• Dentistry,  Oral Surgery

    Wisdom Teeth Removal Often Unnecessary?

    WebMD poses this question: Are wisdom teeth removal often unnecessary? And answers this rhetorical question in the affirmative:

    Teens often have their wisdom teeth removed. But there’s no evidence this painful procedure prevents future trouble.

    That’s the conclusion of a careful review of dental studies by a research team including Dirk G. Mettes, DMD, of Radboud University Medical Center in, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Although Mettes and colleagues looked at 40 studies, they found only two controlled clinical trials of wisdom tooth removal.

    The bottom line: If impacted wisdom teeth are not causing trouble, there’s no evidence that removing them helps or hurts future health. But there is some evidence that removing teens’ impacted wisdom teeth “to reduce or prevent late incisor crowding cannot be justified,” the researchers conclude.

    Read the abstract of the Mettes’ study here.

    How controversial is it to remove wisdom teeth that aren’t currently causing problems? Two dentists who spoke with WebMD agree that there’s no reason to remove perfectly healthy wisdom teeth. Both agree that troublesome wisdom teeth should be removed. And both say that there has to be a medical reason to perform such a serious surgery.

    Eric K. Curtis, DDS, spokesman for the Academy of General Dentistry and a private-practice dentist in Safford, Ariz., says it comes down to what an individual dentist thinks is best for an individual patient.

    “In my practice, about 75% of the asymptomatic (without symptoms), impacted wisdom teeth I see I take out,” Curtis tells WebMD. “It is subjective. There is no decision tree to tell us, ‘If this happens, take the tooth out,’ or ‘If this happens, leave it in.’ It comes down to your own sense of what is right and wrong and to patients’ own preferences.”

    Mohamed Bassiouny, DMD, PhD, professor of dentistry at Temple University — the oldest dental school in the U.S. — in June will celebrate his 40th anniversary as a dentist.

    But isn’t it normal for teen’s to have their wisdom teeth removed? Not to Bassiouny.

    “It is a shame,” Bassiouny tells WebMD. “It should not be considered that way. God gave us a full set of teeth. We should live with it.”

    Wisdom tooth removal is so common, Curtis says, that patients have stopped thinking of it as a serious medical procedure.

    “In the public’s mind, dentistry is really routine,” he says. “You turn 18 and you think it is time for wisdom teeth to come out. It is almost ubiquitous, a rite of passage. But a dentist has to tell you maybe you should take out wisdom teeth for this, this, and this reason. But there is this, this, and this risk, too. You have to decide if it is worth it.”

    Wisdom teeth typically emerge around age 17 to 24 or later. Wisdom teeth can be a problem because the human jaw is shorter than it was early in our evolution. And these teeth are at the very end of the jaw, Curtis notes.

    “If the jawbone is straight, the tooth wants to come in straight,” Curtis tells WebMD. “But most people run out of bone. Your jawbone starts its curve upward, and the wisdom teeth on the lower jaw get caught in that curve and tip forward.”

    Impacted wisdom teeth may lie fully horizontal. If that’s the case, trouble almost certainly lies ahead. It’s a harder call when a wisdom tooth fully emerges but is only slightly tipped toward the molar next to it. Some worry that, over time, this will cause crowding of the front teeth. The Mettes review, however, suggests this is not the case.

    “If a wisdom tooth is completely horizontal, I almost universally recommend taking that out,” Curtis says. “The chances of bone disease are so high that I can predict with pretty good probability that 10 or 20 years down the road that person will have gum problems that will pose a risk to other teeth as well.”

    Also risky, Curtis says, is a wisdom tooth that emerges from the underlying bone but comes only part way through the skin. That leaves a person open to high risk of decay and infection.

    When a dentist deems wisdom tooth removal necessary, he or she should talk to the patient about possible risks of surgery.

    “It is surgery, so there is risk of infection, there is some risk of jaw fracture, and risk of numbness that lingers on because a nerve is damaged in pulling the tooth,” Curtis says. “And that is a really uncomfortable thing to have your lip numb for the rest of your life or even for a couple of years. You have to think of risks.”

    What Good Are Wisdom Teeth, Anyway?

    We get three sets of molars — and get them at different times of life — because the diet we ate as we evolved into humans was tough on the teeth. A third set of molars — the wisdom teeth — kept us chewing on as our first set of molars wore out.

    The modern diet isn’t so tough, so we aren’t as likely to wear out our first two sets of molars.

    “Wisdom teeth simply aren’t necessary. I don’t know anyone who can’t get along without them,” Curtis says. “And a wisdom tooth is very difficult to clean. Even when it comes in well, it is far back against the upward curve of the jawbone. Sometimes you can’t get a toothbrush behind it — sometimes not even to it. So if it takes a root canal or crown to fix a decayed wisdom tooth, that is not an unsubstantial cost. So is it worth it to do that?”

