Archive for March, 2011
These are my links for March 31st from 18:52 to 18:55:
- Rudy Giuliani Blasts Obama on Libya Action – Rudy Giuliani told Laura Ingraham that "since this whole thing in the Middle East began," the Obama administration "doesn't know what it's doing."
"This is probably the worst handled national security military action I have ever seen. From announcing — when he didn't know what to do — that Gadhafi must go to then making that speech the other night, which was internally contradictory. You cannot say we're there to protect the Libyan people, but we're not going to be for regime change with Gadhafi because the reason we are there to protect the Libyan people is because of Gadhafi."
======
Obama does not understand foreign policy and has no experience in it.
- President 2102: Can Obama Lose? – Perhaps – So what combination of factors in this complex system of politics must come together to cause a catastrophe for Obama politically that would result in his defeat?
Only one Democratic president has lost a reelection bid.
I see three, and all have to be in place and reinforce each other for Obama to lose. First, the economy in 2012 has to be either stagnant or in decline in the 10 or so key electoral states (especially the ones in the Midwest) as he heads into the election. This would mean that the economy is creating very few net jobs in 2012 and that prices (including food and gas) are still rising.
Second, no new major international crisis arises that causes people to rally behind Obama because of his competent handling of it. And I emphasize the words “new,” “major,” and “competent.” Afghanistan and Iraq devolving again into a problem will not help Obama, and actually may hurt him because our country has basically moved on from the situation in both places.
Third, a Republican nominee has to emerge who is charismatic; is a very good communicator; is in touch with the country’s economic and social needs; and is a new brand of GOP leader whom many younger voters can connect with. Think of what it took in 1980 to defeat the Democratic incumbent—Ronald Reagan and crises galore.
All three factors must converge for Obama to lose, and two of them are needed to drive his job approval down to a place, as I have written before, that makes it difficult for him to win. As one can see, these three elements don’t include how much money the Democratic National Committee and Obama have at their disposal; how much cash the Republican National Committee or the Republican nominee raises; the quality of each campaign staff; the legislative machinations of Congress; or the use of modern technology in the campaigns (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc.). Those are all tactical factors that, ultimately, will have little influence on whether Obama wins or loses.
======
It will have to be a new GOP candidate like Mitch Daniels or Chris Christie – not a retread like Huckabee or Romney.
Tags: 2012, Chris, Christie, Daniels, Giuliani, Libya, Obama, President, Rudy
1 Comment »
These are my links for March 31st from 15:41 to 16:09:
Tags: #catcot, #tcot, Dianne, Feinstein, Libya
Comments Off
Greenpeace is flying a blimp over Rancho Mirage, California to protest the Koch Brothers
Well, DUH.
A number of organizations are advocating a boycott of the products that come from companies owned by the Koch family. This is problematic for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that it could potentially hurt the wrong people.
The Koch brothers own Georgia Pacific. It is an American consumer goods company that makes everyday products like facial tissue, napkins, paper towels, paper cups and the like. Their plants are great examples of American advanced manufacturing. Incidentally,
GP makes most of its products here in America. The company’s workforce is highly unionized. In fact, 80 percent of its mills are under contract with one or more labor union. It is not inaccurate to say that these are among the best-paid manufacturing jobs in America.
This presents a dilemma and a paradox. While the Koch brothers are credited with advocating an agenda and groups that are clearly hostile to labor and labor’s agenda, the brothers’ company in practice and in general has positive and productive collective bargaining relationships with its unions.
While some companies are running from investment in American jobs, The Koch brothers’ Georgia Pacific just reached agreements with its primary union in the paper industry to invest more than a half a billion dollars in capital to essentially create two state-of-the-art machines that conserve fiber and energy at two separate union mills.
While certainly there are disagreements from time to time on what the right pension program is, or right wage increases and incentives, or the right formula for health care cost sharing, ultimately we end up with negotiated solutions.
So the problem for the advocates of a boycott against Koch is that it can only marginally hurt Koch, and the workers who are the epitome of what advanced manufacturing jobs in the United States ought to look like, would be the first casualties of a boycott. Of course, this will eventually drive a wedge between groups that are otherwise in political alignment.
