Site Meter

Archive for December, 2010

telephoneoperators57762 The DREAM Act Senate Vote is Tomorrow: Melt the Phones

Melt the Phones, Patriots

The DREAM Act vote WILL be tomorrow in the U.S. Senate.
Sen. Reid’s change of plans was announced suddenly Thursday evening.

Does that mean he thinks he has the 60 votes to pass this amnesty? Not necessarily. Our NumbersUSA whip count says he doesn’t have the votes. But votes could change over the next 24 hours under the barrage of last-minute personal appeals from poster-child illegal-alien students and groups of local clergy all saying the amnesty is a moral requirement. Pres. Obama put out an appeal for clergy to help him round up the last votes needed.

So, the moment of truth is upon every one of us. Will we rise to the occasion and help our allies in the Senate defeat this amnesty?

So, melt the phones to these 12 Senators and urge them to vote NO on the DREAM Act.

Florida
George LeMieux (R)

Washington, DC ph: 202-224-3041 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 205100001
Coral Gables, FL ph: 305-418-8553 adr: 8669 NW 36th St.,, Coral Gables, FL 33166
Jacksonville, FL ph: 904-398-8586 adr: 1650 Prudential Drive,, Jacksonville, FL 32207
Pensacola, FL ph: 850-433-2603 adr: 1 N. Palafox St., Pensacola, FL 32502
Tampa, FL ph: 813-977-6450 adr: 3802 Spectrum Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33612

Kansas
Sam Brownback (R)

Washington, DC ph: 202-224-6521 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 205100001
Topeka, KS ph: 785-233-2503 adr: 612 S. Kansas Ave., Topeka, KS 66603
Garden City, KS ph: 620-275-1124 adr: 811 North Main St., Garden City, KS 67846
Overland Park, KS ph: 913-492-6378 adr: 11111 West 95th – Suite 245, Overland Park, KS 66214
Wichita, KS ph: 316-264-8066 adr: 245 N. Waco, Wichita, KS 67202
Pittsburgh, KS ph: 620-231-6040 adr: 1001-C N. Broadway, Pittsburgh, KS 66762

MAINE

Susan Collins (R)
Washington, DC: ph: 202-224-2523 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 20510
Augusta: ph: 207-622-8414 adr: 68 Seawall Street, Augusta, ME 04330
Bangor: ph: 207-945-0417 adr: 202 Harlow Street – Room 204, Bangor, ME 04401
Biddeford: ph: 207-283-1101 adr: 160 Main Street, Biddeford, ME 04005
Caribou: ph: 207-493-7873 adr: 25 Sweden Street – Suite A, Caribou, ME 04736
Lewiston: ph: 207-784-6969 adr: 11 Lisbon Street, Lewiston, ME 04240
Portland: ph: 207-780-3575 adr: 1 City Center, Portland, ME 04101

Olympia Snowe (R)

Washington, DC: ph: 202-224-5344 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 20510
Auburn: ph: 207-786-2451 adr: Two Great Falls Plaza, Auburn, ME 04210
Augusta: ph: 207-622-8292 adr: 68 Sewall Street – Suite 101C, Augusta, ME 04330
Bangor: ph: 207-945-0432 adr: 1 Cumberland Place, Bangor, ME 04401
Biddeford: ph: 207-282-4144 adr: 231 Main Street, Suite 2, Biddeford, ME 04005
Lewiston: ph: 207-784-6969 adr: 11 Lisbon Street, Lewiston, ME 04240
Portland: ph: 207-874-0883 adr: 3 Canal Plaza – Suite 601, Portland, ME 04112
Presque Isle: ph: 207-764-5124 adr: 169 Academy Street, Presque Isle, ME 04769

MONTANA

Max Baucus (D)
Washington, DC ph: 202-224-2651 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 20510
Billings: ph: 406-657-6790 adr: 202 Fratt Building, Billings, MT 59101
Bozeman: ph: 406-586-6104 adr: Federal Building, Bozeman, MT 59715
Butte: ph: 406-782-8700 adr: Silver Bow Center, Butte, MT 59701
Great Falls: ph: 406-761-1574 adr: 18 5th Street South, Great Falls, MT 59401
Helena: ph: 406-449-5480 adr: 225 Cruse Avenue – Suite D, Helena, MT 59601
Missoula: ph: 406-329-3123 adr: 211 North Higgins – Room 102, Missoula, MT 59802

