• California,  Politics

    Governator Schwarzenegger Completes Petition Drive on Legislative Redistricting Measure

    California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced the completion today of a petition drive to change how legislative districts are drawn — the second of three measures he wants to put before voters in a proposed special election this fall.

    The San Francisco Chronicle has the story here:

    Supporters turned in about 215,000 signatures to county officials in Los Angeles, the first of nearly 1 million they expect to deliver to election offices statewide by Monday. The measure requires 600,000 valid signatures to qualify for the ballot.

    In a public appearance, Schwarzenegger pressed for the redistricting measure that would put retired judges in charge of drawing boundaries instead of the Legislature.

    “The politicians have divided neighborhoods, they’ve divided cities, towns and people — and that is what we want to eliminate,” he said. “The district lines were drawn to favor the incumbents rather than to favor the voters.”

    Although the Legislature’s Democratic majority largely views the measure as targeting it, Schwarzenegger is selling the proposal as a nonpartisan issue.

    The Governor submitted signatures for his teacher tenure reform proposal yesterday.

    Without a fair and impartial redistricting the legislative, and Congressional district races will never be competitive and reflective of California voter sentiment.

    Look for the Democrats in the California Legislature and the Republicans in Congress to attempt a compromise to save their current gerrymander.

  • Adscam Scandel,  Canada

    Canadian Adscam Scandel: $300,000 in Cash Goes to Liberal Party?

    The Globe and Mail reports today that $300,000 in cash has gone from Adscam sources to Liberal Party electoral efforts:

    Senior Liberal organizers allegedly showered about $300,000 in cash on Quebec ridings held by the opposition during the 1997 federal election campaign, The Globe and Mail has learned.

    Michel Béliveau, a close supporter of former prime minister Jean Chrétien, made the allegation in preliminary interviews with members of the Gomery inquiry into the sponsorship program.

    Mr. Béliveau is scheduled to testify today about allegedly receiving the cash from Jacques Corriveau, another Liberal supporter and close friend of Mr. Chrétien, who got millions through the sponsorship program in the 1990s.

    The testimony would be the first by a Liberal official describing illicit cash transactions in contravention of Canada’s electoral laws. It builds on allegations from Jean Brault, former president of Groupaction Marketing Inc., who told the inquiry of secret payments to Liberal officials in the 1990s and early 2000s — including payments to Mr. Corriveau he was told were “for the cause.”

    Mr. Béliveau was the director-general of the Quebec wing of the Liberal Party when he allegedly asked for the money from Mr. Corriveau.

    Mr. Béliveau said he later received $75,000 to $100,000 in an envelope full of $20 and $100 bills from Mr. Corriveau.

    “Only Mr. Corriveau and Mr. Béliveau were in the room. Mr. Béliveau did not provide him with a receipt,” a confidential record of the interview says.

    Mr. Béliveau said the rest of the money — $200,000 — was given to another Liberal organizer in Eastern Quebec, former provincial Liberal minister Marc-Yvan Cote.

    His allegation contradicts the Martin government’s position that the problems in the program were caused by a “parallel group” of rogue Liberals.

    The cash was used to prop up Liberal organizations in “orphan ridings,” Mr. Béliveau said, referring to the expression used in Liberal circles to describe ridings held by other parties. The ridings were evaluated before the campaign and found to be short of cash, he said.

    Mr. Béliveau said he was unaware at the time that Mr. Corriveau was acting for some of the biggest recipients of sponsorship funds. Over the years, Mr. Corriveau earned almost $8-million in sponsorship subcontracts, often through fake or inflated invoices, according to evidence at the Gomery inquiry.

    “Mr. Beliveau points out that he never thought the money could come from a governmental program. Mr. Corriveau never informed him of the origin of the funds,” the document says.

    The secret report, called a “will say,” has been circulated to the various parties that are officially involved in the Gomery inquiry’s proceedings. Mr. Béliveau is not bound to stick to those statements when he testifies under oath.

    Still, his allegation follows other claims of massive transfers of sponsorship cash into the hands of Liberal organizers.

    Mr. Béliveau’s successor, Benoît Corbeil, has said in news-media interviews that he once received tens of thousands of dollars in cash from Groupaction to pay off Liberal organizers during the 2000 election. Mr. Corbeil is also high on the list of coming witnesses at the Gomery inquiry, where he has promised to name the recipients of the cash payments.