If consumers pick alternate products (because people will still use toilet paper), in many cases, the substitute will be from a company with a track record that is much less friendly to the values of the workers who would, as a result of the boycott, become the collateral damage. The Koch brothers’ lifestyle will not dramatically change; there are no shareholders that will become concerned; the company is privately owned. The stock won’t plummet either — there is none.
The Koch Brothers believe in capitalism and free markets. This also includes collective bargaining and organized labor.
I don’t see why Charles and David Koch are demonized by the LEFT – unless you don’t believe in capitalism. They are businessmen, run very good business enterprises and have ideas in which they will put their money where their mouths are. Oh yeah, and a great deal of charity donations, including cancer research and the fine arts.
Kind of the American way, no?
Tags: Charles Koch, David Koch, Georgia Pacific
7 Comments »
According to the latest Strategic National Poll.
- Huckabee - 24.49%
- Gingrich - 21.94%
- Palin - 16.33%
- Romney - 13.78%
- Bachmann - 5.61%
- Pawlenty - 3.57%
- Santorum - 2.04%
- Barbour - 1.53%
- Huntsman - 1.53%
- Undecided - 9.18%
Ohio is a must win state for the GOP in the Electoral College against President Obama. Again, Mike Huckabee who has made little or no effort to declare himself a Presidential candidate is leading Mitt Romney who will be running.
Again, Sarah Palin trails but this time in the middle of the pack.
Tags: Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Polling, President 2012, Sarah Palin
Comments Off
Jerry Brown campaigned on the promise that he could bring both parties together and make the tough decisions now. Call Jerry and tell him to make the tough decisions now!
A hard-hitting ad by the California GOP that makes an apt point to California Democrats. Where have you been? Especially since they have had control of the California Legislature for decades and Brown has been around California politics for decades.
So, Jerry, why not negotiate with the Republicans and do YOUR job?
Tags: California Budget, California Republican Party, Jerry Brown
Comments Off
These are my links for March 31st from 11:41 to 11:56:
- President 2012 GOP: S.C. Republicans Escalate Election Calendar Feud – South Carolina Republican Party Chair Karen Floyd today brought into the open the simmering tensions between the traditional early states and the others — particularly Florida — jockeying to break into the primary calendar.
Floyd's demand: If Florida won't step aside, the RNC should move its convention out of the state.
She writes to fellow RNC members:
Unfortunately, our Party stands on the precipice of our hard work being rendered meaningless, with the very real possibility looming that Florida’s Presidential Preference Primary may be held prior to March 1, in contravention of Party Rules – a move that would precipitate numerous other states similarly violating Party Rules.
As conservatives, we believe in the rule of law, and that rules are made to be followed. To that end, I am sure we all appreciate our state Party counterparts in Florida advocating for the RNC rules being obeyed. But what is disconcerting is the apparent recalcitrance of Florida’s Republican-controlled legislature, which is in effect thumbing its nose at the RNC – and feels emboldened to do so because of the 2012 convention location….
Simply put, if Florida does not respect the process by which our primary calendar was set, the RNC should not be bound to the process by which the convention site was selected.
If Florida refuses to move its primary date into compliance with RNC rules, I am respectfully requesting that the Committee convene a special task force to select a new site for the 2012 Convention outside the state of Florida…
She suggests the labor battlegrounds of Wisconsin, Ohio, or Indiana, Senate battlegrounds of Virginia, Missouri, or Michigan, or the Democratic convention spot of Charlotte as possible alternatives.
======
Florida is > than South Carolina
- The AARP America Doesn’t Know – An Investigative Report – AARP, formerly known as the American Association of
Retired Persons, is a tax-exempt non-profit membership
organization for those aged 50 years and older. As
such, AARP has long been regarded as a protector and
advocate of the nation’s senior community.
What is less known is the extent to which AARP
operates as a massive for-profit enterprise and how
that conflicts with its legal requirements to “primarily
operate to promote the common good and social
welfare of a community of people.”
This report highlights AARP’s increasing reliance on
the “for-profit” sale of insurance, particularly health
insurance, and the underlying implication for this storied
“non-profit” organization. In conducting the research,
one of the central questions became: Why would AARP
aggressively advocate for the Democrats’ health care
law last year which contained nearly one half-trillion
dollars in cuts that independent analysts said would
negatively impact seniors’ access to affordable health
care services.
=======
Read it all
Tags: 2012, AARP, Carolina, Florida, President, South
Comments Off
|