• Barack Obama,  Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina

    Updated: CA-Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 46% Vs. Carly Fiorina 45%

    fiorinaboxerb CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 49% Vs. Carly Fiorina 46%

    Republican Nominee Carly Fiorina and California Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer

    Looks like Carly Fiorina is starting to surge in this latest Reuters/Ipsos Poll.

    Democratic candidates are clinging to narrow leads over their Republican rivals in two key California races with less than three weeks to go until November 2 elections, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found on Friday.

    Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer’s lead over Republican Carly Fiorina among likely voters in California is only 1 percentage point, 46 percent to 45 percent, down slightly from a 4-point advantage early this month.

    The margin of error for likely voters in the latest survey is 4.6 percentage points, making the Democrats’ lead more tenuous.

    Looks like my assessment of President Obama’s involvement in this race is correct.

    The White House is scared this seat will FLIP.

    Updated Story Link

  • Barack Obama,  Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina

    CA-Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 46% Vs. Carly Fiorina 45%

    fiorinaboxerb CA Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 49% Vs. Carly Fiorina 46%

    Republican Nominee Carly Fiorina and California Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer

    Looks like Carly Fiorina is starting to surge in this latest Reuters/Ipsos Poll.

    Democratic candidates are clinging to narrow leads over their Republican rivals in two key California races with less than three weeks to go until November 2 elections, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found on Friday.

    Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer’s lead over Republican Carly Fiorina among likely voters in California is only 1 percentage point, 46 percent to 45 percent, down slightly from a 4-point advantage early this month.

    The margin of error for likely voters in the latest survey is 4.6 percentage points, making the Democrats’ lead more tenuous.

    Looks like my assessment of President Obama’s involvement in this race is correct.

    The White House is scared this seat will FLIP.

    Updated Story Link

  • Barack Obama,  Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina,  Michelle Obama

    CA-Sen: President and First Lady Michelle Obama Go All In for Barbara Boxer

    President Obama and California Senator Barbara Boxer

    All in to say the least, look at the events and they are not cheap either.

    October 22, 2010 – Friday Luncheon with President Obama at the University of Southern California

    October 26, 2010 – Tuesday evening concert with First Lady Michelle Obama and Dr. Jill Biden (The Vice President’s Wife)

    October 27, 2010 – Wednesday noon luncheon with First Lady Michelle Obama in Pacific Palisades

    I suppose California is so “blue,” Obama remains popular here (unlike other areas of the country) and there is so much Hollywood money floating around. Or, is it that the White House is worried that they will lose control of the Senate if the Boxer seat flips to Carly Fiorina?

    Carly Fioirna just announced she raised about $9 million this quarter and with recent NRSC funding announcements, it looks like she will remain strong “on air” through the rest of the campaign.

    The Obamas are all in for Boxer, milking the California money tree for her and their own re-election campaign in two years.

  • Barbara Boxer,  Jerry Brown,  Sarah Palin

    Sarah Palin Video: Do You Know the Way to San Jose?

    Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin on Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer yesterday in San Jose, California

    Sarah Palin found her way to San Jose yesterday on the campaign stump. But, for whom?

    Palin, who resigned as governor 2 1/2 years into her term, delivered a 40-minute speech – complete with a trademark “You betcha!” – and answered a few questions afterward before a less-than-capacity audience of 1,400 at the San Jose Center for the Performing Arts. Her paid appearance was sponsored by the conservative Liberty and FreedomFounda tion.

    With husband Todd standing offstage – he’d just driven the family motor home down from Alaska – it was Palin’s first stop in her three-city swing through California over the next few days, a pilgrimage that appears designed both to raise her political profile, in preparation for a possible 2012 presidential run, and enthusiasm for GOP candidates.

    Not that she mentioned any Republicans by name Tuesday. Not even Republican Senate nominee Carly Fiorina, endorsed by Palin last spring in California’s GOP primary. Fiorina and GOP gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman (who Palin has not endorsed) were invited to attend Thursday, but declined, said event spokesman J.D. Gordon, because of scheduling conflicts. Neither is expected to join Palin in Sacramento today or Anaheim on Saturday.

    The answer is for Palin’s Presidential run in 2012.

    Sarah’s money quote from yesterday’s speech: Re: Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer: “act like they’re permanent residents of a unicorn ranch in fantasyland.”

    Yeah, Sarah is running.

  • Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina

    CA-Sen Video: Barbara Boxer Gets Mixed Up On CNN – Not the First Time She is Confused With Facts

    Good grief and Barbara Boxer is a U.S. Senator? She cannot even get her own career facts straight = OLD.