    In addition, Mr. Brault has told the inquiry that he gave about $1-million in various contributions to the Liberals between 1996 and 2002, including tens of thousands of dollars in cash to another Liberal fundraiser, Joe Morselli.

    The former Groupaction president said he also paid about $500,000 in fees to Mr. Corriveau, who had allegedly told Mr. Brault the money was going to the Liberal Party.

    In his appearance before the inquiry last month, Mr. Corriveau rejected all allegations of illicit payoffs, saying he only made officially registered donations to the Liberal Party and helped sell tickets to party events.

    “I was known as a good ticket salesman,” he said.

    Mr. Morselli is also set to appear before the commission, where he will be asked about the alleged cash transactions with Mr. Brault.

    Mr. Béliveau, who is now retired, is a psychologist who long worked in the school system in the Mauricie region of Quebec, where he first met Mr. Chrétien in 1965. Among other partisan activities, he ran local election campaigns for Mr. Chrétien on many occasions.

    Named director-general of the Liberal Party’s office in Montreal in 1996, Mr. Béliveau remained in that position until 1998. He said he never informed any of his political superiors about the cash transactions.

    “Mr. Béliveau did not inform the electoral commission nor the political minister for Quebec of these transfers of funds, nor any minister nor the prime minister nor the party’s board of directors,” the document says.

    Mr. Béliveau added that he takes full responsibility for his actions, which were in part fuelled by the Liberal Party’s financial difficulties in Quebec at the time.

    “According to him, the management position that he held calls on him to assume the consequences today,” the document says.

    Captain Ed over at Captain’s Quarters has this:

    …If Béliveau testifies as predicted, it will mark the first real threads of electoral fraud perpetrated by the Liberals through the Adscam monies. So far, the Gomery Inquiry has documented plenty of personal enrichment at the expense of the Canadian taxpayers, and even Liberal Party featherbedding at favored ad agencies, but this will demonstrate that the primary purpose of Adscam was to get unregulated cash into the hands of Liberal Party leaders in order to gain an unfair, and unregulated, advantage over the other parties.

    Béliveau’s recollection that he received the money from Corriveau and from provincial Liberal minister Marc-Yvan Cote makes it more difficult for Martin to pretend that a small, breakaway contingent of Liberal ministers created the entire Adscam issue. That cash went directly to ridings in Quebec held by other parties and which chronically ran short on cash for the Liberals. The sudden infusion of a large amount of money had to be noticed by many within the party structure, especially since funds weren’t coming from any other source. That would appear to implicate a large portion of the Liberal Party in Quebec with responsibility to keep the books for election contributions and outlays, and not just a couple of renegade Grits playing cowboy.

    The picture keeps getting more focused even as the conspiracies continue to widen…

    The Liberal Party hacks are as dirty as their bosses.

    Flap says sparks will fly next week after everyone’s return from Europe.

  • Illegal Immigration,  Politics

    Real ID Act Passes the House

    The REAL ID Act (H.R. 418) as part of an appropirations bill for the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars has passed the House of Representatives. Yahoo News has the story here:

    The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday voted to replenish military funds depleted by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, money needed to buy everything from bullets to armored trucks.

    By a vote of 368-58, the House embraced the $82 billion measure that also provides more funds for relief efforts related to December’s Indian Ocean tsunami, imposes new immigration controls that supporters say are needed in the post-Sept. 11 era and spends more to secure U.S. borders.

    The Senate is expected to approve the House-Senate compromise bill next week, clearing the way for President Bush to sign it into law.

    House Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis urged quick approval of the measure because of looming supply shortages for American soldiers. “Our forces (in Iraq) are on gas fumes rather than real gasoline,” said the California Republican.

    The majority of the new money, $76 billion, would go to the
    Pentagon to fund combat in Iraq and Afghanistan through the fiscal year ending on Sept. 30. With this legislation the cost of the wars approaches $300 billion.

    The goods the Pentagon says it needs to buy immediately range from big-ticket items such as additional armored and tracked combat vehicles and missiles, to more mundane provisions that are the backbone of any war, including bullets, water purification systems and bandages.

    Despite overwhelming support in Congress for the emergency funds, lawmakers from both parties expressed frustration over the Bush administration’s refusal to lay out long-term projected estimates of the cost of the war.

