• Cuba,  Fidel Castro,  Michael Ramirez,  Socialists,  Socialized Medicine

    Michael Ramirez on Castro’s Socialized Medicine

    Readers: Please Vote in Flap’s January 2008 GOP Presidential Poll

    ramireztoon012607web

    Cuba Watch: Fidel Castro – Decided to Avoid Colostomy?

    Cuban leader Fidel Castro chose to avoid a colostomy and opted for riskier intestinal surgery that led to serious complications, the Spanish newspaper El Pais said in its Wednesday edition.

    The shortcut involved sewing the colon to the rectum but did not heal properly and broke apart, releasing gastric fluid with feces that caused serious infection, El Pais said on its Web site.

    The newspaper reported a day earlier that Castro’s prognosis was “very serious” and that he is being fed intravenously after three failed operations for diverticulitis, or pouch-like bulges in the large intestine that get infected.

    El Pais cited medical sources at the same Madrid hospital where a surgeon who examined Castro in late December works.

    And ask the Canadians who travel to the United States to see a doctor or get a test since their universal care (socialized) system imposes rationing of care.

    NOTE WELL:

    Both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton support government run universal single payor health care.

    Previous:

    The Michael Rimerez Files


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger,  California,  Health,  Socialized Medicine

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: If It Looks Like a Duck…..

    Readers: Please Vote in Flap’s January 2008 GOP Presidential Poll

    arnoldjan252007a

    The Consumer Alliance for a Strong Economy has a new television ad opposing California Governor Arnold Schwarzengger’s radical health care plan.

    The ad is here.

    QUACK – it IS a massive tax increase for all Californians…….

    ramireztoon011207web

    Previous:

    President Bush Watch: Bush Health Care Plan a LOSER

    Michael Ramirez on California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Radical Health Care Proposal

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: TV Ads To Oppose Governor Schwarzenegger’s Radical Health Care Reform Proposal

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Proposes RADICAL Health Care Reforms


    Technorati Tags:

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger,  George W. Bush,  Health,  Socialized Medicine

    President Bush Watch: Bush Health Care Plan a LOSER

    Readers: Please Vote in Flap’s January 2008 GOP Presidential Poll

    bushjan22bweb

    U.S. President George W. Bush waves upon his arrival on the snow-covered South Lawn of the White House in Washington, January 22, 2007. Bush returned from a weekend at the Camp David Presidential retreat where he worked on his annual State of the Union address that he is scheduled to deliver on January 23.

    Reuters: Millions could see taxes up in Bush health plan

    About 30 million Americans could face a tax hike under President George W. Bush’s plan to expand health insurance coverage and address rising health care costs, the White House said on Monday.

    “There are always going to be some winners and some losers, but the people who might initially be losers have options,” Kate Baicker, a member of the White House Council of Economic Advisors, told reporters.

    There are about 47 million people with no health insurance in a country of 300 million. Baicker said Bush’s tax proposal would result in “upwards of 3 million or more newly insured people.”

    Bush plans to highlight the plan in Tuesday’s State of the Union speech to the U.S. Congress.

    Wow, socialism/tax redistribution and a massive middle class TAX INCREASE.

    Remember “READ MY LIPS?”

    This plan is a LOSER and almost as bad as Arnold Schwarzenegger’s radical health care proposal. And the WORD in California is that the Governator’s health care reform proposal is DEAD ON ARRIVAL.

    But don’t forget the 150,000 medical doctors. Forget about managed care, imposing medical decisions on doctors by high school graduates, and forget about huge mal-practice premiums….the docs are organizing and are in an ugly mood. Nothing in 35 years have galvanized doctors since the mal-practice crisis. And, they are all furious with the Governor.

    But, the Democrat’s plan is even WORSE – UNIVERSAL SINGLE PAYOR GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTH CARE.

    The President’s health care plan is DODDEAD ON DELIVERY.

