• Iran,  Iran Nuclear Watch,  John Bolton,  Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Bolton – United States Iran Policy FLAWED

    Readers: Please Vote in Flap’s January 2008 GOP Presidential Poll

    boltonjan24aweb

    Former US Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton answers questions during a press conference at Japan’s National Press Club in Tokyo. Bolton said that six-way talks with North Korea had failed and a breakthrough would only come after the collapse of Kim Jong-Il’s regime.

    AP: Bolton: U.S. Following Flawed Iran Plan

    Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says the United States may not be able to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons because the Bush administration is following a flawed diplomatic strategy.

    In an interview with Fox News airing Wednesday night, Bolton said that contrary to administration claims, the U.N. Security Council resolution against Iran that was approved last month is “very weak.”

    Bolton stepped down in December after serving as U.N. ambassador for 16 months. He was the point man for the administration in the diplomatic debate over the resolution.

    The former envoy said the diplomatic means chosen by the administration to halt Iran’s nuclear program may not achieve the desired ends.

    “The disjunction between that objective and the diplomacy we have been pursuing is ultimately going to be a problem for the president,” Bolton said.

    He added that the administration placed too high a priority on achieving unity in the council.

    “Pursuing the goal of unity detracts from the substantive goal of preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons,” Bolton said.

    Not only have the diplomatic efforts towards the Axis of Evil been too weak but United Nations negotiations have also been protracted and allowed Iran and North Korea to more fully develop their nuclear and missile delivery programs.

    Mr. President, the “NUCELAR POINT OF NO RETURN” is IMMINENT.

    The American people deserve ACTION not “stalled” and “feckless” diplomacy.

    Stay tuned…….

    boltonjuly20aweb

    Previous:

    Iran Nuclear Watch: North Korea Helping Iran With Nuclear Testing

    Iran Nuclear Watch: United States Warns Iran – BACK DOWN

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Bars 38 IAEA Inspectors

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Defiant of United Nations Sanctions, Plan Missile War Games

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Ahmadiejad – Iran is Ready for Any Possibility

    Cox & Forkum: Dead Ball

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Russian Missiles Delivered to Iran: Ivanov

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran To Install 3,000 Uranium Enrichment Centrifuges

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Next Target Tehran?

    Iran Nuclear Watch: United States Has No Plan to Strike Iran?

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Arrests a Nuclear Spy

    Iran Nuclear Watch: United States Submarine Collides With Japanese Ship

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – Iran Will NEVER Abandon Development of Nuclear Technology

    Cox & Forkum: Saber Rattling

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Israel Planning Nuclear Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Facilities?

    The Iran Nuclear Files

    irannukejuly15aweb

    The Natanz uranium enrichment complex in Natanz is pictured in this January 2, 2006 satellite image.


    Technorati Tags: , , , ,

  • John Bolton

    John Bolton Watch: Mideast Peace Efforts a Waste of Time

    Readers: Please Vote in Flap’s January 2008 GOP Presidential Poll

    boltonnovember13bweb

    Fox: John Bolton: Mideast Peace Efforts a Waste

    As Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice meets with Mideast leaders to jumpstart the peace process, former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton called the attempt a waste of time.

    Bolton, who also said it’s time another body replace the United Nations, told the Sunday Times of London the Arab-Israeli conflict was “not a priority,” adding: “I don’t see linkage to Iraq, and Hamas and Fatah are in a state of civil war.”

    Now back at American Enterprise Institute, Bolton let loose on a variety of topics during the interview, from negotiating nuclear weapons with Iran to the reunification of the Korean peninsula.

    Times Online: Ousted Bolton puts world to rights

    AS America’s ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton was no tame diplomat. Armed with his feared red pen, ready to strike out waffling resolutions, he was an able and aggressive defender of US interests, but he often had to uphold policies with which he was not in tune.

    “To the great chagrin of many people, I followed my instructions at the UN,” he said in his first newspaper interview since relinquishing his post. He is a free man now and eager to have his say.

    Bolton on Iran

    “I wouldn’t have engaged in negotiations with Iran in the first place,” he said, evidently disdainful of Britain, France and Germany’s years of reaching out to Iran. “The policy has failed. Sanctions won’t stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons.”

    Bolton thinks the Bush administration would “rather find a way for diplomacy to succeed but time is running out”

    One of his greatest concerns is the threat to Israel and the West posed by Iran’s nuclear programme. Regime change is “preferable” to striking Iran’s sites, he noted, but “the only course worse than the use of force is an Iran with nuclear weapons”.

