• Arnold Schwarzenegger,  California Republican Party

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California GOP Has Lost the Middle

    California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger speaks at the California Republican Party convention in Indian Wells, Calif., Friday, Sept. 7, 2007.

    Addressing Republican activists and volunteers tonight in Indian Wells. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger exhorted his party to regain the political center:

    Our party has lost the middle, and we will not regain true political power in California until we get it back. I am of the Reagan view that we should not go off the cliff with flags flying. I did that in 2005.

    In 1967, when Ronald Reagan spoke to the California Republican Assembly, he said:

    “We cannot become a narrow sectarian party in which all must swear allegiance to prescribed commandments. Such a party can be highly disciplined, but it does not win elections. This kind of party soon disappears in a blaze of glorious defeat.”

    What the Governor forgets is that a political party is more than just winning a majority of races in each election cycle . It is governing and leading government with a set of ideological principles. Without a platform a political party is meaningless.

    A Governor without principles or one who turns his back on his party is IRRELEVANT.

    Political parties lead the public/voters toward their ideological goals. The Governor is mistaken if he thinks it is the other way around.

    The California Republican Party has lost membership, elections and its organization is in disarray. But, where is the Governor?

    In January, remember his post-partisan speech?

    This is leadership?

    Now, does Arnold propose that the California GOP poll its way into the political center, abandon its principles so HE can be elected to the United States Senate over Democrat Barbara Boxer?

    Flap thinks not…….

    Flap will reprint the entire text of the Governor’s speech:

    Good evening. I’m happy to be with my fellow Republicans. I have so many people I want to thank tonight.

    I want to thank Ron, of course, for all the great work he does for our party.

    I want to thank Mike Villines and Dick Ackerman for their leadership. Especially on the recent budget. For the fourth year in a row ever since the recall we have not raised taxes on Californians. The new budget contains less than a one percent rise in spending. The Federal Government should do so well.
    And, of course, I want to thank the thousands of volunteers who make our party possible.

    Ladies and gentlemen, this is not going to be the typical convention address. I didn’t come with a bunch of applause lines. Instead, I came with some concerns about our party…and some hopes. And there is no better place to raise them than at this convention.

    The people in this room love the Republican Party or you would not be here. Since I know you want our party to flourish, this allows me to speak frankly about how we can make it stronger…how we can ensure it is not relegated to the margins of California’s political life.

    I know there are some who think, “What does Arnold know about Republicans? He’s not a real Republican.”

    I have been a Republican since Nixon. I have been a Republican in spite of years of debates with Maria, the entire Shriver clan and all the Kennedy’s up at Hyannis Port. Believe me, it would have been far easier to abandon my Republican identity years ago.

    But being a Republican is important to me. This party is important to me. I am proud to be a member of the party of Abraham Lincoln, who righted the greatest moral injustice in this nation’s history…the party of Teddy Roosevelt, the enthusiastic reformer and conservationist…I am proud to be a member of the party of Ronald Reagan, the pragmatic conservative who reached out and captured the political center, winning 49 of 50 states in 1984.

    Where is the party today?

    In California, as you know…our party is losing numbers. An astonishing 30 of the 32 Republican Assembly districts lost registered Republicans this year. Since 2005, we’ve lost 370,000 registered Republicans statewide. In just the last eight months, our numbers have declined by 120,000.

    In movie terms, we are dying at the box office. We are not filling the seats.

    Now, while the number of California Republicans has been declining, the number of independents has been growing. They may well outnumber both political parties in just 20 years.

    So, who are these people? According to the Public Policy Institute, 70 percent of independents own their own homes. Most are graduates with incomes of more than $60,000. They are younger and more likely to be employed than members of either major party. They describe themselves as moderates. They often hold conservative views on fiscal policy and law-and-order issues, while taking more liberal stands on social and environmental issues. And they can be reached. They voted for me, 59 to 33 percent, over my opponent last year.

    The real opportunity for Republicans is that independents generally agree with our core principles. Like us, they believe in limited government that is not wasteful. They believe taxes should be as low as possible, because the more you give government the more it will spend. They believe in individual freedom and the responsibility that goes with that freedom. They believe in the importance of public safety. And they believe that economic prosperity comes from the energy of the marketplace, not from the heavy hand of the state.

