• Atlas Shrugged,  John and Ken,  John Galt

    Californians Going Galt – California Tea Party and Tax Revolt

    Fullerton California Tax Revolt 2009 15,000 + citizens show support to throw the Sacramento Liars out the door John and Ken’s a start of something Big ! Throw out the Liars.

    From Atlas Shrugged, the California Legislature and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Californians are “GOING GALT” (Via M/M).

    Flap has spoken to many California voters who have almost given up on the California silliness it calls its bureucratic government. Tax increase upon tax increase to satisfy the ever increasing amount of government spending, including illegal aliens.

    This “Going Galt” is a prelude to an open tax revolt and/or mass exodus from California by business.

    Here is part two of the Fullerton Tax Revolt:

    Radio station KFI AM 640 sponsored John and Ken’s first 2009 California Tea Party and Tax Revolt at Slidebar Cafe’ in Fullerton, California, on March 7, 2009. An estimated 15,000 people participated and are gearing up for more action. This is just the beginning.

    Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • Chris Dodd

    Poll Watch: Democrat Senator Chris Dodd in Trouble for 2010 Re-election Race

    Chris Dodd

    Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., left, asks a question of Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, not pictured, as the committee’s ranking Republican Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., right, listens during the committee’s hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2009

    Yes, he is.

    Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd continues to struggle in the eyes of Connecticut voters with a new poll showing the five-term incumbent in a statistical dead heat with his likely Republican challenger.

    The survey, conducted by Quinnipiac University, shows former Rep. Rob Simmons (R) taking 43 percent of the vote to Dodd’s 42 percent in a hypothetical 2010 matchup — a danger zone for any incumbent, particularly a Democrat in a state as blue as Connecticut.

    Inside the numbers, the prognosis isn’t much better. Simmons is winning the support of 15 percent of self-identified Democrats in the poll and independents are siding with the former Republican House member by a whopping 49 percent to 32 percent.

    Dodd’s personal favorability ratings are also languishing with 46 percent expressing a favorable opinion about him and 45 percent feeling unfavorably. Compare those middling numbers to Dodd’s showing in Q polls from May 2007 (45 percent fav/31 percent unfav) and February 2007 (49 percent fav/30 percent unfav) and you see just how badly he has been hurt by his ties to the troubled mortgage lender Countrywide and his quixotic presidential bid.

    The re-emergence of the national Republican Party may come in unanticipated places, like solidly blue states such as Connecticutt and perhaps New York.

    But, corruption has sunk Chris Dodd and the GOP needs to exploit this pick up opportunity.


    Technorati Tags:

  • Michael Steele,  Republican National Committee

    Michael Steele OUT As Republican National Committee Chairman if GOP Fails to Win in New York?

    michael steele

    Former president George W. Bush’s Republicans, groping their way from their November elections rout, need a “hip-hop” makeover to court younger voters, the party’s chief said in an interview. “We need to uptick our image with everyone, including one-armed midgets,” Michael Steele, elected in late January as the first black chairman of the Republican National Committee, told the Washington Times.

    So say ex-RNC staffers.

    Wishful thinking from the LEFT mostly and stirring the pot.

    Jim Geraghty has the RIGHT view.

    But, Steele must quickly organize his staff and demonstrate that he has command of the party apparatus as a change agent.


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Gay Marriage,  Gay Politics

    Poll Watch: Gay Marriage Evenly Splits Californians – Tough Race in 2010

    gay marriage march 5

    Kate Kuykendall (R) and her wife Tori Kuykendall (L) stand with their daughter during a gay rights rally against the Proposition 8 measure at the El Pueblo de Los Angeles park, March 5, 2009.

    The latest California Field Poll shows it continues to be a difficult issue for California registered voters.

    California voters are as sharply divided over gay marriage as they were in November when they approved Proposition 8, overturning a state Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriages.

    Voters passed Proposition 8, which declared marriage could only be between a man and a woman, 52 percent to 48 percent.