    California incumbent Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer spent some time today with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer straightening out her arithmetic. Boxer is in a toss-up race with GOP challenger and former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina.

    “I voted for over $2 trillion of tax cuts, the largest one was in the stimulus bill,” Boxer said. Blitzer, confused, thought she meant $2 trillion in the stimulus, when she meant over her career.

    Then Boxer got confused: “No, no, no — $1.2 trillion with the stimulus.”

    That confused Blitzer even more, since the entire stimulus was about $800 billion. He asked, “There was $1.2 trillion in tax cuts in the stimulus?”

    Boxer replied, “There was a lot. About, well, I will put it this way, over time, that’s what it will be, when you figure all the tax cuts over time. And what we did for the senior citizens, giving them back those refunds. So there was a lot.”

    She finally got back on track, adding, correctly this time, “Actually, a third of the stimulus was tax cuts. That I can tell you.”

    That’s the “Making Work Pay” cut that President Obama mistakenly thought would bring Republicans along to support the stimulus. Democrats bitterly complained later that the tax cut showed up as a few dollars a week in people’s paychecks that almost no one noticed.

    But, you know this is not the first time. Look at this video:

    Senator Barbara Boxer confused again

    Now, California voters understand why Boxer only agreed to one face to face debate with Carly Fiorina. Boxer really does not have the command of herself necessary to be a Senator.

    Sen. Barbara Boxer appeared on Ed Schultz’s MSNBC show earlier, and her performance was a pretty stunning demonstration of how little clue she has about what’s actually in the health care legislation she was on air to promote. A frustrated Boxer appeared on the show to defend the bill against attacks from the liberal Schultz, who began the segment by hammering Democrats for caving into moderates and watering down the government-run plan.

    In the clip below, Boxer tried to reassure Schultz by touting all of the government programs that are expanded by the bill. But she stumbled when trying to say how many new Medicaid beneficiaries would be added, said she needed to fact check it, looked off camera as if for guidance, and ended up asserting that the Medicaid expansion alone would cover 30 million more people. Yet anybody with an inkling of understanding of the Senate bill knows that the entire bill only covers 31 million according to the Congressional Budget Office. The expansion of Medicaid and SCHIP accounts for 15 million of that. I may sound like I’m nitpicking, but this is not some obscure provision of the bill or esoteric statistic. The coverage provisions account for the bulk of the overall cost of the legislation. It’s alarming that a sitting Senator would be this utterly clueless on the most sweeping domestic policy initiative since Medicare was created in 1965.

  • Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina

    CA-Sen Poll Watch: Barbara Boxer 49% Vs. Carly Fiorina 46%

    Republican Nominee Carly Fiorina and California Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer

    This is what the latest Rasmussen poll says about this closely fought California U.S. Senate race.

    Incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer continues to hold the slightest of leads over Republican challenger Carly Fiorina in California’s U.S. Senate race.

    The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in California shows Boxer with 49% support and Fiorina with 46%. Two percent (2%) prefer another candidate in the race, and three percent (3%) are undecided.

    The race remains a Toss-Up in the Rasmussen Reports Election 2010 Senate Balance of Power rankings.

    Just over a week ago, Boxer, who is seeking a fourth six-year term, posted a similar 49% to 45% lead over Fiorina, a former CEO of Hewlett-Packard. Boxer has held a small lead in every survey but one since February with 42% to 49% of the vote. Fiorina, in those same surveys, has earned 38% to 47% support.

    With Carly Fiorina now running statewide television ads, it may be time for her to start showing a move.

    Larry Sabato earlier today moved the race back to “leans Democrat” from toss-up. This is likely premature as early California voting and the televised ad wars continue.

    Note that if Barbara Boxer had this race in the bag, why would President Obama be coming to Los Angeles to campaign for her next week. The internal polls obviously show a close race.

    The survey of 750 Likely Voters in California was conducted on October 13, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

    Here is the latest Real Clear Politics poll average graph:

  • Barbara Boxer

    CA-Sen: Barbara Boxer, Countrywide Home Loans and Ethics

    Countrywide Loan Scandal

    Senators Christopher Dodd, Democrat from Connecticut and chairman of the Banking Committee, and Kent Conrad, Democrat from North Dakota, chairman of the Budget Committee and a member of the Finance Committee, received loans from Countrywide Financial through a little-known program that waived points, lender fees, and company borrowing rules for prominent people. (Friends of Angelo Mozilo)

    California U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, Chair of the Select Committee on Ethics has some explaining to do.

