-
John Edwards Watch: The Baby and Learjet
Cover of the latest National Enquirer
It continues to get worse for John Edwards. And the Learjet? On the bright side, Mickey Kaus says the baby might be a photoshop.You think?
Technorati Tags: John Edwards, Rielle Hunter
-
Why Elizabeth Edwards Stayed With Cheating John
The cancer?This is as hard to swallow as Cheatin’ John’s story about Rielle Hunter and her baby’s father.
Technorati Tags: John Edwards, Elizabeth Edwards
-
John Edwards Watch: Anyone Buying Edwards Story?
Mickey Kaus asks the question about 99 per cent honest John. Most are not buying his story.The Left excuses the MSM not covering the story and Edwards himself by saying he is no longer running for office. What a load of crap.
John Edwards needs to come clean especially about the child’s paternity and his expenditure of funds for Rielle Hunter.
More lies don’t cut it.
Technorati Tags: John Edwards, Rielle Hunter
-
John Edwards Watch: Still Lying? Part Two
See more funny videos at Funny or DieJohn Edwards reveals some of his affair’s bombshellsNobody believes John Edwards convoluted story about his affair with Rielle Hunter. The photo evidence about Edwards continued lying is here.
Now, about the paternity of the child.
Edwards claims the affair ended in 2006, but the National Enquirer is set to report that his trysts with Hunter continued well beyond that and led to the birth of her daughter, Frances Quinn Hunter, last February.
Edwards denies fathering the baby, but Hunter’s younger sister, Melissa Druck, has called on him to fulfill his offer to take a paternity test – something Hunter says she doesn’t want.
“If he would just come forward and tell the whole truth, I think then this would all go away,” Druck told The Post yesterday.
Asked whether Edwards is the daddy, Druck sighed, “I’ve probably said more than I should.”
The only mystery left in this story is why the MSM failed to report the story of Edward’s infidelity for over a year.
Not really……..
- John Edwards Watch: Still Lying?
- Did John Edwards Affair Cover-up Cost Hillary?
- John Edwards Watch: Stupid?
Technorati Tags: John Edwards
-
John Edwards Watch: Still Lying?
The entire John Edwards – Rielle Hunter Love Child Scandal to date in 3 minutes.Is John Edwards continuing to lie?
Why, of course he is.
And, Edwards is DEAD MEAT politically and the palimony/child support will COST him financially.
A typical story when a man thinks with his appendage instead of his brain.
Technorati Tags: John Edwards, Rielle Hunter
-
Did John Edwards Affair Cover-up Cost Hillary?
Michael Ramirez on the John Edwards Love Child AffairHoward Wolfson, former Hillary Clinton for President campaign communications director whines that John Edwards cost Hillary the Presidential nomination to ABC News.The Clinton Cabal is still trying to “PAINT” Obama as an illegitimate nominee.
However, it is certain the Clintons knew about Edwards’ affair and at the time were happy to use Edwards to divide the radical left wing of the Democrat Party. If Edwards had been a threat, believe Flap, the Clintons would have used it.
So, nice try Hillary.
Technorati Tags: John Edwards, Hillary Clinton
-
John Edwards Watch: Stupid?
Screen capture from the National Enquirer
Jim Geraghty asks the question: Does John Edwards think the American public is STUPID?…. there are at least two glaring questions that suggest Edwards’ explanation consists of additional lies. (Besides his claim that the affair started after she was hired by his PAC, and not before, which appears to be contradicted by the PAC billing records.)
If the affair ended in 2006, why were Edwards and Hunter meeting in the Beverly Hills Hilton from 10 p.m. to 2 a.m. last month? Beyond that… if the child is not his, why did she bring the baby to their late-night meeting?
The official Edwards explanation is that he met, without telling Elizabeth, for a secret meeting at a luxury hotel room from 9:45 p.m to 2:40 p.m., in order to not have sex, while a friend took care of the child in a room several doors down (according to the Enquirer’s account), and that after they had spent time together in the room not having sex, he told her, “hey, let’s bring in your infant that I am not the father of, I would be happy to caress the adorable little child that I did not sire.” Because philanderers are legendarily concerned about the offspring of their ex-mistresses.