    Bassiouny says it’s still a good idea to have an extra set of molars.

    He points out that the wisdom teeth can take up the slack should other teeth fall out or need to be pulled — as commonly happens as we age. And when a person needs a dental bridge, Bassiouny says, wisdom teeth provide an important anchor.

    Check out the good illustrations of wisdom teeth classifications here.

    Bottom Line: A good educated discussion with your dentist and oral surgeon can best inform the patient as to the appropriate course of treatment.

  • Federal Judiciary,  Politics

    Senator Schumer calls on Bush to demand restraint in rhetoric on judicial nominees

    California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown

    Sen. Charles Schumer, a leading Democrat in the fight over judicial nominees, urged President Bush to intervene and rein in the strongest conservative critics of Democratic opposition to some candidates:

    Schumer, D-N.Y., delivered his party’s weekly radio address Saturday, in which he decried “a whiff of extremism in the air the likes of which we haven’t seen in decades.”

    Without naming any, Schumer criticized “small groups … trying to undermine the age-old checks and balances that the Founding Fathers placed at the center of the Constitution.”

    Democrats have blocked 10 of Bush’s appellate court choices with the threat of filibusters, which means those nominees would need 60 votes to be confirmed. Republicans are considering using their majority to change rules to require a simple majority vote for confirmation…

    Hugh Hewitt has the hypocrisy of Schumer here:

    A day after Senator Uriah Reid (D-Nev) brands the president a “loser” and then apologizes, a week after Senator Ken Salazar (D-Colo) labels Focus on the Family as the anti-Christ and then apologizes, and a month after Senator Robert Byrd (D-WVA) brands the Senate GOP as Hitler’s heirs, Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) appeals to President Bush to bring moderation to the Republican side of the debate on the filibusters. Now that is rich. Wildly amusing and ineffective, but rich.

    Especially when you consider this account of Senator Reid’s appearance before high school students yesterday:

    “Reid took students through a primer of the five most-disputed judicial nominees, arguing some were opposed to the 1973 Roe v. Wade case legalizing abortion. He charged others with trying to dismantle government programs like Social Security.

    ‘I don’t want them. I think they’re bad people,’ Reid said of the nominees

    He described California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown, one of the Bush nominees Republicans will probably float first for approval, as an African-American opposed by the Congressional Black Caucus.

    ‘She is a woman who wants to take us back to the Civil War days,’ Reid said.”

    On the appaling scale, accusing a distinguished African-American jurist of wanting a return to the era of slavery is simply reprehensible. Perhaps Senator Schumer would like to issue a statement on Senator Reid’s disgusting attack on Justice Brown and the other nominees?

    Indeed!

  • Politics,  United Nations

    Senator Biden Scolds Secretary Rice over Bolton Nomination

    Senator Joe Biden (D-Delaware) has scolded Secreatary of State Condoleeza Rice over State Department documents in the Bolton-United Nations confirmation FLAP:

    The top Democrat on the Senate committee considering the nomination of John R. Bolton as United Nations ambassador scolded Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Saturday for ignoring Democratic requests for additional information about the embattled nominee.

    In a curt letter to Rice, Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., reiterated his requests for State Department documents related to charges that Bolton tried to bend or ignore government intelligence findings that did not suit his hard right ideology.

    The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is scheduled to vote on Bolton’s nomination on Thursday. Biden repeated a warning to Rice that Democrats could hold up the vote if they are not satisfied they have investigated Bolton fully.

    Biden acknowledged that the State Department sent the GOP-led committee a large number of documents last week from Bolton’s four-year tenure as the department’s arms control chief. But the documents answered only requests from the committee’s Republican chairman, and ignored what Democrats wanted to see, Biden wrote.

    “In particular, the unfulfilled portions of the request relate to the nominee’s reported efforts, in speeches and testimony, to make statements that went far beyond what the intelligence would support,” Biden wrote.

    “What I seek to determine is whether these documents demonstrate a pattern of conduct that calls into question the nominee’s fitness to serve as U.S. Representative to the United Nations,” he said.

    A copy of the letter was obtained by The Associated Press.

    Biden said that in her public remarks about the Bolton nomination fight last week, Rice implied “that you do not believe you have a duty to respond to requests from the minority.”

    Biden also complained about a bureaucratic impasse over Bolton’s acknowledged pursuit of names of U.S. officials whose communications were secretly recorded by the National Security Agency.

    The new national intelligence chief, John Negroponte, may allow the spy agency to brief some senators next week on Bolton’s unusual request for names and details of the secret intelligence intercepts, but it is not clear how many senators would receive the information or how detailed it would be.

    I recognize that this information is not under your direct control, but it relates to the consideration of the nomination,” Biden wrote.

