• Del.icio.us Links

    links for 2011-01-10

    • Non-RNC Member Endorsement Watch
      National Right to Life has declined to endorse a particular candidate in the race, but has publicly released a glowing letter in praise of Maria Cino… the closest to an endorsement the group will most likely make.
      Marc Racicot, Governor of Montana and former RNC Chairman himself, has endorsed Ann Wagner, praising her for her leadership, work ethic, and commitment to “grassroots politics.”
      Michael Reagan has endorsed Reince Priebus in the race. Additionally, Priebus has scored two more RNC member endorsements, bringing his frontrunner total to 36.
      For whatever it’s worth, conservative bloggers Erick Erickson and Dan Riehl have both endorsed Saul Anuzis in the race, and both named Ann Wagner as their second choice.

      ++++++

      Read it all = a good summary of the state of the RNC race

      I cannot support Saul Anuzis because of the National Popular Vote position.

      (tags: saul_anuzis)
    • Let’s not indulge in any equivocation: Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s 2008 presidential campaign was a flop. Though he was an early front-runner in national surveys of potential Republican primary voters, Mr. Giuliani placed a distant sixth in the Iowa caucus, fourth in the New Hampshire primary, sixth again in both Michigan and South Carolina and then, finally, a distant third in Florida, a state where he had allocated much of his resources. Mr. Giuliani then dropped out of the race and endorsed John McCain.

      Mr. Giuliani may try his luck again, according to the New York Post, which thinks he might be interested in the 2012 race — although Mr. Giuliani himself has worked to tamp down such speculation.

      +++++++

      Rudy will not run but will likely be an Attorney General for whomever beats Obama in 2012.

    • Now to Tucson, Arizona, where six people are dead and Democrat congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords is seriously injured following another gun rampage. Attacker Jared Lee Loughner has thus far offered no clue at all about why he did it. Apparently the fellow is a drug-using gamer whom one former classmate recalls as “left wing”, a “political radical”, “reclusive”, a “pot head” and “quite liberal”. He’d met Giffords four years ago and thought her “stupid & unintelligent”. Besides that background and Loughner’s MySpace and YouTube rantings, that’s all we have. There’s no “Allahu Akbar” here. Yet – incredibly – many clearly heard a cry of “Allahu Palin”.

      +++++++

      Read it all and why, of course Sarah Palin is easy to demonize

    • How sick do you have to be to start making political capital out of the killing of six people including a nine-year old girl, long before anyone has the remotest clue what the murderer’s motives were, or his political affiliations, or his state of mind?

      Not sick at all, to judge by the response of so many US Tweeters in the immediate aftermath of the Arizona shootings. When you’re a liberal, it seems, cloying sanctimoniousness, grotesque moral posturing, double standards, hypocrisy and cynical, malevolent smearing all come as naturally and healthily as breathing.

      As Toby Harnden reports, barely were the bodies cold when the liberal fascists started pointing the finger of blame: it was Sarah Palin’s fault, of course; Sarah Palin’s and Glenn Beck’s and, of course, the Tea Party’s. Definitely not a crazed killing spree by a deeply confused young man, no, sirree. After all, as Rahm Emmanuel would say, you must “never let a crisis go to waste.”

      ++++++

      Read it all

    • But I also can’t help detecting a desire to make Saturday’s shooting something that it doesn’t seem to be – a chance to say, "See, we told you" to Palin and the Tea Party crowd. Or, as Rep. Raul Grijalva, who represents the district next to Giffords’ in Arizona, put it in an interview with the Nation: "Ms. Palin needs to look at her own behavior." He is far from alone in expressing this sentiment.

      This seems unfair. At best, the connection between Palin’s behavior and Saturday’s tragedy is abstract. If anything, the shooting reinforces a point that James Fallows has made: The motives of political assassins rarely have anything to do with mainstream political debate and rhetoric. For now, at least, this seems to be the case with Loughner.

      +++++++

      The Left's hands are not clean.

      Remember the rhetoric and President Bush?

    • The linchpin of Gov. Jerry Brown's budget plan is a June special election in which voters would be asked to extend temporary tax increases on income, purchases and vehicles that are set to expire this year. Placing such a measure on the ballot would require a two-thirds vote of the Legislature, meaning Republican votes are needed.

      Assembly GOP leader Connie Conway of Tulare says her caucus won't provide any. "Assembly Republicans stand united as the last line of defense for California taxpayers," she said in a statement. "There are not votes in the Assembly Republican Caucus to place the same tax increases that voters overwhelmingly rejected less than two years ago back on the ballot."

      If Conway is right, things just got trickier for Brown.

      ++++++++

      If Brown end arounds the Legislature, might he be recalled for malfeasance?

    • 1) Latinos did not constitute 22% of the electorate as reported by the Edison Research exit poll and blabbed along by those who would make the Latino vote look more important than it is (for the record, our two posted references to the 22 % factor, one from a guest columnist, the other a suggestion, are here and here). Latinos accounted for 16% of the vote, just as the better pollsters had predicted (and just 1-point lower than the LA Times/USC poll found after the fact).