    The EU3 nations’ years of negotiations with Iran were not a “neutral activity”. Iran used the time to develop its mastery of uranium enrichment — as its own leaders have boasted.

    “There are all kinds of ways to change the regime,”
    he added, citing covert and overt means to topple the theocracy. “We have an extensive diaspora of people with Iranian heritage in America who we don’t use effectively.”

    Bolton on Middle East Talks

    Bolton believes that Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, is wasting her time trying to restart the Middle East peace process. The Arab-Israeli conflict was “not a priority”, he added. “I don’t see linkage to Iraq, and Hamas and Fatah are in a state of civil war.”

    Bolton on America and Britain

    In Bolton’s view, America needs to take the lead in global affairs rather than the ineffectual UN because “Who else will?” His opinion of the Foreign Office in London is not much higher than the UN. It is “European” — not a compliment.

    Britain has a “fundamental choice” to make, Bolton insisted. “The real issue is whether the UK sees itself as part of a ‘little Europe’ as opposed to Atlanticist. I certainly hope the Atlanticist view will prevail.”

    Bolton on Iraq

    Unlike Bush, Bolton believes Iraq is already at war with itself: “The fundamental point is whether the civil war that exists is going to continue.” Bolton has often been mistaken for a neocon, but while he considers democracy preferable to other forms of government, he does not consider it America’s duty to spread it.

    The shape and form of the nation is irrelevant: what matters is that Iraq is either tolerably pro-western or de-fanged. He has no regrets about the removal of Saddam Hussein; now it is up to the Iraqis if they want to engage in “fratricide”. The same goes for partition: “If the future of Iraq is to stay together, that’s fine. If not, I couldn’t care less from a strategic perspective.”

    Flap somehow thinks that John Bolton will be MORE effective in developing perspectives on foreign policy than he ever could do in the United States State Department and certainly in the United Nations.

    Bolton fits Jeanne Kirkpatrick’s office at AEI well.

    Stay tuned……

    boltonnovember13aweb

    Previous:

    Zalmay Khalilzad Watch: New United States Ambassador for the United Nations?

    John Bolton Watch: Who Will Replace United Nations Ambassador Bolton?

    John Bolton Watch: Bolton Resigns as United Nations Ambassador

    John Bolton Watch: Bolton and Bipartisanship

    John Bolton Watch: President Bush Resubmits Bolton Nomination – DEAD ON ARRIVAL

    John Bolton Watch: Biden – “And I Think John Bolton’s Going Nowhere”


    Technorati Tags:

  • John Bolton,  United Nations,  Zalmay Khalilzad

    Zalmay Khalilzad Watch: New United States Ambassador for the United Nations?

    U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad speaks during an interview with The Associated Press at the U.S. Embassy in the heavily fortified Green Zone in Baghdad, Iraq in this Sunday, May 21, 2006 file photo.

    Robert Novak: Bolton’s successor

    Zalmay Khalilzad, who was announced this week as leaving as U.S. ambassador to Iraq, is the leading prospect to replace John Bolton as envoy to the United Nations.

    President Bush was reported by aides as looking for someone who approximates Bolton’s combination of toughness and diplomatic skill and has tentatively decided on Khalilzad. A native of Afghanistan, he has served in government posts dating back to 1985 and is the highest-ranking Muslim in the Bush administration.

    A sound choice and definitely the President’s man.

    Stay tuned for the announcement tomorrow or Monday.

    Previous:

    John Bolton Watch: Who Will Replace United Nations Ambassador Bolton?


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • John Bolton,  United Nations

    John Bolton Watch: Who Will Replace United Nations Ambassador Bolton?

    boltondecember7aweb

    United States Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton leaves a Security Council meeting at United Nations Headquarters in New York, Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2006. Speculation on a new U.S. ambassador to the United Nations to succeed John Bolton is focusing on Washington’s current ambassador in Iraq , Zalmay Khalilzad, and a former U.S. deputy ambassador at the U.N., Richard Williamson. President Bush accepted Bolton’s resignation Monday, angered that a few Republicans joined Democrats in preventing his nomination from reaching the floor of the Senate.

    AP: Who’ll be Bolton’s replacement at U.N.?

    Speculation on a new U.S. ambassador to the United Nations to succeed John Bolton is focusing on Washington’s current ambassador in Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, and a former U.S. deputy ambassador at the U.N., Richard Williamson.

    But there also are a number of other Republicans and even some Democrats whose names have been floated among diplomats at U.N. headquarters.