    State Department spokesman Noel Clay said he could not confirm whether Rice had seen the letter. Rice is traveling in Europe with President Bush. Clay also had no comment on the letter. He referred a reporter to statements from other spokesmen last week that the State Department is cooperating fully with the Senate committee.

    Bolton’s nomination is the most contentious of Bush’s second term, and has revealed fissures in Republican support in the Senate. Four of the 10 Republicans on the Senate committee have expressed reservations about Bolton, but none has said they will definitely vote against him. GOP qualms are based on allegations that Bolton abused underlings or ran roughshod over intelligence analysts who disagreed with him.

    All eight Democrats on the committee are united against Bolton. One Republican vote against him would deny Bolton the committee’s endorsement, although his nomination could still reach the Senate floor.

    If the eight Democrats are already united to vote against Secretary designate Bolton then why request additional documents and……

    why Senator wait until the President and Secretary of State are out of the country to leak your letter to the Associated Press?

    I guess in time for the Sunday talk shows……

    Senator you are a plagiarist and a disgrace to the United States Senate.

    And you really think you will run for President?

    Please make Flap’s day.

  • North Korea,  Politics

    North Korea Warned

    The White House today warned North Korea:

    The White House said Saturday that the United States had a “robust deterrent capability” in the face of worries that North Korea might be planning to test a nuclear weapon.

    “We do have concerns about North Korea,” the White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, told reporters during President Bush’s visit to Latvia. “It is shared by our partners in the region. North Korea would only further isolate itself if it took such a provocative step.”

    Mr. McClellan urged North Korea to return to the six-party talks with the United States, South Korea, China, Japan and Russia, which have been stalled for almost a year, with recent efforts to restart them showing little progress.

    North Korea said in February that it had nuclear weapons.

    On Thursday and Friday, United States officials said that there had been construction and other events that would be consistent with preparations for a nuclear test.

    Flap will be surprised if the United States allows a nuclear test.

    Be prepared for B-2’s to be launched from Guam carrying bunker buster conventional and nuclear bombs.

    George Bush’s patience is wearing thin.

  • Illegal Immigration,  Politics

    Latinos Rally Against Real I-D Act

    In Rockville, Maryland today hundereds of Latinos (many of them illegal aliens) protested the Real ID Act which passed the House of Representatives this past week.

    Read the news release here.

    NB – no arrests were made.

    Update #1

    Michelle Malkin attended this rally. Read her extensive piece on the rally here.

  • California,  Politics

    Ballot Wars

    The Sacramento Bee (free registration required) publishes a weekly summary of proposed California state ballot measures for a special election.

    Read about it here.

    Remember – follow the money!

  • California,  County of Ventura,  Politics

    Ventura County Voting By Mail?

    The Ventura County Star editorializes today on the bill (AB 867) that is working its way through the legislature that would enable Ventura County to be a mail only ballot county. The legislation as now written would take effect with the 2006 June primary election cycle and be in force until 2011.

    Flap previously covered this story here.

    A copy of the May 4, 2005 amended legislation is here.

    Backed by the Democrat party, Warren Slocum, San Mateo County Assessor (County Clerk) Recorder & Chief Elections Official, California Association of Clerks and Election Officials and California Common Cause this bill is similar to previously proposed legislation that was vetoed by then Governor Gray Davis:

    The Secretary of State opposed similar legislation, SB 1135 (Murray, 1999) due to fears of poorly maintained voter lists. The Secretary proposed a requiring participating jurisdictions to conduct list maintenance activities to ensure list accuracy. Governor Davis vetoed the bill because, “[m]any counties do not aggressively purge their voter file or duplicate names.” While AB 867 does not address the issue of voter list maintenance, the Secretary of State has not taken an oppose position.

    The Star’s editorial, as the legislation, is flawed.

    The main arguments in favor of wholly vote by mail ballots are:

    1. Reduced costs in conducting elections

    2. Increase voter participation

    Any cost savings is speculative at best. Granted the Oregon cost analysis looks promising. But, Oregon is not California and any cost savings may be speculative. Also, the major population counties of Los Angeles and Orange have already heavily invested in new voter technologies. Ventura County has not but would have to upgrade soon due to its outdated punch card voting system.

    Increased voter participation in California could be the result of mailing duplicate ballots to voters who have moved or died. California voting lists are a mess and this legislation provides no provision for a clean-up of these lists prior to implementation.

    Flap can forsee voting parties (spelled MAIL DROPS) sponsored by the SEIU (Service Employees International Union), the CTA (California Teachers Association), and AFSCME (American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees) with the mailing of thousands of duplicate ballots all marked for their Democrat party stalwarts. The visions of the 1960 Presidential election where the unions stole the Illinois election fraudulantly for John Kennedy dance wildly in my head.

    The potential for fraud for mail only balloting is just too great.

    Notwithstanding, residents must show up for jury duty. It is not asking too much to show up to vote.

    The Governor should veto this bill should it reach his desk.