    A new Field Poll showed voters almost evenly split, 48 percent to 47 percent, when asked if they would approve a new constitutional amendment to again allow same-sex couples to marry.

    Last week, the state Supreme Court heard arguments in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8. From questions asked by the seven justices, court watchers concluded the court is likely to uphold Proposition 8 but also allow to stand the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed after the court’s original ruling in May and the November election.

    A coalition of gay-rights groups have filed an initiative aimed at the 2010 ballot to make same-sex marriages legal again.

    Field Poll director Mark DiCamillo said that while Californians are dramatically more supportive of same-sex marriages than they were a few decades ago, he questioned whether attitudes would be much different in 2010 than they were in 2008.

    He noted that gubernatorial elections always have smaller voter turnouts than presidential elections and that younger voters most supportive of same-sex marriage are also among the least reliable voters.

    “If you bring this to an election, turnout really does matter,” DiCamillo said. “Which groups turn out a little bit more and which ones turn out a little bit less have a big effect on the outcome.”

    A second difficulty, the pollster said, is that an amendment reinstating same-sex marriage would require a “yes” vote whereas Proposition 8 required a “no” vote to preserve gay marriages.
    “The thing that works against the advocates’ position is now they’ve got to get a ‘yes’ vote which is harder to get than a ‘no’ vote,” DiCamillo said.

    It is likely that the California Supreme Court will PUNT on the issue of gay marriage in the coming weeks. By PUNT, Flap means that the court will uphold California Proposition 8 restoring the traditional definition of marriage – while on the other hand allowing the same sex marriages already completed to remain valid.

    What will this mean for gay politics in 2010 – a Governor’s election year?

    Dan Walters has an accurate description of the conventional wisdom on a California electoral outcome.

    It will be a gamble for gay marriage proponents to come before California voters again in 2010.

    Will homosexual activists roll the dice?


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Barack Obama,  Day By Day

    Day By Day by Chris Muir March 10, 2009 – Tag n’ Bag ’em

    day by day 031009

    Day By Day by Chris Muir

    The Obama Administration is so desperate to raise revenue so they can spend waste it, Flap does not doubt that GPS tracking data for driving mileage/location data is being considered.

    Will cities and states erect border barriers and charge taxes to use “THEIR” infrastructure?

    How about a tax on illegal border crossing along the Mexican border? Now, you know THIS will never happen – why alienate a constituent voting group of the future?

    Stay tuned as more economic silliness comes from the Obama spendaholics. What will they spend today?

    Previous:

    The Day By Day Archive


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Del.icio.us Links

    links for 2009-03-10

    • Okay, Senate Republicans are officially ratcheting up their war against Chas Freeman, who is taking heavy fire from the pro-Israel lobby and the neocons as Obama’s pick to head the National Intelligence Council.

      I’ve just obtained a letter that half dozen Republican Senators will fire off later today to Dennis Blair — the Director of National Intelligence and the person who appointed Freeman — protesting the choice of Freeman for the NIC post. The letter complains about Freeman’s relative lack of experience and views on China and Israel.

      Freeman’s gig is key because he is responsible for preparing some of the intel community’s most sensitive assessments.

    • Mr. Bush frequently used signing statements to declare that provisions in the bills he was signing were unconstitutional constraints on executive power, claiming that the laws did not need to be enforced or obeyed as written. The laws he challenged included a torture ban and requirements that Congress be given detailed reports about how the Justice Department was using the counter-terrorism powers in the USA Patriot Act.

      Dating back to the 19th century, presidents have occasionally signed a bill while declaring that one or more provisions were unconstitutional. Presidents began doing so more frequently starting with the Reagan administration.

      But Mr. Bush broke all records, using signing statements to challenge about 1,200 bill sections over his eight years in office — about twice the number challenged by all previous presidents combined, according to data compiled by Christopher Kelley, a political science professor at Miami University in Ohio.

