Aurora Johnson, left, a dental therapist, filled cavities for Paul Towarak, 10, in the village of Unalakleet, Alaska. For more involved procedures, Ms. Johnson refers patients to a dentist. Photo Credit NY Times
From the press release:
The American Dental Association today released six reports examining the economic viability of three models of so-called “midlevel” dental providers, the Dental Health Aide Therapists (DHATs) currently providing care in Alaska Native territories, the Dental Therapists (DTs), currently working in Minnesota, and the proposed but as yet unrealized Advanced Dental Hygiene Practitioner (ADHP). The reports raise serious questions about whether these midlevel provider models can sustain themselves economically.
“These studies represent a new way of examining whether midlevel providers are an economically viable way to improve access to dental care for underserved populations,” said ADA President William R. Calnon, DDS. “They are a first step, and not the last word. But certainly, lawmakers and public health authorities should consider the factors examined in the studies carefully before rushing to create dental providers that may be unable to fulfill their intended purpose of reducing oral health disparities.”
The studies, performed by ECG Management Consultants, examine practice parameters in five states where adopting one or more of these models has been under discussion in the legislature or the public health community. ECG produced separate reports for the five states,
Connecticut, Kansas, Maine, New Hampshire and Washington. A five-state summary report also is available.
ECG based its modeling on the length and cost of training of each midlevel position, operating costs, likely salaries, academic debt, and projected revenues. Researchers considered each model in the context of various combinations of public, sliding-scale, and private fee schedules. (The fee schedules varied by state.)
Of the 45 scenarios modeled (three payer mixes for each of three practice models in five states), only five indicated positive net revenues, ranging from $8,000 in Kansas to $38,000 in Connecticut, assuming a 50/50 mix of public and private fees. Four positive net revenue scenarios involved the Dental Health Aide Therapist model; one involved the Dental Therapist model. The other 40 scenarios showed net losses ranging from $1,000 for a DHAT operating on a 50 public/50 private mix in Washington to $176,000 for an ADHP practicing in the same state, assuming a 75/25 public/sliding revenue mix.
“It is critical to understand that oral health disparities are a complex set of problems requiring an integrated set of solutions,” said Dr. Calnon. “Medicaid reforms, community water fluoridation, oral health education and helping people overcome cultural, geographic and language barriers are critical components of this. The ADA believes that allowing nondentists to perform irreversible surgical procedures is the wrong way to go. And based on these studies, midlevel dental providers would in most settings be unable to generate sufficient revenue to sustain themselves absent a continual source of financial underwriting. Given the current budget constraints at every level of government, and the already insufficient financing for dental care in most states, midlevel providers do not appear to be viable.
“Certainly, this research is not all-encompassing. But to our knowledge, no one has considered the question this comprehensively. The ADA encourages all stakeholders to study these models comprehensively, to avoid wasting constrained resources on programs that ultimately are not sustainable. We welcome others who are interested in breaking down barriers to oral health to join us in delving further into how best to maximize limited available resources—and advocating for increased resources—to improve the oral health of the tens of millions of Americans—including as many as one-quarter of the nation’s children—who live without adequate access to regular dental care.”
I was invited to an American Dental Association webinar and the screencap summary chart above was taken from the presentation.
A link to the embargoed summary report is here.
I will have more later, after digesting the reports and the webinar presentation.
Republican Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty announces that he is running for President in Des Moines, Iowa, May 23, 2011
The legislative battle over what have come to be known as “midlevel providers” in Minnesota has come to a close.
What began as two distinct models of education and practice emerged as one with the state creating a new position—the dental therapist—who will provide care for underserved patient populations in the state.
Gov. Tim Pawlenty signed Senate File 2083 May 16, creating the dental therapist, a licensed provider with a bachelor’s degree in dental therapy who will work with Minnesota-licensed dentists to provide preventive dental services, restoration of primary and permanent teeth, extraction of primary teeth and select other dental treatments.
Governor Pawlenty signed the legislation and now will be held accountable. Pawlenty is not a fan of dentistry no matter how the American Dental Association or anyone else spins it. He could have vetoed the legislation.
Dental therapists or mid-level providers will fracture American dentistry into multiple tiers of care and help undermine private practice while increasing Big Government control of my profession.
Sorry, Tim. I will support and vote for someone else.