    Stay tuned……..

    ramireztoon011207web


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger,  California,  Health,  Medicine,  Michael Ramirez,  Socialized Medicine

    Michael Ramirez on California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Radical Health Care Proposal

    Readers: Please Vote in Flap’s January 2008 GOP Presidential Poll

    ramireztoon011207web

    AP: Schwarzenegger’s health plan has critics

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is taking on just about every major interest group in California in his audacious effort to bring universal health care to the nation’s biggest state: unions, small business, doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, conservatives.

    The Republican governor unveiled a $12 billion-a-year plan on Monday to extend health care coverage to most of California’s 6.5 million uninsured and make it the second state, behind Massachusetts, to require everyone to carry insurance. Coverage for the poorest of the poor would be free; for many others, it would be heavily subsidized.

    Schwarzenegger also proposed to share the sacrifice by requiring individuals, employers and health care providers to contribute to the cost, saying the program will save billions, in part by providing preventive care, which is cheaper than waiting for people to get sick and treating them in the emergency room.

    “Building on shared responsibility, where everyone does their part,” the governor said, “we will fix California’s broken health care system and create a model that can be used by the rest of the nation.”

    But for all his optimism, Schwarzenegger is getting some pushback. Some of those who will have to pay are opposed, or at least leery.

    Economists warn the plan will expose the state to runaway costs.

    Calif.’s healthcare plan looks familiar

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: TV Ads To Oppose Governor Schwarzenegger’s Radical Health Care Reform Proposal

    Wall Street Journal: Terminatorcare

    Real Clear Politics: Schwarzenegger’s Health Care Socialism by Ross Kaminsky

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Proposes RADICAL Health Care Reforms

    arnolddecember28b


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger,  California,  Health,  Socialized Medicine

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: TV Ads To Oppose Governor Schwarzenegger’s Radical Health Care Reform Proposal

    arnoldjan10aweb

    Appearing via video conference, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger discusses his plan to extend health coverage to nearly all Californians, Monday, Jan. 8, 2007, during a news conference in Sacramento, Calif. Schwarzenegger, who is recovering from a broken leg, did not travel to Sacramento, under advice from his doctor. At left is Kim Belshe, secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services and Schwarzenegger health advisor Herb Schultz is seen at right.

    Los Angeles Times: Flash: TV Ads to Oppose Schwarzenegger Health Plan

    Inevitably, a conservative small business group is launching a TV ad to oppose Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s “$1 billion tax increase” to pay for a new California health care system.

    arnoldhealthjan10aweb

    Consumer Alliance for a Strong Economy’s TV ad is here.

    The 30-second ad comes one day after Schwarzenegger announced the plan, widely panned by conservatives but treated with optimism by Democrats, some big businesses, health care advocates and even HMOs. The ad was produced by the political PR firm of Gilliard Blanning Wysocki and Assoc., under the name of Consumer Alliance for a Strong Economy. The firm is co-managed by Republican consultant Dave Gilliard, who has been a frequent critic of the governor.

    The ten page Governors’ Health Care Proposal is here.

    A good summary of the Governor’s proposal is here.

    arnoldjan10bweb

    Graphic courtesy of WSJ

    Wall Street Journal: Terminatorcare

    Gov. Schwarzenegger writes a prescription for disaster.

    On Monday, Arnold Schwarzenegger presented his proposal for reducing the number of Californians who lack health insurance. His proposal is almost indistinguishable–except in details–from that of the Democrats who dominate the California Assembly and Senate.

    The Democrats tend to favor solutions involving regulations, government spending and taxes, and Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata’s proposal–the main contending Democrat plan–hits the trifecta. It would require employers to provide health insurance; give them the option of paying a tax instead of providing health insurance; and increase spending by expanding both the Medi-Cal and Healthy Families programs, which provide care to low-income children–including children of illegal immigrants and the disabled.

