-
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Urges Patience
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, left, shakes hands with Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul at the start of their meeting, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 25, 2006.
AP: Iran urges patience as it considers deal
Iran said Sunday it was seriously considering incentives to halt its nuclear program and asked the United States and other nations to be patient while Tehran weighs its response.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi told reporters that specialized committees in key state agencies were studying the nuclear incentives offered June 6 by the United States, Britain, China, France, Russia and Germany.
“The package contains legal, political and economic dimensions. All its dimensions have to be studied,” Asefi said. “We recommend to Europeans that accuracy should not be sacrificed for the sake of speed.”
Asefi said the package required careful study before Tehran delivered its formal response.
“The reason that there can’t be a speedy response is that we have to hold serious discussions on the contents,” he said. “We are taking it seriously.”
Iran is the “MASTER” OF stall and obfuscate. A reasonable nation-state would agree in principle pending negotiation of details. Of course, Iran would have to agree to the immediate cessation of uranium enrichment. This Iran will NOT do.
So, why wait?
Next stop is the United Nations Security Council…….
Stay tuned……
Discuss this blog post and MORE…. at the FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blogs, My Dental Forum.
Previous:
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Repeats Threat to Use Oil As a Weapon
Iran Nuclear Watch: Uranium Enrichment Halt Not a Precondition to Negotiations And Not EVER
Iran Nuclear Watch: Uranium Enrichment Halt Not a Precondition to Negotiations
Iran Nuclear Watch: President Bush Rejects August Iranian Response to Big 6 Proposal
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Accuses the United States of Pushing Europe Away from Compromise
Iran Nuclear Watch: President Ahmadinejad – Big 6 Proposal a “Step Forwardâ€
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Would “Use Nuclear Defense†If Threatened
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Sends Mixed Signals on Big 6 Proposal?
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei REJECTS Suspension of Uranium EnrichmentThe Natanz uranium enrichment complex in Natanz is pictured in this January 2, 2006 satellite image.
Technorati Tags: Iran, MahmoudAhmadinejad
-
Iraq War Watch: America More of a Threat to World Peace than Iran or North Korea
Arizona Republic: Murtha says U.S. poses top threat to world peace
American presence in Iraq is more dangerous to world peace than nuclear threats from North Korea or Iran, Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., said to an audience of more than 200 in North Miami Saturday afternoon.
Murtha was the guest speaker at a town hall meeting organized by Rep. Kendrick B. Meek, D-Miami, at Florida International University’s Biscayne Bay Campus. Meek’s mother, former Rep. Carrie Meek, D-Miami, was also on the panel.
A former Marine and a prominent critic of the Bush administration’s policies in Iraq, Murtha reiterated his views that the war cannot be won militarily and needs political solutions. He said the more than 100,000 troops in Iraq should be pulled out immediately, and deployed to peripheral countries like Kuwait.“We do not want permanent bases in Iraq,” Murtha told the audience. “We want as many Americans out of there as possible.
Actually, Murtha recommended deploying the troops to Okinawa around 4,000 miles away from Iraq.
This old MORON, an unindicted co-cospirator in the Abscam politcal scandel (1980) who ratted out his fellow Congressmen while saying, “I’m not interested. I’m sorry… at this point” needs to shut the hell up.
America is a greater threat than Iran or North Korea to World peace?
Sounds like another senior “Okinawa” moment for the Congressman.
Does anyone REALLY believe this BULL?
Time for Murtha to retire. His credibility = zero.
***Correction***
From John Fund at the Wall Street Journal:
On June 28 the South Florida Sun-Sentinel published this correction: “An article on Page 3B of Sunday’s Local section misinterpreted a comment from U.S. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., at a town hall meeting in North Miami. In his speech, Murtha said U.S. credibility was suffering because of continued U.S. military presence in Iraq and the perception that the United States is an occupying force. Murtha was citing a recent poll, by the Pew Global Attitudes Project, that indicates a greater percentage of people in 10 of 14 foreign countries consider the U.S. presence in Iraq a greater danger to world peace than any threats posed by Iran or North Korea.”
