• Cox & Forkum,  Global Warming

    Cox & Forkum: Stretching the Truth

    cox&forkum07.03.13web

    Cox & Forkum: Stretching the Truth

    The Telegraph: Scientists threatened for ‘climate denial’.

    Scientists who questioned mankind’s impact on climate change have received death threats and claim to have been shunned by the scientific community.

    They say the debate on global warming has been “hijacked” by a powerful alliance of politicians, scientists and environmentalists who have stifled all questioning about the true environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions.

    Timothy Ball, a former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg in Canada, has received five deaths threats by email since raising concerns about the degree to which man was affecting climate change.

    One of the emails warned that, if he continued to speak out, he would not live to see further global warming.

    “Western governments have pumped billions of dollars into careers and institutes and they feel threatened,” said the professor.

    “I can tolerate being called a sceptic because all scientists should be sceptics, but then they started calling us deniers, with all the connotations of the Holocaust. That is an obscenity. It has got really nasty and personal.”

    Last week, Professor Ball appeared in The Great Global Warming Swindle, a Channel 4 documentary in which several scientists claimed the theory of man-made global warming had become a “religion”, forcing alternative explanations to be ignored.

    Richard Lindzen, the professor of Atmospheric Science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology – who also appeared on the documentary – recently claimed: “Scientists who dissent from the alarmism have seen their funds disappear, their work derided, and themselves labelled as industry stooges.

    “The Great Global Warming Swindle” is an excellent British documentary that shows how global warming is treated as a religious orthodoxy that cannot be questioned. Little Green Footballs has posted the Flash version of the film. YouTube has a version in eight parts for easier viewing starting here. (LGF also noted an article about an oceanographer who says his views were misrepresented in the film).

    But, if it were about EVOLUTION, then what would be the response……..?

    Previous:

    The Cox & Forkum Files


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Cox & Forkum,  Iran,  Iraq,  Iraq War

    Iraq War Watch: The Iraq Talks

    cox&forkum07.03.08.IraqTalk

    AP: U.S. and Iran hold rare direct talks

    U.S. and Iranian envoys exchanged direct talks Saturday on efforts to end Iraq’s violence and bolster its government, opening limited but potentially significant contacts that could ease their nearly 28-year diplomatic freeze.

    The discussions were confined to one session during a conference on Iraq stability, but they appeared to offer room for further interaction between the two nations — which find themselves increasingly drawn toward common issues in Iraq as the nation’s most influential allies.

    The U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, said he exchanged views with Iranian delegates “directly and in the presence of others” at the gathering led by Iraq’s neighbors and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council.

    He declined to give details of the contacts — calling them only “constructive and businesslike and problem-solving” — but noted that he raised U.S. assertions that Shiite militias receive weapons and assistance across the border from Iran.

    Yeah, talking to the representatives of a country that supply arms to kill American soldiers help how?

    Talking to Iranians who covet a nuclear weapon to threaten nuclear armageddon, wipe Israel off the face of the earth and to nuclear blackmail the world, helps how?

    And whats does Iran want?

    Well, how about the United States leaving the area so they can expand their hegemony over the region. This helps American interests how?

    Iran continues to foment sectarian violence in Iraq in order to achieve their interests.

    Negotiation with the Iranians serves no American purpose.

    But, a blockade or seizure of Iranian oil facilities would.

    Related:

    From Cox & Forkum:

    Rumsfeld: Iraq bombs ‘clearly from Iran’ (CNN, August 10, 2005)
    EXCLUSIVE: Iraq Weapons — Made in Iran? (ABC News, March 6, 2006)
    Rumsfeld accuses Iran of troublemaking in Iraq (AP via Army Times, March 7, 2006)
    Casey cites Iran hand in attacks by Iraqi Shiites (The Washington Times, June 23, 2006)
    Barbero: Iran training Shiite insurgents (AP via Army Times, August 24, 2006)
    Donkeys harboring weapons stopped at Iran-Iraq border (Army Times, November 2, 2006)
    Iran involvement suspected in Karbala compound attack (CNN, January 31, 2007)
    Iraqi insurgents using Austrian rifles from Iran (The Telegraph, February 13, 2007)
    U.S.: Large Cache of Weapons Discovered in Iraq Traceable to Iran (AP via FOX News, February 26, 2007)
    Military: more evidence of Iran-made explosives (Seattle Times, February 27, 2007)
    Iraqi extremists trained in Iran: US intelligence (AFP, February 28, 2007)
    Iran’s influence grows in Iraq, region (Chicago Tribune, March 7, 2007)


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • Cox & Forkum

    Cox & Forkum: Symptomatic

    cox&forkum07.04.06web

    Cox & Forkum: Symptomatic

    CNN: Dole, Shalala to investigate Walter Reed problems.