    Mr. Schwarzenegger’s solution hits the trifecta also. He would require employers with 10 or more workers to provide health insurance or pay a 4% tax on all wages covered by Social Security: Look for employers with 10 to 12 employees to get creative about outsourcing. And look as well, as Harvard economist Jonathan Gruber has documented, for wages to fall in firms that offer health insurance because of the mandate. Gov. Schwarzenegger would throw in a 2% tax on doctors and a 4% tax on hospitals to help fund Medi-Cal, California’s name for Medicaid. And he would expand Medi-Cal to adults earning as much as 100% above the poverty line and to children, even those here illegally, in poor and middle-income families. He hopes, by doing this, to shift $5 billion of Medi-Cal’s annual cost to the federal government.

    There are two problems with such solutions. First, they infringe on economic freedom, preventing, in Robert Nozick’s phrase, “capitalist acts between consenting adults.” Second, government solutions rarely work.

    Read it all…….

    Real Clear Politics: Schwarzenegger’s Health Care Socialism by Ross Kaminsky

    Before I get into what I hope to be a well-reasoned and economically sound discussion of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s new “universal health care” plan, please bear with the following outburst: Arnold’s plan is some of the most muddle-headed, idiotic, socialist crap I have ever seen from a serious politician, much less from a Republican…..

    ….Health care is not a Constitutional right. It is an individual responsibility. The closer we get toward socialized medicine, the further we get from the best medical system we could have. Just imagine when California has to implement a rule like England has: A mandatory minimum waiting time for someone to see a doctor, because the government can’t afford the health care system to move any more efficiently.

    The single biggest needed change to health care market which has any actual chance of taking effect is much larger deductibles and co-payments. This should be done in combination with health savings accounts so that people really feel like they are spending money when they go to the doctor or the hospital. Keeping demand under control is the real economic piece that is missing from the health care puzzle.

    As long as we have politicians who believe that it is the proper role of the state to redistribute money, interfere in private contracts, and use their power to reward their favored constituencies regardless of the cost to taxpayers, we will never be safe from the dead hand of government. When even Republicans are willing to legislate as Communists (and I do not use that term as hyperbole), there is little reason to have hope.

    Read it all.

    Flap thinks the Governator has been talking to Uncle Teddy too much over the holiday season.

    Arnold, forget about this proposal – put a fork in it!

    IT’S DONE

    Update: Robert Sallady over at Political Muscle finds something nefarious in the group running the ads against Schwarzenegger:

    The Consumer Alliance for a Strong Economy, the front group running TV ads in the Sacramento market lambasting Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s new health care plan, won’t reveal its donors except to say “they are all small.” The group has been fighting to keep its financial supporters secret for years, despite efforts by lawmakers and campaign finance reformers to out them.

    The Capitol has some anxiety over the ads, which ran in prominent spots on the three major networks immediately after Schwarzenegger’s State of the State speech (and continue to run on cable). The governor’s office, health care advocates and others don’t want a repeat of the PR barrage that killed HillaryCare, even though the CASE campaign seems relatively harmless at this point.

    The group is run out of the Republican PR firm, Gilliard Blanning Wysocki and Assoc., and has used small TV ad buys to oppose mandatory health insurance under Proposition 72, the November 2004 referendum, and sabotage Democratic efforts to raise the minimum wage. They also wrote letters to lawmakers supporting Schwarzenegger’s workers’ compensation reform package.

    Not a big deal….but obviously making the Hillary Schwarzenegger health care reform folks nervous in Sacramento.

    Don’t worry Governor……your proposal will NOT go very far.

    arnolddecember25bweb

    Previous:

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Proposes RADICAL Health Care Reforms

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Governor A No Show at Inaugural Parties

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Continues to Work Despite Injury

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Scheduled for Tuesday Surgery

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Governator Breaks His Leg while Skiing


    Technorati Tags:

  • Arnold Schwarzenegger,  Health,  Socialized Medicine

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Proposes RADICAL Health Care Reforms

    arnoldjan92007aweb

    California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (C) unveils his new health care plan to health care and business professionals via satellite from his office in Los Angeles, California, as Kim Belshe, Secretary of the California Health and Human Services Agency, listens in Sacramento January 8, 2007. Schwarzenegger was unable to attend due to his broken leg.

