Ventura County Republican Party Watch: On The Eve of the First Presidential Debate

Posted Posted in Republican Party of Ventura County

Here are some photos Flap snapped today at the Ventura County Republican Party HQ in Thousand Oaks. All of the phones were in high gear with volunteers calling voters.

VCRP 1

VCRP 2

VCRP 3

VCRP 4

VCRP 5

Watch for Flap’s comments on tonight’s McCain vs Obama debate in the right sidebar (under Twitter Updates) ——–>


Technorati Tags: ,

Hannah-Beth Jackson Watch: Blowing Smoke Over Tobacco Company Contributions

Posted 4 CommentsPosted in Hannah-Beth Jackson, Republican Party of Ventura County, Tony Strickland
hannah-beth-Jackson12w

Former Democrat California Assemblywoman Hannah-Beth Jackson of Santa Barbara

On Tuesday Jackson the Democrat nominee for California State Senate (Senate District 19) issued the following press release:

Jackson Statement on Tobacco Campaign Contributions

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Over 440,000 Americans die early, costly, preventable deaths from tobacco, and over 2,000 children begin illegal tobacco use each day. In August 2006, after a criminal prosecution extending over 8 years, the US tobacco cartel was found guilty on federal racketeering charges for “marketing and selling their lethal product with zeal, deception, with a single-minded focus on their financial success and without regard for the human tragedy or social costs that success exacted,” (Judge Kessler). This same cartel spends over $1.8 million dollars a year in California in contributions to elected officials and candidates, to limit regulation of their products and stop effective tobacco control that would reduce smoking and thereby reduce the astronomical costs to the public of tobacco-related disease. It is deeply troubling to me that any candidate for public office would be complicit in so seriously undermining the public interest and public health.

In light of the extraordinary dangers posed by tobacco products and the tobacco industry’s defense of their use, I call upon my opponent in the race for the 19th Senate District to return all contributions received from tobacco companies or their representatives, including

ü the over $6,000 received directly by Strickland for Senate for the current campaign;
ü the $50,000 received by the Ventura County Republican Party which is clearly earmarked for this State Senate contest;
ü the over $85,000 which Tony Strickland campaign committees have received directly from tobacco interests throughout his career in the State Assembly

By returning the contributions, my opponent Republican Tony Strickland can reassure the public that his voting record in the Assembly was not in any way influenced by contributions from the tobacco lobby, and that he has no intention of allowing contributions to influence his legislative behavior.

· In the Assembly, he failed to vote on a measure which would have prohibited self-service sales of cigarettes or free distribution of tobacco products on publicly accessible property. (SB 1510, 2000)
· He voted against allowing the Department of Health Services to conduct stings on business selling tobacco to minors (SB 757, 2001). Passed into law anyway.
· He voted against restricting non face-to-face sales of cigarettes (SB 1016, 2003). The measure passed anyway and was signed into law by Gov. Schwartz.)

My record as a public official is clear. Tobacco Industry money has no influence on my vote. As a member of the Assembly and as a candidate for the 19th State Senate District I have not and will not solicit or accept contributions from tobacco companies. I received one of the highest scores in the legislature on tobacco control issues from independent reviews by the UCSF Medical School. As a representative of the 19th Senate District I will advocate for a return to the public health strategies first implemented in the early 90s in California, which included highly effective media communications and public education on the dangers of tobacco, and caused immediate and significant decreases in the rates of smoking among Californians.

The American Medical Association recommends that its members, state and local medical societies, to determine whether candidates for federal state and local offices accept gifts or contributions of any kind from the tobacco industry, and publicize their findings to both their members and to the public (AMA Resolution CSA Rep. 3, A-04). I urge California AMA Chapters, doctors, nurses, everyone in health related professions and in the media to carefully monitor the spending by the tobacco industry in the campaign for Senate District 19, so that the public can safely predict how their representative will vote and advocate on tobacco control related issues.

–Hannah-Beth Jackson, June 17, 2008

But, is Hannah-Beth a former attorney (she is no longer a member of the California Bar) being disingenuous at best and hypocritical at worst regarding Tobacco Industry campaign contributions?

The answer is yes.

Flap in a previous post discussed the continuing FLAP regarding tobacco industry/company contributions to the Republican Party of Ventura County and the California State Senate campaign of Republican nominee Tony Strickland.

