• Morons,  Politics

    British Doctors Propose Ban on Kitchen Knives

    First it was my gun now they want to take away my pointed kitchen knife. Read the moronic story here:

    A&E doctors are calling for a ban on long pointed kitchen knives to reduce deaths from stabbing.

    A team from West Middlesex University Hospital said violent crime is on the increase – and kitchen knives are used in as many as half of all stabbings.

    They argued many assaults are committed impulsively, prompted by alcohol and drugs, and a kitchen knife often makes an all too available weapon.

    The research is published in the British Medical Journal.

    The researchers said there was no reason for long pointed knives to be publicly available at all.

    They consulted 10 top chefs from around the UK, and found such knives have little practical value in the kitchen

    Well, if they have no value in the kitchen then why not BAN them. What idiocy!

    None of the chefs felt such knives were essential, since the point of a short blade was just as useful when a sharp end was needed.

    The researchers said a short pointed knife may cause a substantial superficial wound if used in an assault – but is unlikely to penetrate to inner organs.

    In contrast, a pointed long blade pierces the body like “cutting into a ripe melon”.

    The use of knives is particularly worrying amongst adolescents, say the researchers, reporting that 24% of 16-year-olds have been shown to carry weapons, primarily knives.

    The study found links between easy access to domestic knives and violent assault are long established.

    French laws in the 17th century decreed that the tips of table and street knives be ground smooth.

    A century later, forks and blunt-ended table knives were introduced in the UK in an effort to reduce injuries during arguments in public eating houses.

    The researchers say legislation to ban the sale of long pointed knives would be a key step in the fight against violent crime.

    “The Home Office is looking for ways to reduce knife crime.

    “We suggest that banning the sale of long pointed knives is a sensible and practical measure that would have this effect.”

    Remember, people cause knife crimes you morons. The knife does not stab itself.

    Home Office spokesperson said there were already extensive restrictions in place to control the sale and possession of knives.

    “The law already prohibits the possession of offensive weapons in a public place, and the possession of knives in public without good reason or lawful authority, with the exception of a folding pocket knife with a blade not exceeding three inches.

    “Offensive weapons are defined as any weapon designed or adapted to cause injury, or intended by the person possessing them to do so.

    “An individual has to demonstrate that he had good reason to possess a knife, for example for fishing, other sporting purposes or as part of his profession (e.g. a chef) in a public place.

    “The manufacture, sale and importation of 17 bladed, pointed and other offensive weapons have been banned, in addition to flick knives and gravity knives.”

    A spokesperson for the Association of Chief Police Officers said: “ACPO supports any move to reduce the number of knife related incidents, however, it is important to consider the practicalities of enforcing such changes.”

    Yes, those knives are pesty little creatures and have a tendency to hide.

    Will they ban manicure scissors next?

  • Politics,  United Nations

    Democrats Force Delay of Bolton Confirmation

    The confirmation of John Bolton has been delayed again by U.S. Senate Democrats. Read the story here:

    Democrats forced a postponement Thursday in a confirmation vote for John R. Bolton, yet another setback for
    President Bush’s tough-talking choice as U.N. ambassador and a renewal of intense partisanship in the Senate after a brief respite.

    The vote to advance Bolton’s nomination to an immediate confirmation vote was 56-42 — four short of the 60 votes needed.

    Within minutes, aides to Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist said Democratic leader Harry Reid had offered assurances earlier in the day that obtaining the 60 votes would be a mere formality.

    “I never said that,” Reid told reporters as he ducked into a post-vote meeting in Frist’s office.

    Democratic aides said that despite the vote, Bolton’s nomination did not appear to be in jeopardy.

    Yeah, right! The Lefties haven’t found anything damning yet but want some classified material to leak so they can claim some fabricated issue.

    By the way, Bolton has been confirmed by the Senate three times previously.

    A final vote on Bolton, whom Bush has called strong medicine for corruption and inefficiency at the
    United Nations, will not take place until at least June, after the Senate returns from a Memorial Day recess.

    The dramatic roll call raised questions about Bush’s ability to win confirmation of some of his more ideological appointees as he begins his second term in the White House. And it was a setback for Frist, R-Tenn., who was hoping to end nearly three months of delays and investigation and finally deliver Bolton’s nomination for the president.

    Frist said the Bolton matter soured the air of cooperation the two parties’ centrists forged just days ago after months of wrangling over judges.