    Los Angeles Times: Gov. seeks sweeping health system reforms

    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger today proposed upending just about every portion of the healthcare industry in one of the country’s most elaborate efforts at holding down medical costs and expanding insurance to those who don’t have it.

    Schwarzenegger’s plan, which he publicly unveiled at noon, would require employers with 10 workers or more to buy insurance for their workers or pay a fee of 4% of their payroll into a program to help provide coverage for the uninsured.

    Schwarzenegger would tax doctors 2% of their gross revenue and place a 4% tax on hospitals. He campaigned for reelection on an anti-tax platform, but his administration argues that so many more people would have insurance that medical providers would make more money.

    The governor also wants to ban insurers from refusing to offer coverage to some individuals because of their prior medical conditions. Insurers would also have to spend at least 85% of their premium revenues on patient care, a move that would limit the amount companies spend on administrative costs and profits.

    In an effort to cover all Californian children, including ones in the state illegally, Schwarzenegger’s plan would expand the state’s Healthy Families program, providing insurance to children whose parents make less than three times the poverty level. That works out to about $60,000 for a family of four.

    And Schwarzenegger said his plan would require every Californian to have health insurance.

    “If you can’t afford it, the state will help you buy it,” he said, “but you must be insured.”

    The ten page Governors’ Health Care Proposal is here.

    The Governor’s vision for health reform is an accessible, efficient, and affordable health care system that promotes a healthier California through prevention and wellness and universality of coverage. For the Governor’s vision to be realized, health care reform must reflect a“systems” approach that incorporates three essential building blocks in an integrated manner.
    These building blocks are:
    Prevention, health promotion, and wellness
    Coverage for all Californians
    Affordability and cost containment

    arnoldjan92007bweb

    Kim Belshe, Secretary for Health and Human Services, outlines Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger health coverage plan during a news conference in Sacramento, Calif., Monday, Jan. 8, 2007. Schwarzenegger proposed to extend health coverage to nearly all of California’s 6.5 million uninsured people, promising to spread the cost among businesses, individuals, hospitals, doctors, insurers and government.

    So, what does the Governor’s plan do?

    REDISTRIBUTION OF INCOME AND WEALTH – TRUE LIES: SOCIALIZED UNIVERSAL COVERAGE but California style.

    And this has been so successful where?

    Great Britain?

    Canada?

    Australia?

    Russia?

    Maine?

    Answer: NOWHERE

    And WHO IS GOING TO PAY?

    Major elements, dubbed “shared responsibility,” include requiring every Californian to be insured, much as motorists are required to carry insurance; requiring employers to either cover workers or pay payroll taxes into a state pool; taxing insurers and medical care providers to recapture some of their new revenues; and extracting more than $5 billion in new federal funds to help cover the $12 billion annual cost.

    While libertarians contend that government shouldn’t be in the health care business, as a practical — and legal — matter virtually everyone already receives some care, with the uninsured misusing hospital emergency rooms, which pass on their costs of uncompensated care to paying patients. Schwarzenegger cites that “hidden tax” as the rationale for bringing costs into the open and paying for them.

    There are some serious reservations about the Republican governor’s approach. With health care costs rising several times faster than payrolls, for example, it seems unlikely that flat taxes on payrolls, doctors and hospitals would work.

    The overarching uncertainty, however, is whether such an ambitious scheme could survive the legislative grinder, where interest groups will exert their influence to gain financially advantageous changes for their members. Consumer groups will oppose the individual coverage mandates, for instance, while many employers will oppose being required to provide coverage (those with under 10 workers would be exempted) or pay in-lieu taxes.

    A big question is whether the proposed taxes — about $4.5 billion of the $12 billion — would require two-thirds legislative votes, which would give a veto to anti-tax Republican legislators and perhaps sink the scheme. Administration officials and Democratic leaders hope to avoid the two-thirds vote by calling the taxes fees, but if they do that, the courts would have the last word.

    And ILLEGAL ALIENS are they covered?

    You bet….