      2) “Independents” did not account for 27% of the voters, as reported by the exit poll and some pollsters (we name no names) who rely on party identification – a practice Calbuzz can’t fathom when party registration is available. Actual independents, that is, decline-to-state voters, accounted for 17% of the electorate.

      These facts, part of the data pulled from the final voter file by Bob Proctor of Statewide Information Systems of Sacramento, are important

      +++++++

      But, Latinos did overwhelmingly vote for J. brown

    • It is usually several weeks before doctors can fully evaluate cognitive function in a patient who has suffered a gunshot wound to the brain, and the body has a significant capacity to compensate for serious injuries.

      Although Ms. Giffords’s ability to follow commands is encouraging, her doctors said that it would take several weeks to know what her recovery would be. That is a caveat that Dr. Flamm well understands. “I can understand the impatience of wanting to know it now,” he said. “But even if I wanted to know and examined her myself, I wouldn’t be able to answer that question at this stage.”

      +++++++

      Read it all

    • The Tuscon massacre ghouls who are now trying to criminalize conservatism have forced our hand.

      They need to be reminded. You need to be reminded.

      Confront them. Don’t be cowed into silence.

      And don’t let the media whitewash the sins of the hypocritical Left in their naked attempt to suppress the law-abiding, constitutionally-protected, peaceful, vigorous political speech of the Right.

      They want to play tu quo que in the middle of a national tragedy? They asked for it. They got it.

      ***

      The progressive climate of hate: A comprehensive illustrated primer in 8 parts:

      I. PALIN HATE
      II. BUSH HATE
      III. MISC. TEA PARTY/GOP/ANTI-TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE HATE
      IV. ANTI-CONSERVATIVE FEMALE HATE
      V. LEFT-WING MOB HATE — campus, anti-war radicals, ACORN, eco-extremists, & unions
      VI. OPEN-BORDERS HATE
      VII. ANTI-MILITARY HATE
      VIII. HATE: CRIMES — the ever-growing Unhinged Mugshot Collection

      +++++++++

      Read it all

    • At 2:00 a.m. on Saturday—about eight hours before he allegedly killed six people and wounded 14, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), in Tucson—Jared Lee Loughner phoned an old and close friend with whom he had gone to high school and college. The friend, Bryce Tierney, was up late watching TV, but he didn't answer the call. When he later checked his voice mail, he heard a simple message from Loughner: "Hey man, it's Jared. Me and you had good times. Peace out. Later."

      ++++++

      Read it all = riveting interview

    • The budget proposals Gov. Jerry Brown is expected to unveil Monday have had those of us in local government in California holding our breath. Why? Because a key component in his plan to solve the state's structural deficit will rely on a strategy known as "realignment," in which state and local governments swap various funding streams and service responsibilities. The stated aim is to restore local administrative control and stabilize unpredictable revenues.

      +++++++

      Read it all.

      Even the Democrat controlled County Board of Supervisors are leary because THEY will have to cut services or raise taxes shifting the blame form the Governor and California Legislature.

      More symbolism over substance from Jerry Brown.

  • Clarence Dupnik,  Gabrielle Giffords,  Jared Loughner,  Rush Limbaugh

    Arizona Sheriff Clarence Dupnik Blames Rush Limbaugh for Tucson Shooting Massacre



    Unhinged and Far Left Democrat – what a shocker.

    The Arizona sheriff investigating the Tucson shooting that left U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords critically wounded had harsh words today for those engaging in political rhetoric, calling conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh “irresponsible” for continuing the vitriol.

    “The kind of rhetoric that flows from people like Rush Limbaugh, in my judgment he is irresponsible, uses partial information, sometimes wrong information,” Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said today. “[Limbaugh] attacks people, angers them against government, angers them against elected officials and that kind of behavior in my opinion is not without consequences.”

    Limbaugh today railed against the media and Dupnik for trying to draw a link between the heated political climate and the shooting rampage, calling the sheriff a “fool.” But Dupnik stood by his assertions.

    “The vitriol affects the [unstable] personality that we are talking about,” he said. “You can say, ‘Oh no, it doesn’t,’ but my opinion is that it does.”

    Investigators have yet to determine what motivated 22-year-old Jared Lee Loughner, described by some as appearing to be mentally unstable, to allegedly open fire on the crowd outside the Tucson Safeway.

    However, so far there is no evidence that he has any ties to any political group.

    I agree with Rush that Sheriff Dupnik is a fool and so do otherseven from the LEFT.

  • Elton John,  Illegal Immigration

    House Republicans Name California’s Rep. Elton Gallegly to Lead Immigration Subcommittee

    California GOP delegation could have sway on immigration issues in Congress

    This is a good appointment for my Congressional district and for California.

    Signaling their approach to immigration reform this year will be hawkish but not rhetorically extreme, House Republicans have chosen a Southern California congressman to head the group of lawmakers that drafts and introduces immigration policy.

