Site Meter

Archive for April 27th, 2011

google plus Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerlinkedin Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerpinterest Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerstumbleupon Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerreader Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerprintfriendly Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegeremail Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegershare save 171 16 Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pfleger

Chicago Catholic pastor Dr. Rev. Michael Pfleger, speaking Sunday at Trinity United Church of Christ: Hillary thinks “I’m white I’m entitled”

Good riddance.
Citing what he called threats from the Rev. Michael Pfleger to leave the church, Cardinal Francis George has removed the outspoken priest from St. Sabina parish and has suspended his “sacramental faculties as a priest.”

Pfleger had publicly feuded with the cardinal about possibly being reassigned to Leo High School, telling a radio show recently that he would look outside the Catholic church if offered no other choice.

“If that is truly your attitude, you have already left the Catholic Church and are therefore not able to pastor a Catholic parish,” George wrote in a letter dated today.

“A Catholic priest’s inner life is governed by his promises, motivated by faith and love, to live chastely as a celibate man and to obey his bishop,” the cardinal continued. “Breaking either promise destroys his vocation and wounds the Church.

“Many love and admire you because of your dedication to your people,” the cardinal wrote. “Now, however, I am asking you to take a few weeks to pray over your priestly commitments in order to come to mutual agreement on how you understand personally the obligations that make you a member of the Chicago presbyterate and of the Catholic Church.

“With this letter, your ministry as pastor of Saint Sabina Parish and your sacramental faculties as a priest of the Archdiocese are suspended.”

The cardinal ended the letter by saying, “This conflict is not between you and me; it’s between you and the Church that ordained you a priest, between you and the faith that introduced you to Christ and gives you the right to preach and pastor in his name. If you now formally leave the Catholic Church and her priesthood, it’s your choice and no one else’s. You are not a victim of anyone or anything other than your own statements.”

Father Pfleger thought he was bigger than the CHURCH.

Wrong….

google plus Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerlinkedin Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerpinterest Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerstumbleupon Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerreader Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegerprintfriendly Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegeremail Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pflegershare save 171 16 Chicago Cardinal Francis George Suspends Rev. Michael Pfleger
Tags:

Comments 2 Comments »

google plus Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetinglinkedin Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingpinterest Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingstumbleupon Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingreader Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingprintfriendly Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingemail Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingshare save 171 16 Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meeting

119427.strip Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meeting

Dilbert by Scott Adams

Oh the indecision at the start of the meeting…..

google plus Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetinglinkedin Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingpinterest Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingstumbleupon Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingreader Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingprintfriendly Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingemail Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meetingshare save 171 16 Dilbert April 23, 2011   Long Meeting
Tags:

Comments Comments Off

google plus Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 linkedin Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 pinterest Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 stumbleupon Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 reader Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 printfriendly Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 email Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 share save 171 16 Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01

These are my links for April 27th from 16:01 to 16:13:

  • Happy birth certificate, Mr. President – Behold the damage Donald Trump hath wrought. Every credible fact check has established that Barack Obama was born in this country. Yet on Wednesday, a reality TV show ringmaster forced the president of the United States to prove it.

    By asking why President Obama had not released his long-form birth certificate on numerous so-called news shows, Trump had even sensible people theorizing as to why the White House had not released the document. Was there something damning about the president's religion? His race? His parentage?

    My theory was simpler. In 2008, Obama released a certificate of live birth.

    Why did he wait until Wednesday to release the long form, which birth-deniers demanded? Easy. Who doesn't like watching their political enemies look like complete dolts? Obamaland no doubt felt a warm rush of satisfaction every time some nutjob right-winger put forth a contorted theory about the president's 18-year-old mother running off to a Third World delivery room to give birth and then, "Manchurian Candidate"-like, falsifying the paperwork. The debate debased conservative opposition.

    ======

    Dolts is a kind term for the birthers.

    But, Obama should have waited just a little longer for more of an advantage.

  • President 2012: Huckabee camp shoots down rumor he won’t run in 2012 – Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee's camp is refuting a South Carolina blogger who suggested Wednesday that Huckabee told consultants in the state he wouldn't run for president next year.

    Speculation Huckabee was opting out of a 2012 bid spread after Red State's Erick Erickson tweeted a link to the blog post, along with the declaration, "Mike Huckabee is out. He won't be running for president."

    HuckPAC Executive Director Hogan Gidley dismissed it as "unfounded speculation" in a statement, insisting that no final decision has been made.

    "National polling consistently shows Governor Huckabee is the frontrunner – so we expect a certain amount of unfounded speculation, odd rumors, and sadly, the occasional lie lobbed our way," Gidley said. "But the Governor himself has been quite clear on this matter. He has truthfully and repeatedly stated that he is seriously considering a run for President but he won’t make that decision until this summer – and that has not changed."

    ======

    Huck is continuing to fund raise in California for Huck Pac, if that means anything.