    • Under fire from congressional Republicans for lifting restrictions on stem-cell research, President Barack Obama got a powerful endorsement for his move Monday from Nancy Reagan, the former’s president’s wife.

      “I’m very grateful that President Obama has lifted the restrictions on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research,” she wrote in a statement released shortly after Obama reversed the Bush administration limits. “These new rules will now make it possible for scientists to move forward. I urge researchers to make use of the opportunities that are available to them, and to do all they can to fulfill the promise that stem cell research offers."

      Nancy Reagan has been an outspoken advocate of stem-cell research – and scientists hope that the research could someday lead to a cure for Alzheimer’s disease, which afflicted her late husband, Ronald Reagan.

    • Want to get involved in the nuts and bolts of the Ventura County Republican Party? We're having an information session for volunteers to join our team this Monday night @ 7pm.

      We will be going over ways that we need your help to build an active organization in our community, including communications, political operations, fundraising, events and more. Come get directly connected with a way to make a difference locally and push back the Democrats' attempts to tax your hard-earned income.

      Join us at our HQ at 2219 E Thousand Oaks Blvd Suite 103. If you have any questions, email Executive Director Chris Collier at ccollier@vcrcc.org.

    • Based on the description, many are concluding that the unnamed prominent African American backer whose endorsement Obama spent two years cultivating, is retired general and former Secretary of State Colin Powell. I contacted Powell's office this morning and Peggy Cifrino, Powell's principal assistant & spokeswoman, offered a pretty comprehensive denial:
    • I am not suggesting that extreme conservatism wasn’t once popular, nor am I suggesting I should in any way be any kind of voice for the party. I have been a Republican for less than a year. Still, even after losing the election, I find myself more drawn to GOP ideals and wanting to fight for the party’s resurgence. And if figureheads like Ann Coulter are turning me off, then they are definitely turning off other members of my generation as well. She does appeal to the most extreme members of the Republican Party—but they are dying off, becoming less and less relevant to the party structure as a whole. I think most people my age are like me in that we all don’t believe in every single ideal of each party
    • Five Ways Obama’s Economic Stimulus Is Already Working

      Time offers five reasons for economic optimism — among them, "The Government Is on the Case."

      While I don’t find Justin Fox’s list particularly reassuring — the surprise ending will do that — it did prompt some rethinking. Perhaps I, among others, have been too relentlessly negative in assessing the economy’s performance in the opening months of the Obama administration.

      After further review, I have found five key signs of economic growth, all of which I attribute entirely, or almost entirely, to President Obama.

    • Last week, the file cabinets at the Department of Justice rolled open. Out came the most brazen thinking imaginable: In the weeks after the 9/11 attacks, ultra-con lawyers said the military could blow up apartment buildings, eavesdrop on anyone and even suspend freedom of the press. All in the name of the war on terror.
      It may all sound like more of the same, another collection of the Bush-Cheney greatest hits as the White House inner circle dreamed up ways to counter the attacks. But it's also the latest exhibit in the case for a "truth commission" that Congress is considering to investigate the Bush era.

      There are reasons to worry about the notion. It could become a partisan piñata that Democrats exploit for attention and Republicans smack as a useless diversion. It could end up producing a political meltdown instead of fresh take on modern history.
      +++++++
      Is there any wonder why the San Francisco Chronicle is a failing newspaper?

    • To those who believe that Barack Obama is a different kind of politician — more honest, more courageous — please don't examine his administration's budget. If you do, you may sadly conclude that he resembles presidents stretching back to John Kennedy in one crucial respect. He won't tax voters for all the government services they want. That's the main reason we've run budget deficits in 43 of the past 48 years.

      Obama is a great pretender. He repeatedly says he's doing things that he isn't, trusting his powerful rhetoric to obscure the difference. He has made "responsibility" a personal theme; the budget's cover line is "A New Era of Responsibility." He says the budget begins "making the tough choices necessary to restore fiscal discipline." It doesn't.

      (tags: barack_obama)