    The solidly pro-enforcement Rep. Elton Gallegly, R-Simi Valley, was named Friday morning to lead the immigration subcommittee in the House of Representatives, which falls under the judiciary committee. House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, surprised many when he chose Gallegly over outspoken Iowa Republican Steve King, who was widely considered to have the job. King will instead be vice chairman.

    Groups that work to halt illegal immigration praised news of the duo’s leadership, but liberal groups interpreted Gallegly’s higher position as a snubbing of King’s harsh tone.

    “The answer to illegal immigration is fairly simple,” Gallegly said in a news release Friday. “First, we must enforce our laws and secure the border. Second, we must remove the magnets that encourage illegal immigration. Finally, we must remove the benefits that make it easy for them to stay.”

    Gallegly said he would oppose any form of amnesty, and he pledged to quickly hold hearings to scrutinize the Obama administration’s approach to work site enforcement and to expand the use of E-Verify, a program for employer screening of workers’ immigration status.

    Missing from Gallegly’s statements Friday was any mention of revoking birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants, a hot-button cause that has been a pet issue for King and other immigration hawks. King introduced a bill earlier in the week that would end automatic citizenship for children born in the United States to illegal immigrant parents.

    I am glad Elton has been appointed to this chairmanship. He is tough, but fair on illegal immigration.

    And, he will actually get something done, meaning legislation will be written in the Congress. Getting it through the U.S. Senate will probably be difficult and past President Obama’s veto pen more than difficult – but that is another story.

    Look for movement on E-Verify, employer sanctions and Congressional hearings if the Justice Department will NOT enforce existing immigration law.

  • California Budget

    The Interactive California Budget Balancer

    The Los Angeles Times posted an interactive California Budget Balancer website yesterday.

    Try your hand at eliminating the red ink in California’s budget.

    The state’s budget shortfall for the rest of this fiscal year and next, estimated to be $28 billion, is the size of the total general fund budget of 12 states combined: Delaware, Idaho, Maine, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont and West Virginia.

    We’ve provided a wide range of options — spending cuts and tax increases — that cover most of the proposals made by Democratic or Republican lawmakers. It’s not easy, but it can be done.

    I have worked through the numbers a few times and found it fairly easy to balance the budget WITHOUT raising ANY taxes.

    See what you can do and either Tweet up your results or leave a comment below.

  • Mike Huckabee,  Mitt Romney,  President 2012,  Sarah Palin

    President 2012 Poll Watch: In Iowa Caucus Huckabee Leads, Romney and Palin Third

    Of course, if Sarah Palin runs, then Mike Huckabee probably won’t.

    Interesting that Newt Gingrich has gained NO traction in Iowa.

    While Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney top the GOP field, the race remains wide open although some candidates are having trouble gaining traction, particularly Gary Johnson, Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich. Romney seems to have the most committed base along with Sarah Palin. Tim Pawlenty is attracting some interest. Michele Bachmann could be a wild card and maybe John Thune.

  • Mike Huckabee,  Mitch Daniels,  Mitt Romney,  Newt Gingrich,  President 2012,  Sarah Palin

    President 2012 President Poll Watch: In GOP Mike Huckabee Most Liked and Sarah Palin Most Known



    Kind of an interesting poll, but it does not really does not say more than what the CW is at this point.

    Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee has the highest net favorable score among Republicans nationwide in a field of potential GOP candidates for 2012, while former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is the most recognized. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney are also widely recognized by Republicans, and have favorability numbers similar to Palin’s.

    If Sarah Palin runs for President, Mike Huckabee will not because he will not be able to raise the money early in order to compete with Mitt Romney’s fortune. Same goes for Newt.

    Should Sarah Palin decline to run, then they both will be in and the race may be open enough for a Mitch Daniels to come in as a newcomer.

  • Day By Day,  Gabrielle Giffords

    Day By Day January 10, 2011 – Grill

    Day By Day by Chris Muir

    Chris, watch that inflammed rhetoric about “grilling” the President.

    You know “dissent is the highest form of patriotism” and all of that but, my God, grill rhymes with “KILL.”

    Jack Shafer’s piece yesterday at Slate pretty much says it all, re: freedom of speech, political rhetoric and the Gabrielle Gifford’s assassination attempt.

    For as long as I’ve been alive, crosshairs and bull’s-eyes have been an accepted part of the graphical lexicon when it comes to political debates. Such “inflammatory” words as targeting, attacking, destroying, blasting, crushing, burying, knee-capping, and others have similarly guided political thought and action. Not once have the use of these images or words tempted me or anybody else I know to kill. I’ve listened to, read—and even written!—vicious attacks on government without reaching for my gun. I’ve even gotten angry, for goodness’ sake, without coming close to assassinating a politician or a judge.

    From what I can tell, I’m not an outlier. Only the tiniest handful of people—most of whom are already behind bars, in psychiatric institutions, or on psycho-meds—can be driven to kill by political whispers or shouts. Asking us to forever hold our tongues lest we awake their deeper demons infantilizes and neuters us and makes politicians no safer.

    Previous:

    The Day By Day Archive