    President Bush on Tuesday named Democrat Donna Shalala and Republican Bob Dole to head a commission to investigate problems at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.Substandard conditions and a confusing bureaucracy at an outpatient facility for troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan were revealed in a series of articles in the Washington Post.

    “It’s unacceptable to me, it’s unacceptable to you, it’s unacceptable to our country, and it’s not going to continue,” Bush said in a speech to the American Legion.

    “My decisions have put our kids in harm’s way. And I’m concerned about the fact that when they come back they don’t get the full treatment they deserve.”

    Newsflash: Government-run health care sucks

    But Universal poor care is what you will have should Hillary Care (Universal Government controlled health care) become a reality.

    No thanks…….

    Previous:

    The Cox & Forkum Files


    Technorati Tags:

  • Cox & Forkum,  Iran,  Iran Nuclear Watch,  Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

    Cox & Forkum: Runaway

    cox&forkum07.02.25.Runaway-

    Cox & Forkum: Runaway

    Iran Nuclear Watch: Ahmadinejad – Iran Won’t End Nuke Program

    AP: Ahmadinejad: Iran Won’t End Nuke Program

    President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Sunday his country would proceed with its disputed nuclear program, comparing its nuclear drive to a train that has no reverse gear or brakes.

    Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, however, said what Iran needed was “a stop button.”

    Ahmadinejad also repeated his call for negotiations, saying the time for “bullying” had expired. International leaders have demanded that Iran halt uranium enrichment.

    “The train of the Iranian nation is without brakes and a rear gear,” the radio quoted Ahmadinejad as telling a gathering of Islamic clerics. “We dismantled the rear gear and brakes of the train and threw them away sometime ago.”

    The International Atomic Energy Agency last week reported that Iran had ignored a U.N. Security Council ultimatum to freeze its uranium enrichment program and instead had expanded the program by setting up hundreds of centrifuges.

    Iran has refused to halt uranium enrichment despite United Nations Resolution 1737.

    Previous:

    The Cox & Forkum Files


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • Barack Obama,  Cox & Forkum,  Hillary Clinton

    Cox & Forkum: La-La Land

    cox&forkum07.02.22.LaLaLand

    Cox & Forkum: La-La Land

    FOX News: Hillary Clinton, Obama in Hot Exchange Over Hollywood Heavyweight’s Comments.

    The war of words between leading 2008 Democratic presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama spread Wednesday night, after the campaigns had earlier exchanged heated words when Clinton suggested Obama return funds to Hollywood bigwig David Geffen, who insulted her in a newspaper article.

    “We aren’t going to get in the middle of a disagreement between the Clintons and someone who was once one of their biggest supporters. It is ironic that the Clintons had no problem with David Geffen when was raising them $18 million and sleeping at their invitation in the Lincoln bedroom,” Obama campaign communications director Robert Gibbs said in a statement that was e-mailed to the news media. …

    Geffen, a former “Friend of Bill,” co-hosted a star-studded, $1.3 million fundraiser for Obama on Tuesday night in Beverly Hills with Hollywood heavyweights Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg.

    Among the 300 contributors who forked over $2,300 each were George Clooney, Barbra Streisand, Jennifer Aniston, Ben Stiller, Eddie Murphy and Morgan Freeman. Also in attendance were Dixie Chick Natalie Maines and director Ron Howard.

    Geffen became a former FOB in 2001 after Bill Clinton refused to pardon Leonard Peltier, a Chippewa Indian convicted of killing two FBI agents in a 1977 shootout on South Dakota’s Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. …

    Geffen is apparently still holding a grudge against the Clintons. In remarks to New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd that appeared in Wednesday’s edition, the music producer suggested that the Clintons have had their day and it’s time for new blood in the White House. …

    ********

    Thanks Hillary for reinvigorating and helping fund my campaign.

    Sincerely,

    Your friend Barack

    Previous:

    Hillary Clinton Watch: James Carville Smacks David Geffen

    The Cox & Forkum Files


    Technorati Tags:

  • Cox & Forkum,  Iran,  Iran Nuclear Watch,  Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

    Cox & Forkum: Throw Down

    cox&forkum07.02.20.ThrowDow

    Cox & Forkum: Throw Down

    FOX News: Ahmadinejad: Iran Will Stop Nuke Enrichment If You Will, Too.