Today, political activists who support the candidacy of Democrat Hannah-Beth Jackson will be protesting these tobacco contributions outside of the Hyatt Westlake Plaza Hotel in Westlake Village, California prior to a Strickland fundraising event featuring former Massachusetts Governor and Presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Flap understands that the GOP will have counter protesters.

But, what are the facts about the tobacco industry and the political contributions they make?

And, has Hannah-Beth Jackson received campaign contributions indirectly from politicians who have accepted money from the tobacco industry?

The answer to the question is yes.

Are Hannah-Beth Democrat Party supporters then hypocritical in protesting Tony Strickland’s acceptance of tobacco campaign cash when both their candidate and party have accepted like contributions?

The answer is yes.

And, Flap showed that Hanna-Beth Jackson has indeed received INDIRECT tobacco company/industry contributions during this campaign cycle.

So, when she says that she ” I have not and will not solicit or accept contributions from tobacco companies” she doesn’t have to do so. The California Democrat Party,various National Democrat Party campaign committees and California Democrat Legislative leaders already have donated or loaned money to her campaign. This allows Jackson to demagogue the tobacco issue against Tony Strickland and to score cheap political points.

Let’s go over a brief history of how California Legislative campaigns are funded. Flap draws upon his experience as being a former member of the California Dental Association’s Council on Legislation and the local Santa Barbara-Ventura County Dental Society’s Cal-D-Pac representative (CAl-D-Pac) for the legislative process history.

The California Democrat Party for decades has used an ingenious system of party committee transfers to insulate their members from campaign reporting scrutiny and to deliver needed funds to those members/candidates who either ingratiate themselves (promise to vote for the leader for various leadership positions) and/or who are in tight races with the Republicans. The transfer mechanism constitute a type of “SLUSH FUND.”

For example, long-time Democrat Assembly Speaker Willie Brown, now the former Mayor of San Francisco as well, would collect money from all the special interests with business before the California Legislature, bundle all of the contributons and then dole them out to whoever was his friend. This has been repeated over and over again for the past decade with various legislative leaders even as term limits and campaign contribution reporting and limitation laws changed.

What does this have to do with Hannah-Beth Jackson and Tobacco company/industry money you ask?

Jackson as late as her 2000 campaign for the California Assembly (her last campaign due to term limits) has been the recipient of such “bait and swich” or “hide the ball” transfers. Let’s look at her disclosure forms:

hannahbethjackson2000a
hannahbethjackson2000b
hannahbethjackson2000c

Graphics from Follow The Money

Fifty-Five per cent of the over $1 million dollars raised by Hannah-Beth Jackson came from Democrat Party transfers. The donors included the California Democrat state Party, Legislative leaders and the national Democrat Party. You can see the component contributions to the California Democrat Party here. and the graphic follows:

cdp2000a

cdp2000b

Remember the graphic from the previous post on federal contributions to the national Democrat Party by the tobacco industry? Here it is again:

tobaccoopensecretslongterm


Confused yet as to where Hannah-Beth Jackson received her previous and current contributions for the state legislature?

Why, of course, you are and that is the point.

The Democrats are masters of “hide the ball.” Jackson can berate Tony Strickland for accepting “Big Tobacco” dirty money while she receives the same, maybe a little more, or maybe a little less from the same ultimate sources.

Is this being Untruthful? Hypocritical? Disingenuous?

You bet.

Thus, the next time you see Hannah-Beth Jackson on the campaign trail, ask her why she is accepting so many “secret” or “laundered” or “sanitized” campaign contributions from Democrat Party leaders. Ask her why she is demagoguing this issue and Tony Strickland when she has received the same tobacco company/industry money?

Ask her why she is blowing smoke?

By the way, as the campaign progresses, Flap will write about Hanna-Beth Jackson’s donors and transfers. The next reporting period filing deadline is July 31, 2008. But, don’t expect the REAL money to pour into Jackson’s campaign account until October when disclosure may be lost within the midst of campaign/election season.


Technorati Tags: ,

Receiving Campaign Contributions from Tobacco Companies a Campaign Issue? Part 3

Posted 5 CommentsPosted in Hannah-Beth Jackson, Republican Party of Ventura County, Tony Strickland, Ventura County Star
TobaccoDonations

Political cartoon by Steve Greenberg, Ventura County Star

There has been a continuing FLAP regarding tobacco industry/company contributions to the Republican Party of Ventura County and the California State Senate campaign of Republican nominee Tony Strickland.