And from the South Florida Sun-Sentinel:
Correction: An article in Sunday’s editions misinterpreted a comment from U.S. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., at a town hall meeting in North Miami on Saturday. In his speech, Murtha said U.S. credibility was suffering because of continued U.S. military presence in Iraq ,and the perception that the U.S. is an occupying force. Murtha was citing a recent poll, by the Pew Global Attitudes Project, that indicates a greater percentage of people in 10 of 14 foreign countries consider the U.S. in Iraq a greater danger to world peace than any threats posed by Iran or North Korea.
But, Murtha, continues to be a MORON…..and all of the other statements about him are correct.
Technorati Tags: Murtha, JohnMurtha, IraqWar
-
North Korea Watch: Senators Hagel and Luger Call for Direct North Korea Talks – Rule Out Preemptive Strike
Former South Korean spy soldiers demonstrate with a mock missile on top of their van at a rally near former President Kim Dae-jung’s home, to oppose Kim’s plan to visit North Korea, in Seoul June 25, 2006.
AP: Sen. calls for direct talks with N. Korea
Leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said Sunday the Bush administration should talk directly with North Korea as concerns grow over a possible test launch of a missile that could reach the U.S.
Senators also rejected the idea by a former defense secretary that the U.S. make a pre-emptive strike against a North Korean missile.
“We are not anywhere close to talking about attacking North Korea, and we should shut up and stop it,” said Sen. Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record), R-Neb.
“We need to talk directly with North Korea. The sooner we do that, the sooner we’re going to get this resolved,” Hagel, the second-ranking Republican on the committee, told CNN’s “Late Edition.”
The committee’s chairman, Sen. Richard Lugar (news, bio, voting record), also spoke out against attacking the missile while it was on the ground.
“It would be advisable to bring about a much greater intensification of diplomacy, and this may involve direct talks between the United States and North Korea,” said Lugar, R-Ind.
North Korea long has wanted direct meetings with the U.S. Washington, however, has refused, insisting it will only meet the North Koreans in the context of six-nation international talks aimed at ridding the communist country of its nuclear weapons program.
Flap thinks that Senators Hagel and Lugar should simply shut up and allow the State, Defense Departments and President Bush deal with the North Koreans. They are only Senators from small Midwestern states and have not been elected to conduct United States foreign policy – regardless of their Senate committee assignments.
Also, Senator Lugar, does this mean everytime a nation threatens the United States that you wish to diectly negotiate with them about said threat.? Pretty absurd position, Senator.
Meanwhile, earlier today Japan has threatened North Korea with economic sanctions and North Korea has responded.
NORTH Korea has scorned a Japanese threat to impose economic sanctions in response to human rights abuses or a threatened missile test by the Stalinist state.
“The independent national economy in the DPRK (North Korea) is not such a weak one to be affected or shaken by sanctions from other countries,” the North Korean government newspaper Minju Joson said.
North Korea has boycotted the six-nation nuclear disarmament talks since November 2005 in protest to United States financial sanctions relating to American charges of money-laundering and counterfeiting.
Now is not the time to return to direct negotiations as a result of a nuclear missile test launch/threat. It encourages bad behavior which must be extinguished.
Stay tuned……
A commercial satellite photo of North Korea’s Nodong missile launch site taken on by a Digital Globe satellite and annotated and released by analysts at GlobalSecurity.org on May 24, 2006. The United States and Japan warned North Korea on Monday against a missile launch that experts say could reach as far as Alaska and threatened harsh action if the test flight goes ahead.
Discuss this blog post and MORE…. at the FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blogs, My Dental Forum.
Previous:North Korea Watch: Former Vice President Mondale Supports Preemptive Strike Against North Korea
Michael Ramirez on Missile Defense
North Korea Watch: SM-3 Block IA Interceptor Missile SUCCESSFULLY Fired in Thursday’s Test
North Korea Watch: United States Says “NO†to Direct Talks
North Korea Watch: Direct Talks with the United States?
North Korea Watch: Korea Says it “Is NOT Bound†by Missile Test Ban
North Korea Watch: United States Activates Missile Defense Shield – Part 2
North Korea Watch: United States Activates Missile Defense Shield
North Korea Watch: North Korea Threatens to “Mercilessly Wipe Out†US Forces In Case of War
North Korea Watch: Preparing to Launch A Long Range Ballistic Missile?