    The Republican speculation includes Rep. Jim Leach (news, bio, voting record), a 15-term lawmaker from Iowa and opponent of the war in Iraq who lost his seat in the Democratic takeover of the House of Representatives in November, and two undersecretaries at the State Department, Nicholas Burns and Paula Dobriansky.

    On the Democratic side, two former senators have been mentioned — George Mitchell of Maine and Sam Nunn of Georgia.

    The President has two fine choices in Zalmay Khalilzad and Richard Williamson. the others are just “window dressing” so it appears the President is b-partisan. Make no mistake about it, but, in the United Nations the President will want HIS ambassador.

    khalilzaddecember7aweb

    U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad speaks during an interview with The Associated Press at the U.S. Embassy in the heavily fortified Green Zone in Baghdad, Iraq in this Sunday, May 21, 2006 file photo.

    Khalilzad, an Afghan-born Sunni Muslim and Republican insider, took up the Iraq post in June 2005 after serving as U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan from 2003 to 2005 following the fall of the Taliban. In November, a senior State Department official said he was likely to leave Iraq as soon as the end of the year but was more likely to remain through the spring.

    ABC News reported Tuesday that Khalilzad will soon return to the United States and is under “strong consideration” to be the new ambassador to the U.N., quoting a senior administration official.

    Khalilzad served at the National Security Council as special assistant to the president and senior director for Islamic Outreach and Southwest Asia, and as head of the Bush-Cheney transition team for the Defense Department.

    williamsondecember7bweb

    U.S. Deputy Ambassador Richard Williamson speaks to media after a Security Council vote, outside the Security Council Chamber at the United Nations headquarters in this Friday, June 21, 2002 file photo.

    Williamson, now a partner in the Chicago law firm of Mayer Brown Rowe and Maw, was a deputy ambassador at the U.N. in 2002-03 and ambassador to the U.N. Human Rights Commission in Geneva in 2004. He was recently in Washington where he reportedly spoke to several senior State Department officials.

    Williamson served as assistant secretary of state for international organizations in the State Department from 1988-89. He is a former chairman of the Illinois Republican Party and currently on the board of directors of the International Republican Institute.

    Two excellent candidates – each with strengths and definitely confirmable in a Democrat controlled Senate. Clearly, the President will make a personal choice.

    And John Bolton?

    President Bush accepted Bolton’s resignation Monday, angered that a few Republicans joined Democrats in preventing his nomination from reaching the floor of the Senate. Bush appointed Bolton last year when Congress was in recess, but his term is about to expire. With a long fight for confirmation going nowhere, Bolton decided to resign.

    Bolton refused to talk about his personal situation when he came to U.N. headquarters Thursday to vote on a resolution authorizing an African force to protect Somalia’s transitional government, which the U.S. sponsored.

    “I will continue to serve until my appointment ends because I’ve not resigned, I’ve simply indicated I will leave federal service when the recess appointment ends,” he said. That will happen when Congress adjourns, either in late December or early January.

    Well, has Bolton had enough of government service? Flap is sure that Bolton will be offered many academic and/or private sector consulting opportuinities.

    In any case, Flap looks forward to Bolton’s book – especially with regard to the Iran nuclear crisis, Hugo Chavez and Kofi Annan.

    Previous:

    John Bolton Watch: Bolton Resigns as United Nations Ambassador

    John Bolton Watch: Bolton and Bipartisanship

    John Bolton Watch: President Bush Resubmits Bolton Nomination – DEAD ON ARRIVAL

    John Bolton Watch: Biden – “And I Think John Bolton’s Going Nowhere”


    Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • John Bolton,  Politicians,  United Nations

    John Bolton Watch: Bolton Resigns as United Nations Ambassador

    boltonnovember13bweb

    On Monday, Dec. 4, 2006, President Bush accepted the resignation of Bolton when his recess appointment expires.

    AP: Bush accepts Bolton’s U.N. resignation

    Unable to win Senate confirmation, U.N. Ambassador John Bolton will step down when his recess appointment expires soon, the White House said Monday.

    Bolton’s nomination has languished in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for more than a year, blocked by Democrats and several Republicans.

    President Bush through the GOP and Donald Rumsfeld over the side in November and now John Bolton in December.

    Who can blame Bolton?

    Like Flap said the first time.

    U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton raises his hand to vote against a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israel’s recent attacks in Gaza at the U.N. headquarters in New York November 11, 2006.

    For what it is worth, the President will be meeting with Bolton this afternoon. Flap wonders if the President will reappoint Bolton to another position in the State Department or if Bolton is through with the Bush Administration?

    ****Update #1****

    Drudge is reporting that a possible replacement for Bolton is former Democrat Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell.

    boltondecember4bweb

    What is the President thinking?

    Does Bush have a GOP DEATHWISH?

    Mr. President, how about Senator Rick Santorum?

    Stay tuned……

    Blogosphere:

    Michelle Malkin

    Allah

    The American Pundit

    Assorted Babble by Suzie

    Stop The ACLU

    Suitably Flip

    Sister Toldjah

    Wake up America- An American Loss

    Iowa Voice

    The American Mind

    Wizbang

    Pajamas Media

    Atlass Shrugged

    Stuck On Stupid

    Mary Katharine Ham

    The FREEPers

    Previous:

    John Bolton Watch: Bolton and Bipartisanship

    John Bolton Watch: President Bush Resubmits Bolton Nomination – DEAD ON ARRIVAL

    John Bolton Watch: Biden – “And I Think John Bolton’s Going Nowhere”


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • John Bolton,  United Nations

    John Bolton Watch: Bolton and Bipartisanship

    boltonnovember13aweb

    U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton raises his hand to vote against a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israel’s recent attacks in Gaza at the U.N. headquarters in New York November 11, 2006.

    Wall Street Journal: Bolton and Bipartisanship

    So let’s see. Democrats retake the Senate, and their first act of “bipartisanship” is to declare that they’ll deny a confirmation vote to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton. And now, say the arbiters of Washington manners, President Bush is supposed to show his willingness to compromise by withdrawing Mr. Bolton’s nomination.

    If Mr. Bush obliges, he’ll be taking a big step toward turning last week’s GOP defeat into a rout. Mr. Bolton has performed in exemplary fashion as a recess appointee these last two years, winning plaudits from everyone except those who admire Kofi Annan and Hugo Chavez. He has followed State Department orders and argued forcefully for U.S. policy.

    The opposition to Mr. Bolton is based on nothing save vindictiveness. Republican Lincoln Chafee, who would have lost his GOP primary without White House support and who finally did lose last week, now says he won’t vote for Mr. Bolton though he had once supported him. Mr. Chafee is a mystery wrapped in a muddle even to himself. Democrats Chris Dodd and Joe Biden are trying to show that any political appointee who refuses to bend to their wishes can’t be confirmed. They know other Democrats would vote to confirm Mr. Bolton if he made it to the Senate floor.

    Having had one recess appointment, Mr. Bolton can’t get another one and be paid. But he could retain his position and be paid if Mr. Bush names him to a non-confirmable post at State and then assigns him to the U.N. Ambassador’s duties. Now, that’s a compromise.

    If John Bolton wishes to continue with the United Nations and the Bush Administration (and Flap wonders why he would) then the President should push for an up or down vote on the floor of the United States Senate. The President is entitled to his team and Bolton has served admirably this past year.

    Any subterfuge appointment of Bolton to a State Department position but assigning him to the United Nations is BULL. If there is any compromise it would be to appoint Bolton as another recess appointee as United Nations Ambassador and pay him out of Bush campaign funds or through some other private means.

    However, the best approach is for the President to stand by Bolton and RAM his nomination through the Senate.

    Stay tuned……

    boltonnovember13bweb

    John Bolton, United States ambassador to the United Nations , waves to reporters after a Security Council meeting on an Arab-backed draft resolution condemning the Israeli military offensive in Gaza at the United Nations headquarters in New York, Saturday, Nov. 11, 2006.

    Previous:

    John Bolton Watch: President Bush Resubmits Bolton Nomination – DEAD ON ARRIVAL

    John Bolton Watch: Biden – “And I Think John Bolton’s Going Nowhere”


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • John Bolton,  Politics,  United Nations

    John Bolton Watch: President Bush Resubmits Bolton Nomination – DEAD ON ARRIVAL

    boltonnovember9gweb

    U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton listens to statements concerning the Middle East during a Security Council meeting at the U.N. headquarters on Thursday, Nov. 9, 2006.

    AP: Bolton unlikely to win Senate approval

    Prospects for extending John Bolton’s job as U.N. ambassador essentially died Thursday as Democrats and a pivotal Republican said they would continue to oppose the nomination.

    It was another blow to President Bush two days after Democrats triumphed in elections that will give them control of Congress next year. On Wednesday, Bush had announced that Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, a polarizing figure and face of the Iraq war, would step down.