    “John Bolton, the very first issue we turned to, we got what looks to me like a filibuster,” Frist said. “It certainly sounds like a filibuster … it quacks like a filibuster.”

    Flap reported on that DEAL previously here and here.

    This DEAL is a short-lived exercise in futility and Harry Reid should be held accountable by Bill Frist.

    The Nuclear Constitutional Option is back on the table – the Democrats have abrogated the DEAL.

    Will Bill Frist have the intestinal fortitude to call it up? Or will he be John McCain’s lackey – again?

    Democrats contended the White House had stiff-armed the Senate over classified information on Bolton’s tenure in his current job as the State Department’s arms control chief, and demanded more information before the Senate can give Bolton an up-or-down vote.

    Bush has called Bolton strong medicine for corruption and inefficiency at the United Nations, but Democrats said he is an ideologue who lacks the diplomatic touch to advance U.S. interests at the world body and repair the American image abroad.

    Sen. Joseph Biden D-Del., said Democrats do not want to postpone an up-or-down vote indefinitely.

    “We are willing to vote 10 minutes after we get back in session, if in fact they provide the information,” Biden said.

    The material Democrats have sought for weeks involves Bolton’s use of government intelligence on Syria, and instances in which he asked for names of fellow U.S. officials whose communications were secretly picked up by a spy agency.

    Senator Biden speaks wrongly and with a shovel.

    What a plagiarising moron!

    Bolton deserves confirmation not delay.

    H/T: Huffington Post

    Update #1

    Hugh Hewitt supports the notion that the DEAL has been breached:

    So much for the new era of bipartisanship Monday’s “deal” was supposed to kick off. The Democrats filibusterd John Bolton today, obliging America’s U.N. seat to remain vacant during the looming elections. Earlier today, in a speech at the National Press Club, Reid had promised a new era in the Senate: “Ameicans want us to put the commmonsense center ahead of nonsense.”

    Right.

    Indeed.

  • Media

    Ventura County Star: Moving to Camarillo

    The Ventura County Star Newpaper based in Ventura for the past seventy-seven years will move to Camarillo at the end of 2006.

    Read the story here:

    The Ventura County Star will move from Ventura to new, larger offices in Camarillo late next year, finally implementing a long-discussed plan to locate closer to the center of the county, Publisher Tim Gallagher said Wednesday.

    Most of the newspaper’s approximately 400 employees are expected to move from the company’s Ralston Street offices to an ultramodern, 54,000-square-foot facility in the fourth quarter of 2006, Gallagher said.

    This is good news for the County of Ventura!

  • California,  Politics

    Swarzenegger: I’ll Be Back (Campaigning Soon)!

    The California Governor’s poll numbers are falling:

    Californians are ticked off, they think their state is sliding downhill and they don’t trust Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to arrest the decline, according to a new poll to be published today.

    “People are just in a rotten mood right now,” said Mark Baldassare, who directed the poll for the Public Policy Institute of California. “There’s no forgive and forget in them at the moment.”

    California voters are frustrated and impatient. There are too many crowded roads and classrooms.

    Former and recalled Governor Gray Davis was a travesty for the state and truth be told his colleagues in the Democrat controlled legislature were largely responsible – and they are still in office.

    Arnold has miscalculated in attempting to negotiate with his opponents. He should have called for the Fall special election as soon as the first initiatives qualified and before the unions completed airing those highly critical television ads.

    The Governinator has to learn that he has been thrust into campaign mode for the 2006 election cycle and he must run his office like he is a candidate again.

    Arnold must make the unions pay for their costly negative PR campaign. He must call for the special election sooner than later.

    If he wants to be re-elected in 2006, he really has no other choice.

  • Politics,  United Nations

    Democrats to Delay Bolton Confirmation?

    A Democrat opponent of President Bush’s designee for United Nations Ambassador, John Bolton, argues that the White House is stiff-arming Democrats over classified information and the Senate should put off a vote on the embattled nominee until next month. Read the story here:

    We should delay this until we see that information; it’s a matter of right and wrong,” Sen. Barbara Boxer (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., maintained at the start of a second day of Senate debate over John R. Bolton’s fitness and qualifications. “It is right for us to get that information, it is wrong for the administration to withhold it.”