    I want to make the Republican Party welcoming to these independents.
    And the reason I mention this is because there were some Republicans who had proposed that we should not allow independents to vote in Republican primaries.What kind of sense would that make?

    The Democrats have said they welcome independents to vote in their primaries. Why wouldn’t we welcome them, too? Research shows that the party you vote for in the primary is usually the party you vote for in the general election.

    The goal of any political party is to win elections, to become a majority and to advance its ideals. How do we succeed at that? By including, not excluding. By being open to new ideas, not rejecting them out of hand. By expanding into the center, not falling back upon ourselves into a smaller and smaller corner.

    Our party has lost the middle, and we will not regain true political power in California until we get it back. I am of the Reagan view that we should not go off the cliff with flags flying. I did that in 2005.

    In 1967, when Ronald Reagan spoke to the California Republican Assembly, he said:

    “We cannot become a narrow sectarian party in which all must swear allegiance to prescribed commandments. Such a party can be highly disciplined, but it does not win elections. This kind of party soon disappears in a blaze of glorious defeat.”

    In business if you lose market share, you do something to about it. But I wonder if we’ve been so beaten down by our minority status that we’ve developed a bunker mentality? I wonder if we’ve come to believe that our only remaining power is to say no?

    This very savvy audience understands that saying no is not the basis for a healthy political party. We need to address the issues that even registered Republicans are urging us to address.

    According to the polls, nearly three-quarters of our own party support the global warming bill that I signed last year. They want this party to do something more about climate change than simply doubt it. If it is the policy of the Republican Party to ignore the great majority of the world’s scientists…to ignore the views of 80 percent of the young people who believe the same…then that party is at odds with the future. The Republican Party needs once again to be the party of Teddy Roosevelt conservationists.

    The surveys show that a majority of our own party also wants us to work for comprehensive health care, not stand in its way. My proposal is not a European socialist plan. It’s not a Canadian single payer plan that is driving Canadians across our border for health care. My plan is a good faith attempt at a market-based solution. Never in history has medicine ever been able to make such a difference in peoples’ lives. And we will be on the losing end of history unless we realize that health care must be addressed.

    A majority of our own party supported our transportation and flood control bonds that were on the ballot last year. Yes, it is expensive. But we cannot allow our levees to break as in New Orleans or our bridges to collapse as in Minneapolis.

    We are the party of President Eisenhower, the moderate military man who understood the need for logistics and infrastructure and created the Interstate Highway System–the largest public works project in American history. The majority of Republicans understand the need for investment. I believe we should be listening to the majority of our party.

    If our party doesn’t address the needs of the people-the needs of Republicans themselves – the voters, registered Republicans included, will look elsewhere for their political affiliation.
    The majority of Republicans prefer progress with messy compromise over defeat with pristine principles. Compromise is part of politics. And it is especially part of politics if you are the minority party.

    California Republicans do not have to be the political equivalent of the Spartans at Thermopolae. We do not have to defend the pass alone. Defeat does not have to be our future.

    A large body of reinforcements is right behind us. It is called the middle, the center. They are independents. They are Reagan Democrats. They are disenchanted Republicans.

    We do not have to give up who we are for them to come to our aid. They already believe much of what we believe. But they must be allowed to believe other things, too – things that perhaps not all of us agree with. That is fine.

    The road to our comeback is clear. The California Republican Party should be a right-of-center party that occupies the broad middle of California. That is a lush, green, abandoned political space. It can be ours.

    And we have accomplished so much together these past 3 ½ years.

    * We brought the economy back.
    * We reformed workers comp.
    * We created nearly a million new jobs.
    * We eliminated the operating deficit.

    * We passed the biggest prison construction program in our history.
    * We protected 3 Strikes.
    * We passed Jessica’s Law.

    And much more.

    Ladies and gentlemen, let me close with this. When I was 21 years old, I lost my first American bodybuilding competition, in Miami, which I thought for sure I would win. I had already won two Mr. Universe titles in Europe.

    When I didn’t win, I couldn’t believe it. I was devastated. I had let people down. It kept going through my head, “I’m away from home, in this strange city, in America, and I’m a loser.” I cried all night long. I vowed to myself I would work as hard as I could to be strong and I would not be beaten again.