Jon Tester (D)
Washington, DC: ph: 202-224-2644 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 205100001
Billings: ph: 406-252-0550 adr: 222 North 32nd Street, Billings, MT 59101
Helena: ph: 406-449-5401 adr: 208 North Montana Avenue, Helena, MT 59601
Missoula, MT ph: 406-728-3003 adr: 116 West Front Street, Missoula, MT 59802
Butte, MT ph: 406-723-3277 adr: 125 West Granite, Butte, MT 59701
Great Falls, MT ph: 406-452-9585 adr: 321 First Avenue North, Great Falls, MT 59401
Kalispell, MT ph: 406-257-3360 adr: 1845 Highway 93 South, Kalispell, MT 59901

NORTH CAROLINA
Kay Hagan (D)

Washington, DC: ph: 202-224-6342 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 20510
Greensboro: ph: 336-333-5311 adr: 701 Green Valley Rd, Greensboro, NC 27408
Raleigh: ph: 919-856-4630 adr: 310 New Bern Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27601

NORTH DAKOTA
Kent Conrad (D)

Washington, DC: ph: 202-224-2043 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 20510
Bismarck: ph: 701-258-4648 adr: Federal Building, Bismarck, ND 58501
Fargo: ph: 701-232-8030 adr: Federal Building, Fargo, ND 58102
Grand Forks: ph: 701-775-9601 adr: Federal Building, Grand Forks, ND 58203
Minot: ph: 701-852-0703 adr: 100 First Street SW, Suite 105, Minot, ND 58701

OHIO
George Voinovich (R)

Washington, DC ph: 202-224-3353 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 205100001
Nelsonville, OH ph: 740-441-6410 adr: 78 West Washington Street, Nelsonville, OH 45764
Columbus, OH ph: 614-469-6697 adr: 37 West Broad Street – Room 310, Columbus, OH 43215
Toledo, OH ph: 419-259-3895 adr: 420 Madison Avenue – Room 1210, Toledo, OH 43604
Cincinnati, OH ph: 513-684-3265 adr: 36 East 7th Street – Room 2615, Cincinnati, OH 45202
Cleveland, OH ph: 216-522-7095 adr: 1240 East 9th Street – Suite 2955, Cleveland, OH 44199

TEXAS
Kay Bailey Hutchison (R)

Washington, DC ph: 202-224-5922 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 205100001
Harlingen, TX ph: 956-412-1468 adr: 222 East Van Buren Street, Harlingen, TX 78550
Dallas, TX ph: 214-361-3500 adr: 10440 North Central Expressway – Suite 1160, LB 606, Dallas, TX 75231
Houston, TX ph: 713-653-3456 adr: 1919 Smith Street – Suite 800, Houston, TX 77002
Austin, TX ph: 512-916-5834 adr: Federal Building, Austin, TX 78701
San Antonio, TX ph: 210-340-2885 adr: 145 Duncan Drive, San Antonio, TX 78226
Abilene, TX ph: 325-676-2839 adr: 500 Chestnut Street – Suite 1570, Abilene, TX 79602

WEST VIRGINIA
Joe Manchin (D)

Washington, DC
ph: 202-224-3954 adr: 311 Hart Office Bldg., Washington, DC 20510

NEW HAMPSHIRE
Judd Gregg (R)

Washington, DC ph: 202-224-3324 adr: U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 205100001
Berlin, AL ph: 603-752-2604 adr: 60 Pleasant Street, Berlin, AL 03570
Portsmouth, NH ph: 603-431-2171 adr: 16 Pease Blvd., Portsmouth, NH 03801
Manchester, NH ph: 603-622-7979 adr: 41 Hooksett Street, Manchester, NH 03104
Concord, NH ph: 603-225-7115 adr: 125 North Main Street, Concord, NH 03301




adbrite your ad here banner The DREAM Act Senate Vote is Tomorrow: Melt the Phones

linkedin The DREAM Act Senate Vote is Tomorrow: Melt the Phonesreader The DREAM Act Senate Vote is Tomorrow: Melt the Phonesstumbleupon The DREAM Act Senate Vote is Tomorrow: Melt the Phonesprintfriendly The DREAM Act Senate Vote is Tomorrow: Melt the Phonesemail The DREAM Act Senate Vote is Tomorrow: Melt the Phonesshare save 171 16 The DREAM Act Senate Vote is Tomorrow: Melt the Phones
Tags:

Comments 1 Comment »

PTImbz**NGQzMDEwNDY*MjU*MDdlYmU4MzBkZGNjNTM1ODY5MyZvZj*w President 2012 Poll Watch: 59 Per Cent Will NOT Vote for Sarah Palin

 

These are tough poll results for Sarah Palin.