    The Senate planned a procedural vote Thursday that Democrats hoped to win and force postponement of a confirmation vote until June. Democratic Sens. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and Joseph Biden of Delaware asked other senators in a letter Thursday to support a delay. If Republicans win the initial vote, the Senate was expected to quickly approve Bolton, whom President Bush says would reform the United Nations.

    Flap thought the “DEAL” on Priscilla Owen et. al precluded these tactics except in extradordinary circumstances.

    Oh yeah, this is not a judicial appointment but just an executive one – so obstructionism is fair game.

    Such a deal Gang of Seven?

    The New York Times has this:

    The Senate was scheduled to vote at 6 p.m. on whether to end the debate over Mr. Bolton. Shutting off debate requires 60 votes, and if Mr. Bolton’s supporters can muster at least that many, the Senate will then vote immediately to confirm him.

    Should Mr. Bolton’s supporters fail to amass the 60 votes to end debate, a vote on confirmation may be put off until after the Memorial Day recess, meaning a decision would come on June 6 or later.

    Republicans have 55 votes in the Senate, so if they can force a yes-or-no vote on the nomination Mr. Bolton is virtually assured of confirmation. On the other hand, Democrats can win a temporary victory by mustering 41 votes, enough to keep debate going for a while.

    Democrats who oppose him have made it clear that they are not threatening a filibuster, or extremely prolonged debate, in an attempt to stymie the nomination. Rather, the Democrats say, they oppose an early end to debate, and they want the Bush administration to provide more information on Mr. Bolton’s handling of intelligence.

    “I don’t think we’re being treated as a co-equal branch of government,” Senator Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat who has been a leader of the opposition to Mr. Bolton, said in debate today. Mr. Dodd and Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., Democrat of Delaware, sent a letter to their Senate colleagues today urging them to support a longer debate.

    The Senate has had enough time to consider this nomination.

    President Bush is entitled to choose his own foreign policy team – after all he won the election. A fact unfortunately beyond the pale for Senate brain-donors like Senator Biden and Dodd.

    Bolton deserves an up or down vote.

    So, GET BUSY and VOTE!

    H/T: Huffington Post

  • California,  Politics

    Warren Beatty: “Does that make me a ‘girlie-man’?”

    Jay Billington Bulworth

    Vs.

    Terminator

    Read the Hollywood and LA Times spin on the Warren Beatty trial baloon for California Governor 2006 here (free registration required):

    “I see nothing wrong with Maria [Shriver] becoming a Republican. I’d say many of my best friends are Republicans,” says Warren Beatty, Oscar-winning actor-director and liberal citizen-activist. Over the phone, his legendary voice purrs. He knows exactly what he’s saying, and although his tone is wry, he’s not really joking.

    Though Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s poll numbers have been dropping thanks to advertising campaigns by teachers and nurses, Hollywood, usually a hotbed of liberal activism, has so far remained mum about this former denizen.

    Well, after Hollywood’s darling, Democrat Governor Gray Davis (King of the Power Outages and Public Spendthrift), bankrupted the State of California it was time for the studio Lefties to remain mum.

    In the last few months, Beatty, the star of and force behind such seminal films as “Shampoo” and “Bonnie and Clyde,” has become the first big name to break the entertainment community’s unofficial speak-no-evil toward Schwarzenegger and his wife, Shriver.

    Over the weekend, Beatty, 68, gave his first commencement speech ever to the graduating class of UC Berkeley’s Goldman School of Public Policy, and used the occasion to humorously but witheringly attack Schwarzenegger — much like the candid candidate Jay Billington Bulworth from his 1998 political satire. He derided the governor for “his reactionary right-wing agenda,” “his bullying of labor and the little guy,” his plan to spend money on a “totally unnecessary special election” and his refusal to raise taxes on the rich. Beatty asked Schwarzenegger to “cut down the photo ops, the fake events, the fake issues, the fake crowds … the scapegoats, the ‘language problems,’ the broken promises, the ‘Minutemen,’ the prevarications and put some sunlight on some taxes.

    “It’s become time to define a Schwarzenegger Republican — a Schwarzenegger Republican is a Bush Republican who says he’s a Schwarzenegger Republican,” Beatty said. “Can’t we accept that devotion to the building of the body politic is more complex and a little more sensitive than devotion to body-building?

    “Does that make me a ‘girlie-man’?” asked one of the 20th century’s most famous Lotharios.

    Uhhhhh Yeah! Well, at least a Red!

    Beatty, a political veteran who’s worked for every Democratic presidential candidate since Robert Kennedy in 1968, dismissed Schwarzenegger’s claims of uniting both sides of the political aisle. “By bipartisanship, do you mean the Kennedy family?” he said to the Berkeley crowd. “Governor — I knew Jack Kennedy.

    “Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Governor, you’re no Kennedy Democrat.”

    Thank God! And he is no Teddy either!

    Within hours, Beatty, a blue-chip Hollywood figure famous for 46 years, was swatted down by the Schwarzenegger team. The governor’s communication director, Robert Stutzman, dismissed him as a “crackpot.”

    “I don’t think that that’s the most intelligent response for Arnold to have his people give,” Beatty muses a couple of days later, though he seems jazzed by his return to the public policy limelight. “I guess I needed to say some of those things.”

    A spokesman for Shriver declined to comment about Beatty’s recent remarks, and Schwarzenegger spokesman Vince Sollitto said, “His comments don’t merit any more of a response than we provided before. We didn’t believe that they’re personal in nature.” He added a refrain that the governor’s office has tried to inject into the debate: “Warren’s just mad at Republicans because he’s afraid they’re going to cut off his Social Security.”

    Beatty advised the Kerry campaign during the last election, but stayed in the background because, he says, “I felt that the Republican campaign was too successfully demonizing the entertainment community. To be more publicly visible in that campaign could do as much harm as it would help.” Of course, the stakes change when it’s all-Hollywood mano a mano.

    “In California, it’s much more difficult to demonize the entertainment community when the governor is an entertainer. If I’m leading the way on that, that’s good,” Beatty says. Indeed, this is the second anti-Schwarzenegger speech that Beatty has delivered in the last few months, and he’s not ruling out more.

    In Hollywood, Beatty’s “the only one out there,” says Andrew Spahn, a DreamWorks executive active in Democratic politics. “He’s been out front on this and helped to give voice to some disorganized feeling.”

    Martin Kaplan, associate dean of the USC Annenberg School for Communication, notes, “Schwarzenegger has such a long personal history with so many players here. On balance, they’d rather be quiet than express publicly their views that they disagree with him. He’s a very congenial companion so it’s tougher to criticize someone that you have a relationship with than a politician you might not know. It’s axiomatic that Hollywood is a relationship town.”

    However, he adds: “What [Beatty’s] saying is something that people have been saying in private. He has nothing to lose. In same ways, he has at least the same kind of standing in this creative community that the governor does.”

    Before Schwarzenegger’s political ascension, he was regarded as a waning action star, long on chutzpah and marketing might. Beatty’s recent films might not have attracted the legions of teenage boys, but inside the community, he is still viewed as a brilliant A-list talent, part of the permanent aristocracy. Of course, power does change everything. At the Golden Globes this year, Schwarzenegger was the only person whose arrival in a room full of celebrities caused rubbernecking.

    A-List talent – Give Me a Break.

    Perhaps Beatty is on the A-List Party scene invited by the Left Winging Studio Folks like Norman Lear and David Geffen.

    Still, as it’s been for decades, whenever Beatty talks, the media wonder if he’s planning to run for public office. During his speech, Beatty said that Schwarzenegger “knows I’m a private citizen just as he was a year ago, I’m an opponent of his muscle-bound conservatism with a longer experience in politics than he has and, although I don’t want to run for governor, I’d do one helluva lot better job than he’s done.” A couple of days later, Beatty demurs and seems keen on simply being a “truth teller,” although he does say, “One never knows at what point one becomes sufficiently inflamed to take a step that one does not basically want to take.”

    One unusual feature of Beatty’s address was his reference to his own relatively modest background. “I grew up a nice Southern Baptist boy in Virginia. My parents and grandparents were teachers,” he told the graduating class. It seemed a pointed reference to Schwarzenegger’s frequent use of his rags-to-riches story as part of his campaign sell. Beatty explains that he was trying to make the point that “the usurpation by the rabid right wing of the message of the church on a national or state level shouldn’t be permitted. As a Democrat, I feel that the basic tenets of the Christian church that I grew up in are ‘Do unto others as you would have them do unto you’ and ‘Love one another.’ I simply believe that the philosophy of the Democratic Party is closer to those Christian principles than what has become the principles of what I would call the Republican activist base.”

    Warren, please the trial balloons in the MSM press are growing weary.

    Run and make the Terminator’s Day!