    My fellow Republicans, I pledge to you that I will work hard to make the Republican Party strong. But I cannot do it alone. For the sake of California and its people, I ask you to join me.

    **********

    Flap will have more tomorrow and in subsequent posts on why the California GOP made one of its worst mistakes in recalling Democrat Governor Gray Davis and replacing him with Arnold Schwarzenegger.

    The California GOP has not lost the middle, Governor. You, sir, in your quest for popularity and short-term electoral gains have lost your governing principles and lost touch with mainstream GOP values.

    Maybe it is time for you to make the switch to the Democrat Party? Or better yet become a post-partisan INDEPENDENT.

    From left, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Florida Gov. Charlie Crist chat with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger following his remarks at the California Republican Party convention in Indian Wells, Calif., Friday, Sept. 7, 2007.

    Update:
    I noted the open-borders debacle at the California GOP in June. The party leadership is a mess. Now, liberal Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is seizing on the vulnerable state of the California GOP to push it to the left (which Kennedy Republicans call the “center”) on the environment and health care……
    Previous:

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Vs. Barbara Boxer in 2010?

    California Restaurant Owners Support Tax Increase to Pay for Health Care

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Health Care FLOP

    Michael Ramirez on California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Radical Health Care Proposal

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: TV Ads To Oppose Governor Schwarzenegger’s Radical Health Care Reform Proposal

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Proposes RADICAL Health Care Reforms


    Technorati Tags:

    Add to Google

    Subscribe with Bloglines

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Subscribe to FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog by Email

    Facebook Flap!

    Gregory Flap Cole's Facebook profile

  • Fred Thompson,  President 2008

    Fred Thompson Watch: NO to Ice Cream But YES to Huckabee Debate?

    Republican Presidential candidate and former U.S. Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) speaks with patrons at Bob’s Drive Inn in Le Mars, Iowa, September 7 2007.

    Fred Thompson campaigning in Iowa today refused ice cream and a Bob Dog but will he refuse Mike Huckabee’s challenge to debate?

    Who can refuse ice cream in the “ice cream capital of the world?”

    And, who can DUCK another GOP debate?

    Previous:

    Fred Thompson’s Past Support for Campaign Finance Reform Scrutinized

    Fred Thompson Watch: Jim Mills Quote of the Day

    Fred Thompson Watch: ANOTHER Campaign Aide OUT

    Fred Thompson Scores “Direct Hit on Romney”

    Fred Thompson Watch: Thompson to Announce September 6 – Ducks GOP Debate

    Fred Thompson to Announce for the Presidency Today

    Fred Thompson to Announce an Announcement Date Today?


    Technorati Tags:

  • Robert Filner

    Representative Robert Filner Watch: Assault and Battery Details Come Out

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93RJR7pGbpE[/youtube]

    Remember California Democrat Congressman Robert Filner who was charged with Assault and Battery in an altercation last August at Dulles International Airport?

    Now, the details of his assault and battery on an airport emplyee have been released:

    Rep. Bob Filner stormed into a United Airlines baggage office at Dulles International Airport, barged past other customers, screamed at employees and repeatedly pushed a female baggage worker, according to a criminal complaint.

    Filner was served Monday with a summons for an Oct. 2 court hearing on the incident. The complaint was subsequently filed in Loudoun County, Va., General District Court and released Thursday.

    Here is the text of criminal complaint against Rep. Bob Filner:

    Mr. Robert Filner came storming into our baggage office demanding help with his delayed baggage. He barged in front of a line, interrupting our business with other passengers. He is screaming.

    I tell him he needs to wait in line. He then begins to step behind our baggage counter. I now stand up and tell him he is not allowed back here and he needs to step back. I then put both of my arms out to the side blocking him from going any further.

    I continue to insist that he leaves and wait in line. He continues to push past me, pushing on my arms. I then yell at him to “Get out of the office now.”

    He again pushes through my arms wanting to get to our adjacent employee-only office. He wanted people in the back office to help him. I told him they were busy.

    I said he needs to stop. He told me, “You can’t stop me.”

    I said, “The police can.”

    At this point I am yelling for co-workers to call the police. He gets past me into the back office yelling at other agents. He again pushes me out of the way near the doorway.