Today, political activists who support the candidacy of Democrat Hannah-Beth Jackson will be protesting these tobacco contributions outside of the Hyatt Westlake Plaza Hotel in Westlake Village, California prior to a Strickland fundraising event featuring former Massachusetts Governor and Presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Flap understands that the GOP will have counter protesters.

But, what are the facts about the tobacco industry and the political contributions they make?

And, has Hannah-Beth Jackson received campaign contributions indirectly from politicians who have accepted money from the tobacco industry?

The answer to the question is yes.

Are Hannah-Beth Democrat Party supporters then hypocritical in protesting Tony Strickland’s acceptance of tobacco campaign cash when both their candidate and party have accepted like contributions?

The answer is yes.

Ok, back to the facts. This first graphic illustrates the influence of the tobacco products industry on state of California politics.

tobaccodonationstocalegisla

Graphic courtesy of Followthemoney.org

The above graphic represents donations to state legislative campaigns, state constitutional officers (e.g. Governor, Secretary of State, etc) and election measures. The California GOP has received more campaign money than the Democrats but in this election cycle by only 8 plus per cent.

Now, let’s look at the federal national contributions:

Again the GOP over the past decade or more have been the recipient of the majority of the federal candidate contributions. This includes members and candidates of/for the House of Representatives, the U.S. Senate, national political parties and President. Note that the GOP controlled the Congress for the majority of the last decade.

Here is a graphic from this year’s federal election cycle of tobacco industry money given to Congress:

tobaccomoneytocongress2008o

Graphic courtesy of Open Secrets.org

There has been alot of tobacco money running through political campaigns, no?

Why?

Would heavy regulation and taxation have something to do with it?

You bet.

The industry is buying access to the legislative and executive leaders who regulate them – just like any other industry that deals with government.

What makes it EVEN MORE difficult to track the contributions is the propensity of California legislative campaigns to raise money in one district and then transfer it to another. Same goes with the political parties both Democrat and Republican.

After reviewing the campaign records of Hannah-Beth Jackson and Tony Strickland, it can be said that for now Strickland has accepted the most DIRECTLY reported contributions from the tobacco industry. A summary of Strickland’s receipts for his California State Senate run this year are here.

However, Hannah-Beth Jackson has also received two money transfers from a fellow California State Senator, Gloria Negrete McLeod, CA SD-32, who HAS received money from Altria Corporation, a tobacco products company. Hanna-Beth Jackson’s contribution receipts are here.

Of course, these records ONLY reflect what has taken place up to May 22, 2008. Tony Strickland has already issues a press release that he has raised over $1 million for his campaign. Undoubtedly, there will be more campaign transfers into Jackson’s account from the Democrat Party legislative leadership and other politicians.

So, where is the FLAP?

Both candidates and both political parties have received contributions from the tobacco industry. The GOP has received more than the Democrats but both have been the recipients of millions of dollars according to contribution limits and state and federal law.

Smoking and chewing tobacco may be unhealthful habits but the use of the products is NOT illegal.

Unless the protesters today can PROVE that these tobacco contributions have illegally influenced the campaigns of either candidate then Flap REALLY doesn’t see the point.

If Ventura County voters do not wish to vote for someone who has accepted campaign contributions from an American business interest selling a legal product that is heavily regulated and taxed, then so be it.

There has been full disclosure.


Conejo Valley Republican Women Watch: A Reagan Legacy—The Principles that Unite Us

Posted Posted in California Republican Party, Conejo Valley Republican Women, Republican Party of Ventura County, Simi Valley Republican Women

Singer/Singwriter Trish Lester with Dr. Terry Paulson at Military Family Appreciation Day, November 18, 2007 in Thousand Oaks, CA

From the press release:

Conejo Valley Republican Women join with the Simi Valley Republican Women
Friday, June 20, 2008 – 11:30 am

Posada Royale Hotel & Suites, 1775 Madera Road, Simi Valley

rsvp to triciaevans1@verizon.net or call 805-493-0639 by June 13th!

Terry Paulson “A Reagan Legacy—The Principles that Unite Us”

Ronald Reagan was more than a great communicator. He was a great educator. He communicated the principles and great ideas that inspired vision for the future and his actions as a leader. The world we face today is different, but the principles we must unite behind to ensure a vibrant future for America remain the same. The biggest difference between a political vision and a hallucination is the number of people who can see it. Come hear Townhall.com and Ventura County Star columnist, Terry Paulson, as he shares a true Reagan legacy—the principles that unite us. You won’t want to miss this informative and inspiring presentation by one of the country’s best keynote speakers.

