Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Stopped Nuclear Weapons Program in 2003
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, speaks at a ceremony in Iran’s nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz, 300 kms 186 (miles) south of capital Tehran, Iran, Monday April, 9, 2007. Iran halted its nuclear weapons development program in the fall of 2003 under international pressure but is continuing to enrich uranium, which means it may still be able to develop a weapon between 2010 and 2015, senior intelligence officials said Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
Iran halted its nuclear weapons development program in the fall of 2003 under international pressure, but is continuing to enrich uranium and could be capable of developing a weapon as early as late 2009, the U.S. intelligence community has concluded.
The nuclear clock is set back from the precipice of WAR. But, Iran continues to enrich uranium with 3,000 centrifuges spinning as we wait for the IAEA and United Nations to take action.
But, what has changed since the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE).
“Tehran’s decision to halt its nuclear weapons program suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005,” states the unclassified summary of the secret report. “Our assessment that the program probably was halted primarily in response to international pressure suggests Iran may be more vulnerable to influence on the issue than we judged previously.”
Officials said the findings show diplomacy is effective in containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
“This is good news in that the U.S. policy coupled with the policies and actions of those who have been our partners appear to have had some success. Iran seems to have been pressured,” one official said. “Given that good news we don’t want to relax. We want to keep those pressures up.”
The key judgments conclude with “high confidence” that:
- Until fall 2003, Iranian military entities were working under government direction to develop nuclear weapons
- In fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program
- The halt lasted at least several years
- Iran has the scientific, technical and industrial capacity eventually to produce nuclear weapons if it decides to do reverse course
- The halt, and Tehran’s announcement that it has suspended its declared uranium enrichment program and signed additional safeguards relating to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty are “primarily in response to increasing international scrutiny and pressure resulting from exposure of Iran’s previously undeclared nuclear work”
- Iran will not be technically capable of producing and reprocessing enough plutonium for a weapon before about 2015.
The United States must continue the pressure on Iran – economic and political. This is “good news” but America must be positive that Iran has not resumed a nuclear weapon program.
Stay tuned…..
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (R) announces economic sanctions on Iran to pressure it to halt its nuclear program as U.S. Secretary of Treasury Henry Paulson stands next to her at the State Department in Washington October 25, 2007.
Update:
Britain says pressure on Iran justified.
“The report’s conclusions justify the action already taken by the international community to get to the bottom of Iran’s nuclear program and to increase pressure on the regime to stop its enrichment and reprocessing activities,” a British Foreign Ministry spokeswoman told AFP.
Previous:
Iran Nuclear Watch: Will Israel Strike Iran?
Iran Nuclear Watch: Ahmadinejad Boasts of 3,000 Uranium Enrichment Centrifuges
Technorati Tags: Iran
8 Comments
hass
Iran NIE report: Are you lying now, or were you lying then?
If the 2005 NIE report was wrong when it claimed with “high confidence” that Iran had a active nuclear weapons program, why should the 2007 NIE be any more credible when it claims that Iran had a nuclear weapons program until 2003? If Iran really had a nuclear weapons program until 2003 as the new report claims, then why has the IAEA found no evidence of it? Why should we believe that Iran EVER had a nuclear weapons program at all?
Cambria Kango
Just as confusing as the frenzy over Iran’s nuclear abilities is the uproar over Ahmadinejad’s saber-rattling. Ultimately, his power is very limited — and our government knows this — so why all the fuss about his inflammatory remarks? I regard him in the same way the same as the loony tune on my street corner that raves about CIA mind control.
Flap
Because you take seriously a nation’s leader who denies the Holocaust and calls for Israel to be “wiped off the map.”
Flap
There was and is evidence. I refer you here: UNSC Resolution 1747 (2007)
Pingback:
Pingback:
Pingback:
Pingback: