Site Meter

Archive for the “Los Angeles Times” Category

google plus LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Solinkedin LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Sopinterest LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Sostumbleupon LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Soreader LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Soprintfriendly LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Soemail LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Soshare save 171 16 LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think So

This is what the LA Times Headline screams: “Protesters out in force nationwide to oppose Wisconsin’s anti-union bill.”

Say what?

Promoters, such as David Dayen at Firedoglake, were predicting a million-person turnout nationwide.  But reports as of 7:00 E.S.T. today make clear that other than in Madison, Wisconsin, the crowds were sparse.

The turnout in Madison was sizable, with estimates ranging over from 50-70,000, which included protesters bused in from other states.  (Dayen is trying to pump the crowd estimate to over 100,000.) But elsewhere, the crowds numbered only in the hundreds or low thousands.

In Washington, D.C., only about 500 people showed up (go to link for good photos of crazy signs). (Note, WaPo says 1000.)

In Columbus, OH, where you would expect a big crowd given a similar controversy, only “several thousand” people protested

Other head counts, based on news reports, include: Boston (1000), Portsmouth, N.H. (few hundred), Augusta, ME (small crowd), New York City (“several thousand“), Chicago (1000), Miami (100), Austin (several hundred), Chicago (1000); Lansing, MI (2000), Nashville (hundreds), Los Angeles (2000), Richmond, VA (300), Denver (1000); Frankfurt, KY (several hundred), Jefferson City, MO (several hundred), Harrisburg, PA (several hundred). 

While I don’t have a complete count, based on these numbers from some major cities and labor states, total protesters nationwide (excluding Madison) likely totaled under 100,000 combined.
Outside of Madison, there were no reports of sizable crowds.  And if you read the news reports, almost all the protesters were other union members.  Despite the efforts, the organizers failed to motivate significant numbers of non-union members to come out for protests.

The 50-state protest was a failure, plain and simple, although the images from Madison may create the false impression of massive nationwide protests.

The subhead at the LA Times reads more accurately: “Up to 100,000 rally in Madison while hundreds show up in dozens of other cities to combat the Republican-backed measure that would limit collective bargaining rights for most public workers in Wisconsin.” But, the subheadline contradicts the headline because the protesters were not out in force NATIONWIDE.

This is NOT true.

But, there is MORE:

Nearly two weeks into a political standoff, tens of thousands rallied in Madison and in dozens of cities around the nation to oppose a bill that would severely limit collective bargaining rights for most Wisconsin public employees.

Joel DeSpain, spokesman for the Madison Police Department, said the rally — in steadily falling snow — drew between 70,000 and 100,000 and may have been the largest protest in Madison since the Vietnam War

Again, NOT true and implying that the protest crowds outside of Madison, Wisconsin were on the massive scale.

Later on in the piece they admit the protest crowd in Los Angeles was not so much:

Elsewhere, hundreds of boisterous pro-union demonstrators gathered on the steps of Los Angeles City Hall, loudly voicing their support for the Wisconsin workers while speaking of concerns that the perennially forceful labor movement in California could one day face a similar crisis.

“If it can happen in Wisconsin, it can happen anywhere,” said Pasquale Gazillo, a merchant marine, referring to Wisconsin’s long history as a union stronghold.

“States like that, they’re the ones that started the eight-hour workday and made sure workers got paid if they got sick. The Republicans are pushing, and if that state falls, the rest of the country is going to be in trouble,” he said.

Nice try at spin LA Times. Gotcha…..

google plus LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Solinkedin LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Sopinterest LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Sostumbleupon LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Soreader LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Soprintfriendly LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Soemail LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think Soshare save 171 16 LA Times Headline: Protesters Out in Force Nationwide to Oppose Wisconsins Anti Union Bill   I Dont Think So
Tags: ,

Comments Comments Off

google plus Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOlinkedin Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOpinterest Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOstumbleupon Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOreader Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOprintfriendly Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOemail Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOshare save 171 16 Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTO

292267022 07e20d6b7a Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTO

The Tribune Company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy today.

The company that owns the Los Angeles Times, KTLA Channel 5 and the Chicago Tribune filed for bankruptcy protection today, seeking relief from $12 billion in debt that largely stems from last year’s leveraged buyout of the media firm.

Tribune Co. directors approved the action to seek Chapter 11 protection in a meeting today, saying they want to restructure payments to banks and other creditors, following real estate magnate Sam Zell’s purchase of the company last year.

Reportedly Zell will sell the Chicago Cubs to reorganize the company.

Flap would think baseball is more viable business-wise than the Tribune newspapers – hell, sell them instead.

When does Tribune apply for their government bailout?


Technorati Tags:

google plus Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOlinkedin Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOpinterest Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOstumbleupon Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOreader Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOprintfriendly Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOemail Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTOshare save 171 16 Tribune Company   Parent of Los Angeles Times   BUSTO
Tags:

Comments 2 Comments »

google plus Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughlinkedin Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughpinterest Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughstumbleupon Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughreader Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughprintfriendly Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughemail Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughshare save 171 16 Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enough

2916750694 54513782c9 o Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enough

Day By Day by Chris Muir

Gee Chris, Zed is now famous as a “CHEATING” Todd Palin.

The MSM better not tell Sam, eh?

Interesting note in Starbucks today. No photo of the Sarah Palin event in Carson yesterday on the cover of the Sunday Los Angeles Times. But, there was a 5 by 7 inch photo of a waving, smiling Sarah Palin on the Spanish language newspaper, La Opinion

What do you know? The Spanish language press actually has some journalistic integrity – unlike the Los Angeles Times and the Tribune Company that owns it.

Previous:

The Day By Day Archive


Technorati Tags:

google plus Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughlinkedin Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughpinterest Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughstumbleupon Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughreader Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughprintfriendly Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughemail Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enoughshare save 171 16 Day By Day by Chris Muir October 5, 2008   Close Enough

Comments Comments Off

google plus John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?linkedin John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?pinterest John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?stumbleupon John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?reader John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?printfriendly John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?email John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?share save 171 16 John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?

2716953692 89ddfe1801 John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?

The latest from The National Enquirer on the John Edwards and his mistress-love child flap

Mickey Kaus says The National Enquirer has moved onto the “coverup” of the John Edwards, paid off mistress and love child story rather than publish the photographs of their reporters run-in with Edwards last week.

In context, the photos would be powerful evidence. Enquirer editor David Perel apparently doesn’t want to win over the MSM by releasing them. He’d rather have the Edwards story all to himself.

An interview of the Los Angeles Times blogmeister Tony Pierce offers the MSM standard excuses of why they buried the story and continue to do so today. Or is it ignoring?

Of course, if Edwards had been a GOP Senator or Presidential candidate, all of the Los Angeles Times bloggers would have been directed to cover the story.

This story will remain moribund until The National Enquirer decides to release at least one of the photographs of the fleeing and/or cowering Edwards or breaks more of which they have promised.

Previous:


Technorati Tags:

google plus John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?linkedin John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?pinterest John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?stumbleupon John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?reader John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?printfriendly John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?email John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?share save 171 16 John Edwards Watch: The Cover Up?
Tags: ,

Comments 1 Comment »

google plus Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008linkedin Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008pinterest Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008stumbleupon Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008reader Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008printfriendly Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008email Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008share save 171 16 Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008

2713907344 e6e19702d5 o Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008

Day By Day by Chris Muir

Chris, the Los Angeles Times which has been laying off employees in droves (due to declining circulation) merely instructed its bloggers to not indulge the National Inquirer story about John Edwards’ mistress and love child.

Yawn……

What else is new at the Los Angeles Times?

Previous:

The Day By Day Archive


Technorati Tags: , ,

google plus Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008linkedin Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008pinterest Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008stumbleupon Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008reader Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008printfriendly Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008email Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008share save 171 16 Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008
Tags: , ,

Comments 1 Comment »

google plus Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?linkedin Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?pinterest Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?stumbleupon Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?reader Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?printfriendly Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?email Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?share save 171 16 Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?

2694411616 5cffdb4cf7 o Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?

Mickey Kaus answers the question besides the obvious answer of bias and illustrates the “double standard” especially at the Los Angeles Times which has instructed its bloggers to not write about the story.

In the meantime, John Edwards has NO comment and Fox News has interviewed the Beverly Hills security guard who intervened between John Edwards and the National Enquirer reporters.

Flap is waiting for the photos from the National Enquirer.

You know they are going to drop soon.

Will John Edwards continue to “stonewall” the flap or will he check himself into rehab?

Previous:

Is John Edwards a Public Hypocrite?

John Edwards Watch: There Goes the Vice Presidency

John Edwards Watch: Love Child Scandal?


Technorati Tags: , ,

google plus Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?linkedin Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?pinterest Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?stumbleupon Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?reader Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?printfriendly Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?email Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?share save 171 16 Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?
Tags: ,

Comments 5 Comments »

google plus MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Stylelinkedin MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Stylepinterest MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Stylestumbleupon MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Stylereader MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Styleprintfriendly MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Styleemail MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Styleshare save 171 16 MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Style

15meetthumbgv5 MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Style

Author Luke Ford and reporter Draeger Martinez

Eric Spillman vs. Luke Ford


Ok, who won?


Technorati Tags: , ,

google plus MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Stylelinkedin MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Stylepinterest MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Stylestumbleupon MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Stylereader MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Styleprintfriendly MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Styleemail MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Styleshare save 171 16 MSM vs. Blogs   LA Times Style

Comments Comments Off

©Gregory Flap Cole All Rights Reserved