John Edwards is finished politically. There is absolutely NO WAY he would be named Vice President, Attorney General or anything within the Democrat Party or government.
The Clintons hate him for costing Hillary the nomination – remember Iowa and Obama would NEVER touch him – remember Henry Cisneros.
Bye Bye $400 haircut……..
Technorati Tags: John Edwards
-
Day By Day by Chris Muir August 9 and 10, 2008
There are many unanswered questions regarding the John Edwards Love Child Affair. And, they will eventually surface. But, does it really matter for Edwards?Politically, despite some Democrats willingness to excuse away his indiscretions, Edwards is TOAST – much like Henry Cisneros (remember him from the Clinton Administration?).
Why? Do you ask?
It is not so much about the affair but ALL about the lies and cover-up.
Put a Fork in John Edwards – He’s DONE.
+++++++++++In blogging matters, Flap is now back home in Thousand Oaks. Regular blogging will commence in the morning.Previous:
Technorati Tags: Day By Day, John Edwards
-
John Edwards Watch: Mistress-Love Child Flap Acknowledged By MSM?
John Edwards and his mistress-love child flap
Mickey Kaus again is on top of the story about John Edwards, his alleged mistress and former videographer Rielle Hunter and his alleged love child, Frances Quinn Hunter.Dissent in the MSM: Rebellious nibbling from mid-rank players who are harder to coopt than the New York and Washington elites…..
It was only three weeks ago that John Edwards was fielding media questions on his chances of filling the Democratic Party’s vice presidential slot on Barack Obama’s ticket or a potential Cabinet position in an Obama administration.
On Wednesday, however, the former U.S. senator and 2004 vice presidential nominee was eager to duck the press when the questions took a tabloid turn.
About a dozen reporters and photojournalists attended a speech Edwards gave to an AARP Foundation symposium on poverty and aging in Washington. Afterward, he avoided most of the waiting reporters, at least some of whom wanted to question him about recent reports in the National Enquirer that alleged an inappropriate relationship with a former campaign videographer.
John Edwards, should he ever wish to resume his political career will have to answer some questions about the National Enquirer piece. Some basics will suffice:
- Is John Edwards the father of Frances Quinn Hunter?
- Why was Edwards in the Beverly Hilton Hotel at this time in the morning and why did he hide from reporters in the bathroom?
But, if he continues to duck the press, “say good night, Gracie” to any appointment to an Obama Administration or any future Democrat Party post.
Flap says Edwards easiest recourse is to check into rehab and claim substance abuse or sex addiction.
Isn’t this what all the CELEBS do? Especially the ones sporting the $400 haircuts?
Related stories:
Monkey business on the Edwards story?The Star Report: John Edwards sex scandal? Hey, you didn’t hear it here
Come on National Enquirer – release the photographs of John Edwards at the Beverly Hilton.
- John Edwards Watch: The Cover-Up?
- Day By Day by Chris Muir July 29, 2008
- John Edward’s Role at the Denver Democrat Convention?
- Why is the Media in the Tank for John Edwards?
- Is John Edwards a Public Hypocrite?
- John Edwards Watch: There Goes the Vice Presidency
- John Edwards Watch: Love Child Scandal?
Technorati Tags: John Edwards
-
John Edwards Watch: The Cover-Up?
The latest from The National Enquirer on the John Edwards and his mistress-love child flapMickey Kaus says The National Enquirer has moved onto the “coverup” of the John Edwards, paid off mistress and love child story rather than publish the photographs of their reporters run-in with Edwards last week.In context, the photos would be powerful evidence. Enquirer editor David Perel apparently doesn’t want to win over the MSM by releasing them. He’d rather have the Edwards story all to himself.
An interview of the Los Angeles Times blogmeister Tony Pierce offers the MSM standard excuses of why they buried the story and continue to do so today. Or is it ignoring?
Of course, if Edwards had been a GOP Senator or Presidential candidate, all of the Los Angeles Times bloggers would have been directed to cover the story.
This story will remain moribund until The National Enquirer decides to release at least one of the photographs of the fleeing and/or cowering Edwards or breaks more of which they have promised.
Previous:
Technorati Tags: John Edwards