    On Thursday the White House resubmitted Bolton’s nomination to the Senate, where the appointment has languished for more than a year. Bush appointed him to the job temporarily in August 2005 while Congress was in recess, an appointment that will expire in January.

    Another nail in the coffin for the Bush Administration. President Bush is a LAME DUCK.

    Watch for more high profile appointees and cabinet members to leave by the first of the year.

    And isn’t Lincoln Chafee a REAL POS?

    You betcha…..the Dems can have him – let us hope.

    And to think all of that money the National Republican Senatorial Committee spent on him in his successful primary election bid.

    Sen. Lincoln Chafee, R-R.I., who was defeated by Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse on Tuesday, told reporters in Rhode Island on Thursday that he would continue opposing Bolton. That would deny Republicans the votes they would need to move Bolton’s nomination from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to the full Senate.

    Democrats indicated that even should the Senate try debating Bolton’s nomination when lawmakers reconvene next week — still under Republican control — they would stretch out debate on Bolton with the aim of killing it.

    “I see no point in considering Mr. Bolton’s nomination again in the Foreign Relations Committee because regardless of what happens there, he is unlikely to be considered by the full Senate,” said Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee.

    Bolton should resign when it is personally convenient and thank the President for the experience. United Nations Ambassador is a worthless position for an even more worthless organization.

    President Bush should refuse to appoint a permanent Ambassador and let an underling career foreign service officer go through the motions. The United Nations is meaningless anyway.

    boltonjuly22bjpgweb

    Previous:

    John Bolton Watch: Biden – “And I Think John Bolton’s Going Nowhere”


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Joe Biden,  John Bolton,  Politics,  United Nations

    John Bolton Watch: Biden – “And I Think John Bolton’s Going Nowhere”

    boltonnovember9aweb

    U.S. Ambassador John Bolton, left, votes during the 49th round of voting in the United Nations General Assembly, New York, Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2006. Panama was chosen to represent Latin America in the UN Security Council after a three-week deadlock vote that saw Guatemala and Venezuela fail in their rival bids for the seat.

    Reuters: Biden says U.N. envoy Bolton “going nowhere”

    John Bolton’s troubled nomination as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations is “going nowhere,” a key Democratic senator said on Wednesday after Democrats scored big in mid-term elections.

    Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, who is expected to chair the Senate Foreign Relations Committee if Democratic control of the U.S. Senate is formally confirmed, told reporters:

    “I never saw a real enthusiasm (for Bolton’s nomination) on the Republican side to begin with. There’s none on our side. And I think John Bolton’s going nowhere.”

    Slow Joe Plagiarising Biden will NOT chase Bolton out of the United Nations. But, the reader has to wonder why Ambassador Bolton would wish to stay? Bolton has a “recess appointment” and his term expires on January 7, 2007 when the new Congress (Democratically controlled) is installed.

    The GOP could call up his nomination prior to January – as they did immediately after Labor Day. But, a Senator, placed a hold on the nomination and the Democrats threatened a filibuster. This attempt then died.

    Bolton could be re-appointed for an additional year, but with NO pay.

    Bolton, the controversial former undersecretary of state in charge of non-proliferation, was nominated by President George W. Bush to be U.N. envoy in March 2005.

    But after his confirmation was blocked in the Republican-led Senate, Bush made a recess appointment, which will last until the new Congress convenes in January 2007.

    After Tuesday’s elections Democrats now control the U.S. House of Representatives and probably the Senate as well.

    Before voters cast their ballots, there was talk of Bush re-submitting Bolton’s nomination.

    Another possibility was having Bush appoint Bolton to another U.S. government job so he could still be paid but assigning him to work at the U.N.

    Senate Democratic aides said they did not know if such a move would be legal.

    boltonnovember9bweb

    U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton is seen in New York October 26, 2006. In an effort to toughen a European draft resolution on Iran , the United States wants the text to say that Tehran’s nuclear ambitions posed a threat to international peace and security, diplomats said. Bolton circulated among a small group a series of amendments, including stronger language on the threat posed by Iran.

    If Flap were Bolton I would immediately resign the United Nations ambassadorship and seek employment outside the government. Now that President Bush is a “lame duck” the White House has NO resolve to fight for Bolton.

    John, write a book and obtain a university appointment. The United Nations job while being high profile is worthless in any case.

    And for the GOP Senate, this is another example of how you squandered the hard fought majority you enjoyed the past few years. And why conservatives lost confidence in you.

    Stay tuned……

    boltonjuly22ajpgweb


    Technorati Tags: ,