    Arnold vetoes California Driver’s Licenses for illegal aliens but now will provide them with “FREE” Universal health care?

    How do you spell RECALL? and/or REFERENDUM?

    The DETAILS IN THIS DEVIL ARE HERE.

    Some of the reactions to the Governor’s radical proposal are here.

    Democrat Speaker of the Assembly Nunez:

    “This is a plan Assembly Democrats could have written – and in a lot of ways already did. I’m pleased to see so much in common with the plan I introduced last month.”

    California Nurses Assn.

    The California Nurses Association today said it welcomed the decision of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to address the state’s escalating healthcare crisis. But, said CNA President Deborah Burger, the sum of his proposals may ultimately amount to “little more than a fresh coat of paint on a collapsing house.”

    CNA commended portions of the governor’s plan that would require health plans to end denials of coverage based on age or health status and assurance of health services for the undocumented. But, overall, “the package has a number of gaping holes,” said Burger.

    That begins with the call to “criminalize the uninsured by forcing them to buy insurance, a plan that shifts the costs and risk from the insurers to individuals, won’t work for millions of Californians, and is a huge gift to the insurance industry,” said Burger.

    “What we don’t see is any discussion of what type of health coverage people will buy. There are no limits on skyrocketing health premiums, no requirements on what will be included in the required plans, and a new call to deregulate existing public protections.

    Assembly Republican Leader Mike Villines:

    “Imposing a new jobs tax on employers of any size and expanding costly government mandates is the wrong approach, one which will devastate our economy. We continue to agree with the Governor’s statements in 2004 when he argued that a new jobs tax will be a job killer and force many businesses to lay off workers, move out of state or close their doors for good.

    “As we debate health care reform this year, it is vital that lawmakers fully consider the impact our actions will have on jobs, the economy, hard working families, and the state budget. Assembly Republicans stand ready to work with the Governor and lawmakers to shape California’s health care future in a fiscally responsible manner, focusing on real problems, while protecting the wallets of California taxpayers.”

    California State Senator Tom McClintock

    ‘It is disappointing that just 72 hours into his [second term] he’s shattered the central campaign pledge upon which he won reelection — not to raise taxes,’ said state Sen. Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks), who ran unsuccessfully for lieutenant governor last year with the governor’s support.

    ‘I think it’s ironic,’ McClintock continued, ‘that a governor who just proclaimed himself a centrist would come up with a proposal well to the left of the one presented by Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata,’ a Democrat from Oakland.”

    Dan Walters in his excellent piece outlines four possible scenarios for this health initiative:

    1. Effectively reforming health care

    2. Enacting a minor, face-saving expansion of care

    3. Another gridlock failure

    4. Creating another unworkable monstrosity

    Flap says number two and the reform will indeed be minor.

    Schwarzenegger has NO voter mandate to undertake such a radical approach to reforming a health care system that until now has been private in California. This is NOT infrastructure reform.
    The Democrats and Labor Unions may like parts of the program but they REALLY want true socialized government paid universal single payor coverage.

    The GOP will NEVER support the business mandates and increased taxes.

    Medicine and hospitals will NEVER support taxes on their services – in hopes of increased revenues? What has the Governator been smoking?

    Stay tuned for tonight’s State of the State address and tomorrow’s unveiling of the Governor’s budget. Then watch, as the California GOP turns against their own Governor on this issue, partisanship and the budget.

    arnolddecember25bweb

    Others Blogging:

    Captain Ed

    Sister Toldjah

    Ed Driscoll 

    Previous:

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Governor A No Show at Inaugural Parties

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Continues to Work Despite Injury

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: California Governor Schwarzenegger Scheduled for Tuesday Surgery

    Arnold Schwarzenegger Watch: Governator Breaks His Leg while Skiing


    Technorati Tags:

  • Socialized Medicine

    National Health Service Watch: The Doctors Complain

    “A splendid book. It’s a devastating critique of the welfare state. A page-turner, yet also extensively sourced. Demonstrates how attempts to achieve good intentions have led to horrible results — increasing crime and violence, worsened conditions of the very poor, an extraordinary deterioration in the quality and character of British life. Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize-winner.