North Korea Watch: North Koreans Can and Have Made a Few Nuclear Devices
North Korea Harvesting More Plutonium for Nuclear Weapons
Technorati Tags: NorthKorea, KimJongIl, MissileDefenseAgency
-
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Repeats Threat to Use Oil As a Weapon
Iranian Oil Minister Kazem Vaziri-Hamaneh arrives at the OPEC headquarters in September 2005. Iran has again brandished oil as a weapon in a dispute over its nuclear programme, with the Islamic republic continuing to resist international demands to freeze sensitive uranium enrichment work.Reuters: Iran repeats oil is potential weapon in atomic row
Iran on Sunday repeated threats that it was ready to use its massive oil exports as a weapon to defend itself if it felt in danger in an international dispute over its atomic program.
But Oil Minister Kazem Vaziri-Hamaneh said international sanctions on 2.5 million barrels per day of Iranian crude exports would be impractical and would send oil prices over $100 a barrel, up from around $70 now.
Iran has been hauled before the U.N. Security Council over suspicions it is seeking nuclear missiles, a charge it denies. It could face economic sanctions and the United States has consistently declined to rule out military action.
Vaziri-Hamaneh said earlier this month the world’s fourth biggest crude producer would prefer not to play the oil card and would only do so to defend its rights.
He struck a similar tone on Sunday, telling state television: “I think using the oil weapon would be advantageous to Iran in times of threats.”
“But using such a weapon in the normal situation in the country and oil markets would mean confronting the world and we do not have such a policy,” he added.
Iran is blustering again because they have not arrived at a diplomatic solution to Condoleezza Rice’s gambit with the Big 6 Proposal.
Anything short of a cessation of uranium enrichment will be a non-starter and a referral to the United Nations Security Council for trade/economic sanctions. Flap outlined a possible compromise solution with a prolonged cessation of enrichment so that Iran could “save face.” However, time is running out and further bluster and attempted manipulation of the Western media cycle is now becoming redundant and pathetic.
On the notion that Iran would use 80 per cent of their export receipts as a weapon is ridiculous. As previously stated by United States Energy Secretary Bodman, the United States would be in “good shape” even if Iran did close the spigots, owing to healthy stockpiles.
Stay tuned……
Discuss this blog post and MORE…. at the FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blogs, My Dental Forum.
Previous:
Iran Nuclear Watch: Uranium Enrichment Halt Not a Precondition to Negotiations And Not EVER
Iran Nuclear Watch: Uranium Enrichment Halt Not a Precondition to Negotiations
Iran Nuclear Watch: President Bush Rejects August Iranian Response to Big 6 Proposal
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Accuses the United States of Pushing Europe Away from Compromise
Iran Nuclear Watch: President Ahmadinejad – Big 6 Proposal a “Step Forwardâ€
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Would “Use Nuclear Defense†If Threatened
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran Sends Mixed Signals on Big 6 Proposal?
Iran Nuclear Watch: Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei REJECTS Suspension of Uranium EnrichmentThe Natanz uranium enrichment complex in Natanz is pictured in this January 2, 2006 satellite image.
Technorati Tags: Iran, MahmoudAhmadinejad
-
Townhall.com Wach: Hugh Hewitt and Salem Communications Team Up for Conservative Activism
Newsweek: The Right: The Next Big Thing?
Conservative pundit Hugh Hewitt marries the power of talk radio with the reach of the ‘netroots.’ Watch out, Kos.
On July 4, Salem Communications, one of the country’s largest radio-station owners, will relaunch an old Web war horse called Townhall.com as a hub for its stable of stars (including Bill Bennett, Michael Medved and Hewitt himself). The hope? That “Web 2.0” wherewithal can transform what was once an op-ed clearinghouse into a single nerve center serving the separate conservative communities of talk radio and the Internet. To Hewitt, a valuable White House ally, the math is simple: add 6 million Salem fans to Townhall’s 1.4 million unique monthly visitors and you’ve got an audience six or seven times the size of liberal site Daily Kos, the Web’s biggest political blog. “We will overwhelm them,” he says.
Hugh Hewitt and Edward G. Atsinger, III, a Ventura County, Camarillo, California resident, have assembled an awesome communications conglomerate/empire from the RIGHT.