    “We have lost 1,500 lives of American servicemen and women. We have seen more than 11,000 be injured and this bill understates, in my view, the amount of money that will be needed eventually to restore the readiness of the U.S. armed forces and to minimize their casualties,” said Rep. David Obey (news, bio, voting record) from Wisconsin, senior Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.

    In an attempt to force the White House to provide better war cost estimates, the bill requires the Defense Department to give Congress an assessment of the number of U.S. troops that will be needed in Iraq through next year.

    But earlier this week, a Pentagon spokeswoman indicated that such estimates might not be forthcoming.

    “War funding needs are closely related to the pace of operations and the situation on the ground,” the spokeswoman told Reuters. “It is not practical to budget for a war this dynamic that far in advance,” she added.

    Besides the war funding provisions, the legislation spends $907 million for tsunami relief. Some of that money reimburses the Pentagon for its aid efforts immediately following the tsunami. Most of the remainder would go to a recovery and reconstruction fund.

    PALESTINIAN CONTROVERSY

    Palestinians would be aided by an injection of $200 million for trade promotion, agriculture, school construction, police, road building and other activities.

    The legislation continues to prohibit the Palestinian Authority from receiving the U.S. economic assistance. And $50 million of the money would be earmarked for Israel to help it “ease the movement of Palestinian people and goods in and out of Israel.”

    White House spokesman Scott McClellan was asked whether the United States would undermine Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas by blocking his access to the U.S. funds.

    “We haven’t made any decisions on distributing any of this money at this point,” McClellan told reporters. He added, “This is very similar to the way it has been structured in the past. And we believe that we have the flexibility we need.”

    Republicans succeeded in attaching another set of hotly contested provisions to the spending bill.

    Foreigners seeking asylum in the United States would face tougher requirements and aliens could more easily be deported if they are found to be involved in “terrorist activities.” Driver’s licenses, which are regularly used as identification at airports, would be denied to illegal aliens.

    Now, onto the Senate!

  • California,  Politics

    The Governator Goes on the Offensive

    California Governor Arnold Swarzenegger yesterday went on offense as he submitted signatures to qualify one of the first of several initiatives that may face voters in a fall special election. The San Francisco Chronicle has the story here:

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger moved Wednesday to qualify the first of several initiatives that may face voters in a fall special election, at the same time asserting that there was “plenty of time” for Democratic lawmakers to negotiate with him to avoid a November ballot.

    In separate appearances, the governor and Democratic Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez at times sounded themes of compromise, and officials in both camps said staff members were examining proposals and counter-proposals on various issues. The negotiations include the how and when public school teachers achieve tenure, Nuñez said.

    Petitions turned in by Schwarzenegger at the Sacramento County registrar’s office Wednesday seek to qualify a ballot measure that would extend the period of time teachers must wait to receive tenure from two to five years. The governor maintains poorly performing teachers, deeply entrenched in public schools, are a key factor hobbling student performance.

    Schwarzenegger aides say they plan to submit signatures for ballot measures that would change the way legislative districts are drawn and impose new controls on the state budget.

    The Democrats’ counter-proposal on teacher tenure was not disclosed. Lengthening the tenure process has been hotly opposed by teacher unions, a key ally of Democrats.

    Schwarzenegger, after unloading boxes of petitions with help from a small group of young children amid the jeers of protesters, said “there is plenty of time for us to work that out.”

    “Our doors our open, and they have now, finally, started negotiating,” he said. “I’m sorry to say that it is four months late, but again, we are open for dialogue because we want to resolve this. We want to create changes.”

    Schwarzenegger said Nuñez and others “complaining about our reforms are the ones that have created the problems in the first place.” Nuñez, while reiterating his party’s willingness to engage the governor, accused him of “leading the state into political chaos.”

    “Hopefully, the governor stays at the negotiating table,” Nuñez said, meeting with reporters at the Capitol. “We have to go back to governing this state.”

    No meetings between Schwarzenegger and key Democratic leaders have been planned.

    Although there isn’t a firm deadline, state elections officials have recommended that all initiative backers submit their signatures by Friday, to allow officials time to qualify each measure for a November ballot, if one is called. Schwarzenegger has said he believes he must call an election by June 10.

    Signature-gatherers of several initiatives hostile to Schwarzenegger’s administration claim they, too, are poised to put their measures across as soon as Friday. They include consumer-friendly referendums on electricity regulation, prescription drug costs and a measure to provide far-reaching protections for used-car buyers.

    There will be no compromise with the Democrat legislature.

    Get ready for another election season.