John Edwards Watch: Stupid?

Jim Geraghty asks the question: Does John Edwards think the American public is STUPID?

…. there are at least two glaring questions that suggest Edwards’ explanation consists of additional lies. (Besides his claim that the affair started after she was hired by his PAC, and not before, which appears to be contradicted by the PAC billing records.)

If the affair ended in 2006, why were Edwards and Hunter meeting in the Beverly Hills Hilton from 10 p.m. to 2 a.m. last month? Beyond that… if the child is not his, why did she bring the baby to their late-night meeting?

The official Edwards explanation is that he met, without telling Elizabeth, for a secret meeting at a luxury hotel room from 9:45 p.m to 2:40 p.m., in order to not have sex, while a friend took care of the child in a room several doors down (according to the Enquirer’s account), and that after they had spent time together in the room not having sex, he told her, “hey, let’s bring in your infant that I am not the father of, I would be happy to caress the adorable little child that I did not sire.” Because philanderers are legendarily concerned about the offspring of their ex-mistresses.

John Edwards is finished politically. There is absolutely NO WAY he would be named Vice President, Attorney General or anything within the Democrat Party or government.

The Clintons hate him for costing Hillary the nomination – remember Iowa and Obama would NEVER touch him – remember Henry Cisneros.

Bye Bye $400 haircut……..