    After hearing a co-worker on the phone with the (Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority) dispatcher Mr. Filner leaves the office.

    **********

    Filner faces an Oct. 2 hearing in Loudon County, Va., General District Court.

    So, when will the APOLOGY be given?

    Good grief. Talk about a first-class jerk who thinks because he is a United States Congressman that he does not have to conduct himself like a regular person.

    Wonder what Representative Filner’s constituents in California think of his attitude?

    Representative Robert Filner D-California

    Previous:

    Representative Robert Filner Watch: Filner to Address American Legion Convention

    Representative Robert Filner Watch: Filner Denies Assault and Battery as Ridiculous Charges

    Representative Robert Filner Watch: Charged for Assault and Battery at Dulles Airport


    Technorati Tags:

  • Fred Thompson,  President 2008

    Fred Thompson’s Past Support for Campaign Finance Reform Scrutinized

    Republican Presidential candidate and former U.S. Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) looks at his daughter Hayden, 4, as his wife Jeri looks on during a campaign stop at Bayliss Park in Council Bluffs, Iowa, September 6, 2007.

    Now that Fred Thompson is a formal candidate for the Presidency among other issues being scrutinized is his position on campaign finance reform, most notably the John McCain-Russ Feingold initiated legislation that resulted in the passage of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.

    His position is a problem for conservatives.

    “It all gets back to pretty basic stuff for me,” Thompson said in 1997. “I think the American people look at a system where we spend so much time with our hand out for so much money from so many people who do so much business with the federal government who we are basically regulating and legislating on, and they look at that system and the amounts of money that are involved nowadays, and they don’t have much confidence in it.”

    This is a position that directly conflicts with the views of many conservatives, according to Brian Darling, director of Senate relations at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank in Washington, D.C. “Most conservatives think McCain-Feingold is an assault on the First Amendment and also did not forward the cause of making government more ethical,” said Darling, using the common shorthand for the 2002 campaign finance law.

    And these activists haven’t forgotten Thompson’s role as an active proponent of that legislation.

    “In the meetings that I have attended . . . where he’s been speaking to conservatives, it has come up,” said David A. Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union. “I think that is one area that a lot of conservatives have a lot of difficulty with him.”

    Here is Fred Thompson today on the Laura Ingraham Show:

    INGRAHAM: One of the things that also happened in the Senate was McCain-Feingold and it was initially called McCain-Feingold-Thompson. And of course that’s campaign finance reform. As you know Senator Thompson, the Supreme Court struck down part of that as unconstitutional on First Amendment grounds. You know, issue ads that you can’t run before a general election or a primary contest, which for conservatives like me, are just an anathema to the First Amendment. And you now say that you’ve seen unintended consequences resulting from campaign finance. Would you today tell us that you made a mistake in supporting campaign finance reform?

    FRED THOMPSON: Laura, ironically enough, all those things you said about Congress I added one more to. And that was the idea of people and companies and corporations, labor unions if they were allowed the way they were once upon a time, giving large sums of money to individual politicians. I don’t think it’s a good idea and then—

    INGRAHAM: Well what about the issue ads?

    FRED THOMPSON: Well, that’s a different story. I’ll get to that in a minute. But my main motivation for campaign finance—the issue ad thing was wasn’t even being discussed as far as I remember when the first debates were had and the first bill was proposed. It was a matter of whether or not you wanted to get rid of soft money. Bill Clinton and Dick Morris showed that you could use soft money in ways that people thought you’d get put in jail for a short time ago. So they poured it in instead of having the agreed upon limitations that historically Democrats, Republicans, conservatives, liberals, and everybody else pretty much acknowledged were constitutional because it had to do with federal elections and the idea that you don’t want to give too much money to any individual member of Congress and then come and lobby him for a bill. I mean that’s called bribery in the real world. But they kind of came in with this soft money to do the same thing through the back door so we wanted to do away with that. Now they added on something that was a mistake and that is the issue ads that you are talking about and I voted for all of it. So I support the first part, but I don’t support that.

    INGRAHAM: And do you think at this point then that full disclosure of campaign contributions, what sources they come from, and I would say that unions and companies also represent people and people have First Amendment rights Senator Thompson. Again, I’m talking from my listeners and speaking for what they believe and I think right now we have an incumbency protection program in place where it’s very difficult to raise money.