    James Bartholomew has Twelve broken bones? Put them to one side and do some hip replacements.

    I took a close relative to see a consultant surgeon in Hampshire yesterday. I raised the subject of the NHS and with no prompting the consultant said that the NHS was in a terrible state and would go. He said that last weekend, he (and presumably his juniors) he had twelve people with fractures in an NHS hospital – in other words these patients had broken bones.

    But while he wanted – as any humane person would – to operate on these twelve emergencies as quickly as possible, the hospital was still bringing him elective cases (‘elective’ means non-emergency cases suh as hip replacements). In describing this ghastly scene, he added that there were not even ward clerks to take notes.

    It is horrible to think that you, me or one of our loved ones might break a bone and be sent – as we automatically would be – to an NHS hospital only to be left lying in bed for days of end with this broken bone. We would be in great pain, on strong pain killers that made us drowsy and there would probably be complications such as bed sores. That is not so much a health service as a torture service. The idea that non-emergency operations should take precedence is a sign that morality and decency have left the building. It is sick.

    What is new is the way that an NHS doctor such as him is so passionately and openly critical of the NHS. Ten years ago, virtually every doctor or nurse I met was a committed supporter of the NHS. Now, increasingly, doctors I meet are sceptical about the NHS or downright hostile. This man was the most forthright of all and said that the NHS would have to go and it would go. It would be replaced by private sector supply, social insurance and pro bono work. He said that he and his colleagues would be happy to spend time each week working for free for those people without funds.

    The Socialized National Health Service Dentistry in the U.K. is in just as sad shape. Flap yesterday had NHS Dentistry Watch: Do It Yourself Extraction.

    Look at the Comments from Bartholomew’s blog:

    Ten years ago, virtually every doctor or nurse I met was a committed supporter of the NHS. Now, increasingly, doctors I meet are sceptical about the NHS or downright hostile.

    You are correct in noting this, there has been a appreciable change of opinion in the staff that I meet. I have been a doctor for 18 years &, when I qualified, expressing an opinion about the inadequacies of the NHS would have been met with scorn & hostility; now such opinions are generally agreed with.

    Posted by Thersites at September 3, 2005 11:34 AM

    It’s entirely accurate, and it’s probably fuelled by the quite outrageous lies that the Trust PR department throws out.

    Ours (Norfolk & Norwich) is “decorating” the wards which involves closing them in rotation, conveniently. They’ve omitted to mention is the Nursing staff levels are being cut from 8/7 to 6/5 though.

    There’s a line in the webmaster’s book about “having given up trying to improve the service and now trying to improve the perception of the service”.

    I do not know of *any* public sector organisation to which this does not apply.

    The ones I know something about (Police, Health, Education) are all the same, near enough. Staffed by people who do their best, run by complete morons obsessed with the latest government junk who handicap those trying to actually do something.

    Posted by Paul at September 5, 2005 08:27 AM

    Sad!

    And what is alarming for an American is that what happens you are touring Britain and you get sick? Or have an accident?

    Your private American insurance will probably be no assurance of timely or even some kind of medical care.

    Scarey stuff.

    Unfortunately, it is just as scarey in Canada.

    H/T Socialized Medicine

    Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • Health,  Socialized Medicine

    Canada’s Healthcare: Don’t Get Sick there

    The Canadian Fraser Institute has released a paper, How Good is Canadian Health Care? 2005 Report. The answer is NOT so good.

    The paper, released by the right-leaning Fraser Institute, compares 27 countries that all guarantee access to health care, regardless of ability to pay.

    The report says Sweden, Japan, France and Australia all outperform Canada in the following areas: keeping women with breast cancer alive; preventing death from disease; waiting times for health services and the number of years people can expect to live without a disability.

    “Canadians continue to not get value for their money,” says Nadeem Esmail, co-author of the report.

    The entire report can be read here.