59 percent of Americans in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll flatly rule out voting for Palin for president — substantially more than say there’s no way they’d vote for Obama, or, for that matter, New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg. And Obama leads Palin by a wide margin in current vote preferences, factoring Bloomberg in or out.

It’s too early in the 2012 presidential election cycle to make too much of the horse-race results in this poll, produced byLanger Research Associates for ABC News. But the numbers of Americans who say they wouldn’t even consider voting for Palin — and the even larger number who see her as unqualified for the presidency (67 percent in an ABC/Post poll in October) — indicate serious obstacles in her path, even if not of the antlered variety
The trends, moreover, are not in Palin’s favor. Just over a year ago 53 percent said they wouldn’t consider her for president. That’s risen, as noted, to 59 percent now, and includes significant chunks of the GOP base, such as 27 percent of John McCain voters, nearly three in 10 Republicans, four in 10 conservatives and four in 10 evangelical white Protestants. About equal numbers of men (58 percent) and women (60 percent) rule Palin out.

Just eight percent of Americans say they’d “definitely” vote for Palin were she to run for president; an additional 31 percent say they’d consider it. But that adds up to just 39 percent who’d even give her a look (41 percent if you count the undecideds) — well short of what it customarily takes to win the White House, absent an unusually strong third-party candidate.

At this point, I do not believe Sarah Palin would run.

As I have said, she will have to assess her poll match up results against President Obama in the Spring. I do believe she can win the GOP nomination. But, this will be a pretty hollow victory when she can make $ millions as a pundit and preserve her political viability by not running and keeping her powder dry, so to speak.

Then, there is an Alaska U.S. Senate seat which is held by a Democrat (Mark Begich) that comes up in 2014.




adbrite your ad here banner President 2012 Poll Watch: 59 Per Cent Will NOT Vote for Sarah Palin

linkedin President 2012 Poll Watch: 59 Per Cent Will NOT Vote for Sarah Palinreader President 2012 Poll Watch: 59 Per Cent Will NOT Vote for Sarah Palinstumbleupon President 2012 Poll Watch: 59 Per Cent Will NOT Vote for Sarah Palinprintfriendly President 2012 Poll Watch: 59 Per Cent Will NOT Vote for Sarah Palinemail President 2012 Poll Watch: 59 Per Cent Will NOT Vote for Sarah Palinshare save 171 16 President 2012 Poll Watch: 59 Per Cent Will NOT Vote for Sarah Palin

Comments Comments Off

“Gov.-elect Jerry Brown appears poised to ask voters next year to raise taxes, or at least continue some temporary taxes that will soon expire, or see vital public programs, such as the schools, suffer irreparable harm.

Ever since his election last month, the once and future governor has been hinting that he’ll ask voters for additional state revenues to partially close a whopping budget deficit, now approaching $30 billion during the next 18 months.

As Brown staged the second of his public budget talk fests Tuesday, this one at UCLA and devoted to education, his doomsday strategy became clearer, although one had to interpret his characteristically elliptical allegories to see it.

Brown said he’ll propose a budget in January that will be so shocking that those affected should read about it while sitting down and hopes to conclude a deal in the Legislature within 60 days.

That’s clearly aimed at having a special election in May or June to give voters the choice of absorbing drastic cuts in education and other major state programs or reducing the impact, perhaps by half, by increasing taxes.”

Jerry Brown will NEVER cut public services unless he is faced with certain insolvency. He would much rather campaign for tax increases and this is what he will do.

But, the question is: How will unemployed citizens pay the taxes? And, how much can you push the public when there is so much uncertainty in the economy and they are not working.

California is broken and only dramatic, permanet cuts in its budget will restore some semblence of fiscal soundness.

tags: California California_Budget Jerry_Brown

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.




adbrite your ad here banner Jerry Browns California Doomsday Strategy Very Risky

linkedin Jerry Browns California Doomsday Strategy Very Riskyreader Jerry Browns California Doomsday Strategy Very Riskystumbleupon Jerry Browns California Doomsday Strategy Very Riskyprintfriendly Jerry Browns California Doomsday Strategy Very Riskyemail Jerry Browns California Doomsday Strategy Very Riskyshare save 171 16 Jerry Browns California Doomsday Strategy Very Risky

Comments Comments Off

capt83320e13c1e74048869 Arnold Schwarzenegger: Hasta La Vista, FAILURE

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger discusses the fiscal emergency he declared during a Capitol news conference in Sacramento, Calif., Monday, Dec. 6, 2010. Schwarzenegger asked lawmakers to meet in a special session to close an immediate $6 billion deficit

After the disastrous California Governor Gray Davis and his recall some seven years ago, how could anything else go wrong?