    I think he runs…..

google plus Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 linkedin Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 pinterest Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 stumbleupon Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 reader Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 printfriendly Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 email Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01 share save 171 16 Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 16:01
Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off

google plus Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 linkedin Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 pinterest Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 stumbleupon Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 reader Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 printfriendly Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 email Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 share save 171 16 Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01

These are my links for April 27th from 08:01 to 15:52:

google plus Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 linkedin Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 pinterest Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 stumbleupon Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 reader Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 printfriendly Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 email Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01 share save 171 16 Flaps Links and Comments for April 27th on 08:01
Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off

google plus Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Voterslinkedin Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Voterspinterest Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersstumbleupon Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersreader Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersprintfriendly Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersemail Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersshare save 171 16 Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Voters

19731a Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Voters

The Pew Hispanic Center has a new report out about Hispanics and the 2010 midterm elections.
More than 6.6 million Latinos voted in last year’s election — a record for a midterm — according to an analysis of new Census Bureau data by the Pew Hispanic Center, a project of the Pew Research Center.

Latinos also were a larger share of the electorate in 2010 than in any previous midterm election, representing 6.9% of all voters, up from 5.8% in 2006.

Rapid population growth has helped fuel Latinos’ increasing electoral participation. According to the Census Bureau, 50.5 million Hispanics were counted by the 2010 Census, up from 35.3 million in 2000. Over the same decade, the number of Latino eligible voters — adults who are U.S. citizens — also increased, from 13.2 million in 2000 to 21.3 million in 2010.

However, even though more Latinos than ever are participating in the nation’s elections, their representation among the electorate remains below their representation in the general population. In 2010, 16.3% of the nation’s population was Latino, but only 10.1% of eligible voters were Latino and fewer than 7% of voters were Latino.

This gap is driven by two demographic factors — youth and non-citizenship. More than one-third of Latinos (34.9%) are younger than the voting age of 18, a share greater than that of any other group. And an additional 22.4% are of voting age, but are not U.S. citizens.

Read it all.

I think both Democrats and Republicans are cognizant of these demographic changes. The issue of the Hispanic vote will be polarizing short term and the GOP may very well cut their losses and abandon states, like California that have large Democratic Hispanic voters. But, this will gradually change as the Hispanic population ages, and assimilates.

Moreover, I think over the long term the result of the demographic shift will be MORE Hispanic Republican candidates, competing against either Anglo or African-American Democrats.

19732 Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Voters

google plus Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Voterslinkedin Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Voterspinterest Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersstumbleupon Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersreader Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersprintfriendly Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersemail Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Votersshare save 171 16 Census Watch: 2010 Latino Electorate = More Voters and More Non Voters
Tags: ,

Comments 1 Comment »

google plus Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Waylinkedin Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Waypinterest Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Waystumbleupon Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Wayreader Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Wayprintfriendly Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Wayemail Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Wayshare save 171 16 Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Way

119426.strip Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Way

Dilbert by Scott Adams

But, you never know, who someday may become your boss……

google plus Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Waylinkedin Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Waypinterest Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Waystumbleupon Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Wayreader Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Wayprintfriendly Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Wayemail Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Wayshare save 171 16 Dilbert April 22, 2011   Nice Way
Tags:

Comments Comments Off

google plus President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%linkedin President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%pinterest President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%stumbleupon President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%reader President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%printfriendly President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%email President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%share save 171 16 President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%

According to the latest PPP Poll.

Job Approval Vs. Disapproval:

  • President Barack Obama – 45% Vs. 52%

Favorable Vs. Unfavorable:

  • Mitt Romney – 43% Vs. 43%
  • Mike Huckabee – 36% Vs. 45%
  • Newt Gingrich – 33% Vs. 53%
  • Sarah Palin – 34% Vs. 61%
  • Donald Trump – 32% Vs. 59%

The General Election:

  • Romney – 46% vs. Obama – 43%
  • Obama – 45% Vs. Huckabee – 43%
  • Obama – 46% Vs. Gingrich – 42%
  • Obama – 50% Vs. Palin – 39%
  • Obama – 47% Vs. Trump – 41%

In Nevada, a key battleground state which the GOP needs to win the Presidency in 2012 is definitely in play. President Obama is in trouble in Nevada.

Barack Obama’s standing in Nevada has taken a significant turn in the wrong direction since early January and it appears he could have a much tougher time in the state next year than he did in 2008, particularly if the Republicans nominate Mitt Romney.

Obama’s approval rating in Nevada is only 45% with 52% of voters disapproving of him. That represents an 11 point negative shift in his net approval since he posted a 50/46 spread on PPP’s first 2011 poll of the state. There are two problems contributing to Obama’s poor numbers. The first is that he is very unpopular with independents, only 33% of whom express favor for the job he’s doing to 65% who disapprove. The second is that Republicans (89%) are more united in their unhappiness with Obama than Democrats (79%) are in their approval. When independents don’t like you and the opposite party dislikes you more than your own likes you, that’s pretty much always going to be a formula for bad poll numbers.

Despite his unpopularity Obama does lead 4 of the 5 Republicans we tested against him in the state, albeit by smaller margins than what he won over John McCain in 2008.

Nevada voters are leery of President Obama. Whether it is the assinine comments about Las Vegas travel, the massive unemployment or rampant house foreclosures, Nevada is increasngly looking like an Electoral College pick-up for the Republicans.

The entire poll is here.

google plus President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%linkedin President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%pinterest President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%stumbleupon President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%reader President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%printfriendly President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%email President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%share save 171 16 President 2012 Poll Watch: Romney 46% Vs. Obama 43%
Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off

©Gregory Flap Cole All Rights Reserved