    Public records show that Sen. Barbara Boxer, chair of the Select Committee on Ethics, needs a training class on conflicts-of-interest.

    Deeds of trust compiled by Leslie Merritt and Frank Perry of the Foundation for Ethics in Public Service show that the California Democrat and her husband, Stewart, held seven mortgages with Countrywide, the company which gave VIP mortgage discounts to influential customers, including Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-CT, and Sen. Kent Conrad, D-ND.

    Senate rules prohibit members from accepting deals not available to other borrowers. The loans and properties associated with them are not listed on her personal financial disclosure forms because she deemed them non-income generating, the type exempted from public airing.

    Countrywide was once one of the biggest home lenders before the housing collapse, so it is not surprising for the couple to have financed home purchases through the company. But it should raise red flags that she investigated two colleagues for receiving preferential treatment from Countrywide without first disclosing the full terms of her loans, which greatly outnumbered those of the people whose conduct was scrutinized.

    Boxer has said she received no preferential treatment and that she paid off the loans prior to the investigation. But even if she did not receive preferential treatment, she should have recused herself from proceedings to avoid the appearance of self-dealing.

    Read the entire piece.

    Barbara Boxer should really come clean and disclose all of her dealings (the complete terms of the loans) with Countrywide Home Loans and Angelo Mozilo.

  • Barbara Boxer

    CA-Sen: Barbara Boxer Votes But Declines to State Positions on Five California Propositions

    U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., fills out her absentee ballot as she votes in her campaign for re-election, at the Registrar-Recorder’s office in Riverside, Calif., Tuesday, Oct. 12, 2010

    Say what?

    Senator Boxer just voted and she cannot state how she voted on them?

    U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer voted early today in Riverside, and likely cast her vote for a host of statewide propositions on the November ballot.

    But after dropping off her ballot, Boxer did not say how she weighed in on five of those measures — propositions 21, 22, 24, 25 and 26. She already has taken a public stance on propositions 19, 20, 23 and 27.

    “Well I have taken a position on the major propositions, but we’ll be working on all of those and will be putting some information out on that,” Boxer said at a news conference.

    Prop. 21 would charge car owners an extra $18 a year to help pay for state parks and wildlife programs. Prop. 22 deals with funds for transportation and local government. Among its provisions, Prop. 22 would prohibit the state from borrowing from funds used for transportation, local government and redevelopment agencies.

    Prop. 24 would repeal recent changes to state tax law that allows some businesses to pay less in taxes. Prop. 25 would eliminate the two-thirds requirement in the Legislature to approve state budgets.

    Prop. 26 also deals with taxes and fees. If approved, the proposition would treat many state and local fees as taxes that require a two-thirds vote by lawmakers to take effect.

    Jeeeeeez Babs – just tell us how you voted.

    Or, do you need your staff to prepare position papers for you – AFTER YOU ALREADY VOTED.

    I mean, how ridiculous can you be – lifelong POL – Sheesh.

    Time to retire Boxer.

  • Barbara Boxer,  Carly Fiorina,  Meg Whitman

    CA-Sen: S.E. Cupp’s 8 Questions for Carly Fiorina

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    Read the light-hearted and more personal interview of Carly Fiorina here.

    SE: Politicians are much maligned in America right now. If you want some love, why not go into the NFL or hip hop?

    CF: Because I throw like a girl, and my hip-hop skills are worse than Betty White’s.

    But in all seriousness, the last thing I want to do is become a politician. I am doing this because I think our nation is headed in the wrong direction and I think that my experience in job creation can help inform the solutions to our challenges.

    I think our government was designed to be comprised of citizens from the real world who took time to serve a term or two in Congress
    and then to return to private life. That’s what I think our Founding Fathers intended in establishing a citizen government. But in recent decades, we’ve seen more and more career politicians who become beholden to the special interest groups that fund their campaigns and who are more interested in winning re-election than they are in serving their constituents.

    SE: Who would you want to play you in a movie?

    CF: Annette Bening.

    SE: Your house is going up in flames and you can save one (non-living) thing. What is it?

    CF: A painting my mother completed that hangs in our living room.

    SE: If you can make one promise to voters, what would it be?

    CF: I will never forget whom I work for. I will always want to hear from my employers, the people of California, and I will always want them to be honest with me, whether it’s the good, the bad or the ugly.

    And, Carly can have some fun.

    Quite a contrast from Babs Boxer, no?