Atsinger, a board member of Oaks Christian High School (Son of Flap’s alma mater) has been acquiring his media empire as President and CEO of Salem Communications for years. His political donations and activism are renown in GOP (conservative) and Christian circles.
Flap is looking forward to the July 4th conversion of Townhall.com. Knowing both Hewitt and Atsinger there are only good things to come.
Captain Ed has Conservative Convergence Coming
What does that mean for conservatives? Looking at the Salem line-up, it portends a strengthening of the center-right rather than conservative extremism. The hosts on Salem tend towards that direction, especially Hugh himself. Dennis Prager and Michael Medved also offer shows that rely on dialogue with opposing views and focus on finding common values to reach larger consensus on political issues. Bill Bennett has a more socially conservative slant, and Laura Ingraham tends towards hard-line conservatism, but the thrust should enable the center-right and put a positive face on the Right.
Kossaks here comes the RIGHT.
Stay tuned for the July 4 launch………
Discuss this blog post and MORE…. at the FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blogs, My Dental Forum
Technorati Tags: TownHall.com, HughHewitt, SalemCommunications, EdwardAtsinger
-
Day By Day by Chris Muir Sunday June 25, 2006
Discuss this blog post and MORE…. at the FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blogs, My Dental Forum
-
Los Angeles Times Watch: Patterico and Danziger Dump the Los Angeles Dog Trainer
Patterico (Via Hugh Hewitt): Patterico Cancels his Subscription to the L.A. Times
I cancelled my subscription to the Los Angeles Times this morning.
I explained to the person who answered the phone that I was cancelling because I am outraged that the newspaper revealed classified details of a successful anti-terror operation.
They put me on with a “specialist,†and I repeated the reason for the cancellation. He said they were sorry to lose me as a subscriber. “I’m sorry, too,†I said. And I am. I’ve had my differences with the paper — plenty of them — but I’ve been subscribing since 1993. That’s thirteen years.
He said: “Of course, different people have different opinions about what’s written in the newspaper . . .â€
I told him that this has nothing to do with disagreeing with what I read in the newspaper. I disagree with the newspaper all the time. This is different. The newspaper made a deliberate choice to print classified details of an anti-terror operation that, by all accounts, was effective and legal. Key members of Congress had been briefed on it and had no problem with it. Strict controls were in place to prevent abuse, and those controls appear to have been effective.
Winds of Change.NET: Goodbye, LAT
Subject: Cancel SubscriptionFrom: Marc Danziger
Date: 9:54 am
To: subscriptions@latimes.com
cc: dean.baquet@latimes.com, readers.rep@latimes.com
I’ve been a subscriber to the Los Angeles Times continuously since I moved back to Los Angeles in 1980.
With this email, I’m asking that you cancel my subscription, effective Monday, June 26, 2006.
Subscription details are:
[deleted]
I’m canceling my subscription because I am appalled that you would publish the details of a legal, effective government program – the financial transaction monitoring program.
The Times and its staff are not above the obligations of citizenship. Those obligations absolutely do extend to vigorously questioning the government about its actions and inactions and continuously challenging it to get better.
But it seems to me that there is a bright line between challenging government policies with an aim to ensuring that it is doing its job, and openly disclosing the mechanics of a program designed to identify those who murder innocent civilians and who have openly declared war on our nation, its people, and on the values that make us who we are.
I’m disappointed in the Times for doing this, and I cannot support you by funding you. I’ll miss the paper.
Marc Danziger
Flap stopped giving his hard earned dollars to the Chandlers and Tribune Company many many years ago. I could not fathom giving any reward to such a biased and, at times, anti-American enterprise. The case at point is one of many Los Angeles Times anti-American moments.
Watch the Tribune Company “DUMP” the L.A. Times after circulation further tanks.
Stay tuned……
Previous:
Los Angeles Times Watch: Los Angeles Times Ignores Discovery of WMD in Iraq
Los Angeles Times Watch: Tribune Company CEO “HIT†by the Los Angeles Times Editors
Los Angeles Times Watch: Up For Sale?
Technorati Tags: LosAngelesTimes, DennisFitzSimons, TribuneCompany, ChandlerFamily, HughHewitt
-
Day By Day by Chris Muir
Discuss this blog post and MORE…. at the FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blogs, My Dental Forum
-
Illegal Immigration Watch: California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Denies President Bush’s National Guard Request
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (L) looks over a photo locator guide with Darryl Griffen, Chief of the San Diego Sector, U.S. Customs and Border Protection during an aerial tour of the border between San Diego and Mexico June 21, 2006, in advance of the anticipated arrival of National Guard troops on June 15 at the border.
