Day By Day by Chris Muir January 21, 2007 on the Democrats and the Iraq War
Readers: Please Vote in Flap’s January 2008 GOP Presidential Poll
Chris is correct.
The Democrats including Speaker Nancy Pelosi have NO PLAN to help President Bush and the United States deal with the problems in Iraq. Congressman Emanuel sums it up – don’t look to the Democrats.
But, they will CARP about and IMPEDE the Iraq War effort in order to discredit the President and elect Hillary in 2008 – no matter what the cost to American troops or the country.
How do yo spell DEMOGAGUE?
Technorati Tags: DayByDay, ChrisMuir, RahmEmanuel, NancyPelosi, Democrats, Iraq, IraqWar
5 Comments
Wouldn't You Like to Know
Are you guys kidding? Why should anybody help the Bush. He’s been a pigheaded fool from day one. Remember, “Either you’re with us or against us.” (Can you spell Demogague? How about Idiot?) Okay, Jackass you’ve f*cked this up so bad that now you find yourself all alone. Now what do YOU do? You members of the Cult of Bush don’t take responsibility for your own mistakes and now you want someone else to take responsibility for your leader’s mistakes. GROW UP! Or better yet why don’t you help him by sending him YOUR suggestions on how to win his war. I’ve got a suggestion: Maybe he should help both the troops and himself by sending those two daughters of his to Iraq. They’d gain a bit of discipline and he could preserve the lives of two soliders who have already who’ve already served too much fighting his war. Help the Bush? He’s helpless.
Elsie E Connelly
The democrats hate Bush so badly, they are willing to sacrifice the US to prove their point. History will judge him, and I would warrant that he will be in the same vein as Lincoln. He presided over the Blue-Gray war.
I think Democrats should just shut up, support the troops and then when they get one of their own elected, see what happens. I don’t think if Hillary is elected that the terrorists will go away, I’m willing to bet that when Hillary is elected we get hit again. Everyone seems to forget about 9/11.
The man that can't understand
WOW!! I have to agree with the last comment…He/she hit it home. Now let me get this straight. We went for WOMD’s first and didn’t find them…Oh yeah, that was bad intelligence, which Bush’s family created the CIA, hhhmmmm-how is he getting bad intell)…second, it’s getting rid of Saddam which we did but he posed no threat to the U.S, we had satellite and Carrier’s standing by, Saddam couldn’t fart or shit with out us knowing about it….then it’s liberating a country, (which he hasn’t ask Congress for more money to help Katrina victims in our own damn country nor did he even mention the greatest natural disaster on U.S. soil in his State of the Union Address). Now he’s crying wolf…IRAN IS HELPING, IRAN IS HELPING THE TERRORISTS!! If it’s not one thing, it’s another… to bend, twist and divert the truth and our attention. Now here’s the kicker!! Then he says… “I’m the decider”, then it’s “I’m the decision maker”…Bush who are you trying to fuckin kid?…You’re batting 4 for 4 buddy. Why should anyone trust you? This man has the NERVE to yell “I’m the Chief” as if that suppose to mean something as if he has done good work and has led by example….WHAT A FUCKIN JOKE!!. He couldn’t make a fucking decision on his own to know which toilet paper was hard or soft enough to wipe his ASS with!! You’re right…no accountability for mistakes; it’s almost as worse as my 13 year old…never her fault, always somebody else’s fault. GOP- WAKE THE FUCK UP!!
The Continental Op
Much as I hate to agree with the always idiotic Chris Muir, I’m afraid he’s at least partly correct on this one. Rahm Emmanuel’s comment was politically foolish and ethically loathsome.
If the Democrats want to be taken seriously as offering a real alternative, they have to do more than harp on the (undeniable) fact that the Bush Administration totally bungled this ill-begotten war — a war, let us not forget, that Rahm Emanuel, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and far too many other Democrats supported with far too much enthusiasm. I have no doubt that Emanuel, Clinton, and their DLC ilk have adopted their belated critical view of the war merely out of expediency, and not because they actually believe there was anything wrong with the endeavor itself (as opposed to its execution). In a sense, I really don’t care, so long as they now do something meaningful to bring it to a swift end. But, if they expect voters to elect a Democrat in 2008, they damn well better be offering solutions. Non-binding resolutions won’t cut it. And neither will standing around pointing fingers at Bush.
Jason Pine
How can anyone help someone who has an anal personality like Bush. Stubborness, meanness, overly orderly, and ill humor (he has a propensity to pass gas without regard to who is around him), and cheapness. Of course we are really only looking at a puppet , the real figures are the ones who donate a small amount of money to get whom they want elected in order to profit later by the award of multi million and billion dollar contracts. None of the cabinet choices are actually made by any sitting president. Bush selected Colin Powell as his first secretary of state (a man that he had never met). So who is really calling the shots? Certainly not Bush. The war should never have been started and it was a lost war before it even began. No one in the middle east wants a western style democracy. How could having a democracy be in their interests? I personally would prefer having a monarch. If you have a bum then at least you know what to expect until he or she is replaced. The bum does not have to be bribed and bought and sold every few years like the present US system.