    FRED THOMPSON:
    Well I don’t agree on the amounts there because on the incumbency issue it was my amendment that brought the $1,000 dollar contribution limitation up to $2,000.

    INGRAHAM: But why should the government set that amount, Senator Thompson?

    FRED THOMPSON: I tried to get it higher.

    INGRAHAM: Why should the government be in the business of telling me how much I can give to my favorite candidate? How is that conservative?

    FRED THOMPSON: Well, why should the government tell a loan officer that he cannot accept money from someone trying to get a loan from him and then go ahead and give that person a loan? I mean it’s bribery in the real world. It is a legitimate function of government to tell a politician or for a people to decide that it’s a not a good idea for me to be able to give a Congressmen who I’m trying to influence a large sum of money right before my vote comes up. You can have a debate, but our country decided that was a bad idea. Historically, worldwide, you can go back to ancient Rome and you will see comments made that Barry Goldwater, conservative Republicans of times past, they’ve all agreed on a reasonable limitation. Limitations have been too low, and as I say I offered an amendment and fought to get that limitation higher. I think it’s still too low because the low limitation is an incumbent protection. Incumbents are going to get their money. You need a higher limitation …

    INGRAHAM: Yeah, I just don’t like government telling me …

    FRED THOMPSON: … in order for challengers to have a decent shot at getting elected.

    **********

    If Fred Thompson is the “CONSERVATIVE” rushing into the Presidential race to SAVE the GOP from the “LIBERAL” Rudy or John McCain or Mitt Romney then after these statements today, how could anyone believe that Fred Thompson is a conservative at all?

    Fred Thompson is NOT a conservative on campaign finance reform. He is a TWIN of John McCain on this issue.
    Previous:

    Fred Thompson Watch: Jim Mills Quote of the Day

    Fred Thompson Watch: ANOTHER Campaign Aide OUT

    Fred Thompson Scores “Direct Hit on Romney”

    Fred Thompson Watch: Thompson to Announce September 6 – Ducks GOP Debate

    Fred Thompson to Announce for the Presidency Today

    Fred Thompson to Announce an Announcement Date Today?


    Technorati Tags:

  • Hillary Clinton,  Norman Hsu

    Norman Hsu Watch: Fugitive Democrat Donor Hsu Captured in Colorado

    Norman Hsu, right, prepares to surrender as he arrives with spokesman Jason Booth, center, and attorney Somnath Raj Chatterjee, left, at a San Mateo County Superior Court in Redwood City, Calif., Friday, Aug. 31, 2007. Hsu, a top Democratic fundraiser wanted as a fugitive in California, turned himself in Friday to face a grand theft charge. After reports surfaced this week of Hsu’s fugitive status in California, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, (D-NY) joined other candidates in returning thousands of dollars Hsu raised. Hsu was arrested in a Colorado hospital late Thursday Sept. 6, 2007 after he failed to show up for a court appearance related to a felony theft conviction in California.

    The FBI has arrested convicted felon and Democrat fundraising BUNDLER Norman Hsu.

    Fugitive political fundraiser Norman Hsu, who skipped out on San Mateo County authorities this week rather than face sentencing for a 1992 fraud conviction, was apprehended Thursday night by federal and local lawmen in Grand Junction, Colo.

    Authorities said Hsu was taken into custody at St. Mary’s Hospital in Grand Junction at 7 p.m. local time. He had been on the lam for almost two days after failing to appear in a Redwood City courtroom Wednesday to surrender his passport.

    Hsu was taken off a passenger train at the Grand Junction train station earlier in the day by paramedics who requested a backboard to move him, said Sgt. Lonnie Chavez with the Grand Junction Police Department.

    Authorities received a request for medical assistance at the train station at about 11:15 a.m., but the exact nature of Hsu’s condition was unclear, Chavez said. Staff at St. Mary’s Hospital declined to comment.

    FBI spokesman Joseph Schadler said Hsu will be returned to California on the 1992 conviction once released from the hospital.

    Norman Hsu, a convicted felon fugitive and Democrat Fundraiser for Hillary Clinton and Senator Hillary Clinton

    And the extent of Hsu’s donations to Democrats and the Democrat supported causes is now meeting more intense scrutiny.