AP: Schwarzenegger Denies Bush Troop Request
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger this week rejected a request from the Bush administration to send an additional 1,500 National Guard troops to the Mexican border, the governor’s office confirmed Friday.
The National Guard Bureau, an arm of the Pentagon, asked for the troops to help with the border-patrol mission in New Mexico and Arizona, but Schwarzenegger said the request would stretch the California Guard too thin in case of an emergency or natural disaster.
Schwarzenegger spokesman Adam Mendelsohn confirmed the governor’s decision Friday after two California National Guard officials revealed it to The Associated Press.
Mendelsohn said the governor believed sending more troops would create an inappropriate burden on the state and disrupt the guard’s training schedule.
The overall deployment for the border mission will remain at 6,000 soldiers.
This sounds like an excuse for the Governor who is running all around the state pandering for Hispanic votes, but visitng the National Guard troops at the border and then criticizing the Congress or the President or anyone not the great Governator for illegal immigration problems.
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, center, and Pico Rivera mayor Pete Ramirez, right, pose for a photo, as he campaigns Saturday, June 10, 2006, in Pico Rivera, Calif. Schwarzenegger is campaigning in several California cities after he won the Republican nomination for governor on Tuesday. Man on the left is unidentified.
Arnold has an incoherent policy on illegal immigration.
First, he was with the Minutemen. Then, he was against a border wall. And he BLAMED the federal government for inaction.
And…….now what?
Come on Arnold…..tell us what you plan?
You veto driver’s licenses for illegal aliens but want to include healthcare fiunds for illegal alien children in your budget.
Arnold, what is your policy?
Is your policy to get you re-elected?
On June 1, Schwarzenegger agreed to send the California National Guard to the Mexican border to help the federal government’s effort to curb illegal immigration. That ended a 17-day standoff with the Bush administration over whether the state would join the border patrol effort and who would pay for it.
California has committed to putting 1,000 troops on the border by July 31 and has 250 there already.
Schwarzenegger initially criticized the administration’s plan to deploy troops to the border, saying it was the wrong approach to dealing with illegal immigration.
The governor finally relented after the Pentagon signed a document promising to pay for the entire mission, a cost that could top $1.4 billion nationally.
Schwarzenegger also wanted the Bush administration to commit to a firm end date. It did not, but Schwarzenegger signed an executive order saying he would not authorize the deployment beyond the end of 2008.
***Flap to Arnold – SECURE THE BORDER – SEND THE NATIONAL GUARD***
Arnold, you have been insulting conservative GOP voters with your flip flops on illegal immigration and other issues. It is increasingly hard for any conservative to vote for you this November even if it means California Democrat Treasurer Phil Angelides wins. At least you will know where he stands on the issues.
Good Grief, Arnold, are you this stupid?
Stay tuned……
Discuss this blog post and MORE…. at the FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blogs, My Dental Forum
A US Border Patrol officer patrols the fence at the US-Mexico border near Nogales, Arizona.
Previous:
Illegal Immigration Watch: GOP Congressional Leaders – Pathway to Citizenship Bill is DEAD
Illegal Immigration Watch: Pennsylvania City to “CRACKDOWN†on Illegal Immigration
Illegal Immigration Watch: Operation Return to Sender
Illegal Immigration Watch: Federal Immigration Agents Raid Dulles International Airport
Illegal Immigration Watch: Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert Wants “A LONG LOOK†at Senate Immigration Bill
Illegal Immigration Watch: Mexican Border Crossings Reduced Since National Guard Troops DeployedIllegal Immigration Watch: Arizona Court Upholds Immigration Smuggling Law
Illegal Immigration Watch: California Anti-illegal Immigration Billboards Go Up on Freeways
Illegal Immigration Watch: “Anchor†Babies Away
Illegal Immigration Watch: Dunkin’ Donuts Now Screening Employees For Work Status
Technorati Tags: illegalimmigration, illegalaliens, ArnoldSchwarzenegger
-
North Korea Watch: Director of the Missile Defense Agency Henry Obering Confident of North Korean Missile Interception
Lt Gen. Henry A. Obering III, Director of the Missile Defense Agency
Official: U.S. Can Hit N. Korea Missile
The Pentagon’s missile defense chief predicted on Friday that interceptor rockets would hit and destroy a North Korean missile in flight if President Bush gave the order to attack it on a path to U.S. territory.
