California and Patty Murray in Washington have been the brights spots of late for a national party beginning to assume the fetal position. Both have begun to put some distance between themselves and their Republican challengers in the last two weeks, and are about five or six points ahead on average.

    Boxer, in particular, has done so well that national Democrats have argued that the NRSC’s withdrawal of a $1.9 million ad buy for the last week before the Nov. 2 election was a sign that the GOP wants to move the money to other races and is giving up on their candidate, former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina. Republicans say they merely wanted to give Fiorina flexibility to spend the money around the state and not just in one city.

    But a Democratic ad buyer who has watched the race closely said the GOP’s buy in late July locked in about 1200 points – or a guarantee of roughly 12 ad views per person in the target range – over that last week. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee made a similar ad buy at the same time over the summer.

    However, rates have gone up since then, the Democrat said, and so giving up the buy means that a repurchase by the GOP would cost more for the same amount of air time or would buy fewer points with the same $1.9 million amount.

    It’s possible that Republicans have decided their money would be better spent in a race like West Virginia, which has quickly become very close, with the bet being that their chances are better there and that Fiorina can afford to spend some more of her own fortune in California if she deems it a worthy investment. A Fiorina spokeswoman did not respond to an e-mail Tuesday evening.

    If there are increasing chances of a national Republican take over of the United States Senate in races with smaller media markets and where campaign cash will go farther, resources will be redirected away from California. Where a week of statewide television ad buys cost about $3 million, it is obvious that the money will go farther in West Virgina, Delaware, Washington and/or Connecticut.

    I have been wondering why the Fiorina campaign has left unanswered the current Boxer television ad and why they have not answered with a television blitz of their own. The answer is: Boxer has the campaign money for the television time buys and Fiorina does not.

    Of course, the management of resources is also a strategic decision and a television ad blitz may be forthcoming for Carly. But, if we do not see many television ads soon, it will be understood that Fiorina has decided not to write any more big checks and will make do with what she has on the table. We will see by the end of the week.

    This is not to say that Fiorina cannot win this race. Carly can still catch a GOP wave but with Boxer dominating California television, it will be just difficult to do so.

  • Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina

    CA-Sen: Barbara Boxer and Carly Fiorina Debate Today on Radio

    KCBS television report on how Senator Barbara Boxer is ducking debates with Carly Fiorina

    This little noticed or broadcast debate between Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer and her challenger Republican Carly Fiorina will happen at 1 PM today.

    As they head into what could be their final debate, Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer and her Republican challenger, Carly Fiorina, are appealing to voters on parallel tracks, each chipping away at the other’s character on the airwaves and each trying to persuade voters that she has a superior approach to turning the economy around.

    The two candidates are to face off Wednesday at 1 p.m. in an hour-long radio debate on “The Patt Morrison Show” on KPCC-FM (89.3) and on other public radio stations around the state. The candidates will be separated by 3,000 miles: Boxer will join the forum from the studios of National Public Radio in Washington, while Fiorina will participate from the KPCC studios in Pasadena.

    Boxer will dodge any further debates since this race is close and she would rather put up paid, partisan ads on California television.

    Carly Fiorina is a much better public speaker and more appealing on
    television so why give her any opportunity to score political points?

    Why would Boxer take any chances, right?

    So, today’s debate exercise in which Boxer will not even be present (playing defense from Washington D.C.) will be the last time these two candidates will square off except on paid media.

    What a waste of time.

  • Day By Day,  SEIU

    Day By Day September 29, 2010 – The Top

    Day By Day by Chris Muir

    Big Labor like the SEIU (Service Employees International Union) have struggled for decades with a declining membership base in private sector jobs. So, they have diversified, so to speak, by expanding into the public job sector e.g. teachers, police, fire and other public government employees. Big government for the unions means more members, more union dues being paid, more pension funds, etc. etc – you get the picture.

    To assure themselves of an ever expanding member base, Big Labor support through their organizational efforts (campaign cash, volunteers to call and walk precincts) the election of politicians who support their ever expanding numbers of union dues paying members. A conflict of interest, you ask?

    Survival of the fittest for them.

    There is a major problem –  when the government has no more ability to exact money from the taxpayers. Who will then pay for the Hope and Change?

    Previous:

    The Day By Day Archive