The speech will be recorded by public access cable television if you cannot make the event on the 20th. The Public Access TV Speakers Series is Fridays at 7pm.

Flap says come on out and support the Conejo Valley and Simi Valley Republican Womens’ Clubs.


Receiving Campaign Contributions from Tobacco Companies a Campaign Issue? Part 2

Posted 9 CommentsPosted in Hannah-Beth Jackson, Republican Party of Ventura County, Ventura County Star

Barack Obama smoking

Senator and presumptive Democrat nominee for President Barack Obama enjoying a cigarette

Is receiving contributions from a Tobacco company a campaign issue?

Flap reported the “HIT PIECE” from Ventura County Star political reporter and Sacramento Bureau Chief Timm Herdt and progressive left-wing VC Star blogger Brian Dennert.

What is the Flap?

You would think from the Ventura County Star that the Ventura County Republican Party was accepting money from drug lords or crack dealers.

The last time Flap checked smoking was NOT illegal and the manufacture of cigars, cigarettes and other tobacco products was NOT illegal. Moreover, there are many Americans employed by the tobacco industry who pay their taxes, vote and enjoy their pursuit of happiness like everyone else.

Also, the state of California and the federal government gladly tax the purchase of these products.

What is REALLY the Flap?

The political agenda of the Ventura County Star, Timm Herdt and Brian Dennert is to paint Ventura County Republicans as immoral,unhealthy and irresponsible pols who take the money to the detriment of Ventura County citizens and voters. Flap invites the readers to look at Dennert’s and Herdt’s blogs and see if they can refute Flap’s opinion of their BIASED agenda.

Does Flap think smoking is unhealthy? You bet. But, I do not believe it is criminal to smoke in a responsible way and according to California law. Nor is it a campaign issue if members of the California legislature lawfully accept campaign money from companies that make tobacco products.

A question back to Timm Herdt: If Tony Strickland’s opponent Democrat Hanna-Beth Jackson accepts ANY campaign contributions from the Democrat Party, California State employee groups and/or Union PACS who have received money from the tobacco industry will she return the money?

Flap thinks it is doubtful because that “distasteful” tobacco cash is heavily laundered in Jackson’s campaign reports. Check them out here.

Now, readers of the Ventura county Star have written exposing the BIAS of the newspaper and HYPOCRISY of the Hanna-Beth Jackson campaign.

  • Samantah Harrison, Moorpark:

…How completely predictable that in an article that points out that both parties accept contributions from Altria, we get a headline singling out Tony Strickland and the GOP. The fact that Democrats accept money from the same source is buried in the article and almost excused. Not only that, but some of the contributions made directly to Hannah-Beth Jackson’s campaign were from Democratic candidates who received money from Altria. How hypocritical of her to criticize Strickland for accepting help when she has done the same from indirect sources…

  • Josh Guthrie, Ventura

…What a stellar example of The Star’s political bias! In an article in which Timm Herdt freely admits both parties and their candidates have received money from Altria, both the headline and subhead mention only the GOP and Tony Strickland. The readers of this paper need to realize that between now and November, The Star’s mission will be to help get Hannah-Beth Jackson elected while pretending to be unbiased…

  • Mark J. Masterson, Ventura

…If Bill Gallaher, chairman of the county Democratic Central Committee, is correct that we’re judged by who our friends are, then perhaps people should be aware that most of Hannah-Beth Jackson’s campaign contributions have come from extreme labor unions, trial lawyers and controversial organizations like Planned Parenthood.

I also haven’t seen her ask the Democratic Party to return contributions from the same source she criticizes the Ventura County Republican Party for…

  • Tressa Golden, Ventura

…It didn’t take me long to discover that some of Hannah-Beth Jackson’s campaign contributors were recipients of funding from Altria.

These contributors are either current or past Democratic candidates for office in California.

To be consistent with the statements she made in this article, she should return the money she received from these sources.

Will she?

Tressa has a good question and Flap repeats his question to Timm Herdt of the Ventura County Star:

  • If Tony Strickland’s opponent Democrat Hanna-Beth Jackson accepts ANY campaign contributions from the Democrat Party, California State employee groups and/or Union PACS who have received money from the tobacco industry will she return the money?

The people can be fooled some of the time but the repeated BIAS of the Ventura County Star newspaper is OVER THE TOP.

Over to Herdt, Dennert and the Jackson campaign to explain themselves.

Previous:

Receiving Campaign Contributions from Tobacco Companies a Campaign Issue?