Well, it did and Arnold Schwarzenegger was it – a colossal failure.

In his headier and hunkier days, Arnold Schwarzenegger spoke boldly about how “failure is not an option.” This kind of bravado worked well in the gym–and in a remarkable career that saw an inarticulate Austrian body-builder rise to the apex of Hollywood and California politics.

But Schwarzenegger’s soon-to-be-ended seven-year reign as California’s governor can be best described in just that one simple world: failure.

Read all of the piece.

Arnold never was able to shake off the Hollywood persona and make believe. He has damaged California and the California Republican Party beyond belief.

Good bye Arnold and don’t let the door hit you in the ass as you leave – Hasta La Vista, Baby.

Good riddance.

linkedin Arnold Schwarzenegger: Hasta La Vista, FAILUREreader Arnold Schwarzenegger: Hasta La Vista, FAILUREstumbleupon Arnold Schwarzenegger: Hasta La Vista, FAILUREprintfriendly Arnold Schwarzenegger: Hasta La Vista, FAILUREemail Arnold Schwarzenegger: Hasta La Vista, FAILUREshare save 171 16 Arnold Schwarzenegger: Hasta La Vista, FAILURE
Tags:

Comments 1 Comment »

1217105799685 Day By Day December 17, 2010   Irony

Day By Day by Chris Muir

The boomer generation (of which I am a member) must give way to a newer generation of Americans for political leadership. There is nothing more telling of the boomers than the late night infomercials of old pop/rock stars hawking their old songs for Time/Life books.

Yes, we boomers can continue to contribute to the political discourse but old Hippies in the House and Senate must really retire. Time for these POLS to go.

The same goes for Wannabe nostalgic LEFTISTS like the Bill Ayer’s influenced President Obama.

Previous:

The Day By Day Archive

linkedin Day By Day December 17, 2010   Ironyreader Day By Day December 17, 2010   Ironystumbleupon Day By Day December 17, 2010   Ironyprintfriendly Day By Day December 17, 2010   Ironyemail Day By Day December 17, 2010   Ironyshare save 171 16 Day By Day December 17, 2010   Irony

Comments Comments Off

  • Earlier today it was reported that far left Representative Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) proposed a $48 billion earmark to redistribute taxpayer money to the inner city.
    It was the Mother of All Earmarks…
    Liberal Rep. Emanuel Cleaver proposed a whopping $48 BILLION EARMARK that would redistribute wealth to the inner cities and gift money to the poor and thereby produce a much larger consumer class to buy the goods and services produced in this country.

    ++++++

    Criminal if this Omnibus Spending bill passes.

  • Incoming House Speaker John Boehner's recent interview on "60 Minutes" with Lesley Stahl, where he once again cried publicly, has created a minor controversy among pundits, with observers trying to figure out the cause of his unusual behavior.

    Is it depression? Or is Boehner simply in touch with his emotions? Does he wear his heart on his sleeve, or does he cry on a dime because he has a tender spot for all things American?
    While it's impossible to know, some are beginning to speculate that Boehner's penchant for turning on the waterworks might have some connection to his consumption of wine. Liberal MSNBC host Ed Shultz, half-jokingly, called Boehner a "cheap drunk" the other day, Capitol Hill aides of both parties are wondering, and there's even a web page devoted to it.
    ++++++
    Well, if he has a problem then the GOP Caucus should find another Speaker

    (tags: john_boehner)
  • Republicans will paralyze the Senate floor for 50 hours by forcing clerks to read every single paragraph of the 1,924-page, $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill.

    Senate clerks are expected to read the massive bill in rotating shifts around the clock — taking breaks to drink water and pop throat lozenges  — to keep legislative business on track, according to a Democratic leadership aide.

    ++++++

    The GOP should do nothing but a short continuing resolution to keep the government open and then go home

  • Democrats will try one more time to bring up a controversial immigration bill in the lame-duck session of Congress, a key Senate chairman said Wednesday evening.

    Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), the chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, said that Democrats would make one last stab at passing the DREAM Act in the Senate.

    "We are going to try to bring the DREAM Act up one more time. And again, that may be filibustered by the Republicans," Harkin said last night on MSNBC. "If it is, well then, we'll have to be in here after Christmas."

    ++++++
    As expected – so melt the phones to squishy GOP Senators to filibuster

    (tags: Dream_Act)
  • California air quality regulators are poised to adopt the nation's most sweeping regulations to give power plants, refineries and other major polluters a financial incentive to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
    The Air Resources Board was expected to pass this key piece of the California's 2006 climate law, called AB32, at its meetings Thursday or Friday, with the hope that other states and nations will follow the lead of the world's eighth largest economy.
    "AB32 was passed primarily to fill the vacuum created by the failure of Congress to pass any kind of climate or energy legislation for many years now," said Mary Nichols, the air board's chairwoman. "The goal was to lead by example, and being a leader you have to bring others along with you."
    California's cap-and-trade rules would set up the largest U.S. carbon trading market as the way to enforce the state's gradually tightening cap on emissions.

    +++++

    More business will leave and more unemployment. Budget deficits increase

  • Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels is setting a deadline for when he must decide whether to seek the Republican presidential nomination in 2012.
    Daniels, a favorite among Republican insiders who respect his fiscally conservative record, said Wednesday that he must figure out his plans by the end of April, when Indiana's legislative session is slated to wrap up.

    "I think the decision has to come at the end of this General Assembly session, if not before. No later than that," Daniels told Fort Wayne television station WANE. "In fairness to people from all over the place – many of whom I've only read about before – who like this idea [of Daniels running for president], I owe them some kind of an answer."
    Daniels has remained mostly cagey about his intentions. Though the governor has resisted invitations to visit key primary states, he's also welcomed national reporters to Indiana to discuss the possibility.

    +++++++

    Well, DUH! He will need to ramp up fundraising.

  • It's been a whirlwind of excitement since the first rumors that Sen. Harry Reid would be passing online poker legislation during the lame-duck session of Congress, but that excitement halted immediately Wednesday night. According to multiple sources, the bill will not be voted on or attached to another bill during the last few days of this session.

    "We are disappointed that Congress failed to act and provide the necessary consumer protections and sensible oversight over this multi-billion dollar industry," John Pappas, executive director of the Poker Players Alliance, wrote in an e-mail to ESPN.com. "Sadly, some politicians remain with their heads firmly in the sand. The leadership of the Poker Players Alliance got the debate this far and we are determined to see this through."

    ++++++++

    This is not a surprise since the bill is a blatant payback to Harrah's and MGM who contributed so heavily for Reid.

    Online poker looks almost dead especially if the feds enforce UIGEA

linkedin links for 2010 12 16reader links for 2010 12 16stumbleupon links for 2010 12 16printfriendly links for 2010 12 16email links for 2010 12 16share save 171 16 links for 2010 12 16

Comments Comments Off

chuckdevoretweets Chuck DeVore to Challenge Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2012?

Termed out California Assemblyman Chuck DeVore

Yes, and I received an e-mail from Chuckles last week saying he will be running for something in 2012 and asking for money to get his California state campaign account out of debt.

If he thinks he can beat long time Senator Dianne Feinstein who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, he is suffering from delusions of grandeur. Even the LEFT is skeptical and they are not greats fans of DiFi.

Despite getting only a small vote share in the GOP Senate primary this year (as conservatives decided to go with the slightly-more-electable Carly Fiorina), Chuck DeVore is talking Senate again, for 2012, when Dianne Feinstein will presumably run for re-election. Or is he? All he’s saying is that he’s likely to run in 2012, but hasn’t decided what office. Senate is the only thing that’s available, though, which makes his statement seem kind of strange (unless he’s talking about trying to rejoin the state Assembly). If Barbara Boxer could still win by 10 points in a terrible year, the more-popular Feinstein in a presidential year is an even more daunting target, meaning that DeVore may be the only prominent GOPer crazy enough to take on the task.

linkedin Chuck DeVore to Challenge Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2012?reader Chuck DeVore to Challenge Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2012?stumbleupon Chuck DeVore to Challenge Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2012?printfriendly Chuck DeVore to Challenge Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2012?email Chuck DeVore to Challenge Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2012?share save 171 16 Chuck DeVore to Challenge Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2012?
Tags: ,

Comments Comments Off

©Gregory Flap Cole All Rights Reserved