    President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tuesday that Iran would only halt its uranium enrichment program and return to negotiations if other Western nations do the same.Ahmadinejad told a crowd of thousands in northern Iran one day ahead of a U.N. Security Council deadline that it was no problem for his country to stop, but that “fair talks” demanded a similar gesture from the West.

    “That … we shut down our nuclear fuel cycle program to let talks begin. It’s no problem. But justice demands that those who want to hold talks with us shut down their nuclear fuel cycle program too. Then, we can hold dialogue under a fair atmosphere,” Ahmadinejad said.

    The Security Council has set Wednesday as a deadline for Iran to stop uranium enrichment or face further economic sanctions.

    Ahmadinejad spoke in a far more conciliatory tone than the one he usually adopts, avoiding fiery denunciations of the West with a call for talks.

    Ahmadinejad is as comical as he is pathetic.

    Does George W. Bush have to show Mahmoud who is the BIG Dog?

    Previous:

    The Cox & Forkum Files


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • Cox & Forkum,  Iraq,  Iraq War,  Jack Murtha

    Cox & Forkum: Crossroads

    cox&forkum07.02.18web

    Cox & Forkum: Crossroads

    The Washtingon Post: Not the ‘Real Vote’.

    [Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.)] would stop the surge by crudely hamstringing the ability of military commanders to deploy troops. In an interview carried Thursday by the Web site MoveCongress.org, Mr. Murtha said he would attach language to a war funding bill that would prohibit the redeployment of units that have been at home for less than a year, stop the extension of tours beyond 12 months, and prohibit units from shipping out if they do not train with all of their equipment. His aim, he made clear, is not to improve readiness but to “stop the surge.” So why not straightforwardly strip the money out of the appropriations bill — an action Congress is clearly empowered to take — rather than try to micromanage the Army in a way that may be unconstitutional? Because, Mr. Murtha said, it will deflect accusations that he is trying to do what he is trying to do. “What we are saying will be very hard to find fault with,” he said.

    Mr. Murtha’s cynicism is matched by an alarming ignorance about conditions in Iraq. He continues to insist that Iraq “would be more stable with us out of there,” in spite of the consensus of U.S. intelligence agencies that early withdrawal would produce “massive civilian casualties.” He says he wants to force the administration to “bulldoze” the Abu Ghraib prison, even though it was emptied of prisoners and turned over to the Iraqi government last year. He wants to “get our troops out of the Green Zone” because “they are living in Saddam Hussein’s palace”; could he be unaware that the zone’s primary occupants are the Iraqi government and the U.S. Embassy?

    It would be nice to believe that Mr. Murtha does not represent the mainstream of the Democratic Party or the thinking of its leadership. Yet when asked about Mr. Murtha’s remarks Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) offered her support. Does Ms. Pelosi really believe that the debate she orchestrated this week was not “the real vote”? If the answer is yes, she is maneuvering her party in a way that can only do it harm.

    Well, Jack Murtha and Hillary Clinton will have to put their votes where their mouths are, now won’t they?

    Flap will look forward to the show…..

    Previous:

    The Cox & Forkum Files


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • Cox & Forkum,  Rudy Giuliani

    Cox & Forkum: Rudy Giuliani

    Giulianicox&forkumfeb12web

    Cox & Forkum: Rudy Giuliani

    The Boston Globe: Giuliani gets warm reception in Calif..

    Rudy Giuliani went west over the weekend to learn whether his brand of Republican politics had a chance among party members significantly more conservative than he . By the time he had received a fourth standing ovation Saturday at the California Republican Party convention, the answer seemed clear.

    Comparing the US fight against terrorism to the Civil War and the Cold War, Giuliani told about 750 of his party’s faithful that failure in Iraq would turn that country into a “massive headquarters for terrorism.”

    “Having had a job where I didn’t have any choice but to make a decision,” said the former mayor of New York, “prepares you as best you can be prepared to be the president of the United States.”

    Asked in a subsequent news conference when he would formally announce his candidacy for president, Giuliani quipped, “If you go back to my speech, I think you’ll find one. We’ll figure out how to do it in five places so we’ll get more attention.”

    Previous:

    The Cox & Forkum files


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Cox & Forkum,  Iraq,  Iraq War

    Cox & Forkum: War Power

    cox&forkum07.01.30.WarPower

    Cox & Forkum: War Power

    AP: Congress to test bounds of its war power

    President Bush may be the decision maker, but the Democratic-controlled Congress holds the purse strings. Whether to yank them shut when it comes to the conflict in Iraq, and under what conditions, is the question facing newly empowered majority Democrats.