Air Force Lt. Gen. Henry A. Obering III, director of the Missile Defense Agency, told reporters he has little doubt that the interceptor system would work, even though it has never been used in a real emergency and even though the U.S. government knows relatively little about how the North Korean missile would perform.
Obering refused to say whether the U.S. missile defense system is ready now for a possible intercept mission, but noted that it has been designed specifically to defend U.S. territory against known missile threats from North Korea.
“(From) what I have seen and what I know about the system and its capabilities, I am very confident,” he said when asked at a news conference about the likelihood that one of the 11 missile interceptors based in Alaska and California would succeed against North Korea’s long-range Taepodong 2 missile.
Obering refused to discuss more specifically the level of his confidence.
He also would not say whether the missile defense system, which includes missile-tracking radars and a communications system linked to the interceptors in underground silos, is currently in an “operational” status. He said it is shifted from a test mode to an operational mode frequently. “We do it all the time,” he said.
Missile interception by Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI)
Missile Interception by Aegis Ship-Based BMD
Noting that North Korea has not conducted a test flight of a ballistic missile since 1998, Obering said that means the Pentagon has a limited amount of information about how a long-range Korean missile would function.
“It’s very, very difficult to understand what they may have, how it may perform,” he said, adding that any long-range ballistic missile would have to follow known trajectories in order to reach U.S. territory.
The Taepodong 2 missile is a newer version that has never been flight tested.
U.S. officials and private experts say they are uncertain of North Koreans’ motives for apparently preparing to launch a Taepodong 2, which U.S. officials believe has a range of between 5,000 miles and 7,500 miles. They may be planning a test flight of the missile to verify its design and gain other technical data for further improvements to the system, or they may use the missile to try to thrust a satellite into orbit.
There is no expectation that the missile would be launched as a deliberate attack on the United States, but without knowing for sure in advance the Pentagon has been considering the circumstances under which it would try a mid-flight intercept, on Bush’s order.
The North Korean missile program is especially troubling to the United States, Japan and other countries potentially within missile range because of North Korea’s declared _ but unproven _ possession of nuclear weapons.
Alan Romberg, an Asia policy expert and former State Department official, said in an interview Friday that he believes it is likely that North Korea has managed to fashion a number of weapons from its nuclear materials, but he finds it questionable to conclude that they have one that could be carried atop a long-range missile.
The three United States options remain:
1. Preemptive Destruction
2. Interception and Destruction
3. Diplomacy to prevent launch
Stay tuned……
A commercial satellite photo of North Korea’s Nodong missile launch site taken on by a Digital Globe satellite and annotated and released by analysts at GlobalSecurity.org on May 24, 2006. The United States and Japan warned North Korea on Monday against a missile launch that experts say could reach as far as Alaska and threatened harsh action if the test flight goes ahead.
Discuss this blog post and MORE…. at the FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blogs, My Dental Forum.
Previous:North Korea Watch: Former Vice President Mondale Supports Preemptive Strike Against North Korea
Michael Ramirez on Missile Defense
North Korea Watch: SM-3 Block IA Interceptor Missile SUCCESSFULLY Fired in Thursday’s Test
North Korea Watch: United States Says “NO†to Direct Talks
North Korea Watch: Direct Talks with the United States?
North Korea Watch: Korea Says it “Is NOT Bound†by Missile Test Ban
North Korea Watch: United States Activates Missile Defense Shield – Part 2
North Korea Watch: United States Activates Missile Defense Shield
North Korea Watch: North Korea Threatens to “Mercilessly Wipe Out†US Forces In Case of War
North Korea Watch: Preparing to Launch A Long Range Ballistic Missile?
North Korea Watch: North Koreans Can and Have Made a Few Nuclear Devices
North Korea Harvesting More Plutonium for Nuclear Weapons
Technorati Tags: NorthKorea, KimJongIl, MissileDefenseAgency