    In the past four years, Hsu raised more than $1.2 million for Democratic causes and candidates, including the DNC and the campaign of New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer. And in the past six months, Hsu became a leading fundraiser for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.). A person familiar with Clinton’s fundraising, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Hsu had raised “in the hundreds of thousands of dollars” since January for Clinton’s presidential bid.

    Here is Flip’s list:

    Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign has announced it would donate to charity the $23,000 in direct contributions Hsu made to Clinton’s presidential campaign, her Senate reelection bid and her political action committee. The campaign does not plan to return any money Hsu raised from other donors.

    And, as of five minutes ago, Norman Hsu is still listed as a HILLRAISER.

    hsuhillary1web

    hsuhillary2web

    So, when will Hillary and Howard Dean, Democrat National Committee Chairman give a thorough accounting of Hsu’s “BUNDLING” activities and return ALL of the money?

    Don’t bet it being anytime soon…….

    Stay tuned.

    Previous:

    Day By Day by Chris Muir September 7, 2007Day By Day by Chris Muir September 7, 2007

    Day By Day by Chris Muir September 6, 2007

    Norman Hsu Skips Bail Reduction Hearing

    Michael Ramirez on Democrat Fundraiser Norman Hsu and the ClintonsMichael Ramirez on Democrat Fundraiser Norman Hsu and the Clintons

  • Day By Day,  Norman Hsu

    Day By Day by Chris Muir September 7, 2007

    daybyday090707web

    Day By Day by Chris Muir

    Fugitive fundraiser Hsu captured in Colorado

    Fugitive political fundraiser Norman Hsu, who skipped out on San Mateo County authorities this week rather than face sentencing for a 1992 fraud conviction, was apprehended Thursday night by federal and local lawmen in Grand Junction, Colo.

    Authorities said Hsu was taken into custody at St. Mary’s Hospital in Grand Junction at 7 p.m. local time. He had been on the lam for almost two days after failing to appear in a Redwood City courtroom Wednesday to surrender his passport.

    Hsu was taken off a passenger train at the Grand Junction train station earlier in the day by paramedics who requested a backboard to move him, said Sgt. Lonnie Chavez with the Grand Junction Police Department.

    Authorities received a request for medical assistance at the train station at about 11:15 a.m., but the exact nature of Hsu’s condition was unclear, Chavez said. Staff at St. Mary’s Hospital declined to comment.

    FBI spokesman Joseph Schadler said Hsu will be returned to California on the 1992 conviction once released from the hospital.

    Hsu’s attorney told state prosecutors that Hsu had been on a charter flight that arrived at Oakland International Airport at about 5:30 a.m. Wednesday and then dropped out of sight, said Gareth Lacy, a spokesman for the state attorney general’s office.

    Amtrak’s California Zephyr train offers service from nearby Emeryville to Grand Junction before heading to Denver and Chicago. The Zephyr left Emeryville at about 7:10 a.m. Wednesday and was scheduled to arrive in Grand Junction before noon Thursday.

    hsuseptember7aweb

    Previously:

    Norman Hsu Skips Bail Reduction Hearing

    Fox News et. al. are reporting that Norman Hsu was a NO SHOW for court and that he was not required when he surrendered last week to turn in his passport.

    Hsu forfeits $2 million in bail he posted last week. An arrest warrant has been issued.

    Hsu’s lawyer says he doesn’t know where he is.

    Hsu has been a fugitive in California for 15 years during which time he became a top donor to Democratic candidates, including presidential contenders Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

    Hsu pleaded no contest in 1991 to a felony count of grand theft, admitting he’d defrauded investors of $1 million in a bogus investment scam.

    Prosecutors say he was facing up to three years in prison when he skipped town before being sentenced.

    Federal Election Commission records show Hsu donated $260,000 to the Democratic party and candidates since 2004.

    So, where is Norman Hsu

    And check out Flip’s summary of the extent of Norman Hsu’s contributions to Democrats.

    Previous:

    The Day By Day Archive


    Technorati Tags: ,

    giulianimay6gweb

    Add to Google

    Subscribe with Bloglines

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Subscribe to FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog by Email

    Facebook Flap!

    Gregory Flap Cole's Facebook profile