    Is anyone surprised that the socialized Canadian healthcare system sucks?

    Uhhhh NO!

    HT: Socialized Medicine

  • Socialized Medicine

    Governor Mitt Romney: Eyes Penalties for Those Lacking Insurance

    Flap was listening to Hugh Hewitt’s radio show on KRLA yesterday and up poped the Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney as a guest. Romney presented and discussed his new and astoundingly government controlling proposal for statewide healthcare Romney eyes penalties for those lacking insurance:

    Massachusetts residents who choose not to obtain health insurance would face tax penalties and even the garnishing of their wages under a proposal Governor Mitt Romney unveiled yesterday.

    Romney says the ”individual mandate” he is proposing, part of his broader plan to cover the roughly 500,000 people who are uninsured, would not cost the state any money. But some healthcare specialists say the approach might cost hundreds of millions of dollars more than state taxpayers currently provide for government health coverage.

    Romney’s plan would require all residents in Massachusetts to have some form of health insurance or agree to pay their medical bills out of their own pockets. No other state has such a requirement, and if Romney manages to make it law, it would be a compelling accomplishment he could point to if he runs for president.

    In an era where citizens demand less governmental instrusion in their lives here comes a child-support – alimony type government coercion plan to make sure you pay your medical bills.

    This proposal reeks of 19th century Mormon self-reliance but is out of the mainstream of MODERN political thought and should be rejected as quickly as any notion that Romney has any chance for the Presidency in 2008.

    ”No more ‘free riding,’ if you will, where an individual says: ‘I’m not going to pay, even though I can afford it. I’m not going to get insurance, even though I can afford it. I’m instead going to just show up and make the taxpayers pay for me,’ ” Romney told reporters after a healthcare speech at the John F. Kennedy Library.

    ‘It’s the ultimate conservative idea, which is that people have responsibility for their own care, and they don’t look to government to take of them if they can afford to take care of themselves,” Romney told reporters after his speech.

    This is not a conservative healthcare plan at all. It is government intrusion.

    If you want a conservative healthcare plan, then go to a private, free market system with government vouchers for the truely indigent, poor and disabled.

    “All around us, we see signs that government mandates and heavy-handed, command-and-control models of providing healthcare don’t work and people are abandoning those, and yet the governor seems to be running toward them,” said Michael Cannon of the libertarian Cato Institute.

    Gary Claxton — vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, which studies health policy — said individual mandates have been rejected before because Americans ”don’t like to tell individuals what to do.”

    Karen Davis, president of the Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation that supports research on health and social issues, said: ”The sticking point has always been the affordability of coverage. It’s one thing to tell people they have to buy it. If they can’t afford it, what do you do? Fine them? Put them in jail?”

    Exactly!

  • Canada,  Socialized Medicine

    Canada Socialized Medicine: Sends Pregnant Women to USA Again

    Whenever, someone mentions a single payor socialized healthcare system for the USA, please send them this link.

    Third pregnant woman sent to U.S. for care: Ontario short of intensive care beds for babies

    Another pregnant woman in Ontario was sent to the United States last week because there weren’t enough intensive care beds for babies in the province, the Toronto Star has learned.

    She is the third pregnant woman to be sent south of the border for care since April 1.

    The woman was moved because she needed to be cared for in a hospital that also had a neo-natal intensive care bed, known as level 3 care, in case she delivered early. There was no room for her last week in hospitals in Toronto, London, Hamilton and Kingston offering that level of care. When medically necessary, CritiCall is authorized to access care outside the province.

    The woman’s transfer is a sign that a shortage of neo-natal intensive care beds in the province may be getting worse. From April 2004 to March this year, only two expectant women were sent to the U.S.

    Last week, the Star reported two pregnant Ontario women were sent to the U.S. earlier this month because no space was available in hospitals that can care for both high-risk mothers and premature infants. Neither delivered their babies in the U.S.

    So, now the USA is supporting a failed socialized experiment north of the border?

    Wonder if the MSM will cover this the next time Hillary expounds upon her single payor socialized vision?