• Bob Graham,  Nancy Pelosi

    Former Senator Bob Graham: I Don’t Have Recollection of Being Briefed on Waterboarding

    The LEFT is going wild that this proves that Nancy Pelosi was NOT briefed on waterboarding and other CIA enhanced interrogation techniques.

    Graham’s comment is that he has NO recollection. It might have happened but the 73 year old former Senator perhaps does not remember. Shocker there, right?

    How about the Obama Administration releasing the Dick Cheney requested CIA memos and asking the Congress for some open and public hearings on the whole issue of CIA “TORTURE” and enhanced interrogation techniques.

    Put Senator Graham and Speaker Pelosi under oath, under the lights and on television. Sweat them a little.

    Then, maybe America can learn the truth and can have an informed discussion of the issues – instead of Obama partial disclosures and Left-Wing spin.


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • Barack Obama,  CIA,  Nancy Pelosi,  Peter Hoekstra

    What Did Speaker Nancy Pelosi Know and When Did She Know it? Re: CIA Enhanced Interrogation Techniques and Waterboarding

    The CIA confirms that Nancy Pelosi was briefed on Enhanced Interrogation Techniques in 2002.

    When President Obama first released the CIA memos about waterboarding and other CIA enhanced interrogation techniques to blame the Bush Administration for “TORTURE,” I relished the thought of Congressional hearings so the true story would come out.

    Now, with the latest revelations, GOP Congressman Pete Hoekstra, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee is asking for the release of more CIA documents (like Vice President Cheney already has) and is considering calling for Congressional hearings on the matter.

    Open public Congressional Hearings and placing Speaker Pelosi under oath to answer questions would be a good idea.

    Want to bet President Obama now regrets placing his fellow Democrats in political peril and the whole “TORTURE FLAP” dies a quiet death?


    Technorati Tags: , , , ,

  • Barack Obama,  CIA,  Nancy Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi on CIA Torture? – NO. Except…

    ramireztoon042709

    Political Cartoon by Michael Ramirez

    What did Democrat Speaker of the House know about CIA Enhanced Interrogation Techniques and when did she know it?

    It is unclear from her public pronouncements.

    Judging by Nancy Pelosi and other members of Congress who were informed at the time, the answer seems to be yes. In December 2007, after a report in The Post that she had knowledge of these procedures and did not object, she admitted that she’d been “briefed on interrogation techniques the administration was considering using in the future.”

    Today Pelosi protests “we were not — I repeat — were not told that waterboarding or any other of these other enhanced interrogation methods were used.” She imagines that this distinction between past and present, Clintonian in its parsing, is exonerating.

    On the contrary. It is self-indicting. If you are told about torture that has already occurred, you might justify silence on the grounds that what’s done is done and you are simply being used in a post-facto exercise to cover the CIA’s rear end. The time to protest torture, if you really are as outraged as you now pretend to be, is when the CIA tells you what it is planning to do “in the future.”

    But Pelosi did nothing. No protest. No move to cut off funding. No letter to the president or the CIA chief or anyone else saying “Don’t do it.”

    On the contrary, notes Porter Goss, then chairman of the House intelligence committee: The members briefed on these techniques did not just refrain from objecting, “on a bipartisan basis, we asked if the CIA needed more support from Congress to carry out its mission against al-Qaeda.”

    More support, mind you. Which makes the current spectacle of self-righteous condemnation not just cowardly but hollow. It is one thing to have disagreed at the time and said so. It is utterly contemptible, however, to have been silent then and to rise now “on a bright, sunny, safe day in April 2009” (the words are Blair’s) to excoriate those who kept us safe these harrowing last eight years.

    There is little doubt that the evidence clearly indicates Speaker Pelosi and other high ranking Democrats in supporting the CIA and its enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding against high value Al Qaeda detainees.

    Why do they continue to LIE?

    And, why President Obama will never support a “Truth Commission” to have public hearings regarding the CIA, Enhanced Techniques and Waterboarding in particular.

    Political cowardice and self-preservation.


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • CIA,  Nancy Pelosi

    Waterboarding: What Did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Know and When Did She Know It?