    No one challenges the notion that Congress can stop a war by canceling its funding. In fact, Vice President Dick Cheney challenged Congress to back up its objections to Bush’s plan to put 21,500 more troops in Iraq by zeroing out the war budget.

    Underlying Cheney’s gambit is the consensus understanding that such a drastic move is doubtful because it would be fraught with political peril.

    But there are other legislative options to force the war’s end, say majority Democrats and some of Bush’s traditional Republican allies.

    The alternatives range from capping the number of troops permitted in Iraq to cutting off funding for troop deployments beyond a certain date or setting an end date for the war.

    “The Constitution makes Congress a coequal branch of government. It’s time we start acting like it,” said Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., who is chairing a hearing Tuesday on Congress’ war powers and forwarding legislation to eventually prohibit funding for the deployment of troops to Iraq.

    His proposal, like many others designed to force an end to U.S. involvement in the bloody conflict, is far from having enough support even to come up for a vote on the Senate floor.

    Closer to that threshold is a nonbinding resolution declaring that Bush’s proposal to send 21,500 more troops to Baghdad and Anbar province is “not in the national interest.” The Senate could take up that measure early next month.

    But some senators, complaining that the resolution is symbolic, are forwarding tougher bills.

    Maybe it will be Senator Barack Obama?

    Obama calls for US combat troops out of Iraq by March 2008

    Likely presidential contender Senator Barack Obama called for the removal of all US combat forces from Iraq by March 31, 2008, to counter what he called President George W. Bush’s “failed policy of escalation.”

    “The American people have waited, the American people have been patient. We have given chance after chance for a resolution that has not come,” Obama said on the floor of the US Senate, as he pledged to introduce legislation calling for the troop pull out.

    “The time for waiting in Iraq are over. The days of our open-ended commitment must come to a close, and the need to bring this war to an end is here,” said the Illinois Democrat, a leading contender for his party’s presidential nomination in 2008.

    “In a civil war where no military solution exists, this redeployment remains our best leverage to pressure the Iraqi government to achieve the political settlement between its warring factions that can slow the bloodshed and promote stability,” Obama said.

    The legislation he proposed, dubbed the “Iraq War De-escalation Act of 2007,” would reverse what Obama called the administration’s “dangerous and ill-conceived escalation.”


    Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • Cox & Forkum,  Islam

    Cox & Forkum: Stranger Than Fiction

    Readers: Please Vote in Flap’s January 2008 GOP Presidential Poll

    cox&forkum07.01.21web

    Cox & Forkum: Stranger Than Fiction

    FOX News: Muslims Unhappy Over ’24’ Portrayal.

    Two years ago, Muslim groups protested when the plot of the hit Fox drama `24′ cast Islamic terrorists as the villains who launched a stolen nuclear missile in an attack on America.Now, after a one-year respite during which Russian separatists played the bad guys on the critically acclaimed series, Muslims are back in the evil spotlight. Unlike last time, when agent Jack Bauer saved the day, the terrorists this time have already succeeded in detonating a nuclear bomb in a Los Angeles suburb.

    Being portrayed again as the heartless wrongdoers has drawn renewed protests from Muslim groups, including one that had a meeting with Fox executives two years ago over the issue.

    “The overwhelming impression you get is fear and hatred for Muslims,” said Rabiah Ahmed, a spokeswoman for the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations. She said Thursday she was distressed by this season’s premiere. “After watching that show, I was afraid to go to the grocery store because I wasn’t sure the person next to me would be able to differentiate between fiction and reality.” …
    Sohail Mohammed, a New Jersey immigration lawyer who represented scores of detainees caught up in the post Sept. 11, 2001 dragnet, watched the episode depicting the nuclear attack with an Associated Press reporter.

    “I was shocked,” he said. “Somewhere, some lunatic out there watching this will do something to an innocent American Muslim because he believes what he saw on TV.”

    Engy Abdelkader, a member of the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee from Howell, N.J., launched a campaign Wednesday to encourage Muslims offended by the program to complain to Fox.

    “I found the portrayal of American Muslims to be pretty horrendous,” she said. “It was denigrating from beginning to end. This is one of the most popular programs on television today. It’s pretty distressing.”

    Perhaps the CAIR folks should discuss these issues with Iran’s President Ahmadinejad?

    Previous:

    The Cox & Forkum files


    Technorati Tags: , ,