    Nancy-Pelosi-Yes-or-No

    Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was briefed on waterboarding or an enhanced interrogation technique in 2002.

    Nancy Pelosi denies knowing U.S. officials used waterboarding — but GOP operatives are pointing to a 2007 Washington Post story which describes an hour-ong 2002 briefing in which Pelosi was told about enhanced interrogation techniques in graphic detail.

    Two unnamed officials told the paper that Pelosi, then a member of the Democratic minority, didn’t raise substantial objections.

    Joby Warrick and Dan Eggen wrote:

    In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA’s overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.

    Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.

    But, Speaker Pelosi today denied that she knew anything about waterboarding.

    Pelosi says she was briefed by Bush administration officials on the legal justification for using waterboarding — but that they never followed through on promises to inform her when they actually began using “enhanced” interrogation techniques

    “In that or any other briefing…we were not, and I repeat, we’re not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used. What they did tell us is that they had some legislative counsel … opinions that they could be used,” she told reporters today.

    Earlier, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) criticized Pelosi and other Democratic leaders for backing probes into the use of waterboarding — after failing to raise objections during briefings on its potential use.

    “Well, yesterday I saw a partial list of the number of members of the House and Senate, Democrats and Republicans, who were briefed on these interrogation methods and not a word was raised at the time, not one word,” Boehner told reporters at his weekly news availability.

    “And I think you’re going to hear more and more about the bigger picture here, that what — the war on terror after 9/11 was done in a bipartisan basis on lots of fronts. And that bigger story will be coming out,” he added.

    So, California Democrat Representative Nancy Pelosi WAS present in “classified” briefings regarding waterbboarding and enhanced interrogation techniques and did NOT raise any objection.

    Why?

    Because she was not able to discuss the classified material with her staff? Or, she was “hamstrung” by confidentiality requirements?

    Oh please!

    This sounds like a pretty lame excuse. She acquiesced in the use of enhanced interrogation techniques because she as were others scared of another attack on the United States. Pelosi looked the other way lest she be blamed for another homeland attack.

    Who is she trying to fool?


    Technorati Tags: , ,

  • Illegal Immigration,  Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),  Nancy Pelosi

    House Speaker Nanncy Pelosi Says Enforcing American Immigration Law is “UNAMERICAN”

    News clip of Nancy Pelosi speaking with illegal immigrants and their familieis

    I understand that Democrat Nancy Pelosi wants to pander to the Latino community for votes. But, Speaker if you do not like the laws of the United States – CHANGE THEM.

    But, then again, Pelosi and the Democrats are good at symbolism over substance.


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • Freedom of Speech,  Nancy Pelosi

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Asks Obama Justice Department to Help Save the San Francisco Chronicle and Other Newspapers

    save-the-newspapers

    The letter House Speaker Pelosi wrote to the Justice Department was released this afternoon.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, worried about the fate of The Chronicle and other financially struggling newspapers, urged the Justice Department Monday to consider giving Bay Area papers more leeway to merge or consolidate business operations to stay afloat.

    In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, released by Pelosi’s office late Monday, the San Francisco Democrat asked the department to weigh the public benefit of saving The Chronicle and other papers from closure against the agency’s antitrust mission to guard against anti-competitive behavior.

    “We must ensure that our policies enable our news organizations to survive and to engage in the news gathering and analysis that the American people expect,” Pelosi wrote.

    The speaker said the issue of newspapers’ survival and antitrust law will be the subject of a hearing soon before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy, chaired by Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga.

    Pelosi’s spokesman, Brendan Daly, said the speaker was moved by the recent announcement by the Hearst Corp., the parent company of The Chronicle, that it would be forced to sell or close the paper if it could not achieve major cost-savings quickly. Hearst has said the paper lost $50 million last year and that this year’s losses will likely be worse.

    How stupid. Why should the newspaper industry which is failing in the marketplace be supported  by favorable anti-trust rules/laws set by the federal government?

    Next thing you know, Pelosi will be asking for $500 Billion of taxpayer money to bail their left-wing friends in the print media businesses out.

    How is that for freedom of the press?


    Technorati Tags:

  • Day By Day,  Nancy Pelosi

    Day By Day by Chris Muir March 12, 2009 – Communication

    day by day 031209

    Day By Day by Chris Muir

    What started as a Bush Administration policy to protect Presidential succession after 9/11 has turned very WRONG with the Diva-type abuse by Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has gone from frequent flier to jet-aircraft connoisseur, with aides berating military officials to get the best planes, e-mails revealed yesterday.

    Pelosi, who clashed with the military to get nonstop service when she flies home to California with police protection on government planes, revealed a particular fondness for Gulfstream’s sleek G-5 – a plane glamorized in Hollywood films and rap videos.

    “It is my understanding there are no G-5s available for the House during the Memorial Day recess. This is totally unacceptable . . . The speaker will want to know where the planes are,” a Pelosi aide wrote in an angry e-mail to the military.

    In another, the same aide wanted the plane for a House delegation when the fleet was being used for senators and Cabinet members.

    “This is not good news, and we will have some very disappointed folks, as well as a very upset speaker,” the e-mail said.

    The military was offering up an Air Force version of a Boeing 737.

    The e-mails were obtained from the government by the watchdog group Judicial Watch.

    Sorry, but Speaker Pelosi can simply make do with the Boeing 737 for her trips back to California on the weekend. Why the federal government has a fleet of G-5’s for use by government officials is a question in itself.

    The Obama Administration must answer the question as to who has use of these planes and why?

    Previous:

    The Day By Day Archive


    Technorati Tags: ,

  • 1984,  Barack Obama,  Day By Day,  George Orwell,  Harry Reid,  Nancy Pelosi

    Day By Day by Chris Muir February 9, 2009 – Frickin’ Politics

    day by day 020909

    Day By Day by Chris Muir

    Yes, Chris, Obama, Pelosi and Reid are all masters of NEWSPEAK.

    And, the new “Fairness Doctrine” will declare conservative talk radio a “THOUGHTCRIME” with the government empowered to impose “FAIRNESS” throughout the land.

    Sounds SOOOOO 1984.

    Previous:

    The Day By Day Archive


    Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

  • Barack Obama,  Morons,  Nancy Pelosi

    The Obligatory Nancy Pelosi 500 Million Americans Lose Jobs – I Am A MORON Post

    Pelosi-and-5-mil-jobs

    And, this moron is Speaker of the House and marshalling President Obama’s Economic Stimulus bill through the Congress?

    Here is the video:

    Nancy Pelosi: Dumber than soap. Nancy claims that we lose 500 million American jobs each month we don’t pass her $1 trillion pork barell spending boondoggle

    The Republicans in the Senate will try to amend this PORKULUS economic stimulus bill. Probably better to scrap the entire bill and start over.

    No hope for this crap sandwich.


    Technorati Tags:

  • Barack Obama,  Nancy Pelosi

    Video: Nancy Pelosi – Birth Control Will Stimulate The Economy

    Pelosi-and-birth-control

    This is what the Democrat-Obama sponsored economic stimulus REALLY IS – PORK and excessive spending that will NOT promote American jobs. Nancy Pelosi proposes a bailout for the states, including birth control.

    Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi boldly defended a move to add birth control funding to the new economic “stimulus” package, claiming “contraception will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.”

    Pelosi, the mother of 5 children and 6 grandchildren, who once said, “Nothing in my life will ever, ever compare to being a mom,” seemed to imply babies are somehow a burden on the treasury.

    The revelation came during an exchange Sunday morning on ABC’s THIS WEEK.

    STEPHANOPOULOS: Hundreds of millions of dollars to expand family planning services. How is that stimulus?

    PELOSI: Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those – one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.

    STEPHANOPOULOS: So no apologies for that?

    PELOSI: No apologies. No. we have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy.

    Here is the video:

    Come on. Is Pelosi saying that less children mean less costs to the state? Or is she proposing a massive bailout for states that are running massive budget deficits?

    You be the judge.

    But, it sounds to Flap like the same old tax and spend, liberal nonsense of the 1970’s – ALL OVER